logo
House committee subpoenas Pfizer executive in probe of alleged Covid vaccine delay

House committee subpoenas Pfizer executive in probe of alleged Covid vaccine delay

CNN30-06-2025
The House Judiciary Committee has subpoenaed a former Pfizer executive who is considered central to its investigation into an allegation that clinical testing related to the development of the company's Covid-19 vaccine was purposefully delayed until after the 2020 presidential election, according to documents obtained by CNN Monday.
The demand for documents and a deposition from Dr. Philip Dormitzer, first obtained by CNN, comes after the committee says Dormitzer has failed to comply with requests to appear voluntarily and turn over records.
Dormitzer is a key figure in the legislative probe. The committee has alleged that it had information the former Pfizer executive, after going to work for British drugmaker GSK, told his colleagues that Pfizer had delayed announcing its Covid vaccine was effective until after the election. The Wall Street Journal reported that GSK brought those claims to federal prosecutors in Manhattan.
But Dormitzer disputed that there had been any delay in seeking approval for the vaccine. He told the newspaper, 'My Pfizer colleagues and I did everything we could to get the FDA's Emergency Use Authorization at the very first possible moment,' and that 'any other interpretation of my comments about the pace of the vaccine's development would be incorrect.'
CNN reached out to Dormitzer and his representative for comment. In issuing him a subpoena, the Judiciary Committee noted his importance to the probe.
'Based on the information we have obtained to date, the Committee believes your testimony is critical for our oversight,' the letter said.
Pfizer's announcement about the effectiveness of its Covid-19 vaccine came nearly a week after Election Day, but Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla has said the timing had nothing to do with politics. In an interview with CNN Chief Medical Correspondent Sanjay Gupta after the election in 2020, Bourla threw cold water on the idea that there was any political motivation behind releasing the news after voters in the United States chose their candidate for president. GSK is a rival drugmaker.
The committee has said it received information from GSK about Dormitzer's November 2024 interactions with a GSK human resources representative. The committee highlighted information GSK provided, but CNN has not reviewed the full GSK letter. CNN has reached out to the committee to request the letter.
'As the human resources representative recalls, in their meeting, Dr. Dormitzer was visibly upset; he requested that he be relocated to Canada due to concerns that he could be investigated by the incoming Trump Administration over his role in developing Pfizer's COVID-19 vaccine,' GSK said, according to a letter from House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan.
'According to the human resources representative, when asked what prompted his request, Dr. Dormitzer made a comment to the effect of: 'Let's just say it wasn't a coincidence, the timing of the vaccine',' the letter adds.
Jordan also quoted GSK's claim that Dormitzer told his former colleagues at the company 'in late 2020, the three most senior people in Pfizer R&D were involved in a decision to deliberately slow down clinical testing so that it would not be complete prior to the results of the presidential election that year.'
The committee has also sought information from Pfizer directly, but has not issued the company a subpoena.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Why would Trump and Intel want to work together: Opening Bid top takeaway
Why would Trump and Intel want to work together: Opening Bid top takeaway

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Why would Trump and Intel want to work together: Opening Bid top takeaway

Investors are in wait-and-see mode. Fed watchers have had quite a week, getting a hot Producer Price Index, a tame Consumer Price Index, and solid retail sales data out today. As it stands, markets are still betting on that September rate cut from the Jerome Powell-led Federal Reserve. There have been a few earnings stumbles in CoreWeave (CRWV), Applied Materials (AMAT), and Cava (CAVA), but a few bright spots from the likes of Cisco (CSCO). The Bullish (BLSH) IPO saw an enthusiastic response. And now markets cast their gaze to the highly anticipated meeting today between President Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin. The outcome of this meeting could have a host of surprises that bullish investors haven't even thought about! Stock analysis: Intel The Trump administration is reportedly in talks to have the US government take a stake in Intel (INTC). An Intel spokesperson didn't comment directly on this to me, but offered this: "Intel is deeply committed to supporting President Trump's efforts to strengthen U.S. technology and manufacturing leadership. We look forward to continuing our work with the Trump Administration to advance these shared priorities, but we are not going to comment on rumors or speculation.' The questions here are numerous. Why would the administration even want a stake in an Intel that is far behind chief rivals Nvidia (NVDA) and Advanced Micro Devices (AMD)? I encourage Trump to compare Nvidia's earnings report on Aug. 27 to the last disaster from Intel a few weeks ago. The president isn't known to hitch his ride to losers. Intel has been a loser and may stay that way in the chip game for some time. Then again, why would Intel want to get in bed with the government when embattled CEO Lip-Bu Tan and the board must act quickly to reorganize the company? I find it hard to believe the government will be a quiet minority shareholder! Intel has billions in cash and doesn't need the money that comes with terms from any government deal. There is a lot at stake here, as Intel should be a beacon of US chip-making, not the punching bag in tech circles. The company's financials have taken a major hit, with sales down for more than three straight years and earnings evaporating in the process. "[A stake would] be a big step for Intel, but right now Intel is on a horse and buggy compared to the Godfather of AI Jensen [Huang] and Nvidia," Wedbush tech analyst Dan Ives told me. Roundtable analysis: More tech When a Wall Street analyst who has been a bear on a stock for a while suddenly issues an upgrade, it always catches my attention. Today, we have that situation on Salesforce (CRM). DA Davidson analyst Gil Luria lifted his rating on Salesforce to Neutral from Underperform. Luria said investor sentiment has declined sharply on Salesforce in recent months as questions mount around the company's acquisition strategy and near-term margins. But what may not be factored into the stock is new activist investor activity, Luria said. Luria pointed out that noted activist investor Starboard Value — led by Jeff Smith — increased its stake in Salesforce by 47% this quarter, according to new 13F filings. Starboard pushed for big changes at Salesforce three years ago, which ultimately led to a new focus on margin expansion by CEO and co-founder Marc Benioff. Luria said, "We believe this is a signal there will be another round of investor activism and increased pressure on management to refocus on growth of the core business, additional margin expansion and hold off on dilutive M&A." Meanwhile, Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway sold 20 million shares of Apple (AAPL) during the period, according to a new 13F filing. Berkshire's Apple holdings remain its largest equity stake by market value, despite dropping by about $9.2 billion in the second quarter. Is Buffett signaling he is concerned about Apple's tariff exposure? Perhaps. After all, Apple did warn tariffs would hit its profits by $1.1 billion in the current quarter. Brian Sozzi is Yahoo Finance's Executive Editor and a member of Yahoo Finance's editorial leadership team. Follow Sozzi on X @BrianSozzi, Instagram, and LinkedIn. Tips on stories? Email Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Over two-thirds of Vermonters disapprove of Trump, the most of any state: See recent polls
Over two-thirds of Vermonters disapprove of Trump, the most of any state: See recent polls

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Over two-thirds of Vermonters disapprove of Trump, the most of any state: See recent polls

Out of all 50 states, President Donald Trump is the least popular in Vermont, a new poll reveals. According to an Aug. 12 update from Morning Consult, which gathers polls over the course of three months to get a look at state-level data among registered voters, Trump has the lowest approval rating in the country in Vermont. There, he has a net approval rating of -32, with 64% disapproving of his job performance. This aligns with polls taken earlier this year, too: a University of New Hampshire Survey Center poll conducted in June found Trump's net approval in Vermont at -41. Trump isn't popular in any of the New England states: the poll found Massachusetts was tied with Maryland for the second lowest net approval nationally with -26. Trump saw his highest approval in New England in Maine: -14. What is Trump's approval rating in New England? According to Morning Consult, this is Trump's net approval rating in each New England state: Connecticut: -19 Maine: -14 Massachusetts: -26 New Hampshire: -16 Rhode Island: -21 Vermont: -32 Where is Trump the most popular? Trump's approval rating is above water in 27 states, according to Morning Consult. The poll found him to be most popular in Wyoming, where 66% of voters approve of his job performance. What is Trump's approval rating overall? An average of recent polls from the New York Times shows that Trump's approval rating as of Aug. 14 is 44%, with 53% disapproving of his performance. This average has remained largely steady over the past month, but some individual polls have shown his support dropping to near-record lows as voters seem frustrated with Trump's August tariffs and his sweeping budget bill passed in early July. What is Trump's current presidential approval rating?Disapprove +22 (38% approve, 60% disapprove) Poll taken Aug. 4-10 3,505 registered votersDisapprove +12 (42% approve, 54% disapprove) Poll taken Aug. 9-11 1,635 adults Hart Research Associates/Public Opinion Strategies Disapprove +5 (46% approve, 51% disapprove) Poll taken July 29 – Aug. 3 1,000 adultsDisapprove +16 (40% approve, 56% disapprove) Poll taken July 25-27 1,023 adults1,400 registered voters Disapprove +1 (46% approve, 47% disapprove) Poll taken July 21-22 Contributing: Kinsey Crowley This article originally appeared on Burlington Free Press: Trump's approval rating is lowest in Vermont, poll says

A Nuclear Energy Stock Worth Watching
A Nuclear Energy Stock Worth Watching

Yahoo

time17 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

A Nuclear Energy Stock Worth Watching

Key Points Nuclear energy is clean, and gaining in popularity. Constellation Energy has agreements with Microsoft and Meta Platforms. 10 stocks we like better than Constellation Energy › The Trump administration has plans to put a nuclear reactor on the moon by 2030. It's far from clear if that will actually happen in just five years -- or ever. But back on Earth, nuclear power is enjoying a renaissance that should cause investors to look twice. The global quest to refocus on nuclear energy is being driven by several distinct factors. The world needs more (clean) power First, worldwide demand for power is projected to soar in coming years -- as much as 18% by 2050, according to McKinsey -- due to the emergence of power-hungry data centers and artificial intelligence projects, as well as the adoption of electric vehicles and the ongoing electrification of emerging market countries, among other factors. Goldman Sachs estimates power consumption from AI data centers alone will rise 50% by 2027 and 165% by the end of this decade. Recall Microsoft's 2024 deal to power data centers by restarting one of the reactors at Three Mile Island that was shut down for economic reasons in 2019 (I'll get to the owner of that plant in just a moment). In addition, countries are scrambling for power sources that don't worsen global warming, and nuclear energy is among the lowest carbon-emitting energy sources available. Finally, nuclear has undergone a technological revolution in recent years with the emergence of so-called small modular reactors that are more easily and rapidly constructed and transported. They're also much less financially risky to build. For all of those reasons, opposition to nuclear has mostly evaporated among important gatekeepers like the World Bank and the European Union that were once, well, lukewarm to the prospect of more plants. And some countries are going all in. This past May, President Trump announced four executive orders designed to reinvigorate America's nuclear energy industry. The real proof of nuclear's rebirth, however, is in the rush to build new plants. There are roughly 70 nuclear facilities under construction across the world, according to the World Nuclear Association. And world nuclear capacity is projected to increase by 2.5 times by 2050, says the International Atomic Energy Agency. Constellation is signing agreements The biggest nuclear provider in the U.S. -- by a long shot -- is Constellation Energy (NASDAQ: CEG), a Baltimore-based power utility. The company generates power through hydro, wind, natural gas and solar facilities, but its biggest source is nuclear, which accounts for about 86% of its output. It currently operates 21 nuclear reactors at 16 facilities (there are 54 total commercial nuclear plants in the U.S. at present). Constellation is projected to produce 95% of its energy carbon free by 2030 and 100% a decade later. Constellation owns the Pennsylvania nuclear plant formerly known as Three Mile Island -- the one that will power Microsoft data centers and is now called Crane Clean Energy Center. A bit of context and history: The 20-year agreement with Microsoft paved the way to restart Three Mile Island Unit 1, which "operated at industry-leading levels of safety and reliability for decades before being shut down for economic reasons" in 2019, according to Constellation. In 1979, there was a partial nuclear meltdown of the Unit 2 reactor at the Three Mile Island facility. "This was the most serious accident in U.S. commercial nuclear power plant operating history, although its small radioactive releases had no detectable health effects on plant workers or the public," according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Unit 2 is permanently shut down. Constellation also recently agreed to provide 20 years of power from an Illinois nuclear plant to support the data centers of Facebook parent Meta Platforms. The stock is worth a look Constellation reported second-quarter results last week and both earnings and revenue beat Wall Street's expectations. Earnings of $1.91 per share were 13% higher than a year ago. Revenue jumped 11.4% to $6.1 billion. The power company also announced a 94% capacity rate for its reactors -- the amount of time they operate at maximum power output -- which is among the highest in the industry. And management is determined to support the stock. It just repurchased $400 million worth of shares. The stock is up 46% year to date as of market close on Thursday and 75% over the past 52 weeks. Constellation's market cap is about $106 billion and its price-to-earnings ratio is around 34. Yes, that P/E ratio is a bit high for a power utility. But consider what you're getting as an investor: a power company that has basically transcended its category. Constellation is increasingly viewed not as a boring utility, but instead as an AI-adjacent stock because of its deals to provide clean nuclear energy to AI-centric companies like those in the "Magnificent Seven." Nuclear energy is hotter than ever, and now is the time to own a piece of it. Constellation Energy is worth a look. Should you invest $1,000 in Constellation Energy right now? Before you buy stock in Constellation Energy, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Constellation Energy wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Matthew Benjamin has no position in the stocks mentioned in this article. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Constellation Energy, Goldman Sachs Group, Meta Platforms, and Microsoft. The Motley Fool recommends the following options: long January 2026 $395 calls on Microsoft and short January 2026 $405 calls on Microsoft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. A Nuclear Energy Stock Worth Watching was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store