Elmbridge Museum collection must move 'as a matter of urgency'
When it was last assessed for accreditation, the issue of poor storage facilities was flagged as a key area for improvement. The next assessment is expected later this year or in 2026.The report said: "Given the proximity to the next scheduled Arts Council accreditation assessment, it is proposed that the museum collection located at Elmgrove be moved... as a matter of urgency."The report said that, if the museum were to lose accreditation, it would "suffer significant reputational damage, will find it harder to recruit staff, and will also be ineligible for many streams of funding."It added that, if the museum ever wished to borrow items from other institutions for displays, this would become impossible without accreditation, according to the Local Democracy Reporting Service.
Between June 2022 and September 2024 various options were explored, according to a council report, but no feasible sites have been yet been identified.Options under consideration include the Luxfords storage facility, in Weybridge.This currently houses a significant part of the museum collection and additional space is available but conversion works would be needed, according to a report.The Luxfords site is also not publicly accessible - prompting the council to explore a longer-term solution in partnership with Brooklands Museum.Discussions are under way to relocate the full collection to Brooklands' Acoustics Building, which would be converted into a shared facility.The project could take up to three years.The council plans to commission a feasibility study later this year to develop detailed proposals, costings, and governance options for the partnership.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
4 hours ago
- The Guardian
Cohesive communities built on work and charity
Your editorial rightly argues that collective belonging is rooted not only in place but also in shared purpose, and the dignified structures of mutual support that have too often been dismantled (The Guardian view on strengthening social cohesion: we can learn from the working-class past, 17 July). Our work at the University of the West of England engages directly with these concerns through research into how light industry – historically a binding force in working-class towns – might be reintegrated into the heart of our communities in a sustainable manner. The disappearance of production from everyday urban life has not simply meant the loss of jobs; it has also eroded identity, civic pride and interdependence. Industrial activity, once visible and valued, has been pushed out of sight, out of mind, and often out of reach. The result is a built environment that is increasingly monotone, functionally segregated and lacking the social and cultural layering that once reflected the richness of everyday life. Our New Industrial Urbanism project, which we are developing with colleagues in the university's college of arts, technology and environment, explores how new forms of small-scale, clean and socially embedded production can return to the high street, the town edge or the repurposed civic building. We are working with communities to understand how productive infrastructure – combined with walkability, sustainability and shared space – can reknit the social and economic fabric of places hollowed out by the relocation of industry to faceless business parks on the urban fringe. What is needed is not nostalgia for the past, but a reimagining of how making, crafting and producing can be civic acts. Social cohesion is not built through consumption but through participation – through people shaping their environments and economies together. I applaud your focus on the importance of belonging. We must ensure that future towns do not just house people; they must empower them to make, contribute and Piers TaylorProfessor of knowledge exchange in architecture, University of the West of England As one of the recently appointed commissioners to the Independent Commission on Community and Cohesion, I read your editorial with interest. In my personal opinion, many of the answers to issues that are challenging for all communities – urban and rural, communities of interest and of place – are likely to be found in building trusted relationships, encouraging regular, honest communication and collaborative working. Effective partnerships between charities, community groups, voluntary associations and decision makers and funders are invaluable in supporting civic engagement. I would draw particular attention to the unique way in which the voluntary sector is regarded as a trusted partner in Wales. The existence of the Third Sector Scheme, setting out key roles and responsibilities between the sector and Welsh government, is envied across the UK and farther afield. Both the organised and informal networks of charities and voluntary organisations have the opportunity to work alongside the public sector, influencing policy and practice. Sustainable engagement with the third sector is likely to support the development of better connected and more cohesive communities. Formal structures such as those in Wales can help achieve a renewed sense of common MarksFormer CEO, Wales Council for Voluntary Action Thank you for your editorial. You hail the reopening, post-refurbishment, of the Durham Miners' Hall as a community hub and note that 'cultivation of communal memory in post-industrial regions can play an important role in evoking a sense of solidarity and belonging'. Deep is my respect for these cultural memories of the industrial north-east. I am filled with similar pride reading about the role of cotton workers in the north-west during the cotton famine (1861-65). Some 70 years before the American civil war, the first ever petition advocating an end to slavery was delivered to parliament in 1788. A second in 1792 came with 20,000 signatures from the people of Manchester. Lancashire imported its raw cotton from the US southern states. Its mills employed 440,000 workers. From 1861, Abraham Lincoln's north blockaded the cotton-exporting ports of the south. The cotton workers went, suddenly, from being the most prosperous workers in Britain to being unemployed. Despite hardships, their support for the north, and its struggle to end US slavery in the south, remained undimmed. These hopes were expressed in a letter to Lincoln, drafted after a meeting at the Free Trade Hall in Manchester in December 1862. Within three weeks, Lincoln replied expressing gratitude for the workers' 'Christian heroism' in accepting their suffering in solidarity with the southern slaves. Lincoln's words are displayed on his statue in Lincoln Square, Manchester. Several of my ancestors worked in the mills. I swell with pride. If only these stories were better John HullSheffield Have an opinion on anything you've read in the Guardian today? Please email us your letter and it will be considered for publication in our letters section.
The Sun
5 hours ago
- The Sun
Full list of DWP benefit errors that can lead to refunds worth £1,000s – including PIP and state pension
HOUSEHOLDS should be aware of these benefit errors that can lead to refunds worth £1,000's. If the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) underpays you on a benefit you could be entitled to the money you are owed back. 1 Vice versa, if you are over paid on a benefit you will need to give the money back or it could result in legal action. This is the case even if you didn't notice and have spent it already. Currently, claimants could be entitled to back payments on a number of benefits including the State Pension and Personal Independence Payments (PIP). We explain who have been impacted below. State Pension error If you took time away from paid work to look after a child or someone with an illness, you could be owed money back. The issue mainly impacts those carrying out caring duties between 1978 and 2010. During this time, the government had a system in place to ensure people would still be paid the state pension if they took time out for these reasons. This system was called Home Responsibilities Protection (HRP) and it should have been automatically awarded to those claiming Child Benefit. But an error in the system found that hundreds of thousands of people were left with gaps in their National Insurance records that should not be there. Disability benefit explained - what you can claim Those impacted have been underpaid on their state pension or could be in the future. But the government has said that all issues related to the error should be resolved by March 2027. How to claim You might have received a letter if you are thought to be affected. People can check their eligibility for backdated HRP and make a claim via HMRC said the process takes around 15 minutes. According to MoneySavingExpert, the average amount being paid out is more than £7,000. PIP Benefit claimants could be owed cash from the government after a PIP payment error. What are state pension errors? STEVE Webb, partner at LCP and former Pensions Minister, explains what state pension errors are and how they can occur: The way state pensions are worked out is so complicated that many thousands of people have been paid the wrong amount for years without even realising it. The amount of retirement pension you get usually depends on your National Insurance (NI) record. One big source of errors has been cases where NI records have been incorrect, particularly for years spent at home with children. This is a system known as 'Home Responsibilities Protection'. Alternatively, particularly for older pensioners, the amount you get can depend on the NI contributions made by your spouse. Errors have arisen where the Government has failed to adjust the pensions of married women when their husbands retired or failed to increase pensions when someone was bereaved and lost a husband or wife. Although the Government has spent years trying to fix these problems, there are still many thousands of people – many of them older women – on the wrong pension. If you have always thought that your pension seems low, then it is worth contacting the Pensions Service to ask them to check, especially if you spent time at home raising children or if you were widowed and your pension didn't change when your spouse died A review was launched following a Supreme Court judgment in July 2019 that changed the way the DWP defines 'social support' in one of the assessed PIP categories. Dubbed the "MM judgement", the DWP realised that hundreds of thousands could now be due additional support. It means that people may not have been given one of the two elements of PIP when they were actually entitled to it. Others may have been awarded the standard rate but should have received the enhanced rate, which is a higher amount. It occurred after some people were given one of the two elements of PIP when they were actually entitled to it. The DWP launched a review in 2021, looking at cases since 2016. How to claim An estimated 633,338 households are thought to be have been affected by the error. The average payout works out at around £5,285 per claim, but you could get more or less. One couple told The Sun they were left shell-shocked" after learning that they were due £12,000 in back payments. The DWP tends to get in contact directly with claimants thought to be impacted. New PIP error The DWP has flagged two more errors relating to the benefits claim. That includes PIP claimants without a National Insurance number not having their claims processed correctly, even though it is not needed to make a claim. Up to £500,000 has been paid out to those impacted. Elsewhere, The DWP has also paid out £13million to Scottish PIP claimants who mistakenly saw a "loss of entitlement" when they tried moving over to the Adult Disability Payment (ADP). How do I appeal a PIP decision? If you've been contacted by the DWP or think you are affected by the MM judgement, you'll need to appeal your PIP decision. If you think a PIP decision was wrong, you can challenge it. If you've been contacted by the DWP or think your PIP payments may be affected by the MM judgment, you should ask for a "mandatory reconsideration notice". This is where the DWP looks at your claim decision again. If you are still unhappy with this outcome, you can then appeal to an independent tribunal. You must send your appeal form within one month of the date shown on the mandatory reconsideration notice. Be aware that it usually takes up to six months for an appeal to be heard by the tribunal. Before it gets to the tribunal, the DWP can make a revision to the original claim. If you're unhappy with the decision you get from the tribunal, you may also be able to get the decision cancelled - known as "set aside". You'll be told how to do this at the time. Another option is to appeal to the Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals Chamber) if you think the tribunal wasn't able to give you proper reasons for its decision, or back up the decision with facts, or if it failed to apply the law properly. Full details about challenging your PIP decisions can be found on
BBC News
7 hours ago
- BBC News
Slade Camp memories project receives National Lottery funding
Two organisations have received funding to research and share the stories of a former Army training camp in Preservation Trust and Shotover Preservation Society have been awarded a £49,204 grant from The National Lottery Heritage Fund to uncover memories of life at Slade Camp, which housed displaced families after World War project will capture the experiences of former residents, including "accounts of resilience" and "childhoods spent exploring a mostly rural neighbourhood."The society said it was "a great pleasure" to work with former residents "in bringing this special part of Shotover back to life". Huts at the site between Brasenose and Magdalen Woods became home to dozens of families in the 1940s, '50s and ' 1970, the camp closed and was dismantled after the residents had remains of its buildings became overgrown but were uncovered during the Covid pandemic and more has been discovered about their history since. The trust said throughout the project there would be "lots of opportunities for people to find about more about this fascinating place". A month-long exhibition about it will open at Oxford's Westgate Library on 1 September, and local historians will be giving tours of the site on 14 physical remains of the camp will be installed with new signage and a guided trail for visitors. Chief executive of Oxford Preservation Trust Anna Eavis said the project would "raise awareness of the historic significance of Slade Camp and value of this woodland site as a community amenity with a remarkable past".Jim Woods, chair of Shotover Preservation Society, said that through the Heritage Fund support "we'll be able to capture more of the stories from this community forged by unusual circumstances, and who showed a remarkable resilience in a difficult time for the country"". "It's a great pleasure working with the former residents and various volunteers in bringing this special part of Shotover back to life," he added. You can follow BBC Oxfordshire on Facebook, X (Twitter), or Instagram.
