&w=3840&q=100)
India lifted 171 mn people from extreme poverty between 2011-23: World Bank
India has lifted 171 million people from extreme poverty in the decade between 2011-12 and 2022-23, the World Bank said.
"Over the past decade, India has significantly reduced poverty. Extreme poverty (living on less than $2.15 per day) fell from 16.2 per cent in 2011-12 to 2.3 per cent in 2022-23, lifting 171 million people above this line, the World Bank said in its Poverty & Equity Brief' on India.
It added that rural extreme poverty dropped from 18.4 per cent to 2.8 per cent, and urban from 10.7 per cent to 1.1 per cent, narrowing the rural-urban gap from 7.7 to 1.7 percentage points a 16 per cent annual decline.
The brief said that India also transitioned into the lower-middle-income category. Using the $3.65 per day LMIC poverty line, poverty fell from 61.8 per cent to 28.1 per cent, lifting 378 million people out of poverty.
Rural poverty dropped from 69 per cent to 32.5 per cent, and urban poverty from 43.5 per cent to 17.2 per cent, reducing the rural-urban gap from 25 to 15 percentage points with a 7 per cent annual decline.
India's five most populous states Uttar Pradesh, Maharashtra, Bihar, West Bengal, and Madhya Pradeshaccounted for 65 per cent of the country's extreme poor in 2011-12 and contributed to two-thirds of the overall decline in extreme poverty by 2022-23, it said.
"Nevertheless, these states still accounted for 54 per cent of India's extremely poor (2022-23) and 51 per cent of the multidimensionally poor (2019-21)," the brief said adding that as measured by the multidimensional poverty index (MPI), non-monetary poverty declined from 53.8 per cent in 2005-06 to 16.4 per cent by 2019-21.
The brief added that employment growth has outpaced the working-age population since 2021-22. Employment rates, especially among women, are rising, and urban unemployment fell to 6.6 per cent in Q1 FY24/25, the lowest since 2017-18.
Recent data indicates a shift of male workers from rural to urban areas for the first time since 2018-19, while rural female employment in agriculture has grown.
Highlighting the challenges that persist, the brief said that youth unemployment is 13.3 per cent, increasing to 29 per cent among tertiary education graduates. Only 23 per cent of non-farm paid jobs are formal, and most agricultural employment remains informal.
Self-employment is rising, especially among rural workers and women. Despite female employment rate of 31 per cent, gender disparities remain, with 234 million more men in paid work.
The World Bank Poverty and Equity Briefs (PEBs) highlight poverty, shared prosperity and inequality trends for over 100 developing countries.
The briefs are released twice a year for the Spring and Annual Meetings of the World Bank Group and International Monetary Fund and help users understand a country's poverty and inequality context at-a-glance and seek to keep poverty reduction on top of the world's agenda.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
First Post
13 hours ago
- First Post
World Bank's $40 Billion for Pakistan: Aid or Terror Financing?
World Bank's $40 Billion for Pakistan: Aid or Terror Financing? | Vantage with Palki Sharma World Bank's $40 Billion for Pakistan: Aid or Terror Financing? | Vantage with Palki Sharma The World Bank has unveiled a $40 billion investment plan for Pakistan, calling it a 'country partnership framework.' This comes just months after Pakistan-backed terrorists killed 26 civilians in India. Despite Pakistan's collapsing economy and soaring defence spending, global institutions like the IMF and World Bank continue to funnel funds into Islamabad. Critics warn this isn't just aid—it's indirect financing of terrorism. With ministers seen alongside known extremists, and the military expanding its grip, where does this money really go? Palki Sharma tells you more. See More
Mint
18 hours ago
- Mint
Kaushik Basu: Redefine prosperity; GDP tunnel-vision could prove costly
In mainstream economics, description is routinely treated as secondary to analysis. Labelling a work as 'purely descriptive' conveys dismissiveness. Yet, as Nobel laureate economist Amartya Sen observed in a seminal 1980 paper, every act of description involves choices. Whether we are describing a historical event, an individual or a country, what we choose to include and what we leave out can be critical. Description shapes perception. And perception, in turn, can profoundly influence behaviour. Describing the state of a country's economy is a complicated task. In the past, scholars wrote lengthy volumes debating whether one country was doing better than another. But over time, globally, a single measure has come to dominate the conversation: gross domestic product, or GDP for short, which represents the value of all goods and services produced within a country in a given year. With some adjustments, it also approximates the population's total income. It is an astonishingly concise metric, often used as shorthand for economic well-being. Also Read: It's time to lay the great Indian GDP controversy to rest As Diane Coyle noted in her 2014 book on the history of GDP, its emergence marked a watershed moment in economic policymaking. Developed by Simon Kuznets in the early 1930s, GDP has brought much-needed rigour to policy debates. Politicians could no longer simply point to tall buildings as evidence of progress (though many still do). Today, assessing a country's economic performance over time means tracking the growth of its GDP. To be sure, there are other ways to assess national well-being, such as the United Nations Human Development Index and the World Bank's shared prosperity indicator. But when it comes to determining whether one economy is outperforming another, GDP (or GDP per capita) remains the default benchmark. While GDP has undoubtedly played a valuable role in modern economics, its limitations are increasingly difficult to ignore. Over time, it has become an end in itself, enabling politicians to use growth figures as a convenient distraction from persistent social and economic fractures. Growing unease with GDP-centric policy thinking was powerfully articulated in UN Secretary-General António Guterres's 2021 report Our Common Agenda, which urged global policymakers to embrace a broader set of progress indicators. Also Read: Statistical dust-up: The great Indian GDP controversy needn't have arisen As an economic indicator, GDP has three key weaknesses. First, by focusing solely on a country's total income, it can create the illusion of widespread prosperity, even when inequality is rising. GDP per capita can rise even as a majority becomes worse off. As Joseph E. Stiglitz put it in his 2010 book Freefall, 'A larger pie does not mean everyone–or even most people–gets a larger slice." But most people may celebrate GDP growth nonetheless—much like they cheer their country's Olympic medal count—without questioning who actually benefits. This concern was highlighted by the Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress, which was established in 2008 by then-French President Nicolas Sarkozy and included Joseph Stiglitz, Amartya Sen and other prominent economists. Its final report called for incorporating measures like income distribution and inequality into GDP. The second weakness of GDP is that its maximization often rewards activities that undermine democratic governance. Being super-rich, after all, involves more than just owning more cars, mansions, planes and yachts. Extreme wealth, especially in the age of social media and AI, also means having a louder voice and disproportionate influence over how people think. In traditional societies, when a feudal lord entered a village council meeting, ordinary people who may have been arguing and pleading for change just moments earlier would fall silent. That same dynamic is now playing out on a global scale. Also Read: The state of India's economy is not as bright as GDP data may suggest As wealth becomes concentrated in fewer hands, and as a handful of online platforms shape what billions of internet users see and hear, many are discovering that they are losing their voice—the most essential instrument of democracy. Clearly, the time has come to develop new measures of national progress that do not strengthen the forces threatening democracy. As US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis famously warned, 'We can have democracy in this country, or we can have great wealth concentrated in the hands of a few, but we can't have both." Lastly, GDP can be inflated at the expense of future generations. We can and do boost GDP growth by engaging in activities that damage the environment and accelerate climate change, leaving our descendants with a scorched earth. Given this, merely acknowledging the urgency of climate action is no longer enough. To ensure a sustainable future, we must reform our most prominent measure of economic welfare so that sustainability is central to how we define prosperity. ©2025/Project Syndicate The author is a professor of economics at Cornell University and a former chief economic adviser to the Government of India.
Hans India
a day ago
- Hans India
Despite GDP growth, India's per capita income abysmally low
According to the World Economic Outlook report released by the International Monetary Fund (IMF), India's GDP is $4,187.017 billion ($4 trillion), surpassing Japan's $4,186.431 billion. By 2028, India is expected to push its GDP to $5,584.476 billion to overtake Germany. China is the second-largest economy at $19,231.705 billion, while the US tops the list with a GDP of $30,507.217 billion. Experts say this is not only a story of India's ascent but also of Japan's decline. In 2010, Japan had an economy of nearly $6 trillion, which has now shrunk to nearly $4.18 trillion, due to an aging population, stagnant productivity and long-running deflation. India, on the other hand, has doubled its nominal GDP in a decade to emerge as the fastest-growing economy. Experts have also pointed out that India's per capita GDP is equivalent to Japan's in 1950s. Considering Japan stagnates, India would need 22 years to reach their level of per capita GDP. India's growing GDP is significant because it indicates overall economic health and improvement in the quality of life for its citizens. A larger GDP generally translates to more job opportunities, higher incomes, and improved access to goods and services. Additionally, GDP growth influences policymaking, strengthens macroeconomic resilience, and boosts India's global standing. The Indian economy continues to grow at a healthy pace despite challenging global conditions, according to World Bank's latest India Development Update. But to reach its $1 trillion merchandise exports goal by 2030, India needs to diversify its export basket and leverage global value chains. India's per capita GDP in 2025 is around $2,400, which is below countries like Kenya, Morocco, Libya, Mauritius and South Africa. India can boost its growth further by harnessing its global trade potential. In addition to IT, business services and pharma where it excels, India can diversify its export basket with increased exports in textiles, apparel, and footwear sectors, as well as electronics and green technology products. To realize its ambition of becoming a developed nation by 2047, India must achieve an annual growth rate of 8 percent or more. Meeting this goal will require the government to implement comprehensive economic reforms to capitalize on geopolitical convergence, an approach Indian leadership seems hesitant to adopt. Economists project India's economic growth to average around 6.5 percent over the next few years, making it likely to maintain its status as the fastest-growing major economy globally, especially as China's economic expansion slows down due to both internal and external factors. While reaching an 8 percent growth rate seems unlikely, it is also improbable for growth to dip below 6 percent. Indian citizens are demanding reforms and policies that will boost GDP per capita by improving wages for India's working class. Here are four ways that India could potentially boost its GDP per capita. In India, 40% of the population works in agriculture and small-scale farming supports many poverty-level communities. The recently introduced 2020 Farm Acts will allow farmers to sell their products to the highest bidder, allowing them to seek higher incomes. When farmers are prospering, they support other sectors of India's economy through their own consumption. Products like fertilizer, working attire and tools are necessary for farmers, especially as they expand their business. This increase in expenditure directly creates jobs for others. This year, incomes have declined for Indian citizens, meaning private consumption has also decreased. By spending money on building and repairing roads and bridges, the government will provide citizens with greater ease and efficiency in their work and create jobs in construction. Furthermore, by using more funds to pay higher salaries, private consumption will once again increase, promoting higher business investment and improving the market for imports and exports. Urbanization drives economic growth, and moving some of these farmers to cities would allow them to get jobs in manufacturing. Not only would this increase agricultural productivity by decreasing the number of farmers using the same amount of land, but it would help grow some of India's medium-sized cities into more prominent urban landscapes. In addition, new urban populations would create a resurgence of the housing market and give banks more lending opportunities. India has the opportunity to create as much as $1 trillion in economic value by establishing itself as a competitive manufacturer of electronics, chemicals, textiles, auto goods and pharmaceuticals. Currently, the country's imports constitute a greater percentage of global trade than its exports. By increasing competitiveness in these sectors, India would not only increase its potential for exports but also decrease its reliance on imports, curbing the amount of money spent by citizens on foreign products.
