Wrexham Kop to be new centrepiece of city gateway project
Councillors on the Employment, Business and Investment Scrutiny
Committee will review the updated masterplan for the Wrexham Gateway Project next Wednesday.
The latest version of the plan includes the recommendation to relocate the hotel, which was supposed to be built next to the STōK Cae Ras.
"The original intention was that the hotel, situated on the junction of Mold
Road and Crispin Lane, would be a landmark feature at this important
gateway to the city," according to the updated masterplan.
"With the evolution of the football stand into an iconic, internationally recognised building, there is little logic to hiding this behind
a new hotel.
"As such, the Wrexham Gateway Partnership, Wrexham County Borough Council and Wrexham AFC are currently in discussions as to whether a hotel is the best use for the site and if it may be better suited for another use."
The plan also reveals that there is a study underway into the realignment of Crispin Lane and the potential impact of that on traffic and pedestrian flows.
When councillors first approved the plans in 2022 they insisted on assurances that both the western and eastern side of the development would be completed.
The Wrexham Gateway project has scaled back its office space plans as the sector faces challenges caused by hybrid and home working. (Image: Wrexham County Borough Council)
The updated plan remains committed to the developing the eastern side of the gateway but due to land and funding issues it will now treat the east as one single development.
Discussions have begun with Wrexham Lager to move their brewery into the former Jewson warehouse in the eastern part of the development, although these talks are at an early stage.
Wrexham General train station car park will also move to the Jewson site.
Office space planned for the scheme has been reduced to 600 desks due to the commercial challenges facing the office space sector due to hybrid working and work from home.
Councillors will review the changes at committee on Wednesday, May 7.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
‘Spiteful' boss cut pregnant accountant's hours after she told him she had morning sickness
A 'spiteful' boss cut his pregnant employee's work hours after she told him she had morning sickness, and then fired her when her maternity leave was due to start, a tribunal has heard. Sadia Shakil had worked as an accountant and bookkeeper at the property development firm Samsons in Bedford since October 2020, and became pregnant early the following year. But after Ms Shakil phoned her boss Mohammed Saleem on 30 March 2021 to inform him that she was experiencing morning sickness due to her pregnancy, he then proceeded to tell her in an email the following day that he was cutting her working hours. In the email seen by the tribunal, Mr Saleem wrote: 'Considering that I am unable to give you extra work as I am abroad and in view that you are feeling unwell during your pregnancy it would be best if you only come into work for 2 days per week.' The tribunal ruled that this was a 'fundamental' breach of Ms Shakil's employment contract, which caused her to experience 'stress, anxiety and panic' while questioning how she and her husband would be able to afford essential items for their baby now that their main source of income had been unilaterally reduced. During this period, Ms Shakil suffered sleepless nights and panic attacks while being 'plagued by worrisome thoughts', including 'doubts about whether she had done the right thing to have a baby at all when she was not financially stable'. After informing her boss that she needed to resign, Ms Shakil managed to secure a second full-time job in May, but she continued to work at Samsons in her spare time in the hope she would be able to resume her full-time role at the firm after her maternity leave. In the months that followed, Mr Saleem ignored multiple emails from Ms Shakil about her upcoming maternity leave, 'which caused her further stress and worry', at a time when she also suffered complications, being admitted to hospital on two occasions. By the end of September, blood tests had revealed a potentially serious condition which Ms Shakil was told put her baby at risk of still birth, resulting in the hospital booking her in to have her baby induced on 17 October. Two days after Ms Shakil's final email on 27 September, informing Mr Saleem that her leave would now commence on 1 October, he finally responded – referring to a letter she had not received 'putting her role at risk of redundancy '. Ms Shakil was dismissed with effect from 1 October 2021, when she began maternity leave, the tribunal noted. After her son was born on 18 October, the family were forced to move back in with Ms Shakil's parents 'due to the financial pressure that [her] loss of employment and lack of maternity pay had created'. Ms Shakil's subsequent claim to the Department for Work and Pensions for maternity allowance was then rejected on the grounds that her employer was responsible for paying it. 'The claimant's early weeks and months with her new baby were marred by the need to devote time to trying to resolve her financial predicament and bringing the employment tribunal proceedings,' the tribunal found. After an initial tribunal in Birmingham in April 2023, Ms Shakil was awarded £5,000 in damages for maternity discrimination and Samsons ordered to pay her for income lost while on reduced hours. In an email sent in June 2023 in which he asked Ms Shakil to provide her bank details so that he could pay her the sum awarded by the tribunal, Mr Saleem wrote 'I hope that you have a wonderful time utilising the monies gained from me', adding that the loss of money 'will make no difference to me'. A further appeal hearing in March 2025 found that Ms Shakil 'was horrified' by the email – which she described as 'disturbing and 'nasty' – and 'was shocked that Mr Saleem could be so spiteful to her'. Ms Shakil's appeal that the sum awarded to her had been too low was accepted, and the judge ordered Samsons to pay her a total of £31,860. Finding it to be a 'serious case of discrimination', the tribunal found: 'The discrimination took place at a time in the claimant's life which she had hoped and planned would be exciting and happy – the pregnancy, birth and early life of her first child. 'Instead, she suffered physical and emotional symptoms of anxiety and distress. These included sleepless nights, panic attacks, intrusive anxious thoughts and tearfulness. There was evidence that the claimant's confidence and self-esteem were damaged by the discrimination. 'These symptoms persisted from the time she was told that her hours had been cut to two days per week, until her baby was born. The symptoms did not stop then, however, because of the claimants' ongoing financial struggles.' It added: 'The effects of the discriminatory dismissal were ongoing at the time of the hearing, four years later, because the claimant is still worried that she might have a similar experience with her new employer if she decides to have another baby.'
The Independent
3 days ago
- The Independent
Europe ends largely higher after US jobs report
European blue-chip stocks ended largely higher on Friday, growing in confidence after a stronger-than-expected US nonfarm payrolls reading. The FTSE 100 index rose 26.87 points, 0.3%, at 8,837.91. The FTSE 250 ended up 87.90 points, 0.4%, at 21,157.28, and the AIM All-Share climbed 2.42 points, 0.3%, at 756.88. For the week, the FTSE rose 0.8%, the FTSE 250 added 0.6%, and the AIM All-Share shot up 1.4%. In Paris, the CAC 40 rose 0.2%, while Frankfurt's DAX 40 ended 0.1% lower. The pound was quoted at 1.3522 US dollars late on Friday afternoon in London, lower compared to 1.3596 dollars at the equities close on Thursday. The euro stood at 1.1387 dollars, lower against 1.1456 dollars. Against the yen, the dollar jumped to 144.93 yen compared to 143.57 yen. The US economy added more jobs than expected last month, although the pace of hiring eased, numbers on Friday showed. According to the latest nonfarm payrolls from the Bureau of Labour Statistics, 139,000 more jobs were added to the US economy in May, topping the FXStreet-cited consensus of 130,000. The pace of job creation abated from 147,000 in April, a figure which was downwardly revised from 177,000. March's figure was revised down to 120,000 from 185,000. It means that in April and March combined, 95,000 fewer jobs were created than previously reported. The unemployment rate in May was 4.2%, in line with consensus and unmoved from April. The BLS said the jobless rate has been in a narrow range of 4.0% to 4.2% over the past year. Schroders analyst George Brown said: 'While it is premature to conclude the US economy will weather the tariff turmoil, the early signs remain encouraging, with a respectable 139,000 jobs created in May. Evidently there is a risk that the hit to confidence eventually leads to a sharp retrenchment. But we view this as unlikely given Donald Trump's first presidency demonstrated this is just part of his unconventional approach to deal-making. 'And while recent court rulings lower the risk of tariffs being raised to prohibitive rates, elevated inflation expectations will mean the Federal Reserve will be wary of falling behind the curve again. As such, our base case remains that the Fed will keep rates on hold for the rest of the year.' The yield on the US 10-year Treasury was quoted at 4.48%, stretching from 4.39% a day prior. The yield on the US 30-year Treasury was quoted at 4.94%, widening from 4.89%. In New York, the Dow Jones Industrial Average was up 0.8%, the S&P 500 climbed 0.9% and the Nasdaq Composite sat 1.1% higher at the time of the closing bell in London. Tesla shares perked up 5.9%, after a 14% slump on Thursday. Nonetheless, the spat between the electric carmaker's chief executive Elon Musk and US president Donald Trump continued. The White House squashed speculation that Mr Trump and Mr Musk would patch up their stunning public feud, saying the US president had no plans to call his billionaire former aide on Friday. Mr Trump lobbed fresh insults at the South African-born Mr Musk a day after the fiery implosion of their unlikely political marriage, saying the tech tycoon had 'lost his mind'. In a telling symbol of how their relationship had deteriorated, the president was even considering selling or giving away a Tesla he had bought to show support for Mr Musk amid protests against the company. On the move in London, banking shares helped support the FTSE 100. StanChart rose 2.9%, while Barclays added 1.9%. Defence stocks, which have enjoyed a strong week, returned some progress. BAE Systems shed 2.6%, snapping a five-day winning streak. Babcock lost 4.3%. Elsewhere, Dr Martens extended gains, adding another 8.7% after a more than 25% jump on Thursday. The boot maker had signalled a return to growth in the year ahead and a refreshed strategy on Thursday. Pinewood Technologies shot up 11%. The Birmingham-based provider of software to the automotive retailing sector said it has agreed to buy out a 51% stake in its joint venture, Pinewood North America, from Lithia UK for 76.5 million dollars in shares. Lithia UK is a wholly owned subsidiary of Oregon, US-based car dealer Lithia Motors. Pinewood said that it will enter a five-year contract with Lithia to roll out its software to all Lithia's current and future sites across the US and Canada by the end of 2028 at the latest. The company said it expects to generate around 40 million dollars in annual recurring revenue from Lithia in North America once its platform has been fully deployed. The biggest risers on the FTSE 100 were Standard Chartered, up 33.50 pence at 1,186.00p, 3i Group, up 115.00p at 4,265.00p, Hiscox, up 25.00p at 1,351.00p, Barclays, up 6.15p at 333.20p, and Aviva, up 11.20p at 626.80p. The biggest fallers on the FTSE 100 were Babcock International, down 48.00p at 1,057.00p, Anglo American, down 76.50p at 2,217p, Endeavour Mining, down 74.00p at 2,312.00p, Antofagasta, down 52.00p at 1,895.50p, and BAE Systems, down 51.50p at 1,930.50p. Brent oil rose to 66.21 dollars a barrel late in London on Friday afternoon, from 65.51 dollars late on Thursday. Gold was quoted lower at 3,330.06 dollars an ounce against 3,364.84 dollars. Monday's economic calendar has a Chinese consumer price inflation reading overnight. As the week progresses, there is UK unemployment data on Tuesday and a gross domestic product reading on Friday. Stateside, there is consumer price inflation data on Wednesday, before the producer price index on Thursday. Next week's UK corporate calendar has trading statements from housebuilder Bellway on Tuesday and grocer Tesco on Thursday.
BreakingNews.ie
3 days ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Businessman fired for 'old school' methods of meeting clients on golf course loses age discrimination claim
A sales representative who was fired for meeting clients on a golf course has lost his claim that he was discriminated against on age grounds because his employer described his business style as 'old school'. The Workplace Relations Commission heard that Paul Ward was dismissed for gross misconduct from his job as business development manager with oil distribution firm, Scotts Fuels (Ireland) Limited, on October 3rd 2024, after eight months in the role. Advertisement Mr Ward claimed the company had breached the Employment Equality Act 1998 by discriminating against him on the grounds of his age. The businessman gave evidence that his use of a golf course for meeting clients was described as an 'old school' approach which he regarded as 'dismissive and ageist.' He told the WRC that he had been headhunted by Scotts Fuels from his previous job where he had over 28 years of proven success in sales and client relationships Mr Ward said he was initially offered a salary of €70,000 which he declined but accepted a role when the offer was increased to €110,000. Advertisement He explained that a key factor in his decision to leave a stable and long-standing job to accept the new role was the promise of full autonomy in developing and implementing sales strategies. Mr Ward told the WRC that his work methods including informal meetings such as rounds of golf which he claimed had previously proven to be effective in fostering client trust and business development. The WRC heard that he was called to an unexpected disciplinary hearing in September 2024 when he discovered that a GPS tracker had been installed on his company vehicle. Mr Ward said the company, which did not attend the WRC hearing, accused him of misconduct on the basis of three instances where he was at a golf club. Advertisement Despite confirmation from clients that the meetings on the golf course were legitimate and business-related, Mr Ward said he was dismissed for gross misconduct on October 3rd, 2024. The complainant said the decision to fire him was excessive as his conduct warranted, at most, an informal warning if such meetings were no longer acceptable. Mr Ward said he believed the immediate jump to dismiss him made him suspect that the outcome was predetermined and possibly influenced by his age and more traditional, relationship-focused approach to sales. He also claimed the disciplinary process was flawed and riddled with procedural failings. Advertisement He said his question as to whether the vehicles of other employees were also monitored was ignored which reinforced his suspicion that he was the subject of targeted scrutiny. The WRC heard that a younger, less experienced colleague, who joined the company on the same day and who was likely to be on a lower salary, was retained. Entertainment 600 apply for the 16 places on Trinity acting cour... Read More Mr Ward said he felt his dismissal was not related to his performance but rooted in biased assumptions about his age and salary. WRC adjudication officer, Breiffni O'Neill said the complainant's case was based on his belief that his dismissal was influenced by age-based discrimination because of the reference to his 'old school' approach to business. However, Mr O'Neill said the expression was widely recognised in its common usage as referring to 'traditional, longstanding, or previously standard practices.' Advertisement The WRC official said it was not inherently age-specific and might be applied to individuals of any age who engage in conventional methods. 'It is generally interpreted as indicative of a way of operating rather than a reference to a person's age,' observed Mr O'Neill Dismissing the claim, he ruled that the use of the phrase did not constitute prima facie evidence of age discrimination.
