logo
Kneecap Banned From Hungary for Posing ‘National Security Threat'

Kneecap Banned From Hungary for Posing ‘National Security Threat'

Yahoo5 days ago
Kneecap's forthcoming performance in Hungary will not go ahead as the Irish band has been banned from the country for three years for posing 'a national security threat.'
Hungarian politician and spokesperson Zoltán Kovács announced the ban on social media on Thursday, saying Kneecap are 'officially banned from entering Hungary—for antisemitism and glorifying terror.'
More from Rolling Stone
Police End Investigation Into Kneecap's Glastonbury Performance
Massive Attack Launch Alliance for Musicians Facing 'Intimidations From Within Our Industry' for Supporting Gaza
Kneecap Don't Back Down in New Video for 'The Recap'
Kneecap were scheduled to perform at Budapest's Sziget Festival on Aug. 11. Kovács said the band would not be allowed in the country because they 'repeatedly engage in antisemitic hate speech supporting terrorism and terrorist groups. Hungary has zero tolerance for antisemitism in any form.'
He added, 'Their planned performance posed a national security threat, and for this reason, the group has been formally banned from Hungary for three years. If they enter, expulsion will follow under international norms.'
Kneecap responded with their own statement apologizing to the 'tens of thousands of fans who we were buzzing to see in person at Sziget.'
'The authoritarian government of Viktor Orban say we 'pose a national security threat,'' the band wrote. 'Which is fucking outrageous coming from a man who welcomed Netanyahu, a wanted war criminal, like a hero just a few weeks ago. There is no legal basis for his actions, no member of Kneecap has ever been convicted of any crime in any country. We stand against all hate crimes and Kneecap champions love and solidarity as well as calling out injustices where we see it.'
They added, 'It's clear this is political distraction and a further attempt to silence those who call out genocide against the Palestinian people.'
In a statement, Sziget called the Hungarian government's decision 'unnecessary and regrettable.'
'Following concerns raised by government and pressure groups across Hungary over the past weeks at the prospect of Kneecap performing, we have liaised closely with the band and they reassured us that their performance would not contravene either Sziget's values or Hungarian law,' the festival said. 'Sziget Festival's values mean we condemn hate speech, while guaranteeing the fundamental right to artistic freedom of expression for every performer. Cancel culture and cultural boycotts are not the solution…. We fear that government's decision announced today to ban Kneecap may not only damage the reputation of Sziget, but also negatively affect Hungary's standing worldwide.'
Kneecap have been a constant subject of controversy over the past few months, both in the U.K. and around the world. At Coachella in April, the trio started one of their sets with a screen message that read, 'Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinian people,' followed by, 'It is being enabled by the U.S. government who arm and fund Israel despite their war crimes.' At Glastonbury last month, the band led the crowd in a chant of 'Fuck Keir Starmer.'
The band was subsequently investigated by police for their Glastonbury performance, which was not aired live. Last week, the BBC reported that the Avon and Somerset Police announced that in following advice from the Crown Prosecution Service it had decided not to take any further action against Kneecap due to 'insufficient evidence to provide a realistic prospect of conviction for any offense.'
Additionally, Kneecap's Mo Chara, born Liam Óg Ó hAnnaidh, faced a terror charge in the U.K. for allegedly displaying the Hezbollah flag and yelling, 'Up, Hamas, up Hezbollah,' and, 'The only good Tory is a dead Tory,' at a November 2024 concert.
Ó hAnnaidh and Kneecap have repeatedly denied the allegations and claimed footage from the concert was 'deliberately taken out of all context.' They've also suggested the charge was backlash towards their vocal support for Palestine, against the war in Gaza, and and against the U.K. and U.S. governments for funding and supplying it. Chara is currently out on bail ahead of an August 20 court date.
This article was updated with a statement from Sziget on July 25 at 7:45 a.m. ET
Best of Rolling Stone
Sly and the Family Stone: 20 Essential Songs
The 50 Greatest Eminem Songs
All 274 of Taylor Swift's Songs, Ranked
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UCLA loses federal research funding in administration's ongoing fight with top universities
UCLA loses federal research funding in administration's ongoing fight with top universities

CNN

time42 minutes ago

  • CNN

UCLA loses federal research funding in administration's ongoing fight with top universities

Race & ethnicityFacebookTweetLink Follow UCLA is the latest major institution of higher learning to see promised research funding snatched away by the Trump administration, the university's leader said in an open letter to students and faculty Thursday. 'This is not only a loss to the researchers who rely on critical grants,' wrote Chancellor Julio Frenk. 'It is a loss for Americans across the nation whose work, health, and future depend on the groundbreaking work we do.' Grants from the National Science Foundation and the National Institutes of Health are included in the suspensions, Frenk said, but did not provide an amount of how much funding is in peril. The Los Angeles Times reported that roughly $200 million in grants awarded to UCLA are being suspended, citing a partial list of suspended grants provided to them by a source. A spokesperson for the National Science Foundation declined to provide specific figures, saying grant awards are being suspended 'because they are not in alignment with current NSF priorities and/or programmatic goals.' 'We will not fund institutions that promote antisemitism,' said a spokesperson for the Department of Health and Human Services, which includes the National Institutes of Health. 'We will use every tool we have to ensure institutions follow the law.' The Trump administration has repeatedly cited antisemitism – especially in the context of contentious pro-Gaza protests on campuses – as a reason to deny promised funds to universities, including Harvard and Columbia. Harvard is fighting the funding decisions in court, while Columbia agreed to a settlement with the government that restored its grants. The funding cut comes days after the Justice Department's Civil Rights Division announced it found UCLA in violation of federal law by 'acting with deliberate indifference in creating a hostile educational environment for Jewish and Israeli students.' While the formal notice to UCLA said the federal government 'now seeks to enter into a voluntary resolution agreement,' Attorney General Pam Bondi sounded less conciliatory. 'DOJ will force UCLA to pay a heavy price for putting Jewish Americans at risk and continue our ongoing investigations into other campuses in the UC system,' Bondi said in a statement. It is not just the Trump administration that has tangled with UCLA over charges of antisemitism. A group of Jewish students filed suit against the university last June, saying the school allowed discrimination against Jews to flourish following Israel's military operation in Gaza in response to the October 7 attacks. The lawsuit said UCLA leaders waited days before responding to a group of pro-Palestinian protesters that refused to allow students to enter campus unless they agreed to 'a statement pledging their allegiance to the activists' views.' UCLA settled the lawsuit earlier this week for $6.45 million, with more than $2 million of the total going to designated 'organizations that combat antisemitism and support the UCLA Jewish community.' UCLA also agreed it is prohibited from 'knowingly allowing or facilitating the exclusion of Jewish students, faculty, and/or staff' from university programs and activities.

American Victims of Hamas and Hezbollah Attacks Sue U.N. Agency
American Victims of Hamas and Hezbollah Attacks Sue U.N. Agency

New York Times

time3 hours ago

  • New York Times

American Victims of Hamas and Hezbollah Attacks Sue U.N. Agency

Victims and relatives of people killed or injured in attacks by Hamas and Hezbollah have sued the United Nations agency dedicated to Palestinians, accusing it of aiding the armed groups and fueling terrorism. The lawsuit suit was filed on Thursday in federal court in the District of Columbia by American citizens living in Israel and the United States and their family members. A similar case has been playing out since last year in federal court in Manhattan. Both suits are attempting to hold the United Nations Relief and Work Agency, known as UNRWA, responsible in some measure for violent acts by Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, groups dedicated to the destruction of Israel that have been designated terrorist organizations by the United States. The plaintiffs are seeking unspecified monetary damages, both compensatory and punitive. Israel has long maintained that UNRWA has been infiltrated by militants and is biased against Israel in the war in Gaza, an accusation U.N. officials have denied. The agency has been at the center of controversy during the conflict, which was set off by the Hamas-led attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. In the New York case, lawyers for the U.N. agency have argued it is exempt from such suits because it has diplomatic immunity. The Biden administration supported that position, but in April, lawyers in President Trump's Justice Department reversed the government's stance, paving the way for the latest lawsuit. Some analysts say the Justice Department's new position could open the door not only to more civil cases seeking damages from the agency, but also to the Treasury Department's imposing sanctions on it. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.

Their families fled the Nazis. Facing Trump, US Jews are making Germany ‘Plan B'
Their families fled the Nazis. Facing Trump, US Jews are making Germany ‘Plan B'

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Their families fled the Nazis. Facing Trump, US Jews are making Germany ‘Plan B'

Germany is making it easier for the descendants of victims of Nazism to obtain German citizenship, and an increasing number of American Jews are applying. While some are seeking citizenship for practical reasons or as a form of reparation, others see it as a way to escape an increasingly anti-Semitic America under US President Donald Trump. Joe Sacks, a high school science teacher in Washington, DC, has begun the process of obtaining German citizenship. He is one of hundreds of Jewish Americans looking to reclaim German citizenship after their families fled the Nazis. "You click 'Yes, I'm Jewish' on the German form and send it to the German government,' he told NPR in an interview last month. 'It's wild.' Among the hundreds of Jewish-American applicants seeking German citizenship, many cite practical reasons like easier travel or opportunities in Europe. Others say they want to have a 'Plan B' in today's tense political climate. But for many, it is a decision taken with a heavy heart. A growing trend Trump's attempts to demonize and scapegoat segments of the population – notably immigrants, 'elite' institutions like universities as well as the media – are uncomfortable echoes of 1930s prewar Germany. His insistence on abject loyalty and taking control of state, independent and cultural institutions to serve his own ends have drawn comparisons to fascist and autocratic regimes. And more than one former Trump adviser has publicly made a Nazi salute – in one case, prompting a French far-right leader to cancel a planned US speech. Read moreWhat parallels do historians see between the Trump administration and the Nazi regime? The United States is also experiencing a surge in hate crime and xenophobic speech. "This rise of authoritarianism just parallels the rise of Hitler,' Eric Podietz, a retired, Philadelphia-based IT consultant who has applied for German citizenship, told NPR. "The squelching of speech and the academic institutions being compromised. The signs are there. It's happening." Podietz's mother fled Germany when she was a child in the late 1930s. Like Sacks, he isn't planning to move, but is increasingly worried by the political rhetoric in the United States that he says harks back to that heard in Germany before his family was forced to flee. At a ceremony held in July 2024 at the German consulate in New York, 82 Holocaust survivors, along with their children and grandchildren, became German citizens. "We've seen an upward trend since 2017, when Donald Trump [first] became president,' David Gill, Germany's then consul general in New York, told the German news program Tagesschau, which covered the event. And the numbers only continue to increase. The New York consulate received 350 applications in 2016 versus 1,500 in 2024, which resulted in 700 naturalizations, according to the German Consulate General NY Instagram account. Streamlined procedure The German constitution granted citizenship to former German citizens who were persecuted by the Nazis and their descendants back in 1949. But for years, difficult legal requirements prevented many applicants from taking advantage. Some were denied German citizenship because their ancestors had adopted another nationality before their German citizenship was officially revoked. Individuals born before April 1, 1953, could only obtain citizenship if they were able to prove that their father had been stripped of German nationality – citizenship having been stripped from the mother was not enough. Germany addressed these problems and others beginning in 2021, significantly simplifying the citizenship process. Anyone applying now can rely on proof obtained on the maternal side, and no longer need to prove they can support themselves financially. Applicants just need to prove that their ancestors were persecuted in Germany between 1933 and 1945, or that they belonged to a targeted group like Jews or Roma, political dissidents or the mentally ill. Although the application process is free of charge, finding old documents to prove family links can be a major hurdle, said Marius Tollenaere, a partner at Frankfurt-based immigration law firm Fragomen, in comments to CNN. The applications must also be submitted in German. Reluctance from some families All four of Scott Mayerowitz's grandparents were forced to flee Germany in the 1930s. He grew up in New Jersey with parents who refused to buy any German-made products or drive a German car. The decision to apply for citizenship from the country that had caused his family so much pain was a weighty one. His mother Susan agreed to gather the necessary documents, albeit reluctantly. 'My parents must be turning over in their graves,' she told CNN. Mayerowitz convinced his mother by pointing out the practical benefits, including the work and educational opportunities the EU could offer his own daughter. 'And finally, I said if for some reason she one day needed to flee the US for persecution, this opened up a lot more doors,' he told the network. Arlington resident Anne Barnett had a similar experience with her mother, who was initially upset that she wanted citizenship from the country that had exterminated so much of her family. She came around eventually, Barnett told CNN. Unfortunately, what convinced her was the increasing anti-Semitism in the United States. Travel writer Erin Levi of Connecticut also made the move to obtain German citizenship after she found her grandfather's US alien ID card, which was stamped '1942' and had Germany as his country of citizenship. Eighty years after the end of World War II, Levi told CNN she feels safer in Germany than in other countries where anti-Semitism is on the rise. 'I think Germany has become such a strong ally and supporter of Israel. It's incredible to see the responsibility they've taken for the atrocities they committed. There aren't that many other countries that have,' she said. Turning the Page Steve North made the decision to apply for German citizenship in 2020 out of fear that Trump would be re-elected. North, a writer for the Jewish Telegraphic Agency, recalled an emotional exchange with former consul general Gill, who handed him his naturalization papers. To his surprise, Gill said that giving him his papers 'feels wonderful, because we Germans get part of our history back', North wrote for the agency. ''It reminds us how much knowledge and wisdom was lost by expelling and murdering the Jews.' Gill went on to describe handing naturalization papers to a 97-year-old woman from Hamburg who said the process gave her closure, and of repatriating a 95-year-old man who told him, 'the Germany of today is a Germany I feel comfortable with'. While North isn't planning on leaving the United States just yet, he is keeping his options open. '[T]he unthinkable happened in a supposedly civilized country in modern times, and it would be foolish to disregard the possibility of history repeating itself here, given the Jew-hatred we constantly see expressed on both the extreme right and left of the American political spectrum,' he wrote.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store