Hawke's Bay fires: Fine criticised as ‘economic incentive to burn'
Photo:
Rex Graham / LDR
A fine given to a person for starting a smoky burn-off near Hastings is being described by an advocate as giving them "an economic license to burn".
The fire in the Longlands area on July 27 was judged to have been a breach of Hawke's Bay Regional Council airshed rules and led to a $300 fine.
On the same day, a National Environmental Standard air pollution breach was recorded in Hastings, of 51 micrograms of particulate matter per cubic metre. The limit is 50 micrograms.
Photo:
Former Hawke's Bay Regional Council chairman Rex Graham, who regularly sends photos to the Hawke's Bay Regional Council, captured an image of smoke drifting across Longlands and said it was one of the worst he'd seen.
"$300 is not a deterrent. It's actually an economic incentive to burn," Graham said.
"I rang the Pollution hotline. This was one of the worst examples of air pollution that I have seen this year, which is saying something considering the extent of this activity," Graham said.
"This fire was in blatant disregard and abuse of our community's air quality and the law.
"The smoke was drifting towards Hastings, completely covering the entire region between Railway Rd and Havelock North," Graham said.
"It was difficult to drive on Riverslea Rd heading back into Hastings due to limited visibility."
Hawke's Bay Regional Council said its pollution response team investigated a complaint regarding smoke in the Longlands Rd area on July 27.
"As a result of that investigation, enforcement action has been taken and a $300 fine issued."
HBRC compliance manager Matt Wilkinson said it was frustrating that the council's ability to deter this behaviour was constrained by the fines set at a national level.
"But we acknowledge the changes made by the government, coming into effect in September, which lifts the infringement fines to $600 for individuals or $1200 for companies as a move in the right direction of discouraging burning in or near airsheds."
Graham said those planned increases were not high enough and would still encourage fires to save money.
Air pollution records published in Hawke's Bay Today on Friday, August 8, show the National Environment Standard air quality was also exceeded in Hastings on July 26 (54 micrograms).
In a twelve-month period in 2023-2024, HBRC received approximately 80 complaints of burning during winter. More than 70 infringement fines were issued.
Orchard burn-offs are allowed under the Regional Air Quality rules, but they must meet specific conditions.
Christian Jirkowsky moved from Austria to Hawke's Bay in 2007 and has more than 30 years experience in the power and heat generation sector, where wood, biomass, and fossil fuels are utilised for energy production.
Jirkowsky said it was scientifically proven that even brief exposure to fine particles (PM 2.5 and PM1) and aerosols emitted from open wood burning increases the risk of non-accidental and respiratory-related fatalities.
"This is why most developed countries have banned open burning and apply severe consequences for violations," he said.
"Wood smoke exposure induces airway irritation, causes lung damage, and substantially increases the likelihood of developing asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and heart attacks," Jirkowsky said.
An airshed is a legally designated air-quality management area. In New Zealand, regional councils and unitary authorities have identified areas to be managed as airsheds for the national environmental standards for air quality.
The majority of airsheds may have levels of pollutants that exceed the national environmental standards for air quality.
Some airsheds are also identified based on factors such as: the number of people living in the airshed now or in the future, unique weather patterns and geography and local air emissions, such as local industrial activity, which need to be specifically considered and managed.
HBRC says airshed rules exist because smoke from backyard fires in urban areas, though they may seem minor, adds up quickly.
On cold, still days, it lingers and affects air quality.
"If everyone lit backyard fires, it would quickly become a serious pollution issue. These rules help protect our whānau and community from the harmful health effects of smoke, especially in winter when it gets trapped close to the ground."
LDR is local body journalism co-funded by RNZ and NZ On Air.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
What you might not know about insurance in a natural disaster
An old abandoned building on Fitzerald Avenue on the edge of Christchurch, on February 17, 2021, nearly 10 years after it was damaged in a 6.3 magnitude earthquake. Photo: AFP / Marty Melville id="4LW03NN_image_crop_138657" crop="16x10" layout="thumbnail"] The Natural Hazards Commission is warning homeowners they're only covered for partial land damage under the Crown-owned insurer. A recent survey shows more than half (56 percent) of insured New Zealand homeowners expect full insurance compensation for natural hazard land damage. The Natural Hazards Commission (NHC) - which used to be called the EQC - said the national scheme provided up to $300,000 for house damage and some limited cover for damage to land. NHC chief executive Tina Mitchell said the land cover was standalone and could not be topped up with private insurance. "Land cover is specifically designed as a contribution payment, not full cover. "The limits of cover available ensures every homeowner across the country gets access to some protection, and helps keep the scheme affordable as it is funded by homeowners," Mitchell said. She said people needed to understand there were limits to Crown-owned insurer scheme before a disaster occurred. "When you understand that your landcover is limited, you can take action. "We recommend learning about the risks to your property and seeking expert advice from builders or engineers about how to protect your land from damage. For example, strengthening retaining walls and considering how waterways might impact your property are good things to check regularly. "If you do think your house is in a risky zone, you may want to allow for possible recovery costs in your financial planning. The scheme is a good contribution, but it is not designed to cover all costs," Mitchell said. Aerial images showing the extent of flooding in Tasman 2025. Photo: Tim Cuff / POOL The commission's chief strategy officer Michala Beacham told Morning Report properties were only covered for land damage within eight metres of the home, or 60 metres of the land needed to access the home. "It is a horribly stressful time dealing with a natural hazard event, it effects people homes, families and livelihoods, and then having an unexpected cost on top of that is really, you know, not a good time for anyone. "So that's why we are just trying to help people understand beforehand." Beacham said settlements for land were based on the cost of repair - within eight metres of the home - or the value of the land damage, but said under legislation NHC paid whatever was less. "So if your cost of repair is greater than the value of the land then you are going to face a shortfall... A number of people do find themselves with less than they expected or less than they might otherwise need to make a repair," she said. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
3 hours ago
- RNZ News
Tauranga returns 70 percent of impounded dogs to owners, 25 percent put down
Tauranga city was able to return 70 percent of impounded dogs to their owners. Photo: More than 15,000 labradors, spaniels, pugs and other dogs call Tauranga city home. And they are lucky to - the city's animal control statistics were a standout in the region. Figures provided to RNZ show over a five-month period, Tauranga city was able to return 70 percent of impounded dogs to their owners and euthanised only 25 percent. Every other area of Bay of Plenty had to put down around half of all impounded dogs - (50 percent in Rotorua, 42 percent in Western Bay, 52 percent in Kawerau and 74 percent in Ōpōtiki ). Brent Lincoln from Tauranga City Council was quick to acknowledge the types of dogs found in Tauranga compared to other areas made an impact on the figures, as did the amount of animal control staff the city could afford. "We have a dedicated animal services group within Tauranga, where some of the small councils their dog control might also be their parking wardens and their bylaws officers or something like that," he said. Kat Thompson, from local animal rescue group Vada's, praised Tauranga for having gone the extra mile in reuniting or rehoming the large majority of impounded dogs. "I feel like they have worked really, really hard to get where they have," she said. But she also said there were many factors affecting the figures and people should not draw unfair comparisons. "You've got to remember Ōpōtiki, and I work closely with Rotorua, they are very different types of dogs you are working with. You are working with a lot more gang dogs, you are working with a lot more aggressive dogs, that aren't up for rehoming," she said. Thompson said she felt every pound in the area was working really hard, but Tauranga had done more. Brent Lincoln said once a dog entered the Tauranga pound a combination of things had been put in place to get the best outcome for the animal. One of which was hand delivering a letter to owners. "We try and work with the owners quite closely once we have identified them, offering the options and giving them a bit of flexibility on how they can work together to get their dog out of the pound," he said. Lincoln said 90 percent of dogs entered the pound because they were found roaming the streets and that was when microchipping and registering a dog became vitally important. Companion Animals New Zealand's register manager Sarah Clement said people often misunderstood what a microchip was. The only information on the microchip was the microchip number. "A lot of people think that once their animal has a microchip the microchip holds all of their information, but registration is really key, [that microchip number] needs to be put on a database, so it can be linked with the guardian's details." There are two nationwide databases for pounds to search - Companion Animals and the councils'. Clement encouraged councils to access both and for pet guardians to keep their information up to date on both. "It's always a really heartbreaking thing when you find an animal, you scan it, yes it has a microchip, you try and call the owner, and their details aren't up to date." Lincoln said they recently discovered a dog in the Tauranga pound had actually been stolen months earlier from Auckland. The national registry was able to reunite the dog and owners - an outcome everyone wanted. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
15 hours ago
- RNZ News
The Panel with Deborah Hart and Andie McCombs Part 2
An image of Mr Ed from his younger days. Photo: supplied In part two, community sports organisations are crying out for more more volunteers after a 40% drop in people signing up since the pandemic. And finally, is this the longest standing classroom toy? Mr Ed of Piha Community Preschool has been taken around New Zealand and further afield for the last 15 years.
