Rail, maritime caught in Trump's order freezing federal spending
Supply chain executives are waiting to see how billions of dollars from the U.S. Department of Transportation will be affected by President Donald Trump's order freezing spending on thousands of federal assistance programs.
The Trump administration on Monday issued a vague, two-page memo ordering government agencies to temporarily suspend all federal assistance payments except for Social Security and Medicare.
Politico reported Tuesday that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) has asked federal agencies to provide information by Feb. 7 about programs and related spending through March 15. The pause in funding 'will provide the Administration time to review agency programs and determine the best uses of the funding for those programs consistent with the law and the President's priorities,' Monday's memo says.
The request for spending program information, detailed in a 52-page spreadsheet, asks DOT to identify programs the agency currently funds – meaning rail, highway and maritime programs potentially could be on the administration's chopping block.Among them:
The Consolidated Rail Infrastructure and Safety Improvements (CRISI) Program.
Grants to Amtrak that would fund the acquisition of new equipment and route expansion.
Capital assistance to states for intercity passenger rail service.
High-speed rail corridors and intercity passenger rail service.
Federal-state partnership for intercity passenger rail.
The Passenger Rail Investment and Improvement Act.
The Railroad Rehabilitation and Improvement Financing Program.
Grade crossing elimination programs.
Grants for railroad safety technology and research and development.
Rail line relocation programs.
It also appears that the Treasury Department is being asked to provide information about the 45G tax credit that shortline railroads rely on to fund track maintenance.
Representatives for Amtrak, the Federal Railroad Administration, which administers rail-related grant and loan programs, and the Maritime Administration did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The Association of American Railroads referred federal funding questions to the OMB and DOT.'As a reminder, railroads privately fund the overwhelming majority of our infrastructure projects to the tune of more than $23 billion a year,' the AAR said in an email statement. 'Those investments will continue moving forward to enhance the safety and reliability of the national rail network regardless of the status of federal funding disbursements.'
The American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association says that while it's unclear how the various spending programs will be judged, the CRISI and rail crossing elimination programs do not appear to be in conflict with the administration's priorities.
For now, however, shortline funding programs appear to be on ice. 'Short line project grantees are definitely affected, at least temporarily,' ASLRRA President Chuck Baker said in the statement.
It's unclear how the programs will be reviewed, Baker says.
'If every single project has to be reviewed and reconsidered, that could be a lengthy delay,' he said. 'There are hundreds of projects just in those two programs, and spread across the whole government the number of projects would likely run well into the tens of thousands.'
Baker adds that he expects Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy — who was confirmed Tuesday afternoon — to 'approach this with considered common sense and get projects reviewed and approved quickly.'
'We do believe that it would be a bad precedent to set to allow a new administration to cancel or even unnecessarily delay projects that have already been selected by the previous administration under the statutory criteria at the time, as long as the grantee is keeping up its end of the bargain,' Baker said. 'It's one thing to change the criteria going forward or to make different types of selections in the next round than the previous administration would have made, that is their right and the expected consequence of an election. But to undo prior grants risks making the whole program less effective and predictable and that uncertainty would make building infrastructure more expensive.'
Other supply chain stakeholders were awaiting clarification.'With federal grant funding now under review, we will wait for that process to be completed,' said Gene Seroka, executive director, Port of Los Angeles, in a statement to FreightWaves. 'Federal partnership is an important component of our public-private initiatives. We stand ready to work with all levels of government to reach our infrastructure and sustainability goals.'
In 2024 the Environmental Protection Agency announced a $412 million grant for LA's zero-emissions port equipment and terminal upgrades.
The port's infrastructure projects in 2024 were helped by a record $60 million in federal money from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers' Harbor Maintenance Trust Fund, which ports pay into. It is uncertain whether those monies would be affected.
Trump's order, which was scheduled to go into effect at 5 p.m. Eastern on Tuesday, has caused a stir in Washington.
Democrats are calling Trump's order an illegal violation of Congress' authority, while the attorneys general of several states plan to challenge the order in federal court.
They argue that a 1974 law requires the executive branch to spend money that has been authorized by Congress and signed by the president. Programs that would fall into this category include funding authorized under President Joe Biden's Bipartisan Infrastructure Law – which included $66 billion in rail spending.
Included in that total through fiscal year 2026: $22 billion for Amtrak, $5 billion for CRISI grants, $3 billion for railroad crossing elimination and $36 billion in federal-state passenger partnerships.
— Stuart Chirls contributed to this report.CN, IBEW reach tentative agreement, avoid strike
CSX, NS tab Begeman, Ryerkerk as new board members
Railcar builder GATX profit up on fleet utilization, lease renewal rates
The post Rail, maritime caught in Trump's order freezing federal spending appeared first on FreightWaves.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he thinks the government has a 'very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
President Donald Trump on Saturday said that it wasn't his decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, back to the U.S. to face federal charges, saying the 'Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine.' 'That wasn't my decision,' Trump said of Abrego Garcia's return in a phone call with NBC News on Saturday. 'It should be a very easy case' for federal prosecutors, the president added. Trump added that he did not speak with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return, even though the two men spoke about Abrego Garcia during an April meeting in the Oval Office. His remarks came after Abrego Garcia arrived back in the U.S. on Friday and was charged in an indictment alleging he transported people who were not legally in the country. The indictment came amid a protracted legal battle over whether to bring him back from El Salvador that escalated all the way up to the Supreme Court. Abrego Garcia's family and lawyers have called him a family man, while Trump and his administration have alleged that he is a member of the gang MS-13. The case drew national attention amid the Trump administration's broader push for mass deportations. After Abrego Garcia's deportation, lawyers for the Trump administration said he was deported in an 'administrative error,' as Abrego Garcia had previous legal protection from deportation to El Salvador. Still, the Trump administration did not attempt to bring Abrego Garcia back, even as the Supreme Court ruled that it had to 'facilitate' his return to the U.S. Democrats, including Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., had for weeks said that Abrego Garcia was denied due process when he was detained and deported, arguing that he should have been allowed to defend himself from deportation before he was sent to El Salvador. Trump on Saturday called Van Hollen, who went to visit Abrego Garcia in jail in El Salvador in April, a 'loser' for defending the man's right to due process. 'He's a loser. The guy's a loser. They're going to lose because of that same thing. That's not what people want to hear,' the president said about Van Hollen. 'He's trying to defend a man who's got a horrible record of abuse, abuse of women in particular. No, he's a total loser, this guy.' On Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia 'was a smuggler of humans and children and women. He made over 100 trips, the grand jury found, smuggling people throughout our country.' In a statement Friday, Abrego Garcia's lawyer called Bondi's move 'an abuse of power, not justice.' This article was originally published on
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump dumps the Federalist Society — and even Republicans are shooketh
In a major about-face, Donald Trump is turning on the conservative powerhouse that built his judicial legacy, the Federalist Society. Yale Law professor Akhil Reed Amar warns that this break with the very group that helped propel him to power marks a dangerous shift. 'He just wants loyalty to himself—thugs and hacks,' Amar says, adding that Federalist Society judges are principled and loyal to the Constitution, not to Trump. 'The Senate needs to play a really important role now—especia
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk Deletes His Explosive Donald Trump Claim Tied to Jeffrey Epstein amid Their Public Feud
Elon Musk has deleted his X post claiming that President Donald Trump's name is mentioned in the Jeffrey Epstein files Musk's claim came after the two men clashed about a new budget bill backed by the president The tech billionaire's decision to take down the post may be a sign of de-escalation in their highly publicized feudElon Musk has taken down his explosive claim that President Donald Trump's name is in the Jeffrey Epstein files — a move which may be a step toward de-escalation in the public feud between the two men. In the since-deleted post, which Musk shared on X on Thursday, June 5, the tech billionaire claimed that Trump appears in the high-profile case files, writing that it was the 'real reason' the files had not been made public. "Have a nice day, DJT!" he added sarcastically. Trump responded to the claim on Friday, June 6, by reposting a statement on Truth Social that was originally written by Epstein's former lawyer, David Schoen, on X. In the statement, Schoen claimed that his client 'had no information to hurt President Trump.' "I was hired to lead Jeffrey Epstein's defense as his criminal lawyer 9 days before he died,' the statement began. 'He sought my advice for months before that. I can say authoritatively, unequivocally, and definitively that he had no information to hurt President Trump. I specifically asked him!" Trump's name has previously been publicly linked with Epstein. His name was mentioned in flight logs released earlier this year by Attorney General Pam Bondi a total of seven times. However, the appearance of Trump's name in the flight logs does not necessarily indicate wrongdoing, as many of the individuals named could have been on Epstein's plane for legitimate reasons. The president was friends with the disgraced financier and pedophile for many years, but the two had a falling out in the mid-2000s, Trump told reporters shortly before Epstein died by suicide in 2019. Musk's deleted claim came on the heels of a number of verbal jabs with the president following the release of a controversial new budget bill. "I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore," Musk posted to X — which he owns — on Tuesday, June 3. "This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it." During an Oval Office press conference on Thursday, June 4, Trump responded to Musk's criticisms. "Elon knew the inner workings of this bill better than almost anyone sitting here," Trump told reporters. "He had no problem with it. All of a sudden he had a problem, and he only developed the problem when he found out that we're going to have to cut the [electric vehicle] mandate, because that's billions and billions of dollars." Trump also predicted Musk's attacks would get personal after saying he was "very disappointed in Elon." The war of words also came just days after it was announced Musk would be leaving the Trump administration. Read the original article on People