Owe Taxes But Can't Pay? Clear Start Tax Shares How to Reduce or Even Eliminate What You Owe
Clear Start Tax Explains How Taxpayers Can Reduce IRS Debt Through Structured Relief Programs
IRVINE, CALIFORNIA / ACCESS Newswire / April 9, 2025 / If you owe taxes and can't afford to pay, you're not alone-and more importantly, you're not out of options. Clear Start Tax, a leading tax resolution firm, is helping Americans understand how to reduce or even eliminate tax debt by using IRS-approved relief programs.
Tax debt can feel overwhelming, especially when penalties and interest begin to stack up. But with the right strategy-and the right guidance-many taxpayers can avoid collections and settle their debt for significantly less than the original amount. Through tools like Offer inCompromise, Installment Agreements, and Hardship Relief, Clear Start Tax has helped thousands of clients move forward with confidence and peace of mind.
How Taxpayers Are Settling for Less Than What They Owe
When a taxpayer can't afford to pay their full IRS bill, the IRS offers structured programs based on their ability to pay-not just what they owe. According to Clear Start Tax, the most effective options include:
'Most taxpayers are unaware that the IRS allows for settlements based on financial hardship,' said the Head of Client Solutions at Clear Start Tax. 'Our role is to help clients understand what they truly qualify for-and guide them through a process that can significantly reduce what they owe.'
Why Ignoring the IRS Can Cost You More
One of the most common misconceptions is that if you can't pay, you shouldn't file. The longer tax debt is left unaddressed, the more it grows. Interest compounds daily. Penalties stack up. And enforcement-like wage garnishments or levies-can begin with little warning. For many, waiting makes the situation worse, not better.
'Filing your return, even if you can't pay in full, is a responsible first step,' said the Head of Client Solutions at Clear Start Tax. 'It keeps you compliant, avoids harsher penalties, and opens the door to relief options that simply aren't available to non-filers.'
IRS Relief Options That May Significantly Cut What You Owe
The IRS offers several relief programs specifically for taxpayers who can't afford to pay their full balance. These programs aren't widely understood-but they're real, and they're designed to provide meaningful relief for those in financial hardship.
Clear Start Tax helps eligible clients access IRS-approved options that may allow them to:
Each case is different, which is why Clear Start Tax conducts a detailed financial review and handles all communication with the IRS. From preparing the necessary forms to presenting a strong case for relief, their team ensures that clients don't have to face the IRS alone.
'Every tax situation is different, but the IRS does offer real, structured solutions-and we know how to apply them effectively,' said the Head of Client Solutions at Clear Start Tax. 'Our role is to simplify a complex process and help clients resolve their debt with clarity, confidence, and the right strategy.'
About Clear Start Tax
Clear Start Tax is a full-service tax liability resolution firm that serves taxpayers throughout the United States. The company specializes in assisting individuals and businesses with a wide range of IRS and state tax issues, including back taxes, wage garnishment relief, IRS appeals, and offers in compromise. Clear Start Tax helps taxpayers apply for the IRS Fresh Start Program, providing expert guidance in tax resolution. Fully accredited and A+ rated by the Better Business Bureau, the firm's unique approach and commitment to long-term client success distinguish it as a leader in the tax resolution industry.
(949) 535-1627
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
New York Becomes First State to Require Employers Disclose When Layoffs Are Due to AI
If you lose your job as part of mass layoffs at your company because your boss believes an artificial intelligence model can do your work instead, they will have to start filing more paperwork disclosing the decision. That is according to a new law in New York state that requires employers to disclose if mass layoffs — which is defined as 50 or more workers — were due to AI. The change to New York's Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification (WARN) system went into effect in March, but has received little coverage since then; Bloomberg was the first major outlet to report on the change on Thursday. Now, employers have to fill out a form at least 90 days before a mass layoff round, according to New York law, and check a box if the cuts are due to 'technological innovation or automation.' If that box is checked, the employers then go to another screen on the WARN website where they have to specify whether AI or another technology is the reason for the cuts. New York is the first state with such a law. Other states have looked to put safeguards in place against AI replacing workers, including in California, which had a law go into effect at the start of 2025 which protects actors from having their likeness used by AI models without informed consent; California also passed a similar law last year that requires the estates of dead actors and performers to give clearance for AI models to use their likeness. The new law in New York comes as AI's rapid rise has led to questions over which jobs are safe in a number of fields. This has been an issue in the media world as of late, where a number of outlets, like Axel Springer and News Corp. have signed content licensing deals with OpenAI, the parent company of ChatGPT. Editorial staff at some outlets have said they are concerned about newsrooms growing too cozy with AI models; the Vox Media Union, for example, called for protections to be put in place for writers at outlets like New York Magazine and The Verge so that their jobs would not be taken by AI bots. That concern is a common one in the U.S. A Pew Research Center survey earlier this year found 52% of Americans were 'worried' about AI in the workplace, compared to 36% who said they were 'hopeful' about it. The post New York Becomes First State to Require Employers Disclose When Layoffs Are Due to AI appeared first on TheWrap.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Undo President: Trump Gets Country Off Wrong Track
Americans are usually an optimistic people - except when it comes to our countrys future. Right-track/wrong-track surveys have long found yawning gaps favoring the dark view. The RealClearPolitics poll average, stretching back to 2009, reports no point with a positive majority but several where the spread was 40 or even 50 points to the negative. When Donald Trump was sworn in last January, the wrong-track view held sway by 30 points. Followers of the news - which presents the presidents first months in office as a kleptocratic frenzy marked by destructive economic policies and naked assaults on the Constitution - would expect these numbers to have subsequently cracked the oceans bottom. But, lo and behold, the wrong-track/right-track gap has shrunk to nine points. Its still in negative territory, but that is the tightest gap since April 2021 (minus 6.5), when the COVID vaccine offered hope that we might return to normal. We did, in a way, as the gap quickly shot back up, peaking at minus 57 in July 2022. The recent positive poll numbers are just a snapshot in time. They might change tomorrow. They do not reflect an algorithms assessment of thousands of firm data points but the fluid psychological state - the vibe, to take the Democrats once favorite phrase - of the people. Still, the near-historic rise in optimism recorded by established polls is significant. It can also be a little confounding given Trumps ridiculously harsh press coverage and the fact that material conditions have not dramatically improved during the last five months. Indeed, a key story of Trumps second term is the difficulty he and the GOP Congress are having passing his agenda. Whats driving the vibe shift? Americas drive for innovation and the progressive domination of the intelligentsia have led us to judge presidencies by their forward-looking plans to get America on the right track. We remember what our leaders built. Trumps secret sauce so far has been his focus on the other side of the equation - dismantling past actions that sent us down the wrong track. Trump may not be a classic conservative, but, like Ronald Reagan, much of his success at home has been rooted in subtraction rather than addition. Trump is a reactionary in the best sense of the word. He has been more "undo" than "can do." The Biden administration gave his wrecking ball plenty of targets. His efforts to reverse the Biden administrations embrace of open borders and its insistence that males be allowed to compete against women seek a return to the way things used to be. His deployment of troops to quell the LA riots is not a strong mans push to silence dissent but a commitment - lost in both the BLM riots of 2020 and the Jan. 6 assault on the Capitol - to the principle that we should not express our political discontent through violence. The same spirit informs his efforts to reform higher education. He is not trying to destroy Harvard, Columbia, and other elite schools. He is seeking to restore their pivotal role as safe spaces for the free exchange of ideas. His efforts to limit the number of foreign students - 25% of whom come from our main adversary, China - aim to reassert the basic point that even our private institutions should, on the whole, serve our countrys interests. Yes, many Americans have concerns about how Trump is pursuing these aims. The devil is always in the details. But the shrunken right-track/wrong-track gap suggests the broad sense across the country that he is moving the country in the right direction by moving us off the wrong track. Anecdotal evidence suggests that even some of his opponents are quietly pleased by some of his more controversial actions. I recently asked a very liberal friend who "fears and despises" Trump whether she supports his opposition to birthright citizenship. "I support the Constitution," she replied. After telling her I wanted to wait for the Supreme Court to definitively answer that question, I asked her: "If we were writing the Constitution from scratch today, should we enshrine the idea that anybody born on our soil is automatically a citizen?" "Of course not," she said, without missing a beat. Taking a step back, it seems fair to say she is not unhappy that he is asking the question. Likewise, she does not support his efforts to cut the federal government, but she is happy that hes refocused attention on the deficit and debt. The right-track/wrong-track numbers show that Americans have recognized that things were amiss in our nations capital. The vibe has shifted because of Trumps willingness to challenge many assumptions of governance and sacred cows. Will it last? Who knows. Getting us off the wrong track is a key first step; moving us on to the right track may be harder still. J. Peder Zane is an editor for RealClearInvestigations and a columnist for RealClearPolitics. Follow him on X @jpederzane.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
U.S. data quality has been declining for years. Now Trump's cutbacks are leading economists to question its figures
A key federal agency is increasingly publishing less accurate inflation data thanks in part to a hiring freeze issued by the Trump administration in January. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which is part of the Labor Department, is increasingly relying on data collection methods that are less accurate than usual and has stopped tracking inflation figures in three U.S. cities. Decades of declining quality and accuracy in federal statistics, exacerbated by President Donald Trump's cuts, have economists questioning data that inform everything from the Federal Reserve's decisions to Social Security payments for more than 70 million Americans. Since taking office in January, Trump has led efforts to cut down on the budgets and staff of government agencies. The Bureau of Labor Statistics, which collects data on hiring, inflation, and other areas, has faced a hiring freeze issued by the Trump administration in January, and an unclear reduction in staff. Additionally, Trump's proposed 2026 budget would cut funding and staff at the BLS by a further 8%, Bloomberg reported. The hiring freeze has already forced the agency, which creates the consumer price index that measures inflation, to cut back on the number of businesses where it checks prices, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing unnamed officials. In last month's inflation report, which tracked April's prices, the BLS said workers would no longer collect figures for three cities: Lincoln, Neb.; Provo, Utah; and Buffalo, N.Y. It also said it increasingly relied on less accurate data collection methods, or 'different-cell imputation,' for the report. The BLS collects data that inform its inflation report through field operators called enumerators, who go into brick-and-mortar stores to gather data on products and services. If the enumerators can't find a specific product in a certain city, they record the price of a comparable product for a next-best estimate. Having fewer workers in the field means the BLS has to rely more than usual on its next-best estimates. 'BLS makes reductions when current resources can no longer support the collection effort. BLS will continue to evaluate survey operations,' the BLS wrote in a statement earlier this month. The Labor Department, BLS's parent agency, did not respond to a request for comment. Erica Groshen, a former BLS commissioner and current senior economics advisor at the Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations, said Trump's most recent cuts add to decades of the BLS struggling to publish accurate and detailed data despite budget cuts and political pressure. The agency's budget is down by about 20% in real terms since 2009, she said. 'You have an institution that was already struggling a bit, and then you have this collateral damage on top of it,' Groshen told Fortune. While the agency always strives to maintain accurate top-line numbers, such as the overall CPI number, more granular data could be drastically scaled back, to the detriment of those who rely on it. Inflation and employment data the BLS publishes affect everything from Social Security payments to business decisions to the availability of unemployment insurance benefits, she said. 'Social Security benefits are indexed to the current CPI,' Groshen told Fortune. 'If the BLS makes a tenth-of-a-percentage-point mistake in the CPI, then Social Security beneficiaries will be overpaid or underpaid by a billion dollars.' The ramifications of increasingly less accurate data could also be substantial for the Fed, wrote UBS Global Wealth Management chief economist Paul Donovan in a note. Although the central bank prefers to rely on the personal consumption expenditures index, it also monitors CPI and some employment numbers published by the BLS. 'Less understanding of U.S. inflation increases the chances of the Federal Reserve making a policy error (especially with the mantra of 'data dependency'),' wrote Donovan. Overall, Groshen said the BLS will likely continue to reduce the scope of its operations in order to maintain the quality of headline numbers such as CPI, yet this comes with a cost. The granularity of some statistics as well as programs that are useful for understanding causes and consequences of changes may be sacrificed. 'This is a choice that we as a country are making to fly blind, or to fly more blindly,' she said. 'We could have a clearer windshield, but we are allowing it to be clouded.' This story was originally featured on
