Senate Dems demand DOJ share Ghislaine Maxwell interview tapes, pledge not to pardon her
WASHINGTON – The top Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator Richard Durbin, asked the Justice Department on July 28 for all recordings of its two days of interviews with Ghislaine Maxwell, the longtime associate of Jeffrey Epstein who is now at the center of a public furor over unreleased DOJ investigative files into a child sex trafficking ring allegedly headed by the two.
Durbin, D-Ill., sought all recordings and related transcripts in a letter to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, the former Trump personal defense lawyer who conducted the interviews with Maxwell last week in Tallahassee, Fla., near where she is serving a 20-year prison sentence related to the trafficking ring.
The letter was co-signed by fellow Judiciary Committee member Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, the former top federal prosecutor in Rhode Island and state attorney general.
The senators also demanded that the Justice Department commit to offering no pardon or reduction of Maxwell's sentence in exchange for information she provides, citing 'serious questions about the potential for a corrupt bargain between the Trump Administration and Ghislaine Maxwell.'
'What does the Justice Department want out of Ghislaine Maxwell? She's a proven liar and sex trafficker. The timing of her meeting with Deputy Attorney General Blanche doesn't pass the sniff test,' according to a social media post with the letter by the Democrats on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which has oversight of the DOJ. 'They're on notice—no political games here.'
In their letter, Durbin and Whitehouse noted that Maxwell has been accused by Justice Department prosecutors of being willing 'to brazenly lie under oath about her conduct' in connection with the case.
More: Trump says he's 'allowed' to pardon Ghislaine Maxwell and he never went to Epstein's island
They demanded to know 'why would DOJ depart from long-standing precedent and now seek her cooperation?' given those accusations of lying, Maxwell's sex trafficking conviction and the 'troves of corroborating evidence collected through multiple investigations.'
The interviews with Maxwell, in which she was reportedly given partial immunity, are likely another tactic to distract from DOJ's failure to fulfill a commitment made by Attorney General Pam Bondi to publicly release all of the Epstein files in DOJ's possession, Durbin and Whitehouse wrote.
'The victims and survivors of Jeffrey Epstein have been repeatedly let down by the criminal justice system,' the senators wrote. 'Rather than engaging in this elaborate ruse, DOJ should simply release the Epstein files, as Attorney General Bondi promised to do.'
Trump has said twice in recent days, including Monday, that while he 'is allowed' to pardon Maxwell, he hasn't thought about it.
Last Friday, after Maxwell's second day of interviews with Blanche, her lawyer David Markus noted that Trump 'said he had the power' to pardon her. 'We hope he exercises that power in the right and just way," Markus told reporters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
a few seconds ago
- CNN
Treasury secretary calls new Trump accounts 'a backdoor' way to privatize Social Security
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Wednesday likened the Trump accounts created by Republicans' massive new domestic policy law to 'a backdoor for privatizing Social Security.' Democrats are already launching political attacks. Bessent was discussing the Trump accounts at a Breitbart policy panel. The federal government will contribute $1,000 into these new tax-deferred investment accounts for US citizen children born between 2025 and 2028, while parents and others can contribute up to $5,000 annually. The funds are intended to be used for higher education, buying a home or starting a small business. The accounts can also be used to help Americans better understand investing and serve as a way to save for retirement, Bessent said. Then he threw out a comment that had Democrats immediately up in arms. 'In a way, it is a backdoor for privatizing Social Security,' he said. 'Social Security is a defined benefit plan paid out. To the extent that if, all of a sudden, these accounts grow and you have in the hundreds of thousands of dollars for your retirement, then that's a game changer, too.' Democrats have long accused Republicans of wanting to privatize Social Security — a topic that sparks intense reactions from Americans who are suspicious of plans to harm the program after they've paid into it for years — and have resurfaced the issue during President Donald Trump's second term. 'Donald Trump's Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent just said the quiet part out loud: The administration is scheming to privatize Social Security,' Tim Hogan, the Democratic National Committee's senior adviser for messaging, mobilization and strategy, said in a statement. 'Trump is now coming after American seniors with a 'backdoor' scam to take away the benefits they earned.' Privatizing Social Security would also enrich Wall Street, said Massachusetts Rep. Richard Neal, ranking member of the House Ways and Means Committee. 'Republicans' ultimate goal is to privatize Social Security, and there isn't a backdoor they won't try to make Wall Street's dream a reality,' Neal said in a statement. 'For everyone else though, it's yet another warning sign that they cannot be trusted to safeguard the program millions rely on and have paid into over a lifetime of work.' The Treasury Department did not return a request for comment. Republicans in Congress last made a major effort to establish private Social Security accounts in 2005, during George W. Bush's second term. It proved unsuccessful after sparking heavy blowback. Bessent also said Wednesday that the Trump accounts would help address people who are disillusioned with 'the system,' referencing New York State Assemblyman Zohran Mamdani's unexpected win in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor. Mamdani is a democratic socialist. 'When you do this, you make everyone a shareholder,' Bessent said. 'People who are part of the system do not want to bring down the system.'
Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Why Talent And Resources Are The Backbone Of Education R&D
The Supreme Court in mid-July cleared the path for the Trump Administration to implement a significant restructuring of the U.S. Department of Education that will, by some estimates, cause the elimination of nearly 1,400 federal education staff. This includes roughly 90% of the professionals at the Institute of Education Sciences (IES), the agency responsible for overseeing national education research and data systems. Good policy starts with good people. Lose them, and the system breaks down. Following the ruling, Education Secretary Linda McMahon stated the department would 'continue to perform all statutory duties.' But early signals suggest this will be an uphill climb. Just days later, the delayed release of the 2025 national science scores underscored the challenge of executing important federal functions without the experienced professionals to deliver them. Meanwhile, state and district leaders scrambled to adjust to another curveball: the withholding of nearly $7 billion in federal education funds for the 2025-26 school year. These funds, authorized by Congress and integral to local budgets, supported everything from academic enrichment to professional development. The money was eventually released on July 25; however, the confusion and chaos caused by the surprise delay were enough for even some of Trump's supporters to question what the Administration was doing. Ten Republican senators sent a letter to OMB Director Russell Vought on July 16, urging him to release the funds, writing: 'The decision to withhold this funding is contrary to President Trump's goal of returning K-12 education to the states. This funding goes directly to states and local school districts, where local leaders decide how this funding is spent.' Alabama state superintendent Eric Makey told POLITICO, 'This is not about political philosophy, this is about reliability and consistency. None of us were worrying about this.' And there are more reports of a potential rescissions package that would target the Department of Education. These are reminders that strong systems require steady support. Talent Is The First Ingredient In Effective R&D When the Alliance for Learning Innovation (ALI), which I lead as executive director, convened over 150 education leaders and stakeholders to develop our Blueprint for the Future of Federal Education R&D, one theme stood out: skilled professionals are required to drive effective research and innovation. Recent firings and buyouts at the U.S. Department of Education are disrupting the work of specialists who conduct large-scale federal education research, analyze critical assessments like the Nation's Report Card, and translate complex data into practical guidance for schools. These staff departures threaten to sever essential connections between researchers, educators, and ed tech developers just when evidence-based decision-making is most crucial for student outcomes. Without the talent to run these systems, even well-intentioned priorities can stall. The need for sound, actionable education research transcends partisan divides. ALI's spring survey of K-12 parents revealed strong bipartisan support for federal education R&D funding, with 79% of all parents and 73% of Republican and right-leaning parents favoring continued investment. Across the political spectrum, families agree that the federal government should play a leading role in helping schools identify effective practices and scale successful interventions. Parents want public investments in evidence-based tools that help students succeed, whether through improved literacy instruction, stronger math supports, or responsible classroom AI integration. What A Reimagined Federal R&D Structure Could Look Like Rebuilding the federal education workforce overnight isn't feasible; it will be a Herculean task. But this moment presents an opportunity to rethink how we structure and support federal education R&D for the long term. ALI's Blueprint outlines a modern approach that harnesses talent both inside and outside government through strategic public-private partnerships to deliver what schools need and parents expect. This dual strategy would expand the education R&D talent pipeline by investing in career pathways for external researchers, developers, and data scientists while simultaneously building interdisciplinary teams within federal agencies, combining experts in learning science, education policy, implementation, and user-centered design. Such integrated expertise, assembled through civil service recruitment and partnership mechanisms like the Intergovernmental Personnel Act and cooperative agreements, would ensure that critical federal initiatives like the Nation's Report Card have the sophisticated analytical capacity needed to generate actionable insights for educators. This is not about growing the government for its own sake. It's about ensuring that the tools and innovations educators need are rigorously developed, tested, and deployed in a way that serves students. We Need to Rebuild, Not Retreat Secretary McMahon reiterated her commitment to ensuring that the Department of Education continues to 'perform all statutory duties' and that, as she said during her confirmation hearing, federal education funding would not be reduced. These are important commitments, and ones that millions of educators, families, and state leaders are counting on. Now is the time to outline how those duties will be met in light of the staffing reductions and the hold on funding. Education R&D is not about compliance; it's about capacity. And that capacity is only possible when the federal government acts as the reliable partner that schools need to plan, adapt, and improve. ALI and many others in the education research and innovation community are committed to working with policymakers across the political spectrum to ensure the federal education R&D ecosystem remains strong, nimble, and aligned to real-world needs. Whether it's evaluating AI tools, supporting early literacy programs, or scaling successful tutoring models, the backbone of these efforts is talent and investment. Because when we lose the people and resources behind education R&D, we don't just slow innovation, we leave schools without the support they need to serve students well. Follow Sara Schapiro on LinkedIn
Time Magazine
a few seconds ago
- Time Magazine
GOP Split on Gaza Grows, as MTG Calls Crisis a 'Genocide'
Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, a right-wing lawmaker closely identified with President Donald Trump's MAGA movement, this week became the first Republican in Congress to describe the situation in Gaza as a 'genocide.' 'It's the most truthful and easiest thing to say that Oct. 7 in Israel was horrific and all hostages must be returned, but so is the genocide, humanitarian crisis, and starvation happening in Gaza,' Greene, who represents Georgia, said in a social media post Monday evening. The post was in response to fellow Republican Rep. Randy Fine, who had posted last week on X: 'Release the hostages. Until then, starve away.' Greene's declaration represented a sharp turn for her on the fraught issue of Gaza. Since Hamas' terror attack on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, in which over 1,200 people were killed and around 250 taken hostage, virtually all prominent Republicans have been in lockstep in support of Israel's military campaign. Weeks after Hamas' attack, Greene filed a resolution to censure Rep. Rashida Tlaib, a Michigan Democrat, over her criticism of Israel. Read More: The Malnutrition Crisis in Gaza Will Outlive the War, Experts Warn The shift from Greene was the latest sign of a broader debate within the Republican Party over Gaza. Greene's words came the same day as Trump seemed to break with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu over Netanyahu's claims that there is no starvation in Gaza. Trump made clear to reporters at an event in Scotland with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that he believed the starvation there was 'real.' 'We're going to set up food centers, and we're going to do it in conjunction with some very good people,' Trump said. 'We're going to supply funds… and we're going to spend a little money on some food. Other nations are joining us.' Starmer later said on Tuesday that the U.K. would recognize Palestine as a state if Israel did not make 'substantive steps to end the appalling situation in Gaza' and make moves towards 'sustainable, long-term peace.' Though Trump did not explicitly condemn Netanyahu, he did acknowledge he 'told Bibi [Netanyahu] that you have to maybe do it a different way.' Republicans are more divided on the issue than they have been since the Oct. 7 attack. While a few fellow Republicans have joined Greene's condemnation—'More need to speak out,' she said in response to a post from Rep. Lance Gooden of Texas about Gaza's 'humanitarian crisis'—others are insisting the fault over the situation still lies with Hamas. Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he 'shares the President's view,' but also accused Hamas of intercepting and diverting much of the food aid going to Gaza. 'The humanitarian thing obviously when you see people hurting in a need like that, is to want to help meet that need and alleviate that pain,' Thune said at his weekly press conference. 'I think all of us want to see, obviously, a peaceful solution there that gets the hostages freed and ends the reign and rule of Hamas in the region. But in the meantime, do everything we can to ease the pain and the hunger that's afflicting so many of the people in that region.' North Carolina's Republican Sen. Thom Thillis simultaneously told The Hill that Hamas deserves blame and that Trump was 'right to hold elected [officials] accountable,' saying he would 'encourage Mr. Netanyahu to just be sensitive to that.' Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Chris Hollen of Maryland said Sunday on CBS's Face The Nation that claims that Hamas was stealing U.N.-delivered food were a "big lie." Many others in the Republican Party remain staunch in their support for Netanyahu's government. 'I want to be crystal clear on my thoughts regarding the catastrophe in Gaza: I blame Hamas 100%,' South Carolina Sen. Lindsay Graham said on X on Tuesday. 'If you want this suffering to end, call on Hamas to lay down their weapons and their leaders to take safe passage out of Gaza. The criticism of Israel is beyond the pale as they are fighting for their very existence.' The split within the GOP comes amid mounting pressure from Democrats and the international community for both Israel and the U.S. to better address starvation in Gaza. On Tuesday, 40 Senators sent a letter to Secretary of State Marco Rubio and U.S. Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff, imploring them and Trump to address starvation in Gaza with the resumption of ceasefire talks. The Senators also expressed opposition to 'permanent forced displacement of the Palestinian people.' 'To prevent the situation from getting even worse, we urge you to advocate for a large-scale expansion of humanitarian assistance and services throughout the Gaza Strip, including through the use of experienced multilateral bodies and NGOs that can get life-saving aid directly to those in need and prevent diversion,' the letter reads.
