Nippon and US Steel complete controversial merger
Japanese firm Nippon Steel has completed its long-sought takeover of a smaller American company, after agreeing to yield unusual control to the US government. The $14.9bn (£11bn) purchase of US Steel, will create one of the world's biggest steelmakers and turns Nippon into a major player in the US.The plan, first announced in 2023, had been seen as a lifeline for the storied but struggling 124-year-old US Steel.But the deal ran into trouble during last year's presidential election, when US President Donald Trump and his Democratic opponents said they were concerned about the foreign acquisition of one of the last major steel producers in the US.
However, Trump reversed his stance, after Nippon made concessions which the President said had satisfied his national security concerns.He gave the official green light to the deal in an executive order on Friday.Nippon agreed to pay $55 per share and take on the company's debt, a deal worth $14.9bn together. It said it had also promised the government it would invest $11bn in US Steel by 2028, including a new facility that would be completed after that year. It also granted the US government a "golden share" in the company, giving the government say over key decisions, including the transfer of jobs or production outside of the US, and certain calls to close or idle factories. Nippon also committed to maintain its headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and install US citizens to key management positions including its chief executive and the majority of its board."This partnership ensures that US Steel will retain its iconic name and headquarters in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, and that it will continue to be mined, melted, and made in America for generations to come," Nippon and US Steel said in a statement as shares in US Steel stopped trading. They said the deal would "protect and create more than 100,000 jobs".
Trump has made protections for the steel industry a key part of his economic agenda, raising tariffs on imports of the metal to 50% to benefit American producers. The president said he changed his mind about deal after hearing from local officials, who were alarmed by warnings from US Steel that it might cut jobs without the investment from Nippon. Leaders of the US Steelworkers union had opposed the takeover, which former president Joe Biden blocked in his final weeks of office. The companies subsequently filed a lawsuit accusing him of improperly politicising a national security review.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
24 minutes ago
- The Independent
Photos of downtown Los Angeles after mayor lifts curfew imposed during protests
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging. At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story. The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it. Your support makes all the difference.
BBC News
25 minutes ago
- BBC News
Trump dey reason make US join Israeli strikes on Iran?
US President Donald Trump say United States fit join Israeli strikes on Iran and e fit no join, afta series of strikes wey di two sides don launch against each oda. Di Republican president dey consider to help target di Islamic Republic nuclear facilities, afta a meeting wit im national security advisers for di White House Situation Room on Tuesday. Trump wey respond to questions on di mata say, Iran get wahala and wan negotiate but Iran reply say dem no go beg for di gates of di White House. Wen dem ask about if e possible say di US go dey involve for Iran, e reply: "I fit do am, I fit no do am. Nobody sabi wetin I wan do." Di US president say Iran negotiators suggest say make dem "come to di White House" while e also call for Iran "unconditional surrender" E say im don already give Iran a 60-day deadline to negotiate a deal wit di US bifor Israel launch dia attack. Meanwhile, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei say Iran no go surrender. Iran supreme leader warn Trump of "irreparable harm" if di US join Israeli attacks. As di crisis continue, Israel say dem still dey hit Iranian targets, including di internal security headquarters, while Iran warn pipo for di Israeli city of Haifa make dem comot sake of say life dey at risk. Israel bin launch strikes across Iran last Friday, and tok say dem dey target di "heart" of Iran nuclear programme. Wit counter-attacks expected "in di immediate future", Israel bin declare state of emergency. Dem kill Hossein Salami, chief of Iran Islamic Revolutionary Guards - wey be powerful branch of kontri armed forces, Iranian state media report, as well as nuclear scientists. Di US say dem no dey involved for di strikes wey also hit Iran main nuclear enrichment facility dat time, but now, US govment say dem go decide if dem go join or not. Earlier on Tuesday, Vice-President JD Vance suggest say di US fit intervene to support Israel campaign as e write on social media say Trump "fit decide say e need to take further action" to end Iran nuclear programme for Tehran. Tehran dey run two principal underground enrichment sites- Israel don hit Natanz and Fordo dey buried deep within a mountain complex near di city of Qom. According to wetin two senior Western military officers tell BBC Verify, to penetrate di facility, di US go likely get to use GBU-57A/B Massive Ordnance Penetrator (MOP) munitions. Di MOP na di only type of munition wey fit really get to di Fordo nuclear site for Iran, which so far dey untouched by Israeli air strikes. Sabi pipo say one potential target for di US na di Iran Fordo nuclear facility wey dey deep underground and only di US get 30,000lb bomb wey fit destroy am. On di oda hand, a former Israeli ambassador to di US say im dey fear say Iran fit force Washington hand by attacking a US ship or base to drag dem into di war. Michael Oren say e get some pipo for di White House wey no wan see di US enta anoda war for di Middle East. US move 30 jets as Iran attack speculation grow Na least 30 US military planes don move from bases for America to Europe ova di past three days, according to flight tracking data wey di BBC Verify review. Di planes in question na all US military tanker aircraft wey dem dey use re-fuel fighter jets and bombers. According to Flightradar24, at least seven of dis planes- all KC-135s - bin stop off for US airbases for Spain, Scotland and England. DI flights dey come as Israel and Iran continue to exchange strikes, afta Israel launch operation on Friday wey dem say na to destroy Tehran nuclear programme. Di seven jets wey BBC Verify track don travel and according to flight tracking data, dem dey fly for east of Sicily on Tuesday afternoon. Meanwhile, six no get any stated destination as one land for di Greek island of Crete. Di US don also move F-16, F-22 and F-35 fighter jets to bases for di Middle East, according to wetin three defence officials tell Reuters on Tuesday. As at now, Iran don fire missiles on Israel for di new wave of strikes, according to wetin Iranian state media report and dem add say di missiles don successfully penetrate into di Israeli defences. Di Israeli military neva acknowledge any strike, but also say dem don launch dia own missiles to hit Iranian missile site.
Telegraph
32 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Deep in a bunker, Iran's supreme leader faces a dilemma: Must he drink his cup of poison?
Somewhere deep in a bunker, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei is confronting the most momentous decision faced by any Iranian leader since the Revolution of 1979. One phrase sums up his dilemma – must he drink the 'cup of poison'? Four decades ago, he was a loyal follower of Ayatollah Khomeini, the previous supreme leader, who vowed never to relent in Iran's 'sacred' war against Saddam Hussein's Iraq. For years, Khomeini adamantly rejected any thought of compromise. Then, in July 1988, he realised that Iran could take no more and, in his words, drank the 'cup of poison' and allowed a truce. 'After accepting the ceasefire, he could no longer walk,' wrote Khomeini's son, Ahmad. 'He never again spoke in public.' Eleven months later, Khomeini was dead, and his quietly dependable lieutenant became his successor. Now Khamenei is brooding over his own 'cup of poison' – only this time the stakes are even higher. With Donald Trump demanding 'unconditional surrender' and threatening to hurl US military might into the Israeli campaign, Khamenei will realise the gravity of the situation. Unlike in 1988, the very survival of the Islamic Republic hangs in the balance. In the skies above, Israeli jets have demonstrated their ability to strike almost any target at will. Last Friday, they wiped out all the generals in the Islamic Republic's high command. On Tuesday, they killed one of their successors. As well as bombing the uranium enrichment plant at Natanz and the conversion facility at Isfahan – two crown jewels of Iran's nuclear programme – Israel is destroying the regime's most vital infrastructure, including refineries and oilfields. If Mr Trump sends US forces into action, the military might arrayed against Iran will be many times greater. And all of this colossal firepower is designed to exert maximum pressure on one 86-year-old man, and force him to emulate his late master and do what he has always sworn never to do. Accepting US and Israeli terms would require Khamenei to sacrifice the entirety of Iran's nuclear programme, especially its ability to enrich uranium. Yet he has spent the past two decades vehemently refusing any compromise on exactly that issue. Why? Because enrichment is the vital process that could be used to produce the weapons-grade uranium at the core of a nuclear bomb. Only a handful of countries have this ability. Under Khamenei, Iran became one of them. The cost was immense, both financial and human, because Israel began assassinating Iranian nuclear scientists as long ago as 2010. And the Ayatollah began this momentous project decades ago. In the 1990s, he started building a clandestine uranium enrichment plant at Natanz, found in the Dasht-e-Kavir, the Great Salt Desert, about 200 miles south of Tehran. The plan was that Iranian scientists would master the whole process in total secrecy, leaving Khamenei free to decide whether to go the whole way and order them to produce weapons-grade uranium for a nuclear bomb. But the plot failed when Natanz was discovered and its existence announced to the world in 2002. Suddenly the regime came under huge international pressure to halt its enrichment programme. Khamenei's response was not just to defy these demands but to construct a second secret enrichment plant, hidden in a mountain at Fordow. Once again, the scheme failed when America and Britain jointly disclosed the existence of Fordow in 2009. Crippling economic sanctions were then imposed to compel Iran to stop enriching uranium. And still Khamenei pressed on, even as the world's richest countries set out to cripple the Iranian economy. His defiance was rewarded in 2015, when the US and its allies signed an agreement that allowed Iran to keep its enrichment capacity, albeit under tight restrictions and constant inspection. This was the deal scorned by Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, and destroyed by Mr Trump during his first term. Whereupon the Khamenei resumed expanding Iran's nuclear programme, amassing about 20,000 centrifuges and over eight tonnes of enriched uranium in the teeth of threats and pressure. Now, as bombs fall on Iran, probably destroying or disabling all the centrifuges at Natanz, every fibre of the Ayatollah's being will urge him to stand firm and give the same answer as before – that Iran will never relinquish its hard-won ability to enrich uranium. But one factor – and one alone – might force him to change his mind. Despite Mr Trump's threats, it will not be personal safety. Khamenei may be an obscurantist fanatic, but he is no coward. He would gladly trade his own life for what he sees as Iran's nuclear rights. Yet he has one supreme and overriding responsibility, and that is to guarantee the survival of the regime. He will hope that he can stand firm against Israel and the US while still ensuring that the Islamic Republic outlives this crisis. Hence Mr Netanyahu and Mr Trump are striving above all to convince the Iranian leader that this option does not exist. Everything they do is designed to force him to contemplate the downfall of the regime, pushing him to the brink, and making him understand that accepting their terms and sacrificing the enrichment programme is the only way of preventing that outcome. This is the ultimate example of power politics in action. Khamenei will probably not dwell on how his own decisions have led him to this pass. The nuclear programme, designed to make the regime impregnable, has instead brought it to the edge. The terrorist groups that Iran sponsored to deter an Israeli attack – particularly Hizbollah in Lebanon – have instead been eviscerated. The resources squandered on that futile cause could have been used to strengthen Iran's air defences and prepare for this onslaught. Instead, Israeli jets are striking with impunity. And all around, Israeli intelligence has obviously penetrated every nook and cranny of Khamenei's regime. By his own folly, he has brought this fate upon himself. Now only one question remains – will he crack and drink the poison?
