
Care Without Distance: Rural Health's Leap Into The Digital Age
When I was practicing surgery as a heart specialist, many of my patients came from small towns. They were referred from rural clinics that were doing their best, often without resources or specialist support. I saw firsthand how delays in diagnosis or distance from care could change the course of an illness. These experiences stay with me. They are part of why I believe so strongly that we can and must build a better, more connected system for rural America.
This moment in time, I believe, brings both hope and genuine opportunity. With the right strategy and newly available technologies, we can deliver care that is closer to home, more consistent, and more personal. Daily advances in artificial intelligence (AI), digital health, and virtual care are opening the doors to revolutionary new ways to connect patients to care. These methods are already transforming delivery in other parts of the country and the world.
In July 2025, Congress passed the One Big Beautiful Bill Act which includes the Rural Health Transformation Program, an innovative $50 billion federal initiative to support rural communities to be disproportionately impacted by the Act's Medicaid spending cuts and other reimbursement reductions.
Beginning in 2026, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) will allocate $10 billion annually through 2030 to states that submit qualifying transformation plans. These funds will support high-priority initiatives such as broadband expansion, digital infrastructure, chronic disease management, and training for the adoption of technologies such as AI and remote patient monitoring.
Though limited in size and scope, the Transformation Program represents a meaningful down payment on a more modern and equitable rural health sector. It's more than a funding package; it reflects a growing recognition in Washington that transformative technology, especially AI, must play a central role in the future of rural health.
In Part Two of this series, we documented the impact of rural hospital closures. But we don't need to rebuild what was lost brick by brick. We can build something better: care that moves to and with the patient, not just inside a building. And rural communities, with their strong culture of self-reliance, adaptability, resilience, and strong local ties, are uniquely positioned to benefit from and potentially lead this transformation.
Barriers to Access—and Why They Must Be Overcome
Rural America is home to 60 million people, nearly one in five Americans. Yet these communities experience some of the worst health outcomes in the country. Chronic illnesses are more common. Life expectancy is shorter. And getting timely, high-quality care is harder than ever.
On average, rural Americans live twice as far from the nearest hospital as their urban or suburban peers. That distance is growing as more rural hospitals and clinics close, many operating on razor-thin margins with aging infrastructure and too few clinicians to sustain services. As discussed in Part One, these facilities are more than care sites. They are employers, civic institutions, and sources of community trust. When one closes, the effects ripple out. A single hospital closure can lead to a 14% decline in employment in the county it served.
Fewer young doctors are choosing to practice in rural communities. Medical specialists are nearly nine times more concentrated in urban areas than rural ones. The provider shortage is worsening just as demand for care, especially for chronic conditions and behavioral health, is growing.
To break this cycle, we need to reimagine how care is delivered. That means shifting away from the narrow model of centralized, inpatient facility care and toward more connected outpatient and community-based systems, including mobile care, telehealth, and in-home services. But to get there, we must invest in the infrastructure that will make this possible.
That's where modern technology, and AI in particular, can play a transformational role.
Laying the Groundwork for a Digital Rural Health System
Before rural communities can fully benefit from artificial intelligence and other cutting-edge technologies, they need the right foundation. And today, that foundation is uneven at best.
Many rural hospitals and clinics rely on outdated electronic medical records that can't share data or integrate with newer tools. Only about 64% of rural physicians use certified electronic health record systems. Twenty-two percent of rural households lack access to high-speed broadband. Most small, independent hospitals can't afford to have dedicated IT or cybersecurity staff. And while AI is becoming a more common feature in many industries, fewer than 1% of rural Americans feel confident using it in the workplace, though the majority say they want to learn.
These gaps matter. Because if we don't address them now, rural America risks falling even further behind as digital care models increasingly become the norm.
What's needed is clear:
Some organizations are already taking action. Thrive Health Tech*, a company we helped incubate at Frist Cressey Ventures, equips patients with mobile devices that connect to a HIPAA-compliant wireless network, helping bridge the broadband gap in hard-to-reach communities. Major technology companies are beginning to partner with rural hospitals to modernize their cybersecurity systems and digital infrastructure.
But scaling these solutions takes more than innovation alone. It will require new commitments to public-private partnerships with policy alignment and sustained investment.
That's what makes the Rural Health Transformation Program so interesting. With $10 billion in federal funding each year between 2026 and 2030, the program gives states the opportunity and the incentive to build the appropriate infrastructure that rural health requires to thrive in the digital age.
From Potential to Practice: How AI Is Already Advancing Rural Health
Advancements in multi-modal language models, reasoning models, and voice agents are central to this innovation. Investments in frontier models and technical ingenuity of engineers are producing tools that are changing care delivery for the better. These are the building blocks for the hospitals and clinics of the future.
Once the foundation is laid, rural communities are positioned to move from planning to action. Across the country AI tools are already being deployed to support patients, reduce administrative burdens, and enhance how clinicians deliver care. These tools are not theoretical. We know they work, and they are especially well-suited to the needs of rural populations, where distance and access are larger barriers to health.
At Frist Cressey Ventures, we sit at the front line of technology innovation in healthcare. Through deep relationships with founders, health systems, medical groups, and independent physicians, we see the impact that AI applications are having on patient outcomes, clinician satisfaction, and operational efficiency at sites of care. For illustration purposes, here are some of what we are seeing in rural health today:
AI-enabled platforms are enhancing how patients understand and manage their own health. Large language models can deliver personalized education, explain care plans in everyday language, and do so in multiple languages and literacy levels by text or voice.
When paired with remote monitoring, this creates a continuous, real-time link between patients and their care teams. In places where behavioral health access is limited, AI-powered applications have been shown to be highly effective in providing structured talk therapy and supporting people burdened with social isolation, depression, or chronic illness.
One compelling example of reaching rural communities is Sprinter Health, which deploys trained clinical staff to patients' homes in rural areas like Kentucky, Maine, and Louisiana. Using a custom logistics platform powered by AI, Sprinter aligns clinician travel with outreach needs, creating efficient, high-density routes, even in the most remote zip codes. These visits, often funded by health plans and paired with remote nurse practitioner consults, reconnect patients with care on their own schedules, reducing barriers and improving outcomes.
Clinicians in rural America are asked to do more with less. AI tools help them reclaim time for what matters most: patient care. Voice-enabled documentation, automated coding, and streamlined prior authorizations reduce the suffocating administrative burden while improving billing accuracy and compliance. These tools also reduce physician and nursing burnout.
One example: Ambience Healthcare* provides a suite of AI tools, including AI-enabled 'ambient scribes' with an integrated coding and compliance engine that have led to a 40% decrease in documentation time. Some health systems have reported revenue increases of $13,000 per physician annually by using these tools.
AI is also helping rural clinics and hospitals improve their back office, automating scheduling, eligibility checks, and insurance workflows. Language models are flagging coding errors, demystifying payer rules, and reducing costly denials. These improvements aren't flashy, but they're critical to keeping rural providers financially solvent. An example is CodaMetrix*, which has shown a 70% reduction in manual coding work and a 60% drop in coding-related denials using digital automation and AI tools.
AI is also bridging the specialist gap. Advanced clinical reasoning models are being used to supplement rural clinicians' decision-making, offering diagnostic recommendations when specialists aren't available. In radiology, large vision models can review and triage imaging studies, highlighting urgent cases for rapid interpretation.
In Kenya, OpenAI's partnership with primary care provider Penda Health, though in a different setting, has shown what's possible: a 16% reduction in diagnostic errors over 40,000 patient visits.
This kind of augmentation won't replace local physicians. It will support and extend their reach, ensuring that rural patients, who by geography are typically more physically distant from their providers, receive the same standard of care as those in more urban centers.
Governance and Guardrails: Making AI Safe, Trusted, and Transparent
While the promise of AI in rural health is real, we must proceed thoughtfully. The speed of innovation cannot come at the expense of safety, patient trust, or clinical integrity. And in rural settings, where resources are stretched and IT support may be more limited, clear guardrails are essential.
AI tools must be explainable. They must be tested for bias. They must work consistently across diverse populations and care settings. And they must be monitored in real time so that rural hospitals and clinics know exactly how these systems are performing. Importantly, technology exists today to make this possible, even for rural independent facilities outside larger, more resource-complete systems. Companies like Qualified Health* are building platforms that allow rural providers to implement AI safely and smartly. Their systems provide audit trails, performance dashboards, and governance frameworks that give local teams control as well as convenience and safety.
Technology alone won't change rural health. But technology implemented wisely with strong community buy-in and a commitment to safety can. And rural communities, free of many oftentimes restraining legacy systems, may well be the best situated to lead.
We've seen it before in other fields. In parts of Africa and India, mobile phones bypassed traditional landline infrastructure altogether. In China, electric vehicle adoption accelerated because the country leapt directly into the next generation of mobility.
Rural America has the same potential when it comes to health. Indeed, rural providers can leapfrog older models and become national leaders in delivering smarter, more equitable care.
A Future Within Reach
Rural health is not failing. It is changing.
Yes, many inpatient hospitals are struggling, and recent Congressional action in reimbursement and Medicaid cuts make the environment more challenging. Many have closed, and many feel that the recent reconciliation law will lead to the demise of others. But this does not have to be an end of care in rural America. In fact, it opens the door to something better, built for today and for tomorrow. A system more responsive, more connected, and more sustainable than what came before.
The Rural Health Transformation Program is not a silver bullet. It is limited in size, and it cannot address every challenge rural providers face. But it does point in the right direction. It signals that rural health care matters, and that technology, wisely applied, can help power a system that works better and more sustainably for patients, caregivers, and communities.
This isn't just about modernizing infrastructure. It's about honoring the values that make rural America such a powerful place to lead this change. In rural communities, people take pride in self-reliance and resourcefulness. They know how to figure things out. They trust neighbors more than distant systems. They solve problems without waiting for someone else to do it. And they've long practiced the kind of resilience that will be needed to adapt, lead, and thrive in a new model of care.
That new model won't rely on size. It will rely on connection. It will deliver care not just in hospitals, but in homes, local clinics, and mobile units. With the right technology in place, rural providers can leapfrog outdated systems and become national leaders in delivering smarter, earlier, and more personal care.
Rural America has always led in farming, in military service, in faith and family. It can lead in health care, too. That's what this moment offers. Not a return to the past, but a chance to shape the future. A future defined by innovation, partnerships, connection, and care.Frist Cressey Ventures, of which the author is a partner, has a minority investment in the companies marked with an asterisk above. They are for illustrative purposes only.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Parents Prepare: Trump's Megabill Brings 3 Crucial Tax Changes
You may have heard of the Trump tax bill that was recently signed. This key piece of legislation, so-called 'One, Big, Beautiful Bill' (OBBB), impacts millions of Americans through its provisions on health, border security, and taxes.


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
Rehab can keep you out of jail — but become a prison itself
Chris Koon didn't read the fine print. Sitting in the Cenikor Baton Rouge rehab center's intake office in 2015, flanked by his mom and grandmother, he signed where told. 'A lot of it read like legalese,' writes Shoshana Walter in 'Rehab: An American Scandal' (Simon & Schuster, Aug. 12). 'Incomprehensible but also innocuous, like something you might see before downloading an app on your phone.' Koon felt lucky. He wasn't going to prison. Just days earlier, he'd been arrested for meth possession. The alternative to five years in state prison? A brutal two-year Cenikor inpatient program. Koon took the deal. In signing the intake documents, he agreed to 'receive no monetary compensation' for work he did, with wages going 'directly back to the Foundation.' He signed away his right to workers' compensation if injured. He forfeited his food stamps, disability payments and any other government assistance. And he agreed to 'adopt appropriate morals and values as promoted by the program.' Koon's story isn't an outlier — it's a glimpse into what Walter calls 'America's other drug crisis.' While overdoses and opioid deaths dominate headlines, far less attention goes to the 'profit-hungry, under-regulated, and all too often deadly rehab industry,' writes Walter. Across the country, thousands of treatment programs are propped up by federal policies and rooted in a distinctly American blend of punishment and personal responsibility. People were 'lured to rehab with the promise of a cure for what ailed them,' Walter writes, 'only to repeatedly falter and fail inside a system that treated them like dollar signs.' The idea hard labor can cure someone isn't new. After the Civil War, US slavery was abolished except as punishment for a crime. That loophole became the foundation for a forced-labor system that conveyed newly freed black people into prisons and chain gangs. Over time, prison officials began marketing this arrangement as 'rehabilitation.' As Walter writes, this legacy has been repackaged for the modern drug crisis. The Affordable Care Act promised expanded treatment access through Medicaid. But the rehab industry that exploded in response was lightly regulated, profit-driven and increasingly dangerous. The result: thousands of people like Chris Koon, lured into treatment by courts, cops or family members, only to find themselves stuck in a system that looked less like therapy and more like punishment. They include women like April Lee, a black woman from Philadelphia. Despite growing up in addiction's long shadow — her mother died from AIDS when Lee was just a teenager, after years of selling sex to support a crack habit — Lee didn't start using drugs herself until after having her second child, when a doctor prescribed her Percocet for back pain. That opened the door to addiction. Child-welfare authorities eventually took her kids. Fellow users nicknamed her 'Mom' and 'Doc' for her uncanny ability to find usable veins, no matter how damaged. April Lee returned to her recovery house — as an unpaid house monitor. April Lee / ACLU She entered recovery in 2016. Every morning at 6, 18 women gathered in the dining room of one of two overcrowded houses to read from the Bible. Lee stayed 10 months. With nowhere else to go, she returned — this time as a house monitor, working without pay in exchange for a bed. 'She was still early into recovery, and she felt stressed by the intensity of the job,' Walter writes. 'On top of that, she wasn't getting a paycheck, so she couldn't save up money to leave.' 'Don't really know how to feel right now,' Lee wrote in her journal. 'The lady I work for — for free, mind you — wont me to watch over women witch mean I have to stay in every night.' She felt physically and emotionally trapped. 'I wanted to snap this morning. Miss my children so much.' Like so many others, Lee found herself stuck in the recovery-house loop — forced to work, unable to leave and earning nothing. She helped with chores, mainly cooking and cleaning. Residents' food stamps stocked the kitchen. Lee loved to cook, and she made comfort food for the house: mac and cheese, fried chicken, beef stew. But all the warmth she gave others couldn't buy her a way out. For others, like Koon, it was about more than just forced labor. During his first 30 days at Cenikor, the other patients policed each other. If one person broke a rule, the entire group might be punished with a 'fire drill' in the middle of the night. 'If anyone stepped out of line or did something wrong during the drill, they'd have to stay awake even longer,' Walter writes. Discipline was obsessive. In his first month, Koon sat in a classroom with about 30 other residents, most sent by courts like he was, reciting rules out loud, line by line. There were more than 100. 'He could get in trouble for not having a pen, not wearing a belt, for an untied shoelace, for leaving a book on the table, for his shirt coming untucked,' Walter details. Koon learned the punishment system fast. A common one was 'the verbal chair,' in which any participant could order him to sit, arms locked and knees at a 90-degree angle, and stare silently at the wall while others screamed at him. 'Go have a seat in the verbal chair. Think about having your shirt untucked,' they'd say. And Koon, like everyone else, was expected to respond, 'Thank you.' There were others. 'Mirror therapy,' where he'd stand and yell his failings at himself in the mirror. 'The dishpan,' where he'd be dressed in a neon-green shirt, scrubbing floors and dishes while loudly reciting the Cenikor philosophy, 'a paragraph-long diatribe about self-change,' Walter writes. And the dreaded 'verbal haircut,' when another resident, sometimes even a staff member, would berate him as part of his treatment. Dressed up as a therapeutic community, Koon thought instead, 'This is like a cult.' Walter believes he wasn't far off. Everyone was required to tattle. Koon had to turn in weekly at least 10 'pull-ups' — written reports detailing rule infractions committed by fellow residents. If he didn't, he could lose points and with them privileges like phone calls, family visits or permission to grow a mustache. Confrontations were public and ritualized: Residents would sit in a circle around one or two people forced to listen as everyone else denounced them. 'They took turns confronting that person, professing their faults and errors, while the person was permitted only to say 'thank you,'' Walter writes. Staff called it 'The Game.' He saw grown men cry. He heard women called bitches and sluts. He realized many employees were former participants enforcing the system that once broke them. Not everyone saw a problem. Many in the legal system embraced tough-love rehab programs, especially judges looking for alternatives to jail. One of Cenikor's biggest champions was Judge Larry Gist, who ran one of the first drug courts, in Jefferson County, Texas, in the 1990s. 'The vast majority of folks that I deal with are basically bottom-feeders,' Gist told the author. 'They've been losers since the day they were born.' Cenikor's extreme model was ideal for 'the right people,' he believed. Cenikor rewarded such loyalty, giving judges and lawmakers steak dinners served by participants and annual awards banquets, complete with gleaming, diamond-shaped trophies. Gist 'proudly displayed his' in 'his chambers, where he liked to host his happy hours with prosecutors and defense attorneys.' Koon was booted out of Cenikor after just two years, for faking a urine sample and contracting a contagious staph infection, but managed to stay sober on his own. He proposed to his childhood sweetheart, Paige, moving in with her two daughters, and finding the stability he'd been chasing for years. He went back to school to learn welding, and the daily rhythms of family life kept him grounded. 'He hasn't taken a drug recreationally for eight years,' Walter writes. Lee's path out took longer, and her recovery was, as Walter writes, 'in some ways a stroke of luck.' She left the house after landing a job at a law firm that helped women reunite with their children in foster care — a world away from the nights she'd once spent tricking at the Blue Moon Hotel but one that barely covered her bills and pushed her just over the poverty line, cutting off assistance. She earned her GED, took online college courses, regained custody of her kids and bought her own home by 2021. 'And yet many days she felt she was teetering on the edge, one crisis or unpaid bill away from making a terrible mistake,' Walter writes. That year, she returned to Kensington, where her addiction had once thrived, bringing fresh food and water to people still living on the streets. As for Cenikor, its time in the shadows ended, at least temporarily. Investigators found evidence of exploitation: residents forced to work without pay, unsafe housing conditions, staff-client relationships, even overdoses inside the facilities. The state of Texas fined Cenikor more than $1.4 million in 2019, but the agency struck a settlement, and it continued to operate. Koon and Lee don't represent everyone who's experienced addiction, treatment or recovery. But they do reflect a system that often promises far more than it delivers. 'When rehab works, it can save lives,' Walter writes. 'It can mend families and be among the most redemptive narrative arcs in a person's life.' But sometimes, rehab not only fails to help people, it actively harms them, recycling them through a gauntlet of relapse, shame and risk: 'Despite the rehab industry's many claims, there is no magical cure for addiction.'


New York Post
3 hours ago
- New York Post
What is ‘social apnea'? How certain weekend habits are wrecking your sleep
When the party keeps going all night long, your breathing might not. New research has uncovered a bizarre new sleep disorder dubbed 'social apnea' — and your weekend habits may be to blame. Scientists from Australia's Flinders University found the mysterious trend hits younger adults hardest, with those under 60 more than three times as likely to be affected as their older, and perhaps better-rested, peers. Advertisement 4 Untreated sleep apnea can lead to serious consequences, harming your short and long-term health. Gorodenkoff – Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) — the most common sleep-related breathing disorder — occurs when the muscles in the throat and tongue relax during sleep, blocking the airway and causing repeated pauses in breathing. Roughly 30 million Americans are believed to suffer from OSA, but as many as 80% go undiagnosed, according to the American Academy of Sleep Medicine. And that's no small issue: untreated OSA can lead to serious health problems, including heart disease, stroke, type 2 diabetes, cognitive decline, depression and even death. Advertisement Now, researchers warn that the newly identified 'social apnea' — marked by a consistent worsening of OSA symptoms on weekends — suggests the problem may be even more widespread than previously thought. 'Sleep apnea is already a major public health issue, but our findings suggest its true impact may be underestimated,' Dr. Lucia Pinilla, lead author of the study, said in a statement. 'Most clinical diagnostic testing is done on a single night, typically a weeknight, missing the weekend effect we're now calling social apnea.' Advertisement In the study, which analyzed data from over 70,000 people worldwide, researchers found participants were 18% more likely to have moderate to severe OSA on weekends compared to mid-week. 4 In addition to making the airway more prone to collapse, alcohol can disrupt the normal sleep cycle. pikselstock – What's behind the weekend spike? Researchers suspect it's a perfect storm of bad habits, including smoking and drinking, that tend to spike when the workweek winds down. Advertisement Alcohol acts as a relaxant, making the airway more likely to collapse during sleep and potentially increasing both the frequency and severity of sleep apnea events. Smoking, on the other hand, causes inflammation and swelling in the airways, narrowing them and making obstruction more likely. 'This is consistent with our finding that the social apnea effect is particularly intensified in men and younger individuals,' the authors wrote, noting these groups report higher alcohol and tobacco use on weekends. The numbers bear that out: men were 21% more likely to suffer severe OSA on weekends, while women saw a smaller 9% increase. Adults under 60 faced a striking 24% jump in weekend OSA severity, compared to just 7% among those over 60. 4 Nicotine can can affect the muscles in the upper airway, potentially leading to relaxation and collapse during sleep. Voyagerix – Sleep timing also appears to play a major role. Sleeping in or staying up late — what researchers call 'social jetlag' — was associated with a 55% increase in the odds of experiencing worse OSA on weekends. In contrast, those who kept a consistent sleep schedule throughout the week showed no significant changes. Even sleeping just 45 minutes longer than usual on weekends was enough to increase OSA severity by 47%, the researchers found. They suggest this happens because OSA tends to worsen during REM sleep, and longer, later sleep stretches the amount of time spent in that stage, increasing the risk of disrupted breathing. Advertisement 4 Staying up later and sleeping in on weekends can disrupt consistent CPAP usage patterns. kudosstudio – Inconsistent use of CPAP machines, the primary treatment for OSA, could also be playing a role. CPAP therapy is highly effective when used regularly, improving sleep quality, mood, heart health and even metabolism. But it only works if patients wear the device for at least four hours a night on 70% of nights each month. Advertisement Many patients fall short of that — especially on weekends. Prior studies show that younger adults, in particular, are more likely to skip CPAP use on Friday and Saturday nights, weakening the treatment's overall effectiveness. These findings mark the first clear evidence that OSA severity worsens on weekends, according to senior study author Danny Eckert, director of FHMRI Sleep Health. He said the results underscore the need for more comprehensive sleep assessments and personalized diagnostic tools. 'Relying on a single-night sleep study may miss important variations, leading to underdiagnosis or misclassification of OSA severity,' Eckert said. Advertisement To counter the weekend effect, researchers suggest keeping a consistent sleep routine — even when you're off the clock. 'Try to keep the same sleep schedule throughout the week and weekend, ensuring that you get the recommended 7-9 hours of sleep a night,' Eckert advised. 'Keeping a fixed wake-up time and using your prescribed OSA therapy, even on weekends, and going to bed when you feel sleepy will help ensure you frequently get enough restorative sleep which can help combat the weekend spike in OSA,' he added.