logo
John Lithgow on JK Rowling's trans stance backlash: 'She's handled it fairly gracefully'

John Lithgow on JK Rowling's trans stance backlash: 'She's handled it fairly gracefully'

Sky News03-05-2025
Why you can trust Sky News
John Lithgow is a man well aware of cancel culture and its ability to destroy careers in the blink of an eye.
The Oscar-nominated actor tells Sky News: "It is terrible to be so careful about what you say. Even in an interview like this. It goes into the world, and you can get misconstrued and misrepresented and cancelled in [the click of a finger]."
It's a theme that runs parallel with his latest work - the stage show Giant - which through the lens of one explosive day in children's author Roald Dahl 's life, poses the question, should we look for moral purity in our artists?
The writer of great works including The Witches, Matilda and The BFG, Dahl revolutionised children's literature with his irreverent approach, inspiring generations of readers and selling hundreds of millions worldwide. But his legacy is conflicted.
Lithgow describes Dahl as "a man with great charm, great wit and literary talent. A man who really cared about children and loved them. But a man who carried a lot of demons."
Specifically, the play - which explores Palestinian rights versus antisemitism - deals with the fallout from controversial comments the children's author made over the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982. Its themes couldn't be more timely.
Lithgow explains: "Things are said in the play that nobody dares to say out loud… But God knows this is a complicated and contradictory issue."
'It didn't start as an idea about Roald Dahl at all'
So controversial are some of the play's themes, the 79-year-old star admits his own son warned him: "Prepare yourself. There'll be demonstrations in Sloane Square outside the Royal Court Theatre."
Indeed, the play's first run carried an audience warning flagging "antisemitic language; graphic descriptions of violence; emotional discussion of themes including conflict in the Middle East, Israel and Palestine; and strong language".
But it didn't put audiences off. Following a sold-out run at the Royal Court, the role won Lithgow an Olivier. Now, it's transferring to London's West End.
The play was written by Mark Rosenblatt, a seasoned theatre director but debut playwright.
He tells Sky News: "It didn't start as an idea about Roald Dahl at all. It was about the blurring of meaningful political discourse with racism, specifically when, in 2018, the inquiry into antisemitism in the Labour Party started to come out."
Rosenblatt describes Dahl's Revolting Rhymes and Dirty Beasts as the "wallpaper" of his childhood, and says he had no desire to "smash the Roald Dahl pinata".
But despite the fond recollections, he was conflicted: "Understanding that [Dahl] also, possibly, didn't like someone like me because I'm Jewish felt complicated." It was Rosenblatt's exploration of "how you hold those two things at the same time" that led to Dahl becoming the play's focus.
'He's not cancelled in our home'
Rosenblatt describes him as "a complex man, capable of great compassion, great passionate defence of oppressed people, and also incapable of enormous cruelty and manipulation. He was many things at once".
And as for Dahl's place in his life now? Rosenblatt says: "I still read his books to my kids. He's certainly not cancelled in our home."
It's likely that Dahl's comments, if uttered today, would lead to swift social media condemnation, but writing in a pre-social media age, the judgment over his words came at a much slower pace.
Dahl died in 1990, and his family later apologised for antisemitic remarks he made during his lifetime. But the debate of whether art can be separated from the artist is still very much alive today.
Earlier this month, Lithgow found himself drawn into a different row over artists and their opinions - this time concerning author JK Rowling.
'A matter of nuance'
Soon to play Dumbledore in the Harry Potter TV series, he has been criticised by some fans for working with the author known for her gender critical beliefs.
Lithgow told Sky News: "It's a question I'm getting asked constantly. I suppose I should get used to that, but JK Rowling has created an amazing canon of books for kids…
"I have my own feelings on this subject. But I'm certainly not going to hesitate to speak about it. Just because I may disagree... It's a matter of nuance… I think she's handled it fairly gracefully."
The actor ignored calls not to take the role.
He goes on: "Honestly, I'd rather be involved in this than not. And if I'm going to speak on this subject, I'm speaking from inside this project and very much a partner with JK Rowling on it."
Demanding an eight-year commitment and a move to the UK for the part, the stakes are high.
And with a legion of Harry Potter fans watching on from the wings, only time will tell if the Lithgow-Rowling partnership will prove a magical one.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Materialists director on ending backlash: 'I'm not asking you do anything'
Materialists director on ending backlash: 'I'm not asking you do anything'

Metro

time21 minutes ago

  • Metro

Materialists director on ending backlash: 'I'm not asking you do anything'

Oscar-nominated filmmaker Celine Song's former career as a matchmaker stood her in excellent stead to make Materialists, the rom-com about modern dating that has seemingly sent some parts of society over the edge. It stars Dakota Johnson as successful New York City matchmaker Lucy, who is faced with choosing between charming and attractive private equity partner Harry (Pedro Pascal) or her broke and struggling ex John (Chris Evans). I assume the Past Lives writer-director must have ripped some of the most ridiculous lines we hear Lucy's clients spout in the movie from real life: '39 is not 30s' complains one man in his 40s, while female clients fixate on bagging a man who's at least six feet tall with a $500,000 salary. But Song is pretty serious when recalling how much these 'dominant beauty and wealth standards' warped the job. 'Unfortunately, what I would hear is a repetition of the same values and I wasn't hearing enough variety,' she recalls. And while it's then fun to recount some of the most savage lines from Materialists with her, Song is all too aware that this cold way of looking at love was 'starting to seep into our hearts'. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video 'I think that the math of it [is] trying to overtake love,' she adds, which is exactly what drove her to tell this story. 'We're hearing about height, weight, age, income, and a lot of those things aren't going to matter very much when you're 90. When I see your face, I see your wrinkles and grey hair. Who cares what you look like now?' she asks. As it's put in the movie – we should all be looking for a 'nursing home partner, a grave buddy', someone willing to change your nappy when you're old and incontinent. 'And anybody who loves you, if you ask them 'why do you love me?', they're not going to say a single number!' This sums up the dilemma that both Lucy and her clients try to overcome – and according to some passionate fans in the US, where Materialists was released in June, Lucy made the wrong choice. Song reveals that she's more than aware of some of the heated reactions to Materialists. 'Something that I've heard is like, 'Well, are you telling me that I need to compromise and settle if I [don't] want to be single?' And I would always say, I don't know what you're talking about because I would never ask you to settle for something. I'm not asking you do anything, these are just characters, it's a movie – but these are also decisions that Lucy's making,' she points out. 'You can make decisions that you want to make, given that it's your life. I don't think there's any reason in settling for something that you're 'entitled' to. The only thing you're entitled to from the person who loves you is that they love you!' In terms of who Lucy ends up with too, Song would also like to remind you that 'it's Lucy's life and these are fictional characters'. 'Lucy's telling you that she's not in love with [redacted], right? So, in which case, I think that she should be believed. I think that she would like to be in love with him in the way that I'm sure all of us would like to be in love with somebody who would be very convenient! It would be great if we could be relieved of financial pressure just because we are with someone, but that does not a marriage make.' Past Lives might be a more poignant film on the surface than Materialists, examining the intense nostalgia that comes with the sense of a missed childhood connection, but they're certainly films that can be viewed as in dialogue with each other – to start with, simply because they are both about a woman trying to 'make a decision about what she wants in her life'. 'So much of it is about this woman who is trying to understand her whole life and become a more actualised person,' says Song, of both. But it goes much deeper than that too. The filmmaker is delighted when I suggest that her films are more sincere and honest looks at love than we are perhaps used to, in a world where the rom-com is often overly glossy or else ready to deliver a punchline about love. She knows Materialists reflects herself as the main creative person too – which includes 'who I am beyond just as the filmmaker, but as somebody who lives and thinks in the world'. 'I feel I am pretty sincere, I'm pretty honest,' Song laughs. 'So I think that those are the only kinds of movies that I could ultimately make. It's really hard for me to be winking through a conversation or through a movie.' As someone who assembled such a stand-out A-list cast – but doesn't write scripts with actors in mind – I've got to discuss with Song how Johnson, Pascal and Evans came on board. 'I write the characters on the page and then I go out like a matchmaker in search of their soulmate,' states the director, simply, of her quest for perfection. That seems like a daunting challenge, but unsurprisingly all three of these stars were keen to meet with her following the success of Past Lives. 'I was getting to know them, and I think at some time in the middle of meeting them, I just realised and I was like, 'I think you might be a soulmate to this character, would you read the script?'' And how could anyone say no to that sort of offer? If you have even a passing interest in Materialists, it's been virtually impossible to avoid seeing spoilers for the end; but if you're even a casual consumer of rom-coms, you'll see it coming anyway. However, there is a reveal for Pascal's Harry that I didn't expect, which I won't divulge. Suffice it to say, an uptight man with a more fragile ego might have baulked at it – but Song says: 'I don't think that Pedro would have wanted to make this movie without that scene.' It also links perfectly to the central idea of Materialists and how we 'turn ourselves and each other into merchandise', according to its director – and it's something that resonated with three of Hollywood's hottest stars too. 'I think that all three of my actors really understand what it's like to be treated like merchandise. It was so clear that all three of them really fell in love with their characters as people, and that they wanted to commit to the story of the movie because they really understood it and felt it very deeply.' She adds: 'I don't know if Pedro would have wanted to play Harry if he didn't feel that all this perfection hides something that's quite broken and a lot of self-hatred: that's what really made it interesting for him. The way that Chris found John interesting because of the way that he is broken, or the way that Dakota wanted to play Lucy because of the way she's broken.' As someone making such talked-about films, I'm keen to get Song's take on the rom-com genre, and Materialists being labelled as one. This has sparked the other half of the wave of emotionally-loaded criticism, as some fans claim it's not funny or light enough, while it does also delve into darker – but relatable – dating territory than expected. I suggest maybe Materialists isn't in fact a rom-com, but Song is having none of that: 'I think it's a rom-com because I feel like it's a modern romance and you laugh!' But audiences perhaps don't expect films with serious themes and depth to be sold that way? 'I think that's unfortunate about the way that rom-com as a genre is seen and not about the movie,' Song counters. 'Because I think that rom-coms have had, in its heritage, so many movies that are deeply about things that really matter to all of us.' More Trending She namechecks American icons of the genre Billy Wilder (The Apartment), Nora Ephron (When Harry Met Sally) and James L Brooks (As Good as It Gets), whose films 'were always going to be about something'. 'I don't think I'm doing something that hasn't been a part of the genre,' argues Song. 'I get to invite the audience to two hours of thinking about love, relationships, marriage and dating in the modern world – and then I have an option to either talk about nothing or I can talk about what it's like to be a human being, which is I think the power of the rom-com as a genre.' 'It's unfortunate if that power has been felt as not an essential part of the genre, because for me that's always been an essential part of rom-coms.' Materialists is in UK cinemas from Friday, August 15. Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: James Cameron struggling to write 'new Terminator film' over stark sci-fi fears MORE: Johnny Depp could return as Captain Jack Sparrow according to Pirates of the Caribbean producer MORE: Together promises 'the first feel-good body horror' movie but here's what I think

Leonardo DiCaprio reveals his 'biggest regret' after turning down 90s role
Leonardo DiCaprio reveals his 'biggest regret' after turning down 90s role

Metro

time2 hours ago

  • Metro

Leonardo DiCaprio reveals his 'biggest regret' after turning down 90s role

Leonardo DiCaprio has revealed his biggest career regret after being forced to turn down an Oscar-nominated film in the 90s. The Hollywood icon has appeared in some huge hits over the years, including The Wolf of Wall Street, Shutter Island, Inception and the Revenant – which he finally took home the best actor award for in 2016. However, in a new interview for Esquire, the 50-year-old opened up about the movie he still regrets not signing on to. Speaking to Paul Thomas Anderson – who directed him in their new movie, One Battle After Another – the acclaimed filmmaker questioned whether he had 'any regrets' at this stage of his career. 'I'll say it even though you're here: My biggest regret is not doing Boogie Nights,' he replied. 'It was a profound movie of my generation. I can't imagine anyone but Mark [Wahlberg] in it. 'When I finally got to see that movie, I just thought it was a masterpiece. It's ironic that you're the person asking that question, but it's true.' Paul helmed Boogie Nights, with the 1997 movie focusing on nightclub dishwasher Eddie Adams, who went on to become one of the biggest names in the porn industry, performing under Dirk Diggler. Mark led the star-studded cast alongside Julianne Moore, Burt Reynolds, Don Cheadle, John C Reilly, Heather Graham, Phillip Seymour Hoffman and Luis Guzman. Leo was the director's top choice for the main role after becoming impressed with his efforts in the Basketball Diaries – however, he was already tied to Titanic so suggested Mark for the role. Thankfully, the pair managed to make their schedules work decades later to collaborate on One Battle After Another. The movie is set to be released on September 26 – the very vague synopsis simply reads: 'When their evil enemy resurfaces after 16 years, a group of ex-revolutionaries reunites to rescue one of their own's daughter.' Elsewhere in the wide-ranging chat, the Hollywood heavyweight was asked about whether he ever watches any of his old films, having appeared in some of the biggest hits in cinema. Despite stealing the scene in Catch Me If You Can, The Departed, Romeo + Juliet, Django Unchained and so many more, he shared that there was one particular movie in his back catalog that he sometimes comes back to more than most – the Aviator with Martin Scorsese. 'I rarely watch any of my films, but if I'm being honest, there's one that I have watched more than others,' he admitted. 'It's The Aviator. That's simply because it was such a special moment to me. More Trending 'I had worked with Marty on Gangs of New York, and I'd been toting around a book on Howard Hughes for ten years. I almost did it with Michael Mann, but there was a conflict and I ended up bringing it to Marty. 'I was 30. It was the first time as an actor I got to feel implicitly part of the production, rather than just an actor hired to play a role. I felt responsible in a whole new way. 'I've always felt proud and connected to that film as such a key part of my growing up in this industry and taking on a role of a real collaborator for the first time.' Got a story? If you've got a celebrity story, video or pictures get in touch with the entertainment team by emailing us celebtips@ calling 020 3615 2145 or by visiting our Submit Stuff page – we'd love to hear from you. MORE: James Cameron struggling to write 'new Terminator film' over stark sci-fi fears MORE: Drag Me to Hell horror film star Lorna Raver dies aged 81 MORE: Trump's honours list includes a British 70s sitcom actor you may have forgotten

Beyoncé award win leads her closer to achieving the EGOT
Beyoncé award win leads her closer to achieving the EGOT

Scotsman

time3 hours ago

  • Scotsman

Beyoncé award win leads her closer to achieving the EGOT

The singer adds a brand new award to her already bustling awards cabinet. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... Beyoncé has earned her first award throughout her glittering career overnight. The singer earned a Primetime Emmy award for her Netflix special, Beyoncé Bowl It brings the singer one step closer to EGOT status - so what else does she need to win to complete the feat? Beyoncé has added yet another award to her mantle overnight, but it's a first-time win at the ceremony in question. The singer is set to be awarded the Primetime Emmy award after the Television Academy announced the winners of the 77th Emmy Awards in juried categories on Tuesday for her costume design in her Netflix special Beyoncé Bowl, in the category of Outstanding Costumes for Variety, Nonfiction or Reality Programming. It marks the first time in her career that she has earned an Emmy win. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad Beyoncé has claimed a Primetime Emmy award overnight for her Netflix special - her first Emmy award win in her career. | Getty Images/Canva In addition to her victory, the singer also has the chance to pick up two more Emmy awards, as 'Beyoncé Bowl' is nominated for Outstanding Variety Special (Live), where she was nominated as both a performer and executive producer, and Outstanding Directing for a Variety Special, which she shared with co-director Alex Rudzinski. Beyoncé Bowl was a halftime show on NFL Christmas Gameday in Houston, Texas, which at its peak drew in over 27 million viewers in the United States alone, making it the most-streamed NFL game in history at the time. The win also puts her one step towards earning the coveted EGOT - but what does Beyoncé need to complete that achievement? What is an EGOT? An EGOT is a highly coveted and rare achievement in the entertainment industry. The acronym stands for the four major American awards in performing arts: an Emmy for television, a Grammy for music, an Oscar for film, and a Tony for theatre. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad To become an EGOT winner, an individual must win at least one competitive award from each of these four ceremonies. This "grand slam" of show business has been achieved by only a select few, including notable figures such as Richard Rodgers, Rita Moreno, Audrey Hepburn, Whoopi Goldberg, and John Legend. What does Beyoncé need to earn the EGOT? With a record-breaking 35 Grammy Awards and now a Primetime Emmy under her belt, Beyoncé only needs two more award wins to complete the EGOT. They would be an Oscar victory, which the singer came close to achieving after 'Be Alive' from the movie 'King Richard' earned a Best Original Song nod, and a Tony Award, which she has yet to receive a nomination for in her career. But at only 43 years of age, there's plenty of time for her to swap the stadium for the stage and potentially earn that Tony nomination. What other pop superstar is one award closer to winning the EGOT than Beyoncé? Check out our article on the other candidate for EGOT success.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store