Custody row: Supreme Court directs Centre to issue LOC against Russian wife, child on Indian man's plea
A bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi directed the authorities to seize her passport and inform all international airports and other ports within India, and the immigration authorities to ensure they did not leave the country.
The father is fighting a custody battle for the child with the estranged Russian wife and alleged she wasn't complying with the court's order of custody of the minor.
The man claimed being unaware of the whereabouts of his wife and the child since July 7. The man was observed to have made several complaints but no action was taken.
"Father of the child apprehends that the petitioner has been facilitated to flee out of the jurisdiction of this court. She was statedly seen entering the Russian Embassy through a back door on July 4, 2025 along with a Russian diplomat, with whom she is alleged to have some relationship. It is further alleged that the police have failed to provide protection to the minor child, thereby defying the directions issued by this court," the bench said.
The top court, therefore, directed the Ministry of External Affairs officials to liaise with the relevant authorities in the Russian embassy and seek permission to enter into the residential premises of the diplomat, who was last seen in her company on July 4, 2025.
"Keeping in mind the comity, diplomatic relationship, and autonomy enjoyed on a reciprocal basis by different embassies, we are not issuing any directions in respect of the officers of the Russian Embassy in India. However, we do not hesitate to observe that if, on the basis of the police report, we find any diplomatic personnel attached or connected to the said embassy has prima facie committed an offence within the framework of the penal laws of this country, the law must take its own course."
The bench for now advised the highest authority in the Russian embassy to assist the Indian authorities, including the Delhi police to ensure directions of this court, issued from time to time, were not violated.
The top court further noted getting "very evasive and vague replies" upon inquiries made about the woman's whereabouts which raised "serious doubts" on the bonafide conduct of her counsel.
The bench's order was directed to be shared with Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati, Delhi police commissioner for information and necessary compliance.
"The officials at the Ministry of Home Affairs and the Ministry of External Affairs, Union of India are also directed to communicate this order to all international airports and other ports within India, and the immigration authorities be intimated to ensure that neither the petitioner (woman) nor the minor child is permitted to leave the country," the order said.
The top court posted the hearing on July 18, when it asked the authorities concerned to file a status report.
The bench had previously remarked that in a "furious fight" between the husband and wife over the child, several speaking orders were passed by the court from time to time.
The top court on May 22, 2025 directed that the exclusive custody of the child was given to the mother for three days in a week on Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday and for the remaining days, the child was directed to remain in the exclusive custody of his father.
The mother of the child is a Russian citizen, who has been residing in India since 2019, initially coming to India on an X-1 Visa, which expired subsequently.
However, during the pendency of the court proceedings, the top court directed the extension of the visa from time to time.
On May 22, the top court directed the Deputy Commissioners of Police (South East and South) and the station house officers of Lajpat Nagar and Defence Colony Police stations to maintain a discreet but effective vigil over the residential premises of both parties.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
India may need up to $13.4 trillion for urban climate resilience by 2070: Report
New Delhi: As India's cities expand rapidly, building climate-resilient infrastructure will come at a massive cost. A new report by World Resources Institute (WRI) India and GIZ estimates that India may need as much as $13.4 trillion by 2070 to prepare its urban areas for climate risks, including floods, heatwaves, and other extreme weather events. Based on a moderate urbanisation projection of 54 per cent by 2050 and 66 per cent by 2070, the total investment needed would be $2.9 trillion by 2050 and $13.4 trillion by 2070. Even under a conservative urbanisation scenario—where 43 per cent of the population is urban by 2050 and 52 per cent by 2070—the estimated funding requirement is $2.4 trillion and $10.9 trillion, respectively. The report titled 'Mainstreaming Urban Climate Resilience: A Policy and Institutional Framework for India' underlines that more than 80 per cent of the infrastructure that will exist in Indian cities by 2050 is yet to be built, and unless resilience is embedded in future construction, India could face massive financial, social, and environmental losses. By 2030, India's urban population is projected to reach 600 million, accounting for 40 per cent of the national population. These urban centres will be responsible for more than 70 per cent of India's GDP, consume 75 per cent of natural resources, and emit 80 per cent of the country's greenhouse gases, the report notes. 'Integrating climate resilience in urban infrastructure is a necessity. Without it, the cascading impacts of urban floods, heatwaves and other climate-induced events could have serious consequences for energy, water, housing and transport systems,' said Madhav Pai, CEO of WRI India. The report identifies key institutional, governance, and financing gaps and proposes a roadmap for integrating resilience into urban development. It recommends the formation of dedicated climate resilience cells at city and state levels, integrating resilience into financial planning and public budgets, and strengthening risk-informed planning through data and digital platforms. The study also calls for streamlining roles among central, state, and local agencies, aligning existing urban missions such as Smart Cities Mission, AMRUT, and National Mission on Sustainable Habitat with climate resilience goals, and attracting long-term investments through appropriate policy reforms. The report supports India's commitments under the Paris Agreement and the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), and aligns with national programmes such as the Smart Cities Mission, AMRUT, and the National Mission on Sustainable Habitat. It also calls for streamlining responsibilities among central, state and local agencies and creating enabling conditions to attract long-term infrastructure investments aligned with climate resilience goals.
Time of India
19 minutes ago
- Time of India
From Delhi to Moscow via Bihar, Nepal and Dubai: How a Russian woman fled India with child, defying SC orders
Viktoriia Basu, embroiled in a custody battle, defied Supreme Court orders by fleeing India with her child. She traveled through Bihar and Nepal, eventually reaching Moscow via the UAE. The Supreme Court, deeming this a severe contempt of court, is pursuing her return and has ordered a thorough investigation into how she exited the country despite passport restrictions. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads How she left the country Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Possible passport misuse under investigation Court action and next steps A Russian woman who was part of a child custody dispute has fled India with her child despite clear orders from the Supreme Court, Delhi Police informed the top court. The woman, Viktoriia Basu , travelled from Delhi to Bihar and then to Nepal before flying out to the UAE and finally reaching Moscow . The Supreme Court described her actions as a 'gross case of contempt of court' and is now considering steps to bring her back, a TOI report case involves a matrimonial dispute between Viktoriia Basu, a Russian citizen, and her Indian husband. On May 22, the Supreme Court awarded joint custody of their child to both parents. As part of the court's directions, the couple was living separately in the husband reported that Viktoriia and the child had been missing since July 7. He said that the last known sighting was on July 4, when she was seen entering the Russian Embassy in Delhi with a Russian diplomat. The man also alleged that she had a personal relationship with the behalf of the Delhi Police and the ministries of external affairs and home affairs, Additional Solicitor General Aishwarya Bhati told a bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi that police tracked Viktoriia's movement using IP to Bhati, Viktoriia left Delhi on July 8 and travelled to Bihar. On July 11, she crossed into Nepal. From Kathmandu, she boarded a flight to Sharjah, UAE, and then another flight to Russia, where she arrived on July 16. This means she had already reached Russia before the Supreme Court was officially informed about her disappearance on July bench noted that the child's original passport was still deposited with the court. They raised concerns about how Viktoriia managed to leave the country. 'Somebody has helped her in escaping India. This should be investigated,' the court said, adding that the passport she used was likely a duplicate issued either by embassy officials or Indian court made it clear that the woman's act of fleeing with the child will not be tolerated. 'It is not acceptable to us at any cost. It is a gross case of contempt of court. We will direct the issuance of a red corner notice,' said the Ministry of External Affairs is currently working through diplomatic channels to facilitate her return. Meanwhile, the court has directed Delhi Police to conduct a detailed investigation and file a status report by July 29, the next hearing date.
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
19 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Explained: What the India-UK free trade deal means for both economies
Prime Minister Narendra Modi 's two-day visit to the United Kingdom on July 23-24 will mark a milestone in India-UK ties, with the Free Trade Agreement (FTA) likely to be signed during his stop in London on July 24. This would be PM Modi's fourth visit to the UK as Prime Minister and the first under the new British leadership of Prime Minister Keir Starmer. PM Modi would also call on King Charles, and will be accompanied by Commerce and Industry Minister Piyush Goyal for the formal signing of the agreement. Following this, Modi will visit the Maldives on July 25–26, becoming the first foreign leader to do so under President Mohamed Muizzu's administration. What is the India-UK Free Trade Agreement? The FTA aims to boost bilateral trade, eliminate or reduce tariffs on goods and services, and facilitate investment and collaboration between the two nations. The pact has been three years in the making, with negotiations beginning in 2022 and officially concluding on May 6. According to Britain, the deal is its 'biggest and most economically significant' bilateral agreement since exiting the European Union. Bilateral trade between India and the UK stood at £42.6 billion in 2024, and the agreement is expected to increase this by £25.5 billion annually by 2040. Which sectors will benefit the most? The agreement is expected to boost labour-intensive Indian exports such as: -Leather -Apparel and footwear -Toys -Marine products -Gems and jewellery India, in return, will reduce tariffs on a range of British goods, including: -Whisky and gin: Tariffs will fall from 150 per cent to 75 per cent immediately, and to 40 per cent by the 10th year -Automobiles: Duties will be lowered from over 100 per cent to 10 per cent, under a quota regime -Medical devices, cosmetics, soft drinks, chocolates and biscuits -Machinery and aerospace equipment British textile tariffs will also be removed, supporting India's large apparel industry, which employs millions. What does the FTA mean for India? The deal will give Indian exporters zero-duty access for 99 per cent of their products into the UK market. It is significant for sectors like engineering goods, auto components, electric vehicles, and sports goods. The agreement includes a double contribution convention, which will exempt Indian professionals and companies from social security contributions in the UK for three years — a move described by the Indian government as a 'huge win'. The FTA also opens up opportunities for Indian businesses under Britain's public procurement market, including in healthcare, transport, and energy sectors. Additionally, British firms investing in India could receive preferential treatment under the 'Make in India' policy. India-UK trade deal: What are the exclusions? India has excluded some agricultural goods from the agreement. This includes products like apples, dairy, and cheese, to protect local farmers and producers. The deal also comes with phased timelines. While whisky duties will drop in stages, automotive tariff reductions will happen under a managed quota regime over time. Why was the UK-India FTA deal stalled for so long? The most prominent reason for the stalling of the UK-India Free Trade Agreement (FTA) negotiations was that both countries entered their general election cycles around the same time. This led to the 14th round of talks being paused as political focus in both countries shifted towards campaigns. The proposed FTA is highly comprehensive, including 26 chapters that include goods, services, investment, and intellectual property rights. This prolonged the time required for consensus and finalising the draft. Both countries are also negotiating a separate Bilateral Investment Treaty (BIT), which may have further delayed the process. What happens after the deal is signed? If signed on July 24, the FTA will need to be ratified by the British Parliament and approved by India's Union Cabinet. The implementation is expected to take up to a year from the date of signing. Both sides are betting on this deal to double bilateral trade to $120 billion by 2030. With India's import demand projected to rise significantly and its middle class expected to reach 60 million by 2030, the agreement could reshape the economic relationship between the two nations.
