logo
The BBC is spouting gender nonsense again with its new trans drama. When will it learn?

The BBC is spouting gender nonsense again with its new trans drama. When will it learn?

Telegraph2 days ago

An adult man does not know what it feels like to be a girl. But that didn't stop transgender writer Paris Lees telling us in his 2021 memoir.
Of course, with What It Feels Like for a Girl, Lees is entitled to choose whatever book title he likes, particularly if he wants to also riff off a Madonna song.
But now that the memoir has been made into a BBC television series of the same name, what it feels like for licence fee payers is another matter. Because, for a very long time, the BBC has run roughshod over the feelings of those not enamoured with the trans cult.
Lees was promoted by the BBC early on, via appearances on Question Time. He also wrote columns for Vice and even Vogue. (Lees uses the pronouns she/her, but, for the purposes of this column, I'm using he/him.)
You can see why he appealed: he'd had extensive facial feminisation surgery, was witty, and was, as was the fashion, 'feisty'. I objected to some of the things he said he now enjoyed, as a woman – such as being taken shopping and being cat-called. We exchanged friendly emails at one point, and then I forgot about him.
Until this week, that is – on the eve of his new TV series. Lees is commonly referred to as a 'Doll'. This is an old slang term for biological men who 'pass' as women (dim celebrities wear 'Protect the Dolls' t-shirts in support of them). Trans people who don't 'pass' as women are called 'bricks'.
It's not very kind, but there you are. In propelling Lees back into the spotlight, the BBC is pushing the notion of trans identity as fun and 'culturally significant'. It's also subtly sanctioning the darker side of Lees's history.
On his 14th birthday, Lees went into a public toilet with a man. Even now, Lees describes himself at that time as a rent boy (though acknowledges he was also a victim of abuse). At the age of 18, he was convicted of robbery with violence for an attack on an elderly man and sent to prison. The man was severely beaten. It was there that he began to identify as a trans woman
Yet none of this violent history seems to have bothered the BBC. Instead, it's tying itself in knots over what pronouns it should use to describe Lees. In the episode guide, it uses they/them to describe him when he was a biological boy (and known by his former first name, Byron). Then Byron becomes she/her when he self-IDs as a woman.
This storyline of What It Feels Like for a Girl is also one of gay conversion, which is in itself questionable when conflated with trans conversion. An adult man can certainly know what it feels like to be a boy who is bullied for being gay and effeminate. But as Maya Forstater, of the campaign group Sex Matters, says: 'Presenting the idea of an effeminate boy 'becoming a girl' as an edgy coming-of-age story is presenting delusion as self-discovery. This series will promote a regressive, dangerous, impossible and fundamentally homophobic dream to another generation of gay young men.'
The homophobia within the trans cult is why so many principled gay men have become allies of women like me. We want to say to boys that they can be effeminate, and girls can be butch, and none of them needs to alter their bodies. (In the new series, Lees himself is played by a male, not a trans, actor, which has of course upset some.)
The Supreme Court ruling that said biological sex is real should have been a wake-up call to the BBC. Instead, it has left the BBC and many other cultural institutions reeling, because to question gender ideology in the arts world is to be ostracised and often fired. Far from being dissidents, the arts have bent the knee to trans orthodoxy to a sickening degree.
Since the ruling, we have seen programmes like Radio 4's Woman's Hour struggle to get on board with reality. They have pandered to men who have transitioned, but are hostile and incredulous when faced with the likes of Helen Joyce, the incredibly articulate gender-critical activist who has been snubbed by our national broadcaster.
We constantly have to read on BBC websites about 'women' who have committed rape. Male sports cheats are referred to as women. We have had a decade of this. I cannot call it brainwashing, because anyone with a brain can see it doesn't wash at all. On every salient point, from puberty blockers to single-sex spaces, the pushback has been real and righteous. The culture has to catch up.
Even if Lee's TV series was commissioned some time ago, there has to be an acknowledgement that times have changed. For example, who would now make the ITV series Butterfly, broadcast in 2018, about an 11-year-old boy who believes he is in the wrong body and then gets puberty blockers? The consultant on that series was Susie Green. She was then head of the controversial trans youth charity Mermaids, but is mostly known for taking her son to Thailand for 'sex reassignment surgery' on his 16th birthday.
Lees is hardly new to this game, nor a media outcast. Cath Leng, a former BBC journalist, wrote recently about a meeting in 2013 between Steve Herrmann, who was in charge of BBC Online and the BBC News style guide at the time, and two trans activists. One of them was Paris Lees. They told Hermann that the BBC should use trans people's 'preferred pronouns'… and thus self-ID was installed at the heart of our national broadcaster. Were the public ever consulted?
What it feels like for a girl? What it feels like for this woman is that the BBC takes our money but ignores our views.
What it feels like is being bullied for knowing that womanhood cannot be purchased, however many fairy tales you tell.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

4 safe places should World War Three start
4 safe places should World War Three start

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

4 safe places should World War Three start

British Army Chief, General Sir Patrick Sanders (pictured), recently warned the UK to train and equip a 'citizen army' to ready the country for a potential land war. The Chief of General Staff said Britain's army is 'too small' and urged ministers to 'mobilise the nation' in preparation for a wider conflict against Russia amid the invasion of Ukraine . More recently tensions heightened between the United States and Iran, after a drone attack killed three American soldiers. With Russia and China warning the US against a 'cycle of retaliation' after Joe Biden threatened to target their ally, MailOnline takes a look at the five places on Earth that could be safe in the event of World War III. Wood Norton, Worcestershire. With only a small radio mast and a security barrier in sight, you would perhaps miss the huge network of tunnels running deep into the Worcestershire forest. Originally bought by the BBC at the beginning of World War II, the bunker's initial purpose was to be a hidden base for the broadcaster in the event a crisis in London. According to GloucestershireLive, Wood Norton is used as a training base for sound engineers and technical staff at the broadcasting company. The bunker also has a mast which would continue broadcasting messages from the BBC if the UK were ever to go into crisis mode. Also referred to as PAWN, Protected Area Wood Norton, the site is hidden deep in the Worcestershire hillside, boasting several storeys of architecture underground. The broadcaster outlined in documents released, also known as the War Book, in 2016 that the base would be utilised in the event of a grave attack on the UK. The facility is reportedly able to house up 90 BBC staff - including 12 news editors and sub-editors - and also boasts a ping-pong table. Raven Rock Mountain Complex, Pennsylvania. The Raven Rock Mountain Complex has maintained an air of mystique ever since they began building the facility in 1948. Dubbed 'Harry's Hole' after President Truman, who gave the project the go-ahead, the Pennsylvanian facility first opened its doors in 1953. Raven's Rock was constructed with the intention of being a 'centrepiece of a large emergency hub' according to Garret Graff, author of Raven Rock: The Story of the U.S. Government's Secret Plan to Save Itself - While The Rest Of Us Die. Boasting 100,000 feet of office space, the bunker could facilitate up to 1,400 people. The base also has two 1,000 foot-long tunnels as well as 34-ton blast doors to help reduce the impact of a possible bomb attack. Even though the site was placed into standby mode by President George H.W. Bush in 1991, $652 million worth of upgrades were pumped into the site following 9/11. According to Graff, the underground city was kitted out with 27 new fuel tanks in 2012, with both having the ability to carry 20,000 gallons. Presently, the bunker is thought to have a whopping 900,000 square feet of office space, as well as the capacity for between 3,000 to 5.000 government employees. Family members would not be permitted to reside in the base. He said: 'Families would have been prohibited from Raven Rock — as they would have been from effectively all of the Doomsday bunkers. Athough in recent years as the veil of complete secrecy has lifted, family members of Raven Rock personnel are allowed to visit it for specific ceremonies. So at the very least, family members today can picture where their relatives will spend Doomsday, even as they're barred outside.' Peters Mountain, Virginia. Peters Mountain, situated in the vast Appalachian Mountains of Virginia has been there for some time, functioning as an AT&T communications station. When you spot the sight you can even see an AT&T logo painted on a helicopter landing pad. It serves as one of several secret centres also known as AT&T project offices, according to The New York Post. These facilities are essential for the US government's continuity planning. The centre tucked away in Appalachia has the ability to house a few hundred people. According to Graff, the bunker has received renovations costing $67 million in recent years. He stated that an attack on Washington were to occur, it would potentially be used as a relocation site for intelligence agencies. Cheyenne Mountain Complex - NORAD. Although Peters Mountain and Raven Rock were kept under wraps from the public, one bunker has always been public since its inception. Cheyenne Mountain Complex, which is located in El Paso County, Colorado, is a defense bunker for the United States Space Force. Better known as the headquarters for NORAD, (North American Aerospace Defense Command), the site was constructed in the 1950 in response to Cold War paranoia. The five chambers within the extraordinary bunker all have reservoirs for fuel and water - and in one section they reportedly even have an underground lake. Almost $40 million was invested into the facility in order to kit it out with the best technology, including 15 console displays and three room-sized Philco 212 computers. In the midst of a crisis, the Cheyenne Mountain Complex can hold up to 1,000 people a month. The facility, which costs an eye-watering $250-million a year to run, was on the brink of closure prior to 9/11. Although it was briefly put on standby mode in 2006, the Obama administration opted to breath a new lease of life into the base.

Meghan Markle posts cringey video of her and Prince Harry dancing in a hospital room ahead of Lilibet's birth - in celebration of her birthday
Meghan Markle posts cringey video of her and Prince Harry dancing in a hospital room ahead of Lilibet's birth - in celebration of her birthday

Daily Mail​

time25 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

Meghan Markle posts cringey video of her and Prince Harry dancing in a hospital room ahead of Lilibet's birth - in celebration of her birthday

Meghan Markle has posted a cringey video of her and Prince Harry dancing in a hospital room ahead of Lilibet's birth. The Duchess of Sussex shared the clip on her Instagram to mark her daughter's fourth birthday. One of the pictures showed the Duke of Sussex holding Lilibet's hand as they walked along a sandy road barefoot in the sunshine, while he held his shoes and a cap. The other image was of Harry holding Lilibet as a baby while they looked at each other. Meghan wrote in a post accompanying the pictures: 'The sweetest bond to watch unfold. Daddy's little girl and favorite adventurer. Happy birthday Lili!' The post was made at 7.40am California time (3.40pm UK), just under eight hours after Meghan earlier posted two other intimate family photos of her with Lilibet. In that post, the Duchess shared a black-and-white snap of herself cuddling Lili, who was sat on her lap, with the pair both sporting windswept hair, seemingly on a boat. The second image in the first post showed Meghan tenderly cradling newborn Lilibet as she enjoyed skin-to-skin time with the new addition to her family in 2021. Meghan wrote in the first post: 'Happy birthday to our beautiful girl! Four years ago today she came into our lives - and each day is brighter and better because of it. 'Thanks to all of those sending love and celebrating her special day!' The duchess usually only shares photos of her daughter pictured from behind to protect her privacy. But in the more recent photo, Lili's eyes and the top half of her face could be seen, with her nose and mouth and the rest of her face covered by Meghan's arms as she hugged the princess. Lili - the Duke and Duchess of Sussex's youngest child - was born on June 4 2021 and was named Lilibet Diana Mountbatten-Windsor. She only became entitled to be a princess when her grandfather the King acceded to the throne, because of rules set out by King George V in 1917. Harry and Meghan started using prince and princess for Archie and Lili after the princess's christening in 2023, following correspondence with Charles about the matter. Yesterday, Meghan expressed her dream of launching a future business with Lili as she chatted to Beyonce's mother Tina Knowles on her podcast. 'I wonder if one day I'll be in business with Lili and we'll be building something,' the duchess said, with Knowles adding: 'That's the best.' Last week, the Duchess shared a clip of her and her daughter beekeeping in matching protective suits, writing: 'Harvesting honey with my little honey. (Like mother, like daughter; she's even wearing my gloves).' Lilibet is named after her great-grandmother Queen Elizabeth II. Princess Elizabeth had difficultly pronouncing her own name as a toddler and her grandfather George V would affectionately call her Lilibet, imitating her own attempts to say Elizabeth. The sweet nickname stuck and she became known as Lilibet to her family from then on. But the late Queen was reportedly 'as angry as I'd ever seen her ' after Harry and Meghan claimed they had her blessing to use the name for their daughter Lilibet, a royal aide said. Royal author Robert Hardman, in his biography of the King, told how a member of staff recounted Elizabeth II's fury following Harry and Meghan's announcement in 2021 over the use of her childhood family nickname. Meghan shared a picture with Archie and Lilibet to mark Mother's Day in the US on May 11 The BBC later reported a Palace source said the Queen was not asked by the Sussexes whether they could use Lilibet. But the Sussexes' lawyers fired off legal letters to the broadcaster and other publishers, saying the claim was false and defamatory. A spokesperson for Harry and Meghan insisted at the time that the duke spoke to his grandmother in advance and would not have used the name had the monarch not been supportive. Hardman wrote however: 'One privately recalled that Elizabeth II had been 'as angry as I'd ever seen her' in 2021 after the Sussexes announced that she had given them her blessing to call their baby daughter 'Lilibet', the Queen's childhood nickname.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store