logo
A Guide to the Newest Innovations in Midlife Hair Thinning Treatments, From Red Light Therapy to PRP

A Guide to the Newest Innovations in Midlife Hair Thinning Treatments, From Red Light Therapy to PRP

Yahoo5 days ago
I've never had an abundance of hair, so seeing it get thinner in the past 10 years has been fairly depressing. I attributed breakage to weekly blowouts, but post-Covid and post-office life, I'm no longer paying for those high-heat, hair-pulling salon sessions. My hair still isn't getting any thicker or healthier.
Talking to girlfriends my age, I have come to accept that hair shedding is a common hair condition to develop in menopause. I've also decided to take some action. I'm fortunate that I don't have Androgenetic Alopecia, which is severe hair loss, so I don't need anything drastic (yet). But like many of us, I am not sitting on a pile of money, so I can't throw thousands of dollars at my thin hair, either. I'm going easy first—but there are lots of interesting innovations in hair restoration to explore.
Why Does Hair Thin in Midlife?
When talking about what causes menopausal hair loss, the simple answer is fluctuating hormones. It's the same thing that everyone tells postpartum women: Your hormones are going crazy, so your hair is going to fall out more rapidly. In menopause and perimenopause, it's the natural dip in progesterone that can especially mess with your tresses.
Other factors might also hit hard in midlife. 'Individuals face hair loss due to medical treatments, stress or illness in addition to hormonal shifts,' says Jennifer Donovan, owner of Le Shag salon in Kingston, NY, which has a dedicated program for hair restoration. 'Post-COVID, many clients have reported unexpected hair concerns—from thinning to changes in texture—often linked to heightened stress or long-term effects of illness.'
Experts also point to diet, so critical to hair growth. We could eat chips and drink cocktails in our youth without beauty consequences, but not anymore. Jay Smalls, a Los Angeles-based trichologist (a healthcare professional who specializes in hair and scalp health), has his clients cut down or give up on processed food, alcohol and smoking as the first step to combating hair loss.
'Our bodies don't need hair as a core biological component. We just want hair!' says Smalls, whose company, Arey.com, sells products for aging hair, and he sees clients individually as well. If our diets lack diversity by the time we hit middle age, Smalls says, our bodies de-prioritize hair growth.
Why is Hair Loss Treatment Having Such a Moment?
'People are taking better care of themselves now with so much information being made available. You also have celebrities who are willing to talk about their hair loss issues,' says Ashley Person, a hair stylist in New York City who works with many women (and celebs) over 40. 'I believe women are more comfortable because fewer people are keeping it a secret.' (See: Ashley Tisdale and her alopecia, for example.)
There are a ton of remedies available, so to keep this simple, I'll go from the easiest and least-expensive options to the most invasive, expensive — and innovative — medical procedures. This isn't even an exhaustive list of all you can do, just an overview!
Step One: Reduce Stress
Why it works: Stress can push hair growth into a resting phase, and if stress continues, hair might fall out, as described by the National Institutes of Health.
Cost: You can tackle stress for free. 'If you have no money, . Your cortisol levels are the biggest culprit of future hair loss,' says Smalls.
Pro: Banishing stress helps you sleep and eat better, too.
Con: Easier said than done, right? No one can magically change the outside stressors in life. But you can be in charge of how you react to them.
Step Two: Eat Better and Consider Supplements
Why it works: Your body needs a rich array of nutrients and protein to make hair. A Mediterranean diet, as described in our authoritative guide to thinning hair, is among the best for midlife. Experts also point to supplements to give hair added nutrients.
And then: 'Water water water!' says Donovan. 'Hydration is key.'
Cost: Your food costs might change as you buy lean meat, fruit and vegetables, but eating better doesn't need to break your budget. What might add to your monthly outlay are supplements. I'm currently on Nutrafol (winner of 'best supplement for healthy hair' in our annual Flow Space Wellness Awards) and that's costing about $75 a month through three-month deliveries.
Pro: We all know that most people look better when they eat better.
Con: Theoretically, eating clean should be easy. But it's hard to be disciplined when others are having burgers and fries. It's also tough to make switches when you really like sugar (like me) or your life regularly includes alcohol. Neither of those are great for hair.
Step Three: Protect and Nurture Your Scalp—And Reconsider Hair Dying
Why it works: We obsess about the skin on our face, yet the skin on our scalp is right there too, and takes more of a beating because it directly faces the sun and harmful UV rays. It also takes the brunt of salon treatments, like hair dye. The scalp can not proliferate hair, Smalls says, if it's always working hard to repair itself.
'The scalp ages six times faster than the skin on our face,' Smalls says. 'We scratch our scalp. We don't use sun protection. And if you start dying your hair at 30, in 10 years, at age 40, you'll start to see the results of all of that chemical exposure. Whatever you did five years ago is still showing in your hair now.' (Gulp.)
Cost: It doesn't cost much to wear a hat or other hair covering when you're in the sun. And you save money if you stop highlights and hair dye, though those are hard beauty habits to give up. (Talk to your stylist. I have a friend who embraced her natural gray and it looks stunningly beautiful! But I have yet to give up my highlights so I'm not one to talk.)
Topical scalp medications, like Minoxidil, are another way to go and have been around for years. You can buy an Amazon Minozidil Treatment for $25; the online reviews are mixed but mostly positive.
can help and good ones cost in the ballpark of $50 a month. In our Wellness Awards, many experts recommended Davines Naturaltech Energizing Superactive Treatment, and I am trying it now (it tingles in a good way). Smalls sells a serum called To the Root that aims to neutralize free radicals from sun exposure and deliver antioxidants to encourage growth.
There are also scalp spas. Person turned me on to RejuvaScalp which targets dermatitis, psoriasis, and other scalp conditions through deep-cleaning and massage stimulation.
Pro: Protecting our scalp is smart, and serums are cheaper than hair coloring treatments.
Con: Many of us, myself included, are addicted to our highlights. Growing them out is a commitment.
Step Four: Try Hormone Replacement Therapy
Why it works: The loss of estrogen and progesterone as we age has a profound effect on hair. Talk to your primary-care doctor or your ob/gyn about whether hormone replacement therapy (HRT) or menopause hormone therapy (MHT) might be right for you. 'If you can start low-level HRT earlier rather than later, you'll notice changes,' Smalls says. I have found it to be true; my hair has gotten noticeably better one year into HRT.
Cost: It depends on what your doctor prescribes and what insurance covers. I'm on an estrogen patch and progesterone pills, and even with my insurance, I probably pay $100 a month. But I have friends whose insurance covers everything.
Pro: Replacing lost hormones through medicine can have benefits beyond helping your hair. I have more energy and sleep better on HRT, and the skin on my face looks healthier.
Con: Not everyone likes the idea of ingesting hormones. And while my ob/gyn is a huge proponent, my primary care doctor wants me to only stay on HRT for five years.
Step Five: Consider a Hair Topper or Extensions
Why it works: Anything mentioned up until now will show positive results over time. But clipping in a hair topper or something like a fake ponytail can provide immediate gratification. There are also elaborate ways to weave in extensions. 'As part of my salon's advanced offerings we have a stylist trained in the InvisaBlend system,' Donovan says. 'With that, we feed individual human hairs into existing thinning areas. This allows the client's own hair to grow while adding density. It's a breathable system that allows all serums and topical treatments to fully reach the scalp for better hair growth.'
Cost: Adding fake hair or human-hair extensions can cost a little or a heck of a lot, depending on what you're looking at. I went down a rabbit hole of trying to price the ones that look super natural and the services are a minimum of a thousand dollars, and often more, plus you need maintenance.
Pro: I can't get enough of the Cinderella stories behind these. Check out @thelaurenashtyncollection (out of South Carolina) or @hairdreaming (out of LA). The before and afters are both compelling and demystifying!
Step Six: Red Light Therapy or Medical Treatments
Why it works: With low-level red light therapy, or a medical treatment like platelet-rich plasma therapy (PRP — and also nicknamed the 'vampire facial'), you're taking bigger steps to stimulate blood circulation and hair growth.
Low-level red-light therapy is the less drastic measure. We've reviewed plenty of red-light panels for your face and also a red light therapy hat for hair growth. The good tools get expensive, and results take time — the hat is to be used for 10 minutes a day for 16 weeks, and then three or four times a week forever after that.
PRP is more intense. It involves a blood draw, a centrifuge, and injecting active stem cells into your scalp. Johns Hopkins describes how it can be used for things like injuries and wound healing in addition to male-patterned baldness. But women try it, too, including, apparently, Gwyneth Paltrow.
Cost: According to Smalls, red-light therapy devices can cost anywhere from $30 to $500, but the cheap stuff might not be legit or useful. PRP or any medical treatment can — or certainly should — run you thousands of dollars. If someone is offering it on the cheap, beware, says Smalls. 'You need to do it with a trusted provider. I compare it to Botox. It's something you'd only want to get from a really trusted medical professional,' Smalls says.
More from Flow Space
FDA Experts Call for Rethink on Menopause Hormone Therapy Warnings
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Mastectomy or Lumpectomy? Reassuring New Data for Young Women
Mastectomy or Lumpectomy? Reassuring New Data for Young Women

WebMD

time7 minutes ago

  • WebMD

Mastectomy or Lumpectomy? Reassuring New Data for Young Women

July 23, 2025 – Young women diagnosed with breast cancer may not need to choose aggressive surgery to reduce recurrence risk. New research suggests the likelihood of cancer recurring (coming back) in the same breast or nearby lymph nodes isn't related to her choice of surgical treatment – removing either the cancerous tissue (lumpectomy) or one or both breasts (mastectomy). And for women 40 and under with invasive but not incurable cancer, recurrence risk across the board was "low" – just 5.6% over 10 years. "Many young women with breast cancer choose to have bilateral mastectomies even if they may be a candidate for a smaller surgery," said study author Laura S. Dominici, MD, a breast surgeon at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Mass General Brigham in Boston. "We know survival isn't impacted by this choice, but historically, young women were felt to have higher risk for local recurrence and tend to have more 'aggressive' breast cancers." The new findings, published Wednesday in JAMA Surgery, suggest that "women cannot make a bad choice," Dominici said. "A woman who wants to keep her breast isn't trading off a cancer outcome to do so." Of the more than 1,100 people in the study, 30% had lumpectomy, 26% had a single mastectomy, and 43% had bilateral mastectomy. When researchers analyzed surgical treatment alongside cancer subtype – such as whether it was related to hormones or certain genes – they found no significant differences in recurrence rates. Researchers attributed the low risk to advances in cancer treatments, which have become more targeted. Breast cancer patients in the study were diagnosed between 2006 and 2015, and they received optimal treatment after surgery – meaning breast cancer in young women may not be as likely to come back as older research suggested. Does This Research Apply to Me? The study included women age 40 or younger with stage I, II, or III breast cancer of any subtype – meaning hormone receptor-positive, triple negative, or any ERBB2 (formerly HER2) genetic status. If that describes you, you may want to talk to your doctor about it. The researchers excluded women with stage IV breast cancer (which has already spread to other parts of the body) and women with stage 0, or ductal carcinoma in situ or DCIS. "The results do require some caution in their generalizability because the patients were not from diverse populations, with nearly 85% non-Hispanic White women," Julie A. Margenthaler, MD, wrote in a commentary published with the study. Margenthaler was not involved in the study and is a breast cancer surgeon at WashU Medicine in St. Louis. What Type of Recurrence Did This Study Look For? It looked for local or regional recurrence (that is, in the same breast or surrounding lymph nodes), but not distant recurrence – when breast cancer returns in a distant part of the body like the brain or bones. That's a stage IV diagnosis, which is usually considered treatable but not curable. What About BRCA? About 1 in 10 women in the study had known BRCA genetic involvement, and most had mastectomies. "Women do not have to have a mastectomy in this setting, but many of them consider it," Dominici said. "Mastectomies will reduce the risk for future cancers (for which patients with BRCA mutations are at higher risk) but will not reduce risk for recurrence of the current cancer. A woman with BRCA mutation having lumpectomy should be doing high-risk screening with mammogram and MRI." Does This Mean I Should Get a Lumpectomy? When deciding what breast cancer surgery to have, you need to consider physical, emotional, and psychological factors, said Dominici, who is also a professor at Harvard Medical School. "There is no 'right' answer," she said, "and it is often hard for women to both appreciate and consider the short- and long-term impacts of the different surgeries." Lumpectomy may not be an option for some women with cancer in a significant portion or multiple areas of the breast, Dominici said. "Surgery is one important part of treatment, but systemic therapy and radiation are also key to lower risk for recurrence," she said.

Investigate Biden's health in office, but investigate Trump's, too
Investigate Biden's health in office, but investigate Trump's, too

Washington Post

time8 minutes ago

  • Washington Post

Investigate Biden's health in office, but investigate Trump's, too

The argument in the July 11 editorial, 'Why Congress should investigate Biden's health,' that Congress should investigate Joe Biden's health while he served as president, would have been far stronger if the board had also argued for looking into President Donald Trump's health. Investigating Biden's situation after the fact might help support arguments for greater transparency and awareness. But politicizing the move by focusing on one party dooms the effort at this point. Furthermore, demonstrating a clear, current focus on fitness for service strengthens the argument for investigating Biden's health now. And need I mention, investigating Trump's health would highlight any risks the nation faces now — not just hypothetically, were Biden to have won the 2024 election. Examining what health-related assessments are the norm in high-level executive positions in both private- and public-sector organizations would also offer insights into how Congress should handle these cases. Tom Martella, Washington The July 11 editorial on the congressional investigation into former president Joe Biden's health during his administration cited a number of concerns. Those included forgetting names of top aides, use of teleprompters and tiredness, which imply that Biden might have been unable to fully exercise the duties of the presidency. The editorial also pushed for Kevin O'Connor, Biden's onetime doctor, to be more forthcoming about his patient's health despite confidentiality laws that apply to health records. To expect an unbiased and nonpolitical investigation into this matter as the editorial would want is ludicrous, given the political environment of Congress. Though such an investigation could be useful, it could only provide meaningful information if conducted by an independent team of experts and if not politically motivated. Congress could authorize such a review. Congress's job is to investigate and react to what is going on in the country by proposing laws. What laws would be proposed after an investigation into Biden's health? Limit the age at which a candidate could run for president? Such an action would probably require a constitutional amendment and take years to enact. Though Biden might have exhibited some of the symptoms of age, whether they affected his ability to function as president is doubtful, as he achieved many positive things for the country during his term. With so much at stake in the country these days, Congress should spend its time on much more pressing issues. Jared Wermiel, Silver Spring Sadly, the 'unflinching investigation into Biden's fitness' that the July 11 editorial advocated would probably never happen in today's Congress. Extreme polarization has made it impossible. Democrats do not have faith in Rep. James Comer (R-Kentucky), chairman of the Oversight Committee, to conduct a proper investigation. Nor should they, given that Comer's impeachment investigation of President Joe Biden was unbecoming of Congress. Even Comer's witness, conservative legal scholar Jonathan Turley, testified there was not enough evidence for impeachment. So, unlike the Editorial Board, I am not the least bit disappointed that former White House physician Kevin O'Connor is refusing to testify. But I do agree fully with the Editorial Board that Americans deserve an unflinching investigation into Biden's health. I am a Democrat of 45 years, and I am extremely disappointed in what has occurred with what seems to me to be a cover-up into the serious matter of a president's health. Democrats' claim that Donald Trump was a threat to democracy was undermined when they appeared to hide from American voters the condition of their 2024 presidential candidate. Attempting to conceal the true condition of their candidate would be a threat to democracy. Bruce Kirby, Rockville Does it really matter whether Congress investigates former president Joe Biden's health in office, as the July 11 editorial charged? He's retired. Leave him alone. Here's a better idea: Investigate the health of our current president. He's the only one who should really matter to Congress. During Donald Trump's first term, dozens of psychiatrists and mental health experts collaborated on a book alerting the American public to the potential danger he posed. Clues to Trump's mental state have been plainly observable for many years. So have at it, lawmakers. But, if they determine that Trump suffers from a health issue that makes him unfit for office, they must act for the nation's good and not for political advantage. Paul Mazich, Yorktown, Virginia The writer is a retired commander in the U.S. Navy. Regarding the July 19 editorial, 'The opioid settlement can help save lives': Naloxone, or Narcan, is a lifesaving tool, and expanding its accessibility should absolutely be a key target of opioid settlement fund spending. But it is not the only strategy worthy of investment. The settlement agreement allows for the funds to be used for opioid use disorder and other substance use disorders, recognizing the high rates of poly-substance use and that substance-specific strategies are often ineffective (particularly for prevention). These funds provide an unprecedented opportunity to address our nation's addiction crisis. Let's encourage states to spend them on the things that we know work not only to reduce opioid overdoses but also to end the recurring cycles of addiction and drug epidemics. Spending all settlement funds on increasing access to naloxone will not prevent the emergence of the next drug epidemic. This can only be done by investing the settlement funds in effective prevention strategies that promote resilience and emotional well-being among youths, targeting the root causes of substance use and an array of other negative health and social outcomes. Though naloxone is a powerful tool for preventing overdose, it will not prevent drug use, nor is it a treatment for addiction. It only reverses opioid overdoses; it does not reduce deaths from other major contributors to preventable deaths in the United States: alcohol and tobacco. Treatment, particularly Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for opioid use disorder, is also a critical tool for reducing overdoses. The suggestion that treatment only works for people willing to seek it out ignores the reality that treatment is widely unavailable and often unaffordable. Expanding access to effective treatment must also be a key focus of the settlement fund spending. States should absolutely use the settlement funds to prevent opioid overdoses and save lives. The danger is in suggesting that there is one solution to this multifaceted crisis. Lindsey Vuolo, New York Linda Richter, Scarsdale, New York Lindsey Vuolo is vice president of health law and policy at the Partnership to End Addiction. Linda Richter is senior vice president of prevention research and analysis. In 2013, we worked on the development of the White House drug strategy, which recommended broader access to naloxone and also recognized the need for an expanded system of care for people with substance use disorder. We are encouraged by The Post's July 19 editorial that called attention to the persistent issue of overdose deaths facing the United States. We also appreciated the Editorial Board's desire to see opioid settlement dollars spent on evidence-based interventions that will reduce overdose deaths. We heartily agree and have dedicated our careers to advancing these interventions. However, though we agree that naloxone and overdose prevention efforts are key elements of a state or local community's response to overdose deaths, naloxone cannot be the primary or sole response simply because this investment alone will not yield the greatest possible impact. Methadone and buprenorphine are the most evidence-based treatment medications for opioid use disorder, and they can have the biggest impact on mortality. That's because these medications provide long-term overdose prevention, decreasing mortality by nearly 50 percent; they support sustained recovery and improved outcomes for individuals, as well as stability for families and communities; and naloxone is estimated to have only a 3.6 percent mortality prevention effect. Treatment medications dramatically lessen illicit opioid use, thereby driving down the risk of overdose (and the demand for illicit opioids such as fentanyl). As the editorial states, long-term efforts are needed, but we must also look to the evidence to drive effective strategies that improve lives and prevent deaths. Regina LaBelle, Takoma Park Caleb Banta-Green, Seattle Regina LaBelle was acting director of the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy in the Biden administration and also served at ONDCP in the Obama administration. Caleb Banta-Green was a senior science adviser at the White House ONDCP during the Obama administration. Post Opinions wants to know: What would you add to a time capsule to represent America today? Share your response, and it might be published as a letter to the editor.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store