
To help solve its egg price crisis, America is turning to Turkey (the country)
America's egg shortage has led US businesses to turn to Turkey. Not the bird, the country.
Turkey plans to export 420 million eggs to the United States this year, the most ever, according to the Egg Producers Central Union in Turkey.
The ramped-up exports come as avian flu has killed more than 140 million egg-laying birds in the United States since 2022, and 17 million alone in November and December. Fewer birds means fewer eggs — and higher prices.
'Bird flu is the main reason of increasing export capacity,' said Ibrahim Afyon, chairman of the Egg Producers Central Union in Turkey.
A carton of a dozen large Grade A eggs hit an average of $4.95 last month, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Costco and Trader Joe's are limiting egg purchases per customer and Waffle House is charging a 50-cent surcharge per egg.
It will take months to replace lost flocks, and the US Department of Agriculture is forecasting an additional 20% increase in egg prices this year. The price of eggs rose 15.2% in January and are up 53% year over year, according to January's Consumer Price Index.
US businesses have taken it upon themselves to look for supply beyond our borders. And Turkey is the only country the United States imports eggs from, according to the American Farm Bureau Federation.
Still, experts warn the increased egg imports won't make much of a dent in America's egg shortage.
'While this is enough to offset some productions losses, it won't provide much support if HPAI (avian flu) continues at its current pace,' said Bernt Nelson, an economist at the American Farm Bureau Federation.
The US produces more than 7.5 billion eggs per year on average, according to the American Egg Board. That number will fall this year as the avian flu continues to claim the lives of more birds.
'We support the temporary import of egg products to help ease the strain on the US egg supply as we navigate this challenging time of continued highly pathogenic avian influenza detections,' said Chad Gregory, president and CEO of United Egg Producers. 'Like everyone, we want to solutions to this situation.'
One solution, at least for now, is importing more eggs. In 2024, the United States imported 71 million eggs from Turkey, according to the USDA. This year's imports will be nearly six times that based on the Egg Producers Central Union's estimates. By July, Turkey will deliver 240 million eggs to the United States, with the rest coming by the end of the year.
Turkey is the fifth-largest egg exporter in the world behind the Netherlands, United States, Poland and Germany. In 2023, Turkey exported $411 million worth of eggs worldwide, according to the Observatory of Economic Complexity. Turkey's export volume to the United States this year will total $37 million, according to the Egg Producers Central Union in Turkey.
Doug Corwin, who had to cull his flock of 99,000 ducks on his farm in Long Island after the virus was detected, says it's time to start vaccinating birds against the virus.
Last week the USDA issued a conditional license for an avian flu vaccine for chickens. Zoetis, the manufacturer behind the vaccine, said the 'license was granted on the demonstration of safety, purity, and reasonable expectation of efficacy based on serology data.'
But vaccinations create a literal chicken and egg problem: Although many egg producers favor vaccinating chickens, poultry producers worry vaccinations would create trade problems.
If a country starts vaccinating its birds, the virus could be seen as endemic, and it can be hard to detect the virus in inoculated birds. Countries could become less eager to buy poultry from the United States, which is the world's largest poultry producer and second-largest exporter of poultry meat, according to the USDA.
Meanwhile, the White House says it is working on a plan to combat the avian flu. On Sunday, Kevin Hassett, the Director of the White House Economic Council, said on CBS' 'Face the Nation' that the plan involves biosecurity, medication and a perimeter.
'Having a smart perimeter is what we're working on, and we're finalizing the ideas about how to do that with the best scientists in government. And that's the kind of thing that should have happened a year ago, and if it had, then egg prices would be, you know, a lot better than they are now,' Hassett said on 'Face the Nation.'
Experts in the agricultural community say more funding and staffing is needed in research and surveillance of the virus. This comes at a time when the Trump administration is doing the opposite. There have been thousands of reported layoffs at agencies including the CDC and USDA.
'If ever there was a time when it was absolutely critical to not infuse more chaos into the system, this is it,' said Rebecca Carriere Christofferson, an associate professor of pathobiological studies at the LSU School of Veterinary Medicine.
Earlier this week, the USDA had to revoke termination letters it sent to workers supporting the bird flu response.
CNN's Isil Sariyuce and Maria Sole Campinoti contributed to this report.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Just How Much Data Does the Fed Need to Cut Rates?
Jerome Powell sees what we see and he hears the huffing and puffing (hard not to), but he's not budging as far as anyone can tell. Despite a slew of new data published Thursday and earlier this week showing inflation has cooled, Powell and the Federal Reserve are still almost universally expected to hold off on cutting interest rates when the monetary policy committee convenes again next week — opting instead to wait until their next meeting in September. As per usual, the central bankers are preaching that patience is a virtue. READ ALSO: Europe Delays Stricter Banking Rules to Keep 'Level Playing Field' With US Rivals and Retail Investors Risk Ominous Opportunity Cost With Private Investments, Moody's Warns A Thursday report from the Bureau of Labor Statistics showed that the Producer Price Index, a closely watched inflation gauge that measures the prices paid to producers, rose just 0.1% in May. The lower-than-expected reading (economists mostly predicted a 0.2% increase) comes just after a Consumer Price Index report on Wednesday that showed consumer prices increased 0.1% month-over-month in May and 2.4% year-over-year — also lower than expectations. Still, more inflation may be on the way. While the White House's tariff regime has yet to spur another inflationary cycle, as many had feared or expected, don't pop the champagne just yet. To see the impact of tariffs show up in inflation data, well, you may have to be a little more patient: The frontloading of inventory earlier this year, ahead of the tariffs, coupled with consumer belt-tightening likely means that price increases have been slow to reveal themselves in the real economy. 'We believe the limited impact from tariffs in May is a reflection of pre-tariff stockpiling, as well as a lagged pass-through of tariffs into import prices,' Nomura senior economist Aichi Amemiya wrote in a note seen by CNBC. 'We maintain our view that the impact of tariffs will likely materialize in the coming months.' Hit the Gas: Traders don't seem to be waiting for the data to show up. Treasury yields across maturities sank to their lowest levels in a week on Thursday as traders of interest-rate derivatives once again started pricing in two rate cuts this year, with the first expected in September. Bettors on prediction market Kalshi similarly view two cuts as the most likely outcome this year, with the odds set at 29% as of Thursday. 'The inflation data have been very, very good for the last four months,' Tony Farren, rates sales and trading managing director at Mischler Financial Group, told Bloomberg. 'How many months of tame inflation data can the Fed ignore?' This post first appeared on The Daily Upside. To receive delivering razor sharp analysis and perspective on all things finance, economics, and markets, subscribe to our free The Daily Upside newsletter. Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tariffs will impact inflation in a 'steady drip,' not a surge
Tariff effects may take years to fully show up in inflation data. John Leer, chief economist at Morning Consult, joins Catalysts to explain why businesses are passing on costs slowly and what that means for consumer prices and hiring. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. The May Consumer Price Index is set to be released on Wednesday. Core year of year inflation expected to come in at 2.9%, and core prices expected to tick up three tenths of a percent higher for the month. Investors expecting the Fed to hold rates steady in the June meeting as inflation remains stubbornly above its 2% target. For more, I want to bring in John Leer, he's Morning Consults Chief economist, on what to expect from this week's data. Great to have you on here, John. Talk to me about what you're anticipating ahead of that key CPI print this week. Yeah, thanks for having me. Well, I think, as you mentioned, I expect to see inflation remain stubbornly high. I still don't think we're going to fully see the impact of, uh, tariffs on inflation. I imagine that will be spread out over the course of the full year with some of it actually backloaded towards the end of the year as businesses increasingly face pressures to pass on, uh, elevated costs. But I think the real question from this particular report is going to be how concentrated are those tariff related, tariff-induced, uh, cost increases. Uh, my expectation is that it will remain fairly muted, uh, through the month of May. So when do we finally see it? I keep feeling like sources are telling me, oh, we can ignore this data, we can ignore this data, we don't have the tariffs in place yet. When can I finally say, okay, guys, we can't ignore it anymore? We see something, I think pretty different relative to the consensus. We run a quarterly survey with the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, and it showed that, uh, small businesses, at least, expect to spend, um, roughly two years passing on the full cost of tariffs to their customers. And so my expectation is actually that we will see sort of a steady drip of price increases rather than this one-off, uh, surge. Due likely to the sort of competitive dynamics in the US economy, it doesn't benefit any company to be the first one out to increase costs when, in fact, the tariff policy might, might change underneath you. And so we really need to see more stable policy announcements, and that, I think, will lead to, uh, a pretty, uh, gradual but protracted period of cost increases. Yeah, and similarly, what are you hearing from those small businesses about the employment picture going forward? Our read is that employment actually has not, uh, pulled back. I think what we see is that the rate of hiring has slowed, um, but it's been slowing at a, on a trajectory sort of consistent with where we were prior to the tariffs. So it doesn't look to us like tariff induced, uh, we've seen tariff induced hiring pullback or hiring slowdown. And that's really counter again to the narrative that existed, let's say a few months ago where everyone expected tariff uncertainty to drive and pull back an investment and then even potentially, uh, uh, elevated layoffs. We simply don't see that. I think small businesses and consumers out there as well, what they're seeing is that the, the, the world remains fairly uncertain. It still is in the financial interest of companies to keep workers on their payrolls when there's so much demand, um, to benefit from. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
CPI data: Fed rate cuts are 'back in the conversation'
Bob Lang, Explosive Options technical analyst, joins Catalysts with Madison Mills to explain how May's positive Consumer Price Index (CPI) report marks the third consecutive month of cooling inflation data, and how that factors into the Federal Reserve's decisions on rate cuts next week and all year. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Catalysts here. I want to bring in our contributor for the hour. We've got Bob Lane back with us. He is explosive options, technical analysts, a great voice to have when we are looking for clarity in the market because sometimes when the sentiment gets over its skis, you can bring us back to earth with the technicals. I want to start on the inflation data. We saw the market have a significant move to the upside. We're coming in just a bit off of that. How would you describe the market reaction? Uh, quite a bit of a surprise, Maddie. I was looking for, uh, a little bit of an increase in, uh, inflation over the prior month, over April. I mean, it came in with a 0.1 print on the core number, which is the number that the Fed really pays much more attention to than just the headline number. Even though the headline number did come in actually a little bit less than expected as well, as well 2.4% annualized. I think it's important to to recognize that, uh, inflation over the last three months has been heading lower. Just one print is not all that important. But as the Fed has, uh, has talked about in the past, Chair Powell has mentioned in several of his press conferences, what's important is to to pay attention to the trend and trend what he looks at is something like about three to five months worth of data in a row. So, so now we have three prints in a row. We have March, April, and May that have shown very much, uh, lower inflation. Prices are starting to stabilize, which is what the Fed is looking for. I think now that rate cuts are back in the conversation at next week's meeting. And you know, I I know some people have already come out and started talking about that as well too. But I think it's a serious conversation that the Fed has to have. I think the last Wow. projections that they had back in March, Maddie, was for two rate cuts in 2025. I still don't think that's going to change next week when they the new projections coming out in June. But I I do think that there's going to be a, uh, a legion of people on the Fed and the voting, uh, block of the Fed that's going to start saying, hey, listen, you know what? The the the proof is in the data here. We've been paying attention to the data. We need to start talking about rate cuts again. And and what's interesting is the economists that we've spoken with throughout our program in this morning have said, look, don't fully trust this because it doesn't have the totality of the tariff policy baked in just yet. But the Fed can't think about the tariff policy impact until it's shown in the data, right? That's that's the squishy part of this whole situation here. When are, uh, price increases from tariffs actually going to be reflected in the data? And, you know, really it's a it's it's hit or miss over here. It could be next month or it could be in six months from now. So, I think that that is the reason why the Fed is taking much more cautious approach as to to Fed policy going forward. They don't want to make a policy error here that they can't suddenly walk back. And and also you have to remember that Chair Powell is going to be in the seat for about another 11 months. I think May is his next term is going to be up. And, you know, who who's going to be in there to replace him with a similar policy that he's got in place? [beep] Sign in to access your portfolio