Government must consider expanding hospital buffer zone, MSP says
Gillian Mackay said protesters have been gathering just outside the 200m exclusion zone around the Queen Elizabeth University Hospital (QEUH) in Glasgow.
The Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Bill came into effect in September and creates areas around medical facilities where terminations are performed, to stop anti-abortion protesters gathering.
The legislation was introduced by Ms Mackay, a Green MSP, and is designed to protect women from harassment.
It contains a provision to extend the size of the buffer zones if it is deemed proportionate.
Ms Mackay said: 'Safe access zones were introduced to protect patients and staff at our hospitals, and, for the most part, that is what they are doing.
'But at QEUH we have seen protests continuing on one of the main entry routes to the hospital.
'The QEUH in Glasgow has quite unique challenges due to its location compared to other hospitals.
'From the correspondence that I and others have received, there are concerns about the patients and staff having no choice but to pass the protests.'
A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'The Abortion Services (Safe Access Zones) (Scotland) Act allows ministers to extend the size of a zone if it is considered necessary to protect those accessing or providing services from impacts prohibited under the Act.
'However, before taking such a step, it is essential that ministers are satisfied such an extension is appropriate.
'We take Ms Mackay's comments extremely seriously and will discuss the matter further with the relevant Health Board as an immediate next step.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scottish Sun
20 minutes ago
- Scottish Sun
Protest groups clash outside Scots asylum seeker hotel as cops shut down town centre road
DEMO DRAMA Protest groups clash outside Scots asylum seeker hotel as cops shut down town centre road Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A PROTEST group has clashed with anti-racism campaigners outside a Scottish asylum seeker hotel. Stand Up to Racism Scotland, Falkirk Trades Union Council and residents said they organised the demonstration today to show that refugees are welcome in the town. Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 4 A protest group has clashed with anti-racism campaigners in Falkirk Credit: Getty 4 Stand Up to Racism Scotland organisers arranged a peaceful counter-protest Credit: Getty 4 Cops are in attendance at the scene this afternoon Credit: Getty 4 Dozens of demonstrators from each group stood on opposite sides of the road Credit: Getty It comes after the group Save Our Future & Our Kids Futures announced plans to hold a protest outside the hotel known as the Cladhan. In a social media post the group said it is "standing against uncontrolled illegal immigration, with people being placed in our communities without transparency, accountability, or consultation". It added: "This is not about hate, racism, or division. This is about safety, justice, and standing up for the people of Falkirk who deserve better." Dozens of demonstrators from each group stood on opposite sides of the road outside the hotel, with police keeping them separate. Protesters, some waving Union flags, chanted "send them home" and anti-racism demonstrators responded with chants of "refugees are welcome here" and "this is what community looks like". Stand Up to Racism Scotland organisers said: "We are organising a peaceful counter-protest to stand in solidarity with refugees and to say that they are welcome." They described it as a "safely stewarded community event with music, speeches from the local community, the trade union movement, local campaigns, faith groups and others". Demonstrators held placards with messages such as "stop the far right", "refugees welcome" and "migrants make our NHS". On the opposite side of the road protesters held signs with messages such as "go home", "enough is enough" and "we want our country back". In a previous statement Save Our Future & Our Kids Futures said it was not "anti-refugee" or "anti-migrant" but is "against a broken asylum system that is impacting communities across the UK, including Falkirk". Refugee rights campaigner praises Scots for taking a stand The group said: "We are not affiliated with any far-right groups, nor do we promote racism, hate, or division." The Home Office did not wish to comment. Police said that Kemper Avenue in Falkirk is closed due to protest activity which began at around 11am. A spokesperson for the force said: "Officers are in attendance and engaging with those involved. "Motorists are advised to use alternative routes."
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Public think Labour will use new online laws for censorship
New laws will be used by the Government to censor content posted online, a majority of the public believe. There is strong backing for the aims of the Online Safety Act to protect children from online harms but deep scepticism about the consequences for people's privacy and whether it will work in practice, a major poll of more than 2,000 adults by Ipsos has revealed. While 69 per cent supported age verification for platforms hosting harmful content, half of those polled were not confident it will stop under-18s accessing it, according to the poll, published exclusively today by The Telegraph. More than six in 10 (61 per cent) believe the Act will lead to personal data being compromised and a similar proportion (58 per cent) expected increased government censorship. More than four in 10 say it will threaten free speech online. It follows The Telegraph's disclosure of a secretive 'spy' unit which has been used by the Government to target social media posts criticising migrant hotels and 'two tier policing'. Last week the US state department criticised the Online Safety Act over its potential impact on free speech as it warned the British Government had 'repeatedly intervened to chill speech' after the Southport attack. The Act also sparked a political row after Reform UK leader Nigel Farage pledged to repeal the Act as a threat to free speech, prompting Labour to accuse him of being on the side of sex offenders like Jimmy Savile. Keiran Pedley, Ipsos director of UK politics, said the poll exposed a 'significant paradox in public opinion'. 'While there is a clear and broad desire to protect children online, reflected in the strong support for age verification, this is matched by deep-seated scepticism about whether the Act can deliver on its promises,' he said. 'Data breaches and the potential for censorship are highlighted, as the public doubt these measures will be effective against tech-savvy young people. This creates a major challenge for platform operators and regulator, Ofcom: how to implement robust age assurance systems that the public actually trusts and is willing to use.' Nearly half (48 per cent) believe the Act will enable parents to better protect their children from online harms and 46 per cent said it will enable adults to more easily block inappropriate material. However, 44 per cent believe it will limit free speech online, against 40 per cent who do not. A similar proportion (43 per cent) fear it will limit adults' access to 'non-harmful' information online. Half of those polled (48 per cent) said they would be likely to submit proof of age to access a platform or website, against 30 per cent who would not. However, this dropped to 14 per cent for porn sites and 19 per cent for dating apps. More than half (56 per cent) were comfortable with using their email as proof of age but the public drew a line at financial information, with fewer than one in five saying they would use a credit card or banking information. Almost seven in 10 Britons (69 per cent) believed it would be easy for children and young people to get around safeguarding procedures by social media platforms. More than half (51 per cent) feared that it would lead to children using less safe parts of the internet such as the dark web. Nearly a quarter (24 per cent) admitted that they used a VPN when browsing the internet, a technology that enables users to encrypt their communications and hide their IP address. A similar proportion (22 per cent) said they had considered or downloaded a VPN since the introduction of the Online Safety Act. Despite this, four in 10 (40 per cent) believed the Act would prevent children and under 18s from seeing illegal or harmful material, although 52 per cent did not believe it would. While 37 per cent believed the legislation would make platforms and websites remove harmful and illegal content, 51 per cent did not.
The National
2 hours ago
- The National
JK Rowling compares Nicola Sturgeon to Twilight's Bella Swan
She accused Ms Sturgeon of being 'flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and hard facts' on issues relating to trans and women's rights. She was reviewing the former first minister's memoir. The Harry Potter author is a long-time critic of the former SNP leader and her views on gender self-ID. READ MORE: Inside the row between Scottish press and Nicola Sturgeon's team at book launch The near-3000-word review, published on her website, accuses Sturgeon, who passed gender reform legislation at Holyrood, of holding 'luxury beliefs' that have caused 'real, lasting harm' to women. The Twilight of Nicola Sturgeon My review of Franklyhttps:// — J.K. Rowling (@jk_rowling) August 14, 2025 Rowling published her review on X alongside what appears to be an AI-generated image of Sturgeon in the woods in front of a wolf and a vampire. She said of the politician's memoir, Frankly: 'She remains stubbornly wedded to her belief that it is possible to let some men into women's spaces on the men's say so, without letting any man who fancies it come inside. 'She denies there are any risks to a policy of gender self-identification. 'She can't imagine any male predator capitalising on such policies, in spite of the fact that it has, demonstrably, happened many times. 'She is flat-out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and facts' Rowling, who lives in Edinburgh, said the Glasgow Southside MSP had not been 'remotely humbled' by the Supreme Court ruling that sex in the UK Equality Act referred to biological sex. The Gender Recognition Reform (Scotland) Act, which was passed by MSPs, was ultimately scrapped by Westminster, with the then-Tory government saying it contravened equalities law. READ MORE: I went to the 'first legal wedding' at the Edinburgh Fringe – here's what it was like In her book, Sturgeon said she had never received as much abuse as when Rowling posted a picture of herself on social media with a T-shirt saying 'Nicola Sturgeon, destroyer of women's rights'. The former first minister said the post made her feel 'more at risk of possible physical harm'. Rowling defended the decision, writing in her review that she intended to encourage journalists to question Sturgeon on the impacts her gender reforms may have. She compares the MSP to Twilight character Bella Swan, saying both were 'monomaniacs', with Sturgeon being 'consumed' by independence.
