
Eurozone consumers happy to ditch US products if hit by tariffs, study finds
FRANKFURT: Eurozone consumers are happy to ditch US products if they are hit by tariffs in the course of a tit-for-tat trade war with US President Donald Trump's administration, a European Central Bank survey showed.
The ECB's Consumer Expectations Survey, conducted in March before Trump had even announced, and later paused his tariff blitz, unexpectedly showed a change in preference regardless of any price increase.
The 19,000 consumers were asked if they would look for alternatives to US products if an import tax of five per cent, 10 per cent or 20 per cent was imposed by the United States and, in retaliation, by the European Union.
"Results show that consumers are very willing to actively move away from US products and services," the ECB said in a blog post.
The median substitution score was 80 on a scale where zero indicates no willingness to buy alternatives to US products and 100 signifies a strong one.
When asked for their motivations, 43.7 per cent of respondents cited a change in preference, a bigger share than the 38.1 per cent who said this was down to prices.
Accordingly, the willingness to substitute was greater for higher-income households.
"Our findings indicate that, in the current context, consumers' reactions could therefore considerably deviate from standard textbook consumption patterns in response to higher tariffs," the ECB said.
Only 8.9 per cent of respondents said there was a lack of alternatives, which could prove a sore point if EU tariffs were actually imposed on products such as digital services.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Malay Mail
32 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Rising global risks drive safe-haven rush, boosting US dollar to monthly peak
NEW YORK, June 20 — The dollar was set to log its biggest weekly rise in over a month today, as uncertainties about a raging war in the Middle East and the repercussions it could have on the global economy fuelled an appetite for traditional safe havens. The dollar index comparing the US currency against six others is poised for a 0.5 per cent climb this week. The conflict between Israel and Iran shows no signs of subsiding and market participants are nervous about potential US intervention in the region. The two countries have been in a week-long air battle as Tel Aviv seeks to thwart Tehran's nuclear ambitions and cripple the domestic government. The White House said US President Donald Trump will make a decision within the next two weeks about whether to join Israel in the war. The resultant recent spike in oil prices added a new layer of inflation uncertainty for central banks across regions which have been grappling with the potential repercussions of US tariffs on their economies. 'Rising oil prices introduce inflation uncertainty at a time when growth is weakening,' said Charu Chanana, chief investment strategist at Saxo. 'That makes central banks' jobs much harder — do they ease to support growth or hold back to avoid fuelling inflation? Most seem to be prioritising growth concerns for now, assuming that crude gains may not be sustained.' In early Asia trading, the euro inched up 0.16 per cent to US$1.151, while the dollar weakened against the yen by 0.17 per cent to 145.23 per dollar. Also underpinning the yen's gains was hotter-than-expected inflation data that kept expectations for upcoming interest rate hikes alive. Furthermore, minutes from the Bank of Japan's policy meet this week showed policymakers agreed on the need to keep raising rates that are still at very low levels. The Swiss franc was flat at 0.816 per dollar today but was set for its largest weekly drop since mid-April after the country's central bank lowered borrowing costs. Swiss rates now stand at zero per cent. Currencies positively correlated to risk sentiment such as the Australian and New Zealand dollars were steady, while sterling was little changed at US$1.34. Although the Federal Reserve earlier this week stuck with its forecast of two interest rate cuts this year, Chair Jerome Powell cautioned against giving that view too much weight. Analysts saw the central bank's delivery as a 'hawkish tilt' further underpinning the greenback's gains this week. Investors were, however, taken aback by an unexpected 25 basis point interest rate cut by Norges bank and the krone is down by more than 1 per cent against the dollar this week. Though geopolitical tensions were the main market focus this week, concerns about tariffs and the impact they may have on costs, corporate margins and overall growth are ever-present. These concerns have weighed on the dollar, which is down about 9 per cent this year. Trump's early July tariff deadline looms and sources said that European officials are increasingly resigned to a 10 per cent rate on 'reciprocal' tariffs being the baseline in any trade deal between the US and the EU. Elsewhere, the offshore yuan was little changed at 7.185 after China kept benchmark lending rates unchanged as expected. — Reuters
![MARKET PULSE AM JUNE 20, 2025 [WATCH]](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75)
New Straits Times
34 minutes ago
- New Straits Times
MARKET PULSE AM JUNE 20, 2025 [WATCH]
KUALA LUMPUR: News on the latest moves on the stock and crypto markets. Bursa Malaysia opened slightly lower today, weighed down by a lack of fresh catalysts and the closure of Wall Street overnight. Wall Street was shut for a holiday, with traders closely watching whether the United States will align with Israel in the coming weeks. Back home, the FBM KLCI closed just above the 1,500 mark, as foreign selling pressure is expected to persist. Analysts suggest buying blue-chip stocks if the index drops below the 1,500 mark, especially near the 1,480 level. In the crypto market, Bitcoin slipped to RM445,413. Ethereum declined to RM10,732, while Solana dropped to RM621. That's it for Market Pulse. Keywords: Donald Trump Bitcoin Stocks Trading Cryptocurrency Crypto Bursa Malaysia Ethereum Fbm Klci Solana Market Pulse


The Star
an hour ago
- The Star
US court lets Trump retain control of California National Guard for now
FILE PHOTO: U.S. Marines stand watch as people protest against U.S. President Donald Trump's policies and federal immigration sweeps during a No Kings Day demonstration in Los Angeles, California, U.S., June 14, 2025. REUTERS/David Ryder/File Photo WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A U.S. appeals court let Donald Trump on Thursday retain control over California's National Guard while the state's Democratic governor proceeds with a lawsuit challenging the legality of the Republican president's use of the troops to quell protests and unrest in Los Angeles. A three-judge panel of the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals extended a pause it placed on U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer's June 12 ruling that Trump had called the National Guard into federal service unlawfully. Breyer's ruling was issued in a lawsuit against Trump's action brought by Governor Gavin Newsom. Breyer ruled that Trump violated the U.S. law governing a president's ability to take control of a state's National Guard by failing to coordinate with the governor, and also found that the conditions set out under the statute to allow this move, such as a rebellion against federal authority, did not exist. Breyer ordered Trump to return control of California's National Guard to Newsom. Hours after Breyer acted, the 9th Circuit panel put the judge's move on hold temporarily. Amid protests and turmoil in Los Angeles over Trump's immigration raids, the president on June 7 took control of California's National Guard and deployed 4,000 troops against the wishes of Newsom. Trump also ordered 700 U.S. Marines to the city after sending in the National Guard. Breyer has not yet ruled on the legality of the Marine Corps mobilization. At a court hearing on Tuesday on whether to extend the pause on Breyer's decision, members of the 9th Circuit panel questioned lawyers for California and the Trump administration on what role, if any, courts should have in reviewing Trump's authority to deploy the troops. The law sets out three conditions under which a president can federalize state National Guard forces, including an invasion, a "rebellion or danger of a rebellion" against the government or a situation in which the U.S. government is unable with regular forces to execute the country's laws. The Justice Department has said that once the president determines that an emergency that warrants the use of the National Guard exists, no court or state governor can review that decision. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tensions in the second most-populous U.S. city. The protests in Los Angeles lasted for more than a week, but subsequently ebbed, leading Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass to lift a curfew she had imposed. California argued in its June 9 lawsuit that Trump's deployment of the National Guard and the Marines violated the state's sovereignty and U.S. laws that forbid federal troops from participating in civilian law enforcement. The lawsuit stated the situation in Los Angeles was nothing like a "rebellion." The protests involved sporadic acts of violence that state and local law enforcement were capable of handling without military involvement, according to the lawsuit. The Trump administration has denied that troops are engaging in law enforcement, saying that they are instead protecting federal buildings and personnel, including U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers. The 9th Circuit panel is comprised of two judges appointed by Trump during his first term and one appointee of Democratic former President Joe Biden. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth in New York and Kanishka Singh in Washington, Editing by Will Dunham and Alexia Garamfalvi)