House votes to ban eminent domain for CO2 pipelines
The Iowa House approved a bill Wednesday that would stop pipelines carrying liquified carbon dioxide from using eminent domain.
Six other bills related to carbon sequestration pipelines, eminent domain and the Iowa Utilities Commission were combined into one bill, which also advanced.
The bills were directed at an ongoing fight between landowners and the Summit Carbon Solutions pipeline, which would stretch more than 1,000 miles in Iowa connecting to biofuel refineries and transporting the sequestered carbon dioxide to underground storage in North Dakota.
House File 943 is similar to a law recently passed in South Dakota, another state crossed by the pipeline's proposed route.
Summit recently asked South Dakota regulators to pause proceedings on its pipeline permit due to the new law.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
The Iowa bill would take effect in May and apply to any eminent domain filings made on or after that date.
Rep. Bobby Kaufmann, R-Wilton, said businesses should 'expect the unexpected' if they plan to use eminent domain in Iowa.
'Expect that we're going to make changes when eminent domain is involved, and expect that we're going to make changes in favor of landowners,' Kaufmann said.
Pipeline opponents advocated for the bill March 18 during a rally at the Capitol and again on Monday at a press conference with a group of Republican lawmakers opposed to the pipeline project.
The bill passed 82-12.
Iowa Renewable Fuels Association Executive Director Monte Shaw said in a press release the decision by the House was 'hardly surprising, but it is still disappointing.'
'IRFA members have been saying for three years that (carbon capture and sequestration) is the most important tool available to grow ethanol demand into new markets both here at home and around the world,' Shaw said in the statement.
Shaw said he believes 'cooler heads will prevail in the Senate' and said the opposition to the project has been led by a 'small, though loud, minority.'
'IRFA calls on the Iowa Senate to stand with the majority of impacted landowners, farmers, ethanol producers, and Iowa's economic future to ensure the state has the tools it needs to meet the brewing economic disaster in the heartland,' Shaw said.
House File 639 would increase the insurance requirements for liquid hazardous pipeline operators.
The five amendments to the bill would also update the definition of a common carrier, require IUC commissioners to be present at all hearings, expand who is allowed to intervene in an IUC docket, limit the pipeline permits to one term not longer than 25 years and stop the IUC from imposing sanctions on intervenors.
These were all bills that had already advanced from House committees, but Rep. Steven Holt combined into HF 639.
Holt, R-Denison, said with all of the amendments, the bill should be called the 'no eminent domain for private gain' bill.
The bill passed 85-10.
A spokesperson for Summit said the company has signed easements with more than 1,320 Iowa landowners and has 'adjusted the route based on feedback from stakeholders and regulatory agencies.'
'Regulatory certainty is crucial for maintaining Iowa's competitive edge in business, fostering long-term opportunities for farmers, ethanol producers, and rural communities,' the spokesperson said in a statement.
Some representatives voiced concern because of historic opposition in the Senate.
Rep. Brian Meyer spoke in support of the bills but said he wondered if lawmakers were 'wasting our time here today.'
'We've done this now several years in a row, and the Senate has not acted,' Meyer, D-Des Moines, said. 'As far as I can tell, they have not even tried to negotiate … Do something. Do something about this important issue.'
Rep. Charley Thomson, R-Charles City, said he appreciated the concerns about the Senate on the issue and said he believes the House will 'do the right thing without regard for what others may do.'
Holt said the issue is not partisan and that in both the House and the Senate, the two parties disagree with one another on the issue. He disagreed with a claim that he and other lawmakers fighting for the issue are doing so performatively.
'We're doing it because it's the right thing to do,' Holt said. 'And regardless of whether the Senate is going to pass it or not, we're going to fight for it here because it's the right thing to do.'
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
12 minutes ago
- Newsweek
California Man Fleeing Home Depot ICE Raid Fatally Hit By Car
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A man was struck and killed on a Southern California freeway Thursday while fleeing a federal immigration raid at a Home Depot, authorities have said. The fatal incident occurred in Monrovia, the Los Angeles County city nestled in the foothills of the San Gabriel Mountains, about 10 a.m. on Thursday, according to a press release issued by Monrovia City Manager Dylan Feik. The Department of Homeland Security said its agents did not pursue the man. Federal agents stage show of force at MacArthur Park, July 7, 2025, in Los Angeles. Federal agents stage show of force at MacArthur Park, July 7, 2025, in Los Angeles. Damian Dovarganes/AP The Context President Donald Trump has directed his administration to remove millions of migrants without legal status as he looks to fulfill his campaign pledge of widespread mass deportations. The Republican leader ordered immigration enforcers to ramp up operations in Democratic-led sanctuary states. The raid was one of several immigration enforcement operations carried out at Home Depot stores across Southern California in the past two months. Immigration authorities have been under growing scrutiny, with the agency at the center of the national debate over immigration policy. Concerns have been raised over ICE's enforcement practices. What To Know A Monrovia Police Department officer observed U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agents at the Mountain Avenue store, after receiving a call at 9:43 a.m, Feik said. After the collission, the man was taken to a nearby hospital, where he died from his injuries, Feik said. The California Highway Patrol said it is investigation the death. Authorities have not yet released the man's name. State Rep. John Harabedian, who represents the San Gabriel Valley, said federal officers detained 10 people during the operation. "Today in Monrovia, federal immigration agents conducted a raid at Home Depot," Harabedian said in a statement on his Instagram story. "One individual, fearing for their safety, fled and was tragically struck by a vehicle. Ten people were detained during the operation." What People Are Saying Monrovia City Manager Dylan Feik said in a press release on Thursday: We extend our condolences for the individual and his family. We also express our appreciation to the Monrovia Police Department and its volunteers, Monrovia Fire & Rescue as well as the California Highway Patrol. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told NBC News: "This individual was not being pursued by any DHS law enforcement." "We were not aware of this incident or notified by California Highway Patrol until hours after operations in the area had concluded."
Boston Globe
an hour ago
- Boston Globe
Is House size the solution to the gerrymandering problem?
Plymouth Advertisement To be truly representative, why not expand House to 10,000 members? Jeff Jacoby's suggestion to enlarge the House of Representatives as a way to end the gerrymandering wars was a good idea but did not go far enough. Today's data and data processing capabilities would still make gerrymandering possible, even if the United States tripled the number of members of the House, and districts would still be too large. Large districts enable the wealthy and special interests to make our representatives beholden to them, and enable outside money to influence what our country's Founders meant to be local elections. Get The Gavel A weekly SCOTUS explainer newsletter by columnist Kimberly Atkins Stohr. Enter Email Sign Up Technology is distorting our electoral processes. Why not use technology to support the democracy the Founders envisioned? Why not expand the House to 10,000 members, with each member representing approximately 34,000 constituents? That's close to the same number when the country was founded, 30,000. We should also end the requirement that all members be physically present and use more video conferencing and other technology to support the actions needed for the House to govern. This would make the 'people's chamber' once again the people's chamber, reduce the cost of elections, make representatives more accessible, and truly eliminate gerrymandering. Advertisement Richard Amster Cambridge Gerrymandering isn't the only problem with the House I stand in complete agreement with both Jeff Jacoby's analysis of the gerrymandering problem and his fitting solution. Our Framers intended Article 1 of the US Constitution, which establishes Congress, to be the most significant. They wanted House members to be close to the average citizen. They anticipated this body increasing in size with our nation's increasing population, to accurately reflect the views and needs of the people. Capping the number of representatives at 435 in 1929 was wrong — and so is the historic practice of gerrymandering, famously done in Massachusetts in 1812 and repeated often since then in virtually every state. But our nation's lawmaking body is also undermined by two related factors — the use of seniority in committee assignments and the lack of term limits. Partly as a result, representatives spend too much time on political pandering, fund-raising, and trying to manage age-related infirmities. Instead of giving committee assignments to the longest serving members, who have been waiting in the wings and feel entitled to the role, grant them to members with practical experience in the work of that committee. And while we're in the mood for change, let's allow representatives only four terms. This should be sufficient time for each to make substantive contributions, especially in smaller districts more 'in touch' with their constituents. Advertisement Peter Vangsness Medway Small districts aren't enough: We need good government initiatives Jeff Jacoby proposes enlarging the House of Representatives as a solution to political gerrymandering. But it's important to note that the term 'gerrymander' goes back to Massachusetts governor Elbridge Gerry, who signed a state redistricting plan into law in 1812. Wags referred to one tortuous, lizard-shaped, North Shore district as a 'Gerry-mander.' The congressional districts at the time had about 35,000 constituents each, and digital computers were still more than a century from their birth. So you do not need large congressional districts, or computers, to engage in gerrymandering. To point out something that should be obvious, running an honest government requires bipartisan support for fair districting practices, honest ethics oversight, and effective protection against foreign government interference. Donald Segretti, Lee Atwater, Roger Ailes, and others have for decades used dirty tricks to win elections — and many of these dirty tricksters have been Republicans. At the same time, the purging of voter rolls has often disproportionately affected Democratic voters. This contrasts with a decades-long effort by Democrats to improve voting access and integrity, including the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Voting Rights Act of 1965, and the post-Watergate campaign-finance reforms. The disparity is stark between the Republicans, who are backing away from bipartisanship and good government initiatives, and the Democrats, who remain committed to them. Stuart Gallant Belmont
an hour ago
Woman pleads guilty to assault for spitting on top DC prosecutor during interview
WASHINGTON -- A woman who spit on the top federal prosecutor for the nation's capital during a videotaped interview pleaded guilty on Thursday to assault charges. Emily Gabriella Sommer, 32, of Washington, D.C., is scheduled to be sentenced on Oct. 10 for assaulting then-acting U.S. Attorney Ed Martin Jr. and two law-enforcement officers who arrested her several days after she spit on Martin. Sommer pleaded guilty to three counts of assaulting public officials, according to U.S. Attorney Jeanine Pirro's office. A trial for Sommer had been scheduled to start next Monday. Instead, U.S. District Judge Jia Cobb accepted Sommer's guilty plea and will sentence her. On May 8, a Newsmax reporter was interviewing Martin on a sidewalk outside his office when Sommer approached him. 'Are you Ed Martin? You are Ed Martin,' Sommer said before lunging at him and spitting on his left shoulder, according to prosecutors. As she walked away, Sommer swore at Martin and called him 'a disgusting man.' "My name is Emily Gabriella Sommer, and you are served,' she said. Sommer later took credit for the spitting incident in a message replying to a social media post by Martin. The encounter occurred on the same day that President Donald Trump pulled Martin's nomination to remain U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia. Martin faced bipartisan opposition in the Senate after a turbulent stint in the nation's largest U.S. Attorney's office. A key Republican senator said he could not support Martin for the job due to his support for rioters who stormed the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021. Martin roiled the office with a series of unorthodox moves, such as firing and demoting subordinates who worked on politically sensitive cases. Trump replaced Martin with former Fox News host Jeanine Pirro, who was confirmed by the Senate on Aug. 2. When U.S. Marshals Service deputies went to arrest Sommer at her apartment on May 22, she spit in a deputy's face and kicked him, prosecutors said. 'How is that spit? Taste good? I was just getting over a cold sore. I hope I gave you herpes,' Sommer told the deputy, according to prosecutors. Sommer also kicked a second deputy during her arrest and told another deputy, 'I would put a bullet in you if I had it. I would put a bullet in every one of you right now,' prosecutors said. During her initial court appearance in May, Sommer repeatedly disrupted the hearing with outbursts. Deputies picked her up and carried her out of the courtroom after one of her interruptions prompted a magistrate to suspend the hearing. Sommer later apologized to the magistrate for her courtroom conduct.
