logo
When An Oil Refinery Closes In California

When An Oil Refinery Closes In California

Forbes13-05-2025

The Valero refinery in Benicia, California, set to close in 2026. In other recent refinery closures ... More in California, few of the laid-off workers have found jobs at anywhere near their refinery wages.
Last month, officials with Valero Energy announced they would be closing the company's 170,000 barrels-per-day oil refinery in Benicia, California—a city of 25,000 residents, east of San Francisco. The plant, spread across 900 acres, employs over 400 workers, and is scheduled to close in April 2026.
In the weeks since the announcement, state and regional officials have come forward to assure Benicia officials, local residents and workers that there will be a 'just transition.' The workers will be provided with re-training and re-employment services to achieve 'good jobs, quality jobs.'
We'll see.
In California we've had experience with refinery closures over the past decade and 'just transition'—a popular phrase of the Biden Administration. In these previous refinery closures, despite generous amounts of government funding for retraining and re-employment, few of the laid-off workers were able to obtain new jobs at anywhere near their previous wages, and a high number remained unemployed, more than a year after closure.
The Valero and broader refinery story is timely, given the prominent role of manufacturing jobs in today's economic debates. Retraining and reemployment of laid-off refinery and other manufacturing workers have proved to be far more difficult in practice than in the retraining theories of high profile journalists (Thomas Friedman) as well as economists with the Obama and Biden Administrations. The experiences suggest why policymakers might not be so cavalier going forward about refinery closures and other manufacturing closures.
The Valero plant is located in a part of East Contra Costa that for the past few decades has been site of several oil refineries. One of these refineries was the Marathon Oil refinery. In October 2020, the Marathon refinery shut down operations and laid off 345 unionized workers.
The Contra Costa Country Workforce Development Board immediately responded with a series of re-employment and re-training services. An individualized employment plan was developed for each worker, incorporating skills and goals, and singling out skills that might be transferable to other occupations. Workers who sought training for new occupations were provided with such training at no cost, and also were provided with assistance in identifying and pursuing job openings.
Additionally, the Contra Costa Board was assisted in re-employment activities by the California Federation of Labor Unions, which had its own Rapid Response unit, as well as by the United Steelworkers Local 5.
Despite these expansive re-employment efforts, only a minority of the laid off workers were able to find jobs at anywhere near their former salaries. The University of California, Berkeley Labor Center tracked the shutdown and re-employment process, and surveyed laid-off workers. The Labor Center final report, issued in April 2023, noted that 14-16 months after the shutdown, 26% of the laid off workers were still not employed. Of those who had found jobs the job paid on average $12 per hour less than the average job at Marathon: the average hourly wage at Marathon was $50 per hour compared to a post layoff average wage of $38 per hour.
Though East Contra Costa has been the hub of refinery activities in Northern California, the number of jobs in the remaining refineries was limited, and had been shrinking in the past decade. Much was made of transitioning workers in the 'green economy", but the number of these jobs in the Bay Area was small, and they paid far less than the Marathon and oil and gas jobs. Health care, business services and information technology were growing sectors in Contra Costa, but often not good fits for or of interest to the Marathon workers.
Following the Valero announcement, Joe Garofoli, Senior Political Writer with the San Francisco Chronicle, contacted Benicia city officials as well as workers at the Valero plant. The officials emphasized the main role that Valero played in the city's finances: of the city's $60 million general fund budget, Valero contributed $7 million, and contributed another $2.9 million toward the city's enterprise fund for water and wastewater.
Garofoli profiled one long time worker at the plant, Mark Felsoci, 63, who had been a crane operator at the plant for 28 years. He was grateful for the job, which had enabled him to purchase a house in Benicia, achieve stable employment, and unlike many other crane operators not commute to multiple work sites. Felsoci told Garofoli that he had few hopes that he or other workers would find similar jobs. He singled out for criticism the idea that the Valero workers could be retrained for green economy jobs.
'These guys that are putting up these solar panels or working in solar fields, they're probably making half of what refinery workers do. They don't get the benefits…You can transition to anything you want, but it's going to pay way less than what you doing before.'
Kern County, the center of oil production in California, illustrates the big gap in number of jobs and wage levels between oil and gas jobs and green economy jobs. Kern, which stretches over 8100 square miles in the south Central Valley, is one of the state leaders in green energy. In 2020, it produced a quarter of the state's total renewable energy in 2020, through its network of solar power generators and its 5000 wind turbines in the Tehachapi wind corridor.
But this renewable energy production created only 543 jobs in 2020. This number amounted to less than 4% of the 16,223 direct jobs in oil and gas in 2020 (with nearly double that amount for the oil and gas sector counting suppliers and other jobs connected to oil production). The average wage of the direct jobs in oil and gas was $82,017 in 2019 while the average wage for green economy jobs in Kern was 40% lower , at $57,000.
Kern County employment in oil and gas has rebounded in the past few years with the rebound in worldwide oil prices. However, Kern officials know the future of oil and gas employment in the county, as well as statewide, is daunting. Since 2015, the oil and gas industry in California has been faced with California state government and politics aimed at phasing out fossil fuels: a lengthy moratorium on permits for new wells, more stringent air quality requirements, and general higher costs of doing business in the state.
In announcing its closing, Valero described it as following 'years of regulatory pressure, significant fines for air quality violations, and a recent lawsuit settlement related to environmental concerns.' Similar government policies were singled out by Phillips 66 officials when in October 2024 they announced the closing of the Phillips 66 refinery in Wilmington, Southern California. That refinery accounted for 8% of the state's oil processing. That shutdown will result in layoffs for 600 direct workers by the end of this year.
With the politics of oil and gas in California (the industry has been the main villain in state government for years), it may be that the industry can do nothing to reverse the trend of refinery closures. But at least as this process continues, there should be no illusions on any side about what can be expected for many of the laid-off workers--even with the sophisticated and well-funded re-employment systems in place. There should be no illusions about 'just transition.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

An OpenAI exec says she was diagnosed with breast cancer and that ChatGPT has helped her navigate it
An OpenAI exec says she was diagnosed with breast cancer and that ChatGPT has helped her navigate it

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

An OpenAI exec says she was diagnosed with breast cancer and that ChatGPT has helped her navigate it

Kate Rouch, OpenAI's chief marketing officer, said she was diagnosed with breast cancer. Rouch said she is expected to make a full recovery and urged other women to prioritize their health. She said she leaned on OpenAI's ChatGPT to navigate her treatment. Kate Rouch, the chief marketing officer at OpenAI, shared on Friday that she was diagnosed with invasive breast cancer weeks after assuming the role, which she called her "dream job," in December. In a thread posted on X, Rouch said she was sharing her story to help other women, adding, "We can't control what happens to us--but we can choose how we face it. My biggest lesson: no one fights alone." Prior to joining OpenAI as the company's first CMO, Rouch was CMO at Coinbase and, before that, spent over a decade at Meta, including as vice president, global head of brand and product marketing. Rouch said she started treatment right around the Super Bowl in February, when OpenAI aired its first-ever ad, and that she has since gone through 13 rounds of chemotherapy while leading OpenAI's marketing team. She wrote that she is expected to make a full recovery. "It has been the hardest season of life — for me, for my husband, and for our two young children," Rouch said, adding she has been supported by OpenAI "at every step." "Silicon Valley can be brutal and transactional. And yet — I've never felt more held," she said, adding that "people showed up in incredible and unexpected ways." Rouch also said OpenAI's ChatGPT has helped her navigate her diagnosis and treatment, including by explaining cancer in a way that is age-appropriate for her kids, helping her manage the side effects of chemo, and creating custom meditations. "Experiencing our work as a patient has made OpenAI's mission feel more personal and important," she said. Rouch said she was sharing her story to encourage other women to "prioritize their health over the demands of families and jobs." "A routine exam saved my life. It could save yours, too," she said. Business Insider reached out to OpenAI for comment. Kevin Weil, the chief product officer at OpenAI, expressed support for Rouch in a reply to her thread. "We love you @kate_rouch!" he wrote. "Proud of you for telling your story and for being so full of fight." Read the original article on Business Insider

Charlamagne says Swalwell should 'cut it the f--- out' with claim he didn't know of Biden's decline
Charlamagne says Swalwell should 'cut it the f--- out' with claim he didn't know of Biden's decline

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Charlamagne says Swalwell should 'cut it the f--- out' with claim he didn't know of Biden's decline

Radio host Charlamagne Tha God reflected Thursday on his interview with Rep. Eric Swalwell, D-Calif., earlier this week, slamming the congressman's claim he was not aware of then-President Joe Biden's decline. Charlamagne grilled Swalwell on Tuesday's episode of his "The Breakfast Club" radio show. He said Democrats "got on television and pretended to act like everything was fine" and asked Swalwell, "Why should we ever trust the Democratic Party after they lied to us [for] so long about President Biden?" Swalwell defended himself and his fellow Democrats throughout the podcast, claiming, "I don't think many of us were behind the scenes, to be honest. I didn't spend much time with President Biden behind the scenes." On Thursday, Charlamagne shared his disgust with Swalwell's answers to his "Brilliant Idiots" co-host, comedian Andrew Schulz. Charlamagne Mocks Schumer, Jeffries And Newsom As He Wonders Who Should Lead Democratic Party "I kept asking him a simple question over and over, 'Why should we ever trust Democrats ever again, knowing that y'all upheld this lie?'" Charlamagne said. Read On The Fox News App After a clip of the interview, Schulz responded, "We clearly can't trust the Democrats that are currently in power that upheld the lie." "Anybody that wants to be the future of the party has to throw the Biden s--- under the bus," Charlamagne said. "Now, Eric and all of these guys are like, 'But we didn't know.' You gotta cut it the f--- out! You're actually around him!" Charlamagne, like Schulz, noted he has never met Biden in person, "but we've got eyes." "If they couldn't be honest about that, would they be honest about anything in the future?" Charlamagne asked, restating his point. He then addressed CNN host Jake Tapper and his new "Original Sin" book about the Biden cover-up as too little, too late. "You've got the same eyes, the same ears that I have. Way before that debate you had to see what we all were seeing," Charlamagne said, arguing journalists should have had the integrity to tell people what was going on. "Maybe that would have pushed him out way earlier." Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Schulz, who interviewed Trump during the campaign, argued that there is a double standard when podcasters are hammered for not asking this or that question to a politician guest, but those same critics turn a blind eye to legacy media personalities who "literally protected the guy who was unfit for office." Charlamagne agreed, calling on people to hold CNN and MSNBC to the same standard they hold podcasters. "I think that, like, the legacy Democrats still believe that people believe them," Schulz said, drawing laughter from Charlamagne. "And they are the last ones that believe that." Fox News Digital reached out to Swalwell for article source: Charlamagne says Swalwell should 'cut it the f--- out' with claim he didn't know of Biden's decline

Judge approves landmark NCAA settlement, clearing way for schools to pay athletes directly
Judge approves landmark NCAA settlement, clearing way for schools to pay athletes directly

CBS News

time2 hours ago

  • CBS News

Judge approves landmark NCAA settlement, clearing way for schools to pay athletes directly

A federal judge signed off on arguably the biggest change in the history of college sports on Friday, clearing the way for schools to begin paying their athletes millions of dollars as soon as next month as the multibillion-dollar industry shreds the last vestiges of the amateur model that defined it for more than a century. Nearly five years after Arizona State swimmer Grant House sued the NCAA and its five biggest conferences to lift restrictions on revenue sharing, U.S. Judge Claudia Wilken approved the final proposal that had been hung up on roster limits, just one of many changes ahead amid concerns that thousands of walk-on athletes will lose their chance to play college sports. The sweeping terms of the so-called House settlement include approval for each school to share up to $20.5 million with athletes over the next year and $2.7 billion that will be paid over the next decade to thousands of former players who were barred from that revenue for years. In a letter penned by NCAA President Charlie Baker following the announcement, Baker wrote that the settlement "opens a pathway to begin stabilizing college sports. This new framework that enables schools to provide direct financial benefits to student-athletes and establishes clear and specific rules to regulate third-party NIL [name, image and likeness] agreements marks a huge step forward for college sports." The agreement brings a seismic shift to hundreds of schools that were forced to reckon with the reality that their players are the ones producing the billions in TV and other revenue, mostly through football and basketball, that keep this machine humming. The scope of the changes — some have already begun — is difficult to overstate. The professionalization of college athletics will be seen in the high-stakes and expensive recruitment of stars on their way to the NFL and NBA, and they will be felt by athletes whose schools have decided to pare their programs. The agreement will resonate in nearly every one of the NCAA's 1,100 member schools boasting nearly 500,000 athletes. Wilken's ruling comes 11 years after she dealt the first significant blow to the NCAA ideal of amateurism when she ruled in favor of former UCLA basketball player Ed O'Bannon and others who were seeking a way to earn money from the use of their name, image and likeness, or NIL — a term that is now as common in college sports as "March Madness" or "Roll Tide." It was just four years ago that the NCAA cleared the way for NIL money to start flowing, but the changes coming are even bigger. Wilken granted preliminary approval to the settlement last October. That sent colleges scurrying to determine not only how they were going to afford the payments, but how to regulate an industry that also allows players to cut deals with third parties so long as they are deemed compliant by a newly formed enforcement group that will be run by auditors at Deloitte. The agreement takes a big chunk of oversight away from the NCAA and puts it in the hands of the four biggest conferences. The ACC, Big Ten, Big 12 and SEC hold most of the power and decision-making heft, especially when it comes to the College Football Playoff, which is the most significant financial driver in the industry and is not under the NCAA umbrella like the March Madness tournaments are.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store