Mm2 Asia considering closing Cathay Cineplexes amid millions of dollars in debt, Singapore News
CNA reported that winding up one of Singapore's oldest cinema's chains is one of the options mm2 Asia is evaluating to address its "ongoing financial challenges".
It has been operating since 1939, and was originally known as Cathay Cinema.
"The group has been committed towards the continued operation of its cinema business in Singapore," said the Singapore Exchange-listed company.
"However, such commitment requires the support from its landlords which has not been meaningful despite the difficult operating environment for cinemas and the wider retail industry over the past years caused by, amongst other things, the Covid-19 pandemic."
Six Cathay Cineplexes cinemas have closed in the last three years, with the remaining four in operation at Causeway Point, Century Square, Downtown East and 321 Clementi.
Mm2 Asia owes $3.3 million to the the landlords of its Century Square and Causeway Point cinemas.
The Straits Times reported that the company has three weeks to pay the full amount or secure or compound the sum to the reasonable satisfaction of the landlord of both premises, Frasers Centrepoint Trust.
Earlier this month, mm2 Asia received a demand for $3.4 million in arrears from Lendlease Global Commercial Reit, the landlord of its shuttered outlet at Jem Shopping Mall.
Linkwasha Holdings has also served a demand for a repayment of $7.6 million by July 28 — the outstanding amount from a $30 million loan to finance the acquisition of Cathay Cineplexes from Cathay Organisation.
Mm2 Asia said that its other options include continuing negotiations with landlords with the aim of restructuring existing obligations consensually, or try and restructure existing obligations under a court-supervised process while continuing operations.
[[nid:716095]]
chingshijie@asiaone.com
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Times
an hour ago
- Business Times
IReit Global sees risk of losing potential lawsuit as ‘remote', takes no action for now
[SINGAPORE] The manager of IReit Global does not plan to take any steps to mitigate the impact of a potential lawsuit from its main tenant for now, citing the 'remote' chance of the case succeeding. If the dispute proceeds, however, it could take 'several years' to resolve. The manager of the Europe-focused real estate investment trust (Reit) was commenting on the possible litigation involving Deutsche Rentenversicherung Bund (DRV), the main tenant of its Berlin Campus asset, during the briefing on Friday (Aug 8) of the Reit's financial results for the first half of the year. DRV is seeking a partial repayment of dilapidation costs amounting to 8.4 million euros (S$12.6 million), out of a contractually agreed 15.5 million euros, for what it claims are 'unjustified' charges. The claim represents about 1.6 per cent of IReit's net asset value and 11.1 per cent of gross revenue for FY2024. 'We have yet to even receive a payment order from the court, so there's nothing much to talk about,' said Kevin Tan, the manager's chief financial officer. DRV had sent a legal letter to IReit's subsidiaries on Jun 12, to which a formal response rejecting the claim was sent on Jun 25. The Berlin Campus is being repositioned from a single-use property to a mixed-use, multi-let asset. The manager is in talks with two potential office tenants and aims to secure a long-term lease of at least 20 years without a break option from one of them by the first quarter of 2026. The manager's chief executive officer Peter Viens said that once a tenant is secured, the Reit plans to divest at least half the asset to fund the remaining capital expenditure without issuing new securities. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up The planned divestment is also in line with IReit Global's strategy to reduce its exposure to the office sub-sector from more than 80 per cent currently to around 50 per cent of its portfolio. Viens noted that the office sub-sector in Europe has 'suffered' in performance since the Covid-19 pandemic. He added that the manager is exploring the sale of its remaining office assets in Germany, as well as some in Spain, as part of its rebalancing plans. At the same time, IReit Global will increase its exposure to the retail sub-sector, which Viens described as providing 'one of the best combinations of diversification and performance'. He noted that brick-and-mortar retail properties have remained resilient despite the growth of online shopping during the pandemic. On Thursday, IReit Global posted a 26 per cent fall year on year in distribution per unit (DPU) to 0.71 euro cent for the half-year of FY2025 ended June mainly due to the absence of rental income from the Berlin Campus under repositioning. Revenue decreased by 27.5 per cent to 26.6 million euros, and net property income slid 33.3 per cent to 18 million euros. IReit Global units were unchanged at S$0.295 on Friday.
Business Times
3 hours ago
- Business Times
Thai Airways shares soar to seven-year high after earnings jump
[BANGKOK] Thai Airways International's shares climbed to the highest level in almost eight years after the state-controlled airline reported that net income for the second quarter soared nearly 39-fold from a year earlier. The carrier rose as much as 10.5 per cent on Friday (Aug 8) to the highest intraday level since October 2018, extending its weekly gains to almost 340 per cent. Its market value has reached more than 407.5 billion baht (S$16.2 billion), making it the fifth-largest carrier in Asia, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. Thai Airways's shares resumed trading on Monday for the first time in five years. The company in June exited a court-supervised debt rehabilitation as the post-Covid travel demand boom enabled it to achieve an earnings turnaround and sell new shares to raise capital. The flag carrier's second-quarter net income surged to 12.1 billion baht from 306 million baht a year earlier on lower finance costs and several one-off items, including a gain from termination of aircraft lease agreements. Revenue rose to 51 billion baht, a 14 per cent jump from a year earlier. Thai Airways' cost-cutting programme and declining fuel prices have given the carrier strong financials for now, according to Eric Zhu, an aviation and defence industry analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence. However, the slump in Thai tourism could weigh on the carrier in the future, he said. 'One has to wonder if they can sustain growth this year given the bleak tourism outlook,' Zhu said. Its resumption of trading marked the airline's return to normal business operations after it had accumulated more than 400 billion baht of debt in the lead up to the pandemic that ravaged the global travel industry. BLOOMBERG
Singapore Law Watch
6 hours ago
- Singapore Law Watch
Ex-Hyflux director fined over firm's failure to disclose Tuaspring info
Ex-Hyflux director fined over firm's failure to disclose Tuaspring info Source: Straits Times Article Date: 08 Aug 2025 Author: Selina Lum A former independent director of Hyflux was fined $90,000 on Aug 7 over the company's failure to disclose information relating to the Tuaspring integrated water and power project in 2011 as required under Singapore Exchange (SGX) listing rules. A former independent director of Hyflux was fined $90,000 on Aug 7 over the company's failure to disclose information relating to the Tuaspring integrated water and power project in 2011 as required under Singapore Exchange (SGX) listing rules. The fine was handed down to Rajsekar Kuppuswami Mitta by a district court after he pleaded guilty to a charge of neglect in relation to an announcement by the company to the SGX on March 7 that year. Rajsekar, a 68-year-old Australian citizen and Singapore permanent resident, was also barred from acting as a company director for five years. Six others who have also been charged with disclosure-related offences – including Hyflux founder and former chief executive Olivia Lum Ooi Lin – are contesting their charges in a trial scheduled from Aug 11 to Feb 5, 2026. Hyflux, once a celebrated water treatment company in Singapore, officially collapsed in 2021 after facing financial woes from its foray into the energy business through the Tuaspring plant. On Aug 7, Deputy Public Prosecutor Kevin Yong told the court that Hyflux intentionally failed to disclose information in the March 7, 2011 announcement that would have allowed investors to make fully informed decisions. The announcement stated that Hyflux had been named the 'preferred bidder' by national water agency PUB to build and operate Singapore's second and largest seawater desalination plant in Tuas for a concession period of 25 years. The announcement also stated that the cost of the Tuaspring project was $890 million. It mentioned that a power plant would be built to supply electricity to the desalination plant, and that excess power would be sold to the power grid. However, it did not disclose that Hyflux was going into the business of selling electricity for the first time. The company also failed to disclose that the profitability of the power plant was contingent on revenue from the sale of electricity, which was projected to make up the significant majority of Tuaspring's revenue. DPP Yong said drafts and e-mails leading up to the release of the final version of the announcement showed an intention by Hyflux to downplay the power plant component of Tuaspring, and to instead focus on the desalination plant component. In particular, information on Tuaspring being Hyflux's entry into the energy retail business in the first draft of the announcement was removed in subsequent drafts. The prosecutor said this information would be likely to influence investors in deciding whether to buy or sell Hyflux's shares, as it would have revealed that the company was entering a new business outside its core competency of desalination. The information would also have revealed that the profitability of Tuaspring was contingent on the revenue from electricity sales, rather than from the sale of water to PUB over the 25-year concession contract. 'This would have exposed Tuaspring to significant market risks due to the volatility of electricity prices,' he added. The final draft was circulated by e-mail to Hyflux's five independent directors before the announcement was made. Rajsekar did not respond. DPP Yong said the other four directors responded, but none of them made any comments regarding the omission of the relevant information. As it turned out, the risks did materialise when electricity prices fell sharply some time in 2015 and remained suppressed through 2017, he said. Because the profitability of Tuaspring hinged on electricity revenue, the fall in electricity prices ultimately led to Hyflux falling into the red for the first time in the company's history. In Hyflux's annual report for 2017, the company reported a loss of more than $115 million after tax. On May 21, 2018, Hyflux suspended trading of its shares. The company then filed for a debt moratorium, which was granted by the High Court on June 19, 2018. On Nov 16, 2020, Hyflux was placed under judicial management. Its share price was wiped to zero. The company had 16,936 ordinary shareholders and 20,104 preference shareholders as at March 14, 2018. On July 21, 2021, the High Court approved Hyflux's winding up. DPP Yong sought a fine of $90,000 for Rajsekar, saying that the harm caused was high while Rajsekar's culpability was low. He said the sentence meted out must send a clear signal that company directors are ultimately responsible for the company's compliance with continuous disclosure requirements. The prescribed sentence is a fine of up to $250,000, a jail term of up to seven years, or both. Defence counsel Suresh Damodara noted that his client was not copied on any of the earlier drafts. Rajsekar had invested his own money in Hyflux and lost $1 million, said Mr Damodara, adding that his client believes the investment indicated his honest belief that the Tuaspring project was commercially viable. Mr Damodara added that his client has decided to give up corporate life altogether. In sentencing, District Judge Chay Yuen Fatt agreed with the prosecution's submission that deterrence was the main consideration. The judge also accepted that neglect was the lowest degree of responsibility for such offences. A second charge, for non-disclosure related to Hyflux's offer of $200 million worth of shares on April 3, 2011, was taken into consideration during sentencing. Source: The Straits Times © SPH Media Limited. Permission required for reproduction. Print
