logo
Explainer: How close is Iran to having nuclear weapons?

Explainer: How close is Iran to having nuclear weapons?

Straits Times6 hours ago

Iranian flag, atom symbol and words \"Nuclear program\" are in this illustration taken June 16, 2025. REUTERS/Dado Ruvic/Illustration
VIENNA - Israel has carried out attacks on Iran's nuclear facilities, alleging Tehran was getting close to obtaining a nuclear weapon.
Below is a summary of what is known on the subject:
HOW DID ISRAEL EXPLAIN ITS ATTACK?
In a statement on Friday, when the attacks were launched, the Israel Defence Forces said they were revealing for the first time Iran's secret and accelerating plan for the development of a nuclear weapon that could threaten Israel.
Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had been making similar accusations for years, even once presenting a cartoon of a bomb at the U.N. in 2012.
Israel has not, however, produced proof that Iran is as close as it now alleges.
The U.N. nuclear watchdog, which carries out inspections in Iran, has said that while it cannot guarantee Iran's nuclear programme is entirely peaceful, it has "no credible indication" of an active, coordinated weapons programme either.
HOW DID WE GET HERE?
As its 2015 nuclear deal with major powers has eroded over the years, Iran expanded and accelerated its nuclear programme, shortening the time it would need to build a nuclear bomb if it chose to - though it denies wanting to.
The 2015 deal introduced strict limits on Iran's atomic activities in exchange for the lifting of sanctions. It slashed Iran's stock of enriched uranium, leaving it only with a small amount enriched to up to 3.67% purity, far from the roughly 90% purity that is weapons grade.
The United States said at the time that a main aim was to increase the time Iran would need to produce enough fissile material for a nuclear bomb - the biggest single hurdle in a weapons programme - to at least a year.
In 2018, during his first term, President Donald Trump pulled the United States out of the deal, reimposing sanctions on Tehran that slashed its oil sales and battered its economy. In 2019, Iran started breaching the restrictions on its nuclear activities and then pushed far beyond them.
It went on to breach all the deal's key restrictions, including on where, with what machines and to what level it can enrich uranium, and how much material it can amass.
Its stock of enriched uranium, which was capped at 202.8 kg under the deal, was estimated at 9.2 tonnes in May, according to the latest quarterly International Atomic Energy Agency report.
HOW FAR HAS IRAN GOT?
The exact status of various Iranian nuclear facilities and material since Israel's strikes is unclear.
At least until Israel's attacks, Iran was enriching uranium to up to 60% purity and had enough material at that level for nine nuclear weapons if enriched further, according to a theoretical IAEA yardstick.
That means Iran's so-called "breakout time" - the time it would need to produce enough weapons-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb - was close to zero, likely a matter of days or little more than a week, analysts say.
Iran had three operating enrichment facilities: an above-ground plant and a larger, underground one at its Natanz complex and another buried inside a mountain at Fordow.
Only Fordow appears to have been spared damage, the IAEA has said. The above-ground plant has been destroyed and the underground one at Natanz has likely had its uranium-enriching centrifuges badly damaged or destroyed, IAEA chief Rafael Grossi has said.
That will have lengthened its breakout time at least somewhat because far fewer centrifuges if any are operating. The status of its stock of enriched uranium is also unclear.
HOW FAST COULD IRAN SPRINT TO A BOMB?
Aside from uranium enrichment, there is the question of how long it would take Iran to produce the rest of a nuclear weapon and possibly make it small enough to put in a delivery system like a ballistic missile, should it choose to. This is much harder to estimate as it is less clear how much knowledge Iran has.
Estimates of how long Iran would need for weaponisation generally vary between months and about a year.
"Certainly it was not for tomorrow... I don't think it was a matter of years," Grossi told CNN on Tuesday when asked how long it would have taken Iran to produce a bomb.
AND WOULD IT?
U.S. intelligence agencies and the IAEA believe Iran had a coordinated nuclear weapons programme that it halted in 2003. It worked on aspects of weaponisation and some work continued until as late as 2009, the IAEA found in a 2015 report. Grossi said this month its latest findings still broadly fit with that.
Iran denies ever having a nuclear weapons programme, though Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei has said that if it wanted to world leaders "wouldn't be able to stop us".
The IAEA has said it has concerns about statements by former senior officials about Iran's ability to make a bomb.
Diplomats said those statements included a television interview by Iran's former nuclear chief Ali Akbar Salehi in which he likened producing a nuclear weapon to building a car, saying Iran knew how to make all the parts needed.
As a result of Iran ceasing to implement elements of the 2015 deal, the IAEA can no longer fully monitor Iran's production and inventory of centrifuges and it can no longer conduct snap inspections. That has prompted speculation about whether Iran could have set up a secret enrichment site, but there are no concrete indications of one. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Bolsonaro was main beneficiary in illegal surveillance scheme, Brazil police allege
Bolsonaro was main beneficiary in illegal surveillance scheme, Brazil police allege

Straits Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Straits Times

Bolsonaro was main beneficiary in illegal surveillance scheme, Brazil police allege

Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro attends Brazil's Supreme Court trial over an alleged coup attempt, in Brasilia, Brazil June 9, 2025. REUTERS/Diego Herculano/File Photo BRASILIA - Former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro allegedly helped orchestrate an illegal surveillance scheme by intelligence agency ABIN to target his political enemies during his term, a federal police report showed on Wednesday. The report, which was released by the Supreme Court, said the group used ABIN to spy on and attack political foes and state institutions and to disseminate fake news. The findings, based on testimony, documents from search operations and other evidence, identified Bolsonaro as the "main beneficiary" from the surveillance. Bolsonaro's lawyer, Celso Vilardi, said he had not yet reviewed the police report and could not comment. Despite implicating Bolsonaro, police did not formally accuse him in the report, which did accuse more than 30 other individuals. Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes said he made the findings public after leaks led to conflicting media reports on the matter on Tuesday. Police noted potential links between the ABIN probe and an investigation into an alleged coup attempt, in which Bolsonaro is already a defendant. The decision on whether to charge Bolsonaro in the surveillance case has been left to Brazil's Prosecutor General's Office. Among those formally accused was Carlos Bolsonaro, the former president's son and a Rio de Janeiro city councilor, who police alleged was part of the criminal organization. The younger Bolsonaro has denied wrongdoing, stating on Tuesday that the investigation aimed to harm him ahead of next year's elections. Alexandre Ramagem, the former head of ABIN under Bolsonaro's administration, and Luiz Fernando Correa, the current head of the agency, were also among the people formally accused by police, the report showed. Ramagem was accused of being part of a criminal organization and using ABIN to illegal ends, while Correa is suspected of obstructing the police investigation into the agency, police said. Ramagem could not be reached for comment on Wednesday, but said in a post on X on Tuesday that he would analyze the accusations once he had access to the police report. ABIN did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Wednesday. It had declined to comment on Tuesday. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

Putin cautions Germany over any Taurus missile supplies to Ukraine
Putin cautions Germany over any Taurus missile supplies to Ukraine

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

Putin cautions Germany over any Taurus missile supplies to Ukraine

Russian President Vladimir Putin attends a meeting with President of the New Development Bank Dilma Rousseff on the sidelines of the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum (SPIEF) at the Constantine Palace in Strelna in the suburb of Saint Petersburg, Russia June 18, 2025. Sputnik/Alexei Danichev/Pool via REUTERS ATTENTION EDITORS - THIS IMAGE WAS PROVIDED BY A THIRD PARTY. ST PETERSBURG, Russia - Russian President Vladimir Putin on Thursday cautioned Germany that Moscow would consider it to be directly involved in the war in Ukraine if Berlin supplied Kyiv with Taurus cruise missiles, but said he was ready to speak to Chancellor Friedrich Merz. German Defence Minister Boris Pistorius said earlier this month that Germany is not considering delivering Taurus cruise missiles, which have a range in excess of 300 miles (480 km), to Ukraine despite Kyiv's repeated requests. Putin said that to fire the Taurus missiles, Ukraine would need Western satellite intelligence and German officers to take care of targeting which, if they were fired at Russia, would mean German officers striking Russian territory. "What is this, if not the involvement of the Federal Republic in a direct armed conflict with the Russian Federation? It can't be called anything else," Putin told senior news agency editors in the northern Russian city of St Petersburg. Putin added that even if Germany did supply the missiles, it would have no impact on the ultimate course of the war, adding that Russian troops were advancing in all directions. Asked if he was willing to speak to Merz, Putin, a fluent German speaker who served as a KGB spy in former East Germany, said he was ready to. "If the Federal Chancellor wants to call and talk, I have already said this many times - we do not refuse any contacts. And we are always open to this," Putin said. Putin added, though, that he did not consider that Germany was a neutral mediator when it came to the war in Ukraine given the presence of German tanks on the battlefield. "We consider the Federal Republic, just like many other European countries, not a neutral state, but as a party supporting Ukraine, and in some cases, perhaps, as accomplices in these hostilities," Putin said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

New Zealand halts Cook Islands funding over China row
New Zealand halts Cook Islands funding over China row

Straits Times

timean hour ago

  • Straits Times

New Zealand halts Cook Islands funding over China row

A spokesperson for New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters (pictured) said the country's core sector support funding relies on a high trust bilateral relationship. PHOTO: REUTERS WELLINGTON - New Zealand announced on June 19 it was suspending NZ$18.2 million (S$14.1 million) in budget funding to the Cook Islands, as the relationship between the two constitutionally linked countries continues to deteriorate amid the Cook Islands' deepening ties with China. A spokesperson for New Zealand Foreign Minister Winston Peters said in a statement that the country's core sector support funding relies on a high trust bilateral relationship and New Zealand decided in early June to pause the funding. We "will also not consider significant new funding until the Cook Islands Government takes concrete steps to repair the relationship and restore trust," the spokesperson said. "New Zealand hopes that steps will be taken swiftly to address New Zealand's concerns so that this support can be resumed as soon as possible." New Zealand along with Australia has become increasingly cautious about China's growing presence in the Pacific region and the potential threats it poses to the country's national security. In January, the government halted new development funding to the Republic of Kiribati, an island in Micronesia. The Cook Islands is a self-governing country in free association with New Zealand. New Zealand commits to defend the South Pacific nation if asked, Cook Islanders are New Zealand citizens, and the two countries commit to consult on security, defence and foreign policy issues. Over the past three years, New Zealand has provided NZ$194.2 million to the Cook Islands through the development programme, according to the government. In February, Cook Islands Prime Minister Mark Brown visited China and signed a strategic partnership that spanned areas from deep-sea mining to education scholarships but excluded security ties. This concerned New Zealand, which says the Cook Islands did not properly consult on the documents ahead of the signing, which breached the arrangement between the two countries. The Cook Islands government had not responded to a request for comment at the time of publishing. The New Zealand government said Mr Brown was told of the decision in early June by letter. Mr Peters' spokesperson said that the agreements signed by the Cook Islands and China and the lack of consultation with New Zealand about them, illustrate a gap in understanding between the Cook Islands and New Zealand governments about what their special relationship of free association requires. "Trust and meaningful engagement are fundamental to free association," he said. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store