Privacy commission finds Alberta government failed to follow freedom of information laws
Alberta's privacy commissioner says the UCP has been breaking the rules around freedom of information requests.
Alberta's privacy commissioner said the Government of Alberta has failed in multiple ways to uphold freedom of information policies.
The Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act (FOIP) was passed in 1995 and requires all public bodies, including government bodies, to make eligible information available to the public.
'Access to information rights are the foundation of an individual's ability to exercise their democratic rights by facilitating access to government information,' said Diane McLeod, Information and Privacy Commissioner of Alberta, in a report on her findings.
'Accountability is the cornerstone of the exercise of good governance,' she continued. 'Acting accountably within the context of the FOIP Act requires that government administer its responsibilities under the FOIP Act in a manner that not only respects these rights but also adheres to the spirit and intent of the Act.'
The report details an investigation launched in regards to 34 requests for review filed over alleged refusals to process access requests by Alberta government public bodies.
It found 27 Government of Alberta public bodies failed to uphold FOIP principals, with violations including:
Refusing access requests on the basis applicants didn't provide enough information;
Requiring applicants to limit the number of topics in a request to one;
Limiting the time frame on the search for records; and
Requiring applications to split requests containing multiple topics into multiple requests.
McLeod also found the Government of Alberta had issued directives and policies that allowed staff to refuse access requests in a way not permitted under the FOIP act.
The privacy commissioner made several recommendations to resolve the issues she found and said she expects them to be followed, despite provincial plans to repeal the FOIP act and replace it with the Access to Information Act.
'My findings and recommendations in this report are in large part still valid under the new legislation. This is because the relevant provisions of the new Act are the same or substantially similar to the provisions of the FOIP Act,' McLeod said.
'For that reason, I expect government public bodies to apply my findings and recommendations to their practices under both the existing and the new legislation.'
In an email to The Canadian Press, a spokesperson for Service Alberta Minister Dale Nally said the ministry is considering the privacy commissioner's findings and plans to work with McLeod to address concerns.
The full report can be accessed here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CTV News
24 minutes ago
- CTV News
UR Pride says work ‘isn't finished' in response to legal challenge moving forward
WATCH: Following a court of appeal ruling allowing a challenge against Sask's pronoun law to proceed, UR Pride says it's a win, but their work isn't finished.
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Nipissing First Nation elects a new chief
It would appear that Nipissing First Nation has elected a new chief. An undated photo of the Nipissing First Nation Band Office. (Nipissing First Nation/Facebook) It would appear that Nipissing First Nation (NFN) has elected a new chief. Cathy Bellefeuille Unofficial results show that Nipissing First Nation has elected Cathy Bellefeuille to serve as chief for the next three-year term of council. An undated photo of Bellefeuille posted to social media on Jan. 4, 2023. (Facebook/Cathy Bellefeuille) Unofficial results show Cathy Bellefeuille has been elected chief for the next three-year term. Scott McLeod, who has served as chief for nine years, will step down when this council term ends at the end of July. There were six names on the ballot and more than 1,400 votes to be cast on Friday. 'A Vote for Unity' was Bellefeuille's campaign motto. Her campaign focused on working for all members both on and off the reserve, protecting NFN inherent and treaty rights while promoting economic development in order to build the community. 'I believe our First Nation has a solid foundation with a fantastic future that has been built over the years of hard work of the previous councils,' said Bellfeuille in her campaign platform. 'I am a strong advocate for health care, education, economic stability, culture, language and social development.' Bellefeuille has served as a court worker for 15 years with the North Bay Indigenous Friendship Centre, has served as band representative and a child welfare coordinator and is actively involved with Nipissing First Nation's Ojibway Women's Lodge. She also served on NFN Council, being elected in 2015. During her tenure, she held the economic development portfolio and the health and social portfolio. Outgoing Chief McLeod posted congratulatory messages to 'all the candidates who put themselves out there to serve our great Nation,' on social media prior to the election. Scott McLeod Scott McLeod, who has served as Nipissing First Nation Chief for nine years, will step down when this council term ends at the end of July after losing his re-election bid. An undated photo of McLeod posted to social media on June 10, 2023. (Facebook/Scott McLeod Shabogesic) 'The community always makes the choice they feel is needed and we must all support the outcome,' he said. True to his words, McLeod formally congratulated Bellefeuille on her win in a subsequent social media post on Saturday morning. 'Congratulations to our new NFN Chief Cathy Bellefeuille and our newly elected Council,' he wrote. 'There are many challenges ahead. Let's all give them our full support as we move forward together.' McLeod briefly reflected on his time as chief. 'I have given my community the best I have to offer and would do it all over again in a heartbeat,' he said. 'Being Chief has been a tremendous honor and a big part of my identity for the last 9(sic) years. Letting that go, although difficult, is a necessary transition for our Nation.' McLeod told the community he will be taking some time to reflect and determine what is next but said he will post more thoughts 'in the near future.' Fred Bellefeuille, NFN's Electoral Officer, states a full report with official election results will be released on Monday. Officials with NFN told CTV News that the face for Chief was a close one but they do not expect any calls for a recount.
National Post
an hour ago
- National Post
Caroline Elliott: B.C. Supreme Court takes an axe to private property rights
Article content While two previous decisions by the Supreme Court of Canada recognized Aboriginal title in British Columbia (Tsilhqot'in in 2014 and Nuchatlaht in 2024), neither declared it over privately held lands as this one does. Article content Even as the B.C. government has promised to appeal the decision, it has been pursuing similar policies outside the courts. The province controversially overlaid Aboriginal title on private land with its problematic Haida Nation Recognition Act in 2024. The act was specifically referenced by the plaintiffs in the Cowichan case, and the judge agreed that it illustrated how Aboriginal title and fee simple can 'coexist.' Article content This is a questionable assertion given the numerous legal concerns. As one analysis explains, private property interests and the implementation of Aboriginal title are ultimately at odds: 'The rights in land which flow from both a fee simple interest and Aboriginal title interest … include exclusive rights to use, occupy and manage lands. The two interests are fundamentally irreconcilable over the same piece of land. Article content Article content While the government claims it adequately protected private property rights in the Haida agreement, Aboriginal title is protected under the Constitution, while private property rights are not. When these competing interests are inevitably brought before the courts, it's easy to imagine which one will prevail. Article content The fact that B.C. Premier David Eby said last year that he intended to use the Haida agreement as a ' template ' for other areas of B.C. stands in marked contrast with his sudden interest in an appeal as a means of preserving clear private property titles in the wake of this politically toxic ruling. Article content Indeed, Eby's government continues to negotiate similar agreements elsewhere, including with the shíshálh Nation on B.C.'s Sunshine Coast, even as government documents admit that Aboriginal title includes the right to 'exclusively use and occupy the land.' Article content Eby's commitment to an appeal suggests he may have learned from his costly refusal to appeal a 2021 B.C. Supreme Court decision, which found that excessive development had breached the treaty rights of the Blueberry River First Nation. Eby's government chose to pay out a $350-million settlement to avoid further litigation, a move that ultimately backfired when the two parties ended up back in court. Article content But for now, the consequences of the Cowichan decision have created considerable uncertainty for property owners, businesses and general market confidence. The judge's own words sum it up: 'The question of what remains of Aboriginal title after the granting of fee simple title to the same lands should be reversed. The proper question is: what remains of fee simple title after Aboriginal title is recognized in the same lands?' Article content If there's one positive aspect to this decision, it's that it is so extreme, it will force the Eby government's radical Indigenous policies onto the public agenda as awareness builds over what's at stake. Article content From its incessant land acknowledgements, to MLAs referring to non-Indigenous British Columbians as ' uninvited guests,' to its embrace of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples and its land back policies, to undemocratic land use planning processes and the overlaying of Aboriginal title on private lands, B.C. government policy has long been headed in exactly this direction. Article content Now, a reckoning is coming, and it's of the government's own creation. The broader issue will soon overtake all others in the public eye, and the premier must decide now whether he'll start walking things back, or double down on his disastrous course. Article content
