
Novak Djokovic row breaks out as Serb faces accusations at Wimbledon
Novak Djokovic has once again found himself at the centre of controversy after being accused of faking injury concerns to "create drama" at Wimbledon. The Serbian star, set to take on Alex de Minaur in the fourth round on Monday, was spotted with a knee support during a weekend training session, igniting fresh speculation about his physical condition.
Last month, Djokovic said he competed with an injury at the French Open, and concerns resurfaced when he called for medical attention during his opening-round win at Wimbledon against Alexandre Muller. He hasn't specifically said he is nursing an injury, and some suspect that wearing a knee brace during a practice session was a deliberate ploy by Djokovic to throw off his rivals.
A number of social media users have voiced doubt about the legitimacy of what seems to be his latest injury issue, implying the 24-time Grand Slam winner might be exaggerating - or entirely fabricating - the issue to ease pressure or lower expectations. "Novak is again trying to confuse everyone with his 'injury,'" one person posted. "It's becoming a routine for him to create drama out of nothing."
Some, however, defended Djokovic, insisting that 'he's 38' and 'should be allowed to wear a knee brace', especially given his history with injuries. But these are accusations the Serb has faced many times before over the course of his career.
Earlier this year, tennis great John McEnroe accused Djokovic of faking an ailment after the Serbian appeared to hobble during his Australian Open quarter-final win over Carlos Alcaraz. "This isn't the first time we've seen this routine," McEnroe said while commentating. "Don't be fooled."
Djokovic responded days later, addressing McEnroe directly: "It's always easier to judge and criticise than to understand. It's a lesson I've learned in life."
The Serbian was ultimately vindicated - albeit in unfortunate circumstances - when he had to pull out of a semi-final clash with Alexander Zverev only three days later. Even so, parts of the crowd at the Rod Laver Arena booed him, prompting Zverev to defend him publicly.
"Please guys, don't boo a player when he goes out with injury," Zverev said in his post-match comments on court. "I know that everybody paid for tickets and everybody wants to see a great five set match. But you have to understand for the past 20 years Novak Djokovic has given tennis absolutely everything.
"He has won this tournament with an abdominal tear, a hamstring tear. If he cannot continue with this match, it means he really can't continue."
While many accept the legitimacy of his injuries in Melbourne, others - such as Nick Kyrgios - think Djokovic sometimes employs health concerns to gain a psychological edge. "Honestly, I think that he [uses medical timeouts] sometimes early on in Slams to mess with his opponents, to be honest," Kyrgios said on talkSPORT after Djokovic beat Muller.
Last year, former French Open champion Adriano Panatta accused Djokovic of deceiving the public about how severe his injury really was, following what many called a miraculous return from knee surgery. Djokovic had suffered a meniscus tear in his right knee during the 2024 French Open and was expected to miss Wimbledon. Instead, he not only showed up but advanced all the way to the final.
"Let's say there's a big mystery surrounding him," Panatta told Libero Quotidiano. "How is he really? Is he bluffing? And his recently operated knee?"
Roger Federer has also raised questions about Djokovic's physical complaints and his tendency to call for medical help mid-match - particularly in his earlier years. During the 2006 Davis Cup, Federer criticised a 19-year-old Djokovic for summoning a trainer in a match versus Stan Wawrinka, questioning the young Serb's integrity.
"I don't trust his injuries. I'm serious," Federer said bluntly. "I think he's a joke, you know, when it comes down to his injuries."
Three years later, Federer again expressed frustration after Djokovic pulled out of an Australian Open match against Andy Roddick due to heat exhaustion. "It's happened before, he's not the guy who's never given up before, so that's kind of disappointing to see," Federer said..
"I mean, he gave up against me in Monaco last year because of sore throat. Those are the kind of things you wonder about. I've only given up basically once in my career."
Roddick himself has also poked fun at Djokovic's injury history. Prior to their 2008 US Open meeting, the American mocked the long list of physical complaints Djokovic reportedly had that tournament.
"Yeah, both of 'em (ankles)? And a back [injury]? And a hip [injury]? And a cramp? Bird flu … anthrax… SARS… common cough and cold," Roddick joked. "No, I mean, if it's there, it's there. There's just a lot. You know, he's either quick to call a trainer or he's the most courageous guy of all time. It's up for you guys to decide."
Over time, Djokovic has silenced many of his critics - not only with his unmatched success on the court but also with his near-pristine injury record. Now 38, he's more susceptible to niggles, which have become more frequent.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Leader Live
10 minutes ago
- Leader Live
Iga Swiatek fires back at her doubters by winning maiden Wimbledon title
The Pole crushed first-time grand slam finalist Amanda Anisimova 6-0 6-0 in less than an hour on Centre Court, making it the most one-sided final for 114 years. Not since 1911, when Dorothea Lambert Chambers beat Dora Boothby, had a Wimbledon title been decided by such a scoreline, while the only other instance at a grand slam came in the French Open in 1988 when Steffi Graf beat Natasha Zvereva. A new Wimbledon champion is crowned 🇵🇱 Iga Swiatek defeats Amanda Anisimova 6-0, 6-0 to win the 2025 Ladies' Singles Trophy 🏆#Wimbledon — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 12, 2025 Swiatek had slipped to eighth in the world rankings after a disappointing clay season by her extremely lofty standards, with the 24-year-old failing to win the French Open for the first time since 2021. 'We as public people and as athletes, we can't really react to everything what's going on,' said Swiatek, who served a one-month doping ban at the end of last season after taking contaminated medication. 'We've got to focus on ourselves. Obviously sometimes it's easier to do that, sometimes it's harder. For sure, the past months, how the media sometimes describe me – and I've got to say, unfortunately, Polish media, how they treated me and my team, it wasn't really pleasant. 'I hope they will just leave me alone and let me do my job because obviously you can see that we know what we are doing, and I have the best people around me. 'I have already proved a lot. I know people want more and more, but it's my own process and my own life and my own career.' Swiatek maintained her unblemished record in grand slam finals, making it six titles and becoming the first Polish player, male or female, to win a Wimbledon singles trophy. By adding the grass-court title to her four French Open crowns and one US Open trophy she has also now won slams on all the surfaces. She had never previously been beyond the Wimbledon quarter-finals, and she said: 'It's something that is just surreal. I feel like tennis keeps surprising me, and I keep surprising myself. 'I think the fact that it's on grass, for sure it makes it more special, I would say, and more unexpected. So it feels like the emotions are bigger because, at Roland Garros, I know I can play well, and I know I can show it every year. Here, I wasn't sure of that. I also needed to prove that to myself.' Anisimova's comeback has been one of the stories of the fortnight, with the former teenage prodigy having stepped away from tennis for eight months in 2023 for mental health reasons. She came into the final off the back of a semi-final victory over Aryna Sabalenka but from the start appeared paralysed by nerves. Anisimova's serve deserted her and there were many more errors than winners off the ground. The crowd, who had paid more than £300 each per ticket, willed the American to find a foothold in the contest but Swiatek was utterly ruthless. Another treat for the Pole was receiving the trophy from the Princess of Wales. 'On court she just congratulated (me),' said Swiatek. 'She told me some nice stuff about the performance. Later on, I don't remember really because I was too overwhelmed. 'I didn't want to do any faux pas. I wanted to behave well. Overall the process of getting the trophy from Her Royal Highness was something surreal. Since I'm a kid, honestly I'm a big fan of the Royal family. It was amazing.'


BreakingNews.ie
16 minutes ago
- BreakingNews.ie
Amanda Anisimova in shock after nightmare Wimbledon final
Amanda Anisimova admitted she was in shock after suffering the worst Wimbledon final defeat in more than a century. The American's first grand slam final quickly turned from a dream into a nightmare, with Iga Swiatek needing just 57 minutes to record a 6-0 6-0 victory. Advertisement Anisimova is only the third woman ever to lose a major final without winning a game, and the first at Wimbledon since 1911. Iga Swiatek consoles Amanda Anisimova following the final (Adam Davy/PA) 'It was a bit tough to digest obviously, especially during and right after,' said the 23-year-old, who cried before and during her on-court speech. 'It's not how I would have wanted my first grand slam final to go. I think I was a little bit in shock after, as well. But I told myself, I'll definitely come out stronger after this. 'I mean, that's not an easy thing to go through, losing love and love in a grand slam final. If anything, I can look at it as a positive and something I can look at as motivation going forward. Obviously there's a lot of things I need to do to progress.' Advertisement Prior to the final, Anisimova had been having the best fortnight of her career, with a semi-final victory over Aryna Sabalenka the high point. "You guys have carried me through this entire Championship" ♥️ It wasn't her day today, but Amanda Anisimova has had an incredible journey at #Wimbledon this year ✨ — Wimbledon (@Wimbledon) July 12, 2025 A first slam final is always a nerve-racking occasion but Anisimova believes her performance was more down to physical fatigue. 'I was nervous, but it wasn't anything out of this world,' she said. 'If anything, I was more excited to go out there and compete. 'I didn't practise yesterday. I think that I was just really fatigued. I could feel it also in my warm-up this morning. I had to take a break after every single rally out there in my warm-up. Advertisement 'To be able to last two weeks in a grand slam is definitely something that you need to work a lot on. It's not an easy feat. It's my first slam final, so at least I have that experience now. Amanda Anisimova did not win a game (John Walton/PA) 'I think it's honestly a fork in the road. It's whatever direction you want to go in. I'm going to choose the path of working towards my goals and to try and keep improving, hopefully put myself in more positions and opportunities like today.' Swiatek is probably the worst opponent to be facing in such a situation, with the Pole one of the best front runners in the sport's history. She has now won all six of her grand slam finals, and Anisimova said: 'She came out playing very, very well. So all the credit to her. She was able to really play the game she wanted. She definitely made it difficult for me. She's an unbelievable player.' Advertisement Anisimova's run has been one of the stories of the fortnight, with the American set to break into the top 10 for the first time 18 months after returning from an eight-month break for mental health reasons. Britain's Princess of Wales consoles Amanda Anisimova (John Walton/PA) A teenage prodigy, Anisimova had to cope with the death of her father when she was only 17 and became burned out by the demands and expectations of the sport. She credited her family with helping her to get to this moment and broke down in her speech while talking about her mother, who flew to London on Saturday morning. 'I'm really fortunate that they're all here, especially in times like this,' said Anisimova. 'I think just receiving all the comfort I can tonight will be super helpful.' Advertisement


Metro
19 minutes ago
- Metro
Why Carlos Alcaraz v Jannik Sinner will be one of the best Wimbledon finals ever
Wimbledon finals like this don't come around very often. The two best tennis players on the planet – Carlos Alcaraz and Jannik Sinner – will fight it out on Sunday to land the biggest prize in the sport. If their showdown is anything like this year's epic French Open final, then we're definitely set for one of the greatest Wimbledon clashes of all time. The world No.1 and world No.2 battled it out for five hours and 29 minutes in Paris – in what became the second-longest Grand Slam final in history. If there was a void when Roger Federer and Rafael Nadal retired, then it has already been filled by these two absolute titans, who are already head and shoulders above any other player currently active on the ATP Tour. It was clear from Sinner's incredibly dominant victory over Novak Djokovic in the semi-finals that the changing of the guard is well and truly here. Alcaraz and Sinner have already won the last six majors between them but Sunday's match is just the second time they've met in a Grand Slam final. Australian Open 2024 – Jannik Sinner – Jannik Sinner French Open 2024 – Carlos Alcaraz – Carlos Alcaraz Wimbledon 2024 – Carlos Alcaraz – Carlos Alcaraz US Open 2024 – Jannik Sinner – Jannik Sinner Australian Open 2025 – Jannik Sinner – Jannik Sinner French Open 2025 – Carlos Alcaraz While there seems to be a lack of needle between the pair – given they're always heaping praise on each other, at least in front of the media anyway – this year's Wimbledon final will surely take their rivalry to the next level. If Sinner loses, he'll be stuck on three Grand Slam titles, half the amount that Alcaraz would've racked up. Despite being so fond of one another, that would surely put some kind of resentment in the Italian star's heart. If Alcaraz loses, Sinner will be just one major trophy behind the Spaniard with the chance to match and then leapfrog him should he defend his titles at the US Open and Australian Open, where he's the current champion. Analysis from Metro's dedicated tennis reporter Liam Grace… Before a ball was hit, I was absolutely adamant that Alcaraz would land the Wimbledon trophy again. He entered the Championships having won 18 matches in a row, winning the title at Queen's Club en route. But I'd be lying if the thought of Sinner coming out on top didn't enter my mind after Alcaraz needed five sets to battle past 38-year-old Fabio Fognini in the first round, while the Italian dropped just 18 games on his way to the last 16, breaking a record set by the great Roger Federer. But then more drama followed… Sinner arguably would've crashed out if it wasn't for his walkover win over Grigor Dimitrov, and there were huge question marks over his elbow injury until he smashed Ben Shelton and Djokovic in the quarter-finals and semi-finals respectively. It's so incredibly hard to call that when Taylor Fritz was asked to predict the champion after his semi-final loss to Alcaraz, he failed to provide an answer. When I spoke to Jamie Murray earlier in the tournament, he argued that Alcaraz becomes harder to beat the further he progresses. It really is on a knife-edge but after Alcaraz beat Sinner in the French Open final this year, coming from two sets down, mixed with his experience of clinching the last two Wimbledon titles, I would narrowly give the edge to the Spaniard. Predicted winner: Carlos Alcaraz There's so much on the line this weekend that any sports fan – regardless of how much you like tennis or not – would be a little foolish to miss it. 'I expect that on Sunday [I will be pushed to the limit],' Alcaraz said ahead of the Wimbledon final against Sinner. 'It's going to be a great day, a great final. I'm excited about it. I just hope it won't be five-and-half hours on the court again – [but] if I have to, I will. 'The level that Jannik is playing is really high, as always. I think he doesn't go down his level in the matches. It's unbelievable what he can do on a tennis court. 'The movement that Jannik has on grass is unbelievable. He's sliding like he's playing on clay.' American world No.5 Fritz was asked to explain the biggest differences between the way Alcaraz and Sinner play at Wimbledon this year. 'I think Jannik typically has a bigger serve, so it's tougher to get in on his return games,' Fritz explained. 'Jannik plays a bit flatter, and it's a little bit more predictable [but] he's unbelievable at what he does playing from the baseline. 'I think Carlos is a little more unpredictable with the slicing and the coming to net and the drop shots. Carlos has a lot of different ways to play. One thing he does, when he whips his forehand cross, there's a lot of movement away. 'They both generate a lot of just, like, raw power. But I think for me it's a little more uncomfortable to play Carlos just because of the unpredictability of what he's going to do. You never know what Carlos might just hit like a short kicker and serve and volley on like a 15-30 or something like that.' Sinner, meanwhile, added: 'It's going to be difficult, I know that. But I'm looking forward to it. 'After Roland-Garros I practiced very hard, maybe more, to improve as a player. 'This is the second consecutive Grand Slam that we are in the final and playing each other. 'I believe it's good for the sport. The more rivalries we have from now on, the better it is, because people want to see young players going against each other. He is the favourite. He won here two times in a row.' MORE: John McEnroe urges Wimbledon bosses to impose new ban on finalists MORE: Amanda Anisimova breaks down in tears after most brutal Wimbledon final ever MORE: John McEnroe reacts to Amanda Anisimova losing 6-0 6-0 in Wimbledon final