FIFO worker hits back at $116,000 misconception: ‘Mental and emotional toll'
Taylor Ambrose has worked as a FIFO health and lifestyle coordinator in the mines near Mildura for the past 12 months. The 27-year-old told Yahoo Finance she had received messages from people telling her FIFO was 'literally the easiest job'.
One message she received noted workers had their breakfast, lunch and dinner prepared for them each day, plus their room cleaned once a week. They claimed workers just needed to 'get up and go', compared to other workers who have to slog it out commuting into the city to work long days.
RELATED
FIFO worker exposes brutal reality behind 'best' entry-level job paying $150,000: 'Only lasted a year'
Tax, HECS, Medicare: All the major cost-of-living relief coming for millions of Aussies
Centrelink Work Bonus offers $4,000 boost to pensioners
The average FIFO worker can earn $116,874 per year, according to Talent, but the pay on offer will really depend on your specific job and experience.
Some entry-level jobs, for example, driller offsiders, can earn up to $150,000 a year.
Ambrose said she thinks the view that FIFO is an 'easy job' likely stems from the financial incentives on offer, along with the structured rosters and extended time off.'From the outside, those aspects can give the impression of a straightforward or even cushy arrangement,' she said.
"That said, as with most things, there are layers to the reality."
Ambrose said the challenges of FIFO work 'shouldn't be underestimated'.
'Extended time away from family and home comforts, the mental and emotional toll of isolation, and the physical demands of some roles all contribute to a complex working environment,' she said.
Ambrose shared a video online about the perception that FIFO jobs are "easy".
It sparked conversation amongst FIFO workers, with many pushing back at the claims and noting that workers had to deal with tough working conditions.
'We do seven days a week for two weeks. 12 hour days, up to 50c heat. dust, cyclones, flies…' one wrote.
'160 hours plus work a fortnight isn't easy at all,' another said.
'I'd like to see people who haven't done it go and do it for six months, then talk about how easy it is,' a third added.
One FIFO worker agreed that the job could 'feel more manageable' compared to working long hours in the city, and the advantages of having meals and accommodation provided meant you had more time to work and could earn more money.
But he said the job had its 'own set of challenges'.
'The working conditions in remote environments can be physically and mentally demanding,' he said.
'Extreme heat, flies and isolation can take a toll, and not everyone is suited to this kind of environment.
'FIFO is a lifestyle choice. It doesn't fit everyone's circumstances, and [is] hard on the important things in life, relationships , family etc.'
Logan Snooks said he only lasted a year as a FIFO driller offsider because the job was so hard.
He was earning a base salary of $101,178 a year, but said it was the "hardest job" he'd ever done and it took a big toll on his body and mental health.
The 31-year-old was stationed at sites in Queensland and the Northern Territory and said he spent of lot of his shifts in the baking heat.
'It peaked over 38 degrees, and you're standing in the desert, no trees, and you're standing on a metal platform, pulling rods or feeding rods,' he told Yahoo Finance.
On top of that, he said he would be working in "the middle of nowhere", about eight to 12 hours drive from the nearest town.
Ambrose said she doesn't think FIFO worth is 'hard' or 'easy'.
"It's just different, and success in the FIFO space often comes down to personal fit, personal preference, and an individual's support systems encompassing their physical, mental and emotional supports," she told Yahoo Finance.
'Ultimately, the FIFO model offers both opportunities and challenges, and how it's perceived will depend on an individual experience, values, and expectations."
Ambrose said it could be "really hard" being away from friends and family, plus the long 12-hour days came with "fatigue and exhaustion".
But, ultimately, she said she was 'forever grateful' for the opportunity to work in the FIFO industry and the benefits it offered her, like extended time off, free food and accommodation, and the ability to meet new people from all walks of life.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IPO market 101: Everything you need to know
Yahoo Finance Markets and Data Editor Jared Blikre, who also hosts Yahoo Finance's Stocks in Translation podcast, explains everything you need to know about the initial public offering (IPO) market. Catch more Stocks in Translation, with new episodes every Tuesday and Thursday. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts. Related videos Labour's plans to tax people's savings accounts explained Waiter brings legal action against the Ivy over share of tips and service charge Up 33% in a year and still yielding 7.5%! Is this FTSE 250 dividend growth stock a screaming buy? 2 shares I'm keen to buy if they become cheap enough Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
40 minutes ago
- Yahoo
This Crypto Investor's 'Never Wrong To Take Profit' Rule Sparked A Heated Debate—Here's Why Bitcoin Holders Are Pushing Back
Benzinga and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue on some items through the links below. The age-old debate about when to take profits in cryptocurrency has reached a fever pitch, with investors split between two radically different philosophies that could determine whether you build wealth or watch it vanish overnight. Reddit user Feisty-Rhubarb-6718 recently sparked intense discussion when he shared his hard-learned lesson: 'It's never wrong to take profit.' After watching significant gains evaporate due to greed, he now advocates for securing partial wins along the way. 'The market owes me nothing,' he explained, emphasizing that leaving the table with something beats walking away empty-handed. His approach represents the 'trader mindset'—selling portions of holdings during rallies and redeploying capital elsewhere. But this strategy has drawn fierce criticism from Bitcoin maximalists who view any profit-taking as fundamentally flawed. Don't Miss: The same firms that backed Uber, Venmo and eBay are investing in this pre-IPO company disrupting a $1.8T market — Accredited Investors: Grab Pre-IPO Shares of the AI Company Powering Hasbro, Sephora & MGM— The Bitcoin Maximalist Counter-Attack Bitcoin purists argue that viewing BTC through a traditional trading lens misses the bigger picture entirely. They compare Bitcoin to a 401(k), where the goal isn't to 'cash out' but to spend from accumulated wealth during retirement. From this perspective, Bitcoin represents financial freedom from traditional banking systems, with its market trajectory consistently outpacing inflation over time. 'Any withdrawal unless for a necessary expense is a foolish decision,' argued one Bitcoin advocate, highlighting the philosophical divide between treating crypto as a trading vehicle versus a long-term wealth preservation tool. This mindset has historical backing. Early Bitcoin investors who held through multiple boom-bust cycles often saw exponentially better returns than those who took profits during intermediate rallies. The difference between a 2x gain and a 100x gain can be life-changing wealth versus modest profits. Trending: 'Scrolling To UBI' — Deloitte's #1 fastest-growing software company allows users to earn money on their phones. The Hidden Costs of Both Strategies The debate extends beyond philosophy into practical considerations that many investors overlook. Taking profits triggers immediate tax implications and exchange fees, while also resetting capital gains tax clocks. Meanwhile, the emotional toll of 'panic selling' during market downturns can lead to poor timing even when technically taking a profit. Conversely, the 'diamond hands' approach carries its own risks. Even major cryptocurrencies can lose significant value or disappear entirely. The volatility that creates massive upside potential also generates substantial downside risk. Finding Middle Ground: The DCA-Out Strategy Many experienced investors advocate for a hybrid approach called 'dollar-cost averaging out'—selling small portions during price increases while maintaining core positions. This strategy captures some profits while preserving upside exposure, potentially offering the best of both worlds. Automated trading systems can help remove human emotion from these decisions, systematically taking profits as prices rise while accumulating during dips. The key is establishing clear rules before emotions take over during market Personal Finance Reality Check Perhaps the most important factor gets lost in these philosophical debates: individual financial circumstances should drive investment decisions, not tribal loyalty to particular strategies. A financial advisor might correctly recommend liquidating crypto holdings for one investor while suggesting increased allocation for another, depending on their age, income, debt levels, and risk tolerance. The Reddit discussion revealed a crucial truth that both camps often ignore—there's no universally 'correct' approach to crypto investing. Success depends on matching strategy to personal goals, timeline, and psychological makeup. Whether you're team 'secure the bag' or 'diamond hands forever,' the most dangerous mistake is investing without a clear plan and the discipline to stick with it when emotions run high. Read Next: — no wallets, just price speculation and free paper trading to practice different strategies. Image: Shutterstock This article This Crypto Investor's 'Never Wrong To Take Profit' Rule Sparked A Heated Debate—Here's Why Bitcoin Holders Are Pushing Back originally appeared on Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
US homeowners are sinking $21K a year into their homes — thanks to these invisible expenses. Are you doing the same?
Moneywise and Yahoo Finance LLC may earn commission or revenue through links in the content below. Did you know the average annual cost of owning and maintaining a single-family home in the U.S. is more than $21,000 a year? And that doesn't even include your mortgage payment. A new Bankrate study did the math, highlighting exactly why some first-time home buyers end up regretting their decision once all the hidden fees are revealed. Don't miss Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now become a landlord for as little as $100 — and no, you don't have to deal with tenants or fix freezers. Here's how I'm 49 years old and have nothing saved for retirement — what should I do? Don't panic. Here are 6 of the easiest ways you can catch up (and fast) Robert Kiyosaki warns of a 'Greater Depression' coming to the US — with millions of Americans going poor. But he says these 2 'easy-money' assets will bring in 'great wealth'. How to get in now The study found that many new homeowners don't factor in these expenses before making an offer, leaving many unable to keep up with expenses over time — particularly in high-cost-of-living areas like the East and West Coast. While this doesn't mean you should permanently forgo home ownership, it does highlight the importance of being aware of the real expense of owning in comparison to renting. Here are some of the biggest hidden costs you should factor into your budget before accepting the keys to a new home. Home insurance The study notes that home insurance prices increased by 24% between 2021 and 2024. They attribute this steep increase to both a rise in property values and the growing frequency of extreme weather events due to climate change, like the fires in Los Angeles and Hurricane Milton in Florida, which inevitably lead to insurers raising their prices. Coming in at an average of $2,267 a year, this is one cost you can likely reduce by contacting a variety of insurance providers and asking for quotes. Remember, sometimes they raise the price just because they want to — but you can always take that as a sign to find a new provider. If you're looking for a quick way to find the most affordable home insurance options, try Just answer a few simple questions, and you'll be provided with a variety of insurance quotes. Users report saving an average of $482 a year after making the switch. Keep in mind that you don't have to wait until your policy is up for renewal to make a change. Just watch out for any early cancellation fees, and factor those into your calculations. Stay in the know. Join 200,000+ readers and get the best of Moneywise sent straight to your inbox every week for free. Utilities If you've spent your renting years enjoying the cost of utilities being included in your rent, you may feel shocked at just how much more expensive life feels when you receive bills for gas, hydro, water and electricity every month. The study found that American homeowners pay an average of $4,494 every year in utility bills alone. If you include cable and internet (which some rentals also provide) that number goes up by another $1,515. While there isn't much you can do to reduce the price charged for utilities, many utility providers offer discount pricing during non-peak hours. If this is available to you, set reminders to do utility-intensive tasks like cooking, dishwashing and laundry during those hours. Typically, these off-peak hours are during the evening, weekends or holidays. You can also call cable and internet providers to ask for the best deal currently available. In many cases, the introductory price they offered during sign up quietly turns into a much higher fee after a year, but if you call them up again and ask to cut services, they will usually offer the promo rate again. Make an appointment in your calendar to do this yearly to avoid these sneaky increases. If they refuse, there are many other providers who will be eager to give you a better offer. As always, shopping around can net you some good savings. Maintenance and repairs While the previous invisible expenses are notable, the most significant expenses homeowners experience are maintenance and repairs. While you likely assumed there would inevitably be some repairs needed down the line, these costs usually end up occurring faster and more frequently than many anticipate. Bankrate's study found the average homeowner spends $8,808 on maintenance every year. And if your home was built before 1980, this number could be even higher, as significant upgrades will be necessary. The study noted that in 2023, homeowners with pre-1980 homes spent 76% more on maintenance than those with newer homes. If you're new to home ownership, you might be feeling this pinch already, but the last thing you should do is panic. Get to work on building out your emergency fund as soon as you can. Often, this involves parking your cash in a high interest savings account so you have the liquidity to quickly respond to repairs. The owning vs. renting debate All these added costs make it clear: Despite all the hubbub around building equity and fearmongering around renting, owning the home you live in isn't always the better financial option. In fact, in the most expensive cities, when you break down the math between renting and investing the savings for retirement, or owning and being house poor — it is often the renter who comes out ahead in the future. Finance experts like Ramit Sethi regularly point out that prevailing wisdom around home ownership being the key to wealth building is a lie. That said, you may not want the hassle or extra expenses of home ownership, but that doesn't mean you should completely miss out on the gains that come from investing in property. There are simple ways to enjoy the financial benefits of property ownership without the many downsides. Platforms like Arrived offer access to shares of SEC-qualified investments in rental homes and vacation rentals, vetted for their appreciation and income potential. Backed by world-class investors like Jeff Bezos, Arrived makes it simple to add real estate to your portfolio without buying a home. With as little as a $100 initial investment, Arrived makes property investing for everyone — even long-term renters. And if you're curious about commercial property, accredited investors can try First National Realty Partners (FNRP). With a minimum investment of $50,000, you can own a share of properties leased by national brands like Whole Foods, Kroger and Walmart without lifting a finger. Thanks to triple net leases, accredited investors are able to invest in these properties without worrying about tenant costs cutting into potential returns. Just answer a few questions to start browsing their available properties. What to read next Want an extra $1,300,000 when you retire? Dave Ramsey says this 7-step plan 'works every single time' to kill debt, get rich in America — and that 'anyone' can do it Here are 5 simple ways to grow rich with real estate if you don't want to play landlord. And you can even start with as little as $10 Rich, young Americans are ditching the stormy stock market — here are the alternative assets they're banking on instead Here are 5 'must have' items that Americans (almost) always overpay for — and very quickly regret. How many are hurting you? This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind. Sign in to access your portfolio