
Split reactions from constituents during Cheyenne town hall with state representatives
CHEYENNE — Seven Cheyenne state representatives answered questions from their constituents during a town hall Wednesday night at the Laramie County Library.
About half of the approximately 30 people who gathered in the room were pleased by their representatives' remarks, while the other half were less than impressed.
The lawmakers fielded questions on a wide range of topics, from the importance of revisiting Wyoming's election laws to how they plan to ensure funding for mental and maternal health care.
Cheyenne Republican Reps. John Eklund, Lee Filer, Rob Geringer, Ann Lucas, Steve Johnson, Daniel Singh and Jacob Wasserburger participated in the panel, which was organized by Filer. A majority of the panelists were in their first or second term as a state legislator.
For the last hour or so of the scheduled three-hour event, patrons were invited to come forward and speak directly with the lawmakers. However, roughly half the audience left the room immediately after the panel portion ended.
Local resident Jeff Daugherty moderated the panel and read out questions written on cards by audience members.
Better Wyoming member Angela Silvester told the Wyoming Tribune Eagle after the town hall she was disappointed her question wasn't properly asked.
'I had a few questions, and one of our (volunteers) also had some questions about health care,' Silvester said. 'They kind of looped it in together.'
Silvester said her question asked lawmakers why they voted for or against increasing Medicaid reimbursement rates in the supplemental budget for maternal and mental health care. Gov. Mark Gordon recommended a $2.3 million allocation to the Wyoming Department of Health to increase Medicaid reimbursement rates in his supplemental budget request to the Legislature this year.
But, for the first time in recent memory, the Legislature failed to pass a supplemental budget.
'I'm a little bit disappointed (Daugherty) didn't read my question exactly,' Silvester said.
Not everyone was disappointed by the panel, however. A couple of attendees told the WTE they were pleased by their representatives' comments and said it appeared the lawmakers knew what they were talking about.
'I thought it was good,' said Cheyenne resident Celeste Simmons. 'They explained why they made certain decisions and explained how the process works.'
Property taxes, education, elections
The 68th Wyoming Legislature passed bills related to education funding, election laws and property tax relief. A universal school choice bill and a 25% property tax cut were among the more controversial topics heavily debated during the 37-day session.
One of the first questions panelists tackled was the impact of major property tax relief. Critics of the 25% property tax cut said city services and special districts will take a major hit, especially without any backfill from the state.
During another Cheyenne town hall that was held a little more than three weeks ago, Lucas said Laramie County is 'wealthy,' and downplayed the effects of property tax cuts on local governments, which she claimed are 'inflation proof.'
'I'm here to tell you, Laramie County has reserves,' Lucas said during the previous town hall. 'I really don't know that there's any need to reduce fire protection when we are such a wealthy county.'
Rep. Ann Lucas, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Rep. Ann Lucas, R-Cheyenne
However, Lucas changed her tune a bit during Wednesday's town hall.
'I live in Laramie County. I was mostly concerned with how the 25% residential property tax cut would hit us, because this is our home,' Lucas said. 'I'll be honest with you, there's a couple of fire districts that are probably going to be hurting a little bit.'
She maintained that 'we'll be OK,' but added that the income cut to some fire districts 'is a big deal.'
'Will the government have to learn to spend a little less? Yes,' Lucas said.
In light of the property tax cuts, panelists also addressed a question that asked how the Legislature will ensure adequate funding for its K-12 public schools, especially considering a recent Laramie County district court decision that found the state has unconstitutionally underfunded its public school system.
Geringer said public school funding will be OK in the short term, but the state should 'be careful … looking into the future.'
Rep. Rob Geringer, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Rep. Rob Geringer, R-Cheyenne
'We're so dependent on a volatile market in the revenues that come into the state, and our schools are highly depend on that,' Geringer said.
He said the state should be cautious about stripping its various savings accounts just because it believes the government is too big. The state has to be able to provide funding when revenues are down, 'and it will come.'
Singh, who serves on the House Education Committee, chimed in that fossil fuels are a major source of education funding. He said the state should consider diversifying its education revenue, such as by expanding its tourism industry.
Rep. Daniel Singh, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Rep. Daniel Singh, R-Cheyenne
'There are other avenues that we can explore to add to the funding for our education system, including from a tourism reserve account,' Singh said. 'There are a lot of different discussions that we have going into the budget session, but that would be one way to add to the funding in our education system.'
The Legislature also considered a record 45 election-related bills that were filed for the session, which made up 8% of the total legislation considered, according to WyoFile.com. Only four cases of election fraud have been reported in Wyoming since 2000, according to The Heritage Foundation, a conservative think tank.
Lawmakers were asked why they felt election integrity is so important to the state of Wyoming. Only Lucas and Johnson volunteered to answer the question. They were also the only two representatives at the panel who were primary sponsors on election bills.
Rep. Steve Johnson, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Rep. Steve Johnson, R-Cheyenne
'As a whole, the citizens of Wyoming are due a legal, honest election,' said Johnson, who is a member of the House Corporations, Elections and Political Subdivisions Committee.
Lucas said it is a matter of patience getting all the election bills through, since a majority of them failed to go into law this year. But she didn't explain why Wyoming's election laws need to be revisited.
Visions for the future
Daugherty asked panelists one last question before they were released to speak with audience members one on one: What is your vision for the 2027-28 biennium?
Eklund, who has served in the Legislature since 2011, said he'd like to see lawmakers move on from 'bloc voting.' In the recent legislative session — the first in which the Wyoming Freedom Caucus held a majority in the House of Representatives — he said it 'was about a 35-25 vote every time.'
Rep. John Eklund, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Rep. John Eklund, R-Cheyenne
'When I started 14 years ago, I was able to bring an idea to the Legislature and have citizen legislators who came and tried to help my bills get across the finish line,' Eklund said. 'We're just not doing that.'
He said he didn't think it was constitutional, and it's already happening in Washington, D.C. Nine thousand people gave him their vote, Eklund continued. He can't represent his people if he's stuck in a bloc voting group.
'That's a vision I would have, for wanting to get out of this ridiculous, unconstitutional way we're trying to run the government,' Eklund said. 'That's how Washington, D.C. does it. We don't need to do that if we're a citizen legislature.'
Other representatives offered their perspectives on the budget for the next biennium, which will be debated in February during the 2026 budget session. Lucas said the state should curb the rate of government growth in spending. Geringer said the state should take a deeper look at how to fund education and be responsible in how it makes cuts to the budget.
'We don't need to just cut for the sake of cutting, but be surgical in how we look at the budget,' he said.
Filer said he wants to heavily focus on protecting the state's savings accounts, which generate revenue from collected interest. Lawmakers successfully eliminated the Budget Reserve Account in the recent session, and Filer said he was a bit concerned about this trend.
Rep. Lee Filer, R-Cheyenne (2025)
Rep. Lee Filer, R-Cheyenne
'We're cutting out our revenues by eliminating accounts that we have that are … making money off the investments,' Filer said. 'We want to actually look at our budget with our general fund and make sure we're spending the dollars correctly, the way we're supposed to, and not eliminating investment dollars.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
San Antonio City Council election results show changing politics
San Antonio City Council District 1 incumbent Sukh Kaur held on to her seat in Saturday's runoff election, in which three new city councilmembers were also elected in a political shakeup. Why it matters: A new generation of councilmembers can help shape a range of transformative city plans as they work with new mayor Gina Ortiz Jones over the next four years — but they'll also have to contend with a possible budget deficit and cuts to services. By the numbers: Kaur beat out conservative neighborhood leader Patty Gibbons 65% to 35% in the downtown area district, which now also includes some neighborhoods north of Loop 410. The big picture: The San Antonio City Council could have a starker political divide. It'sgaining one more progressive and one more conservative member, who are taking over seats previously held by business-friendly and moderate Democrats. Ortiz Jones is expected to lead as a progressive. The latest: In District 6 on the Far West Side, Ric Galvan (50.1%) beat Kelly Ann Gonzalez (49.9%) by just 25 votes. Both have progressive backgrounds running in a district that has previously elected Republicans and business-friendly Democrats. In District 8 on the Northwest Side, Ivalis Meza Gonzalez (57%) beat Paula McGee (43%). Meza Gonzalez is the former chief of staff to Mayor Ron Nirenberg, while McGee had experience on city boards and support from the Republican Party of Bexar County. In District 9 on the North Side, Misty Spears (57%) beat Angi Taylor Aramburu (43%), putting this more conservative district back in Republican hands for the first time in eight years. Spears has been the director of constituent services for Republican Bexar County Commissioner Grant Moody. Flashback: The four districts headed to the June runoff after no one earned more than 50% of the vote in the May 3 election. District 4 on the Southwest Side is newly represented by Edward Mungia, a former staff member in the office. He won outright in the May election.


Axios
23 minutes ago
- Axios
San Antonio mayor live election results: Gina Ortiz Jones wins race
San Antonio on Saturday elected Gina Ortiz Jones as its next mayor, choosing a Democrat instead of Republican Rolando Pablos for a nonpartisan race that became distinctly about politics. Why it matters: The mayoral election, the city's first in 16 years without an incumbent on the ballot, drew money and influence from across the state and nation. Neither Ortiz Jones nor Pablos have held elected office before, and San Antonio has not elected a mayor who hasn't served on the City Council since Phil Hardberger in 2005. The latest: Unofficial vote results showed Ortiz Jones with 54% of the vote compared to 46% for Pablos. All precincts were counted. What they're saying: Ortiz Jones told supporters at a watch party at The Dakota East Side Ice House that voters "reminded folks what San Antonio stands for," adding "that our city is about compassion and it's about leading with everybody in mind." "But you know what, our country — I think we're going through a blip right now, but San Antonio has had the opportunity to say, you know what? We're going to move past this," she added. Pablos conceded at his watch party, per KSAT. "We tried. I want to thank everybody for your support. It was a tough race, and I'm just happy that everybody came together for this community," he said. State of play: Ortiz Jones, who is believed to be the first openly gay woman elected San Antonio mayor, served as an Air Force undersecretary in the Biden administration and was twice the Democratic nominee for the 23rd Congressional District. During the runoff campaign, both candidates leaned into their families' immigrant backgrounds. Ortiz Jones spoke of being raised by a single mother who immigrated from the Philippines and Pablos of his family moving from Mexico to El Paso when he was 8 years old. Pablos is a former Texas secretary of state who has served as a senior adviser to Republican Gov. Greg Abbott. Follow the money: Pablos and his supporters appeared to both outraise and outspend Ortiz Jones in the runoff election, campaign finance reports show. Pablos raised nearly $333,000 and spent more than $275,000 from late April through May 28. He got a big boost from the Texas Economic Fund, a political action committee run by Abbott's former political director, which raised $1.35 million and spent over $623,000 during that time. Ortiz Jones raised nearly $249,000 and spent over $133,000 in the same period. She had help from Fields of Change, a national Democratic PAC, which spent more than $160,000 for her campaign. The big picture: The new mayor will lead San Antonio at a pivotal time, as officials seek to gain public support for a new downtown Spurs arena that could be surrounded by a sports and entertainment district. They will also lead the city through the remaining years of the Trump administration, under which San Antonio has lost millions of dollars in federal funding. The city is also expecting a budget deficit. Catch up quick: Mayor Ron Nirenberg reached his term limits after eight years in office, making him the city's longest-serving mayor since Henry Cisneros in the 1980s. San Antonio's next mayor will serve for four years after voters approved increasing term length from two years. They will work alongside several new city councilmembers members. Flashback: Nirenberg's departure left a rare opening that drew a crowded 27-candidate field to replace him. Four sitting city councilmembers struggled to break through the noise as traditional backers in local elections, like the police union, sat out the first round of voting. By the numbers: Voters showed low enthusiasm for the May 3 election, which overlapped with Fiesta, at 9.26%. In the runoff, turnout rose to nearly 17%.
Yahoo
31 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Biggest Boondoggles in Trump's Big Beautiful Bill
The House reconciliation bill — officially known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act — is extraordinary in how much it robs from the poor to boost the rich. Its tax cuts for the wealthy are financed by cuts to health care coverage (both in Medicaid and Obamacare) that will help Republicans swell the ranks of the uninsured by 16 million, according to the Congressional Budget Office. But the Big Beautiful Bill is not just an ugly tax bill where society's less fortunate are made to sacrifice for the benefit of the wealthiest. It's also a spending bill that steers hundreds of billions of dollars into new pet projects. This is financed with debt. All in, the BBB will spike deficits by $2.4 trillion over 10 years, according to CBO, likely increasing the national debt by $3 billion when interest payments are included. The bill's spending has angered budget hawks in the Senate like Rand Paul (R.-Ky.). It has been part of the public split between Donald Trump and Elon Musk, who calls the bill a 'disgusting abomination' that will squander any supposed savings imposed by DOGE, the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. Conservative budget analysts are sounding the alarm: 'This inability to set priorities is going to bring a debt crisis,' Jessica Riedl, a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute tells Rolling Stone. In fact, the bill would create so much new debt that it risks triggering a mechanism called 'sequestration,' which would impose deep, mandatory cuts to Medicare. These cuts to the health care of America's seniors would start next year, and rise to half-a-trillion dollars over ten years. The BBB's spending provisions have received far less scrutiny than the tax cuts and safety-net slashes. But the bill lards new funds on a range of already-fat-cats — from the military-industrial complex and Big Tech to private prisons and construction concerns. Below we survey the biggest boondoggles of the Big Beautiful Bill: The BBB proposes spending nearly $50 billion for construction of Trump's border wall with Mexico. Sen. Paul, in an appearance on Face the Nation last week, accused the administration of waste. He cited an existing Customs and Border Patrol estimate that wall construction should cost only about $6.5 billion over 1,000 miles: 'They have inflated the cost of the wall eightfold,' said Paul. (After his TV hit, CPB appears to have scrubbed the construction cost estimate Paul quoted from its website.) Paul even questioned the need for more wall, at all, given his view that Trump has 'essentially stopped the border flow without new money and without new legislation.' Offering just a small taste of the anticipated building bonanza, the Trump administration awarded a $70 million, 7-mile wall-construction contract to California-based Granite Construction in March. The bill includes $45 billion for 'Adult Alien Detention Capacity' and 'Family Residential Centers.' This funding would enable the administration to ramp up its mass deportation program for undocumented immigrants. As the nation has seen from recent high-profile Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids at restaurants, this involves ripping productive members out of society and making them wards of the state, at great public cost, until they can be deported. The money would be a boon to private prison contractors and construction firms. For a taste of where this is headed, consider that the administration has already inked a 15-year, $1 billion deal with GEO Group to house ICE detainees at Delaney Hall, a 1,000 bed facility in Newark, New Jersey. The mayor of the city was arrested by ICE amid a recent protest at the facility. The private prison company is well connected to the Trump administration. As Rolling Stone has reported, Attorney General Pam Bondi is a former lobbyist for GEO Group, which also made a $500,000 donation to the Trump inaugural committee. A GEO subsidiary donated $1.3 million to a Super PAC that backed Trump's 2024 election. The BBB puts up nearly $25 billion for the Golden Dome. The satellite-based missile defense project builds off the branding of Israel's 'Iron Dome,' a ground-based defensive system that can intercept rockets and missiles launched from local militants or state actors like Iran. 'To the extent we match Iron Dome technology, we will be well protected from a missile attack from Canada or Mexico,' says Riedl of the Manhattan Institute, sarcastically. 'But not necessarily from Russia, North Korea or China.' In reality the Golden Dome appears to be Trump's revival of the Ronald Reagan era Strategic Defense Initiative, or SDI — a hugely expensive, largely ineffective space-based missile-defense system derided in the 1980s as 'Star Wars.' 'Ultimately this is $25 billion more for SDI' says Rieidl. 'This is a noble idea — but a lot of spending up until now hasn't brought a lot of success.' Trump envisions the BBB as a downpayment on a total investment of $175 million. The Golden Dome promises to be a golden goose for defense contractors. SpaceX, the rocket company founded by Trump's billionaire benefactor Elon Musk, who's currently feuding with Trump, is reportedly vying for a contract. So are the Peter Thiel-linked tech firm Palantir and longtime military-industrial heavyweights like Raytheon and Lockheed Martin. Including the Golden Dome, the Big Beautiful Bill increases America's Pentagon spending by a colossal $150 billion. 'This is a bill from the military-industrial complex advocates who are padding the military budget,' according to Paul, who has long criticized the Defense Department for failing to pass every audit to which it's been subjected. Budgets are moral documents. And metaphorically people often speak of the tradeoff between 'guns and butter' — or programs that defend the public and those that keep the public out of misery. The guns side of the Big Beautiful Bill is financed entirely by cuts to butter. The bill strips $128 billion in funding to the states for the SNAP food assistance program that keeps American families from going hungry. It also aims to avoid another $92 billion in spending by knocking people out of the program with red tape and work requirements, including for parents of argues that the Pentagon should be forced to achieve cost efficiencies before it receives any new federal dollars. 'One of DOGE's great failures was essentially ignoring the enormous waste and cost overruns inside the Pentagon. There is a reason the Defense Department cannot pass an audit. There is so much waste. It has significant cost overruns — particularly in government contracts and procurement — that absolutely must be addressed before we further increase defense spending,' says the Manhattan institute fellow. The House bill steers new money to more than a dozen weapons systems, including many dogged by cost overruns, construction delays, performance issues, and questions of combat capability. On the airplane side, this list includes: $4.5 billion for the B-21 Raider, the Air Force's newest long-range stealth bomber, which cost nearly $700 million per aircraft to produce. The two-person Northrup Gruman-built plane may be poorly suited to modern warfighting, where swarms of unmanned drones are becoming the dominant air threat. $3.2 billion for the Boeing-built F-15EX. The planes cost $90 million a pop, making them more expensive than the notoriously costly F-35A. Unlike that fighter, the F-15EX is not a stealth aircraft. And production has been snarled by manufacturing problems. A recent federal assessment put it bluntly: 'Boeing has experienced increased quality deficiencies.' Ships include: $4.6 billion for Virginia Class submarines. The nuclear submarine program has a reported cost overrun of $17 billion and has delivered boats massively behind schedule. The contractors are General Dynamics Electric Boat and Huntington Ingalls Industries. The Pentagon already has 23 of these submarines. $2.1 billion for San Antonio Class 'amphibious transport docks.' This ship was put on production pause in 2023 because of massive cost overruns. The boats are supposed to land Marines into onshore combat, but have been found by DOD testers to only be suitable 'in a benign environment' because the ship is 'not effective, suitable and not survivable in a combat situation.' Huntington Ingalls Industries is the contractor. The Pentagon already has 13 of these boats. More from Rolling Stone Donald Trump Is Destroying the Economy and Waging War on the Poor Trump Moves to Deploy National Guard to L.A. Over ICE Protests 'Dejected' Trump Says Relationship With Musk Is Over; Calls Him a 'Big-Time Drug Addict': Report Best of Rolling Stone The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence