
UNSC holds closed consultation on India, Pak situation; president Sekeris calls it productive
As he left the meeting on Monday, he told reporters, 'The Security Council is always helpful in such efforts' to de-escalate. "It is the responsibility of the Council". 'It was a productive meeting and helpful', he said.
Since the meeting was a closed consultation, its proceedings are secret without official records.
Assistant Secretary-General Mohamed Khaled Khiari, who briefed the meeting, said on his way out that all want de-escalation.
Asked how he viewed it, he said, 'Situation is volatile", and would not elaborate.
Russia's Deputy Permanent Representative Anna Evstigneeva, who attended the meeting, said, 'We hope for de-escalation".
Sekeris convened the meeting at the request of Pakistan's Permanent Representative Asim Iftikhar Ahmad.
Ahmad called for a closed consultation because countries that are not members of the Council are not allowed to participate in it under Council procedures.
That effectively shut out India, while Pakistan, as a current elected member, attended.
Before the meeting, Secretary-General Antonio Guterres said the situation was at a 'boiling point" and asked the two countries to 'step back from the brink'.
"It is also essential – especially at this critical hour -- to avoid a military confrontation that could easily spin out of control', he said.
Condemning 'strongly' the terrorist massacre of 26 people in Pahalgam last month, he said, "I understand the raw feelings following the awful terror attack'.
The Resistance Front, an affiliate of the Pakistan-based Lashkar-e-Tayiba, owned responsibility for the terrorist attack.
Speaking to reporters after the consultation, Ahmad 'categorically' denied India's charge that Pakistan was involved in the attack.
He vacillated between militancy and conciliation. He referred to Kashmir as a disputed territory welling with mass discontent that is at the root of the problem with India, rather than terrorism, while also offering cooperation with India.
'We are fully prepared to defend our sovereignty', he said.
'We reiterate our commitment to peaceful cooperative relations with all our neighbours, including India, [and] we remain open to dialogue', he added.
'In view of the gravity of the situation, the calls of dialogue and de-escalation and peaceful resolution of disputes as we also heard from the Council members today are most pertinent', Ahmad said.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
No exchange of sweets on India, Pak border today
New Delhi No exchange of sweets on India, Pak border today Amid heightened tensions between India and Pakistan, Border Security Force (BSF) personnel will not exchange sweets with Pakistan Rangers at the Indo-Pak border this Independence Day, a departure from a long-standing tradition, officials aware of the matter said. However, the customary exchange of sweets on the occasion will continue at the Indo-Bangladesh border outposts in the eastern sector. The decision not to exchange sweets this Independence Day has been taken against the backdrop of Pakistan-sponsored terror attack in Pahalgam and India's successful response - Operation Sindoor. During Operation Sindoor, Pakistan Rangers had provided cover fire to assist infiltrating terrorists. In one operation, at least 7 Jaish-e-Mohammed terrorists, aided by Pakistan Rangers, were neutralised by BSF on the night of May 8 on the border in Samba district.


NDTV
4 hours ago
- NDTV
Russia Claims New Ukraine Gains Ahead Of Putin-Trump Summit
Russia said on Thursday its troops had captured two new settlements in eastern Ukraine on the eve of a summit between President Vladimir Putin and US counterpart Donald Trump. The defence ministry said Russian forces captured the village of Iskra and the small town of Shcherbynivka in Ukraine's Donetsk region, which the Kremlin claimed to have annexed in September 2022. Shcherbynivka is near the mining town of Toretsk, captured by Russian troops in February, and Kostiantynivka -- one of the last large urban areas in the Donetsk region still held by Ukraine. The Russian army has accelerated its gains in recent months. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky on Tuesday conceded that Russian forces had advanced by up to 10 kilometres (six miles) in a narrow section of the front line near the coal mining town of Dobropillia. The Russian army's gains on Tuesday were the biggest for a single 24-hour period in over a year, according to an AFP analysis of data from the US-based Institute for the Study of War (ISW). In southern Russia, 13 people, including two children, were injured Thursday in a Ukrainian drone attack that damaged around 10 residential buildings in Rostov-on-Don, regional governor Yuri Sliusar said on Telegram. The Russian military claimed to have shot down 268 Ukrainian drones and four glide bombs in 24 hours. In Ukraine, the air force said Russia had fired two missiles and 45 drones at Ukrainian territory overnight. Two people were injured in the northern Sumy region and one in the Kherson region, according to local authorities. Putin and Trump are to meet on Friday in Alaska for a summit which the Kremlin said would focus on "the resolution of the Ukraine crisis".


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Free speech clash: Supreme Court allows Mississippi's law requiring age verification for minors; tech giants oppose mandate
US Supreme Court (AP image) The US Supreme Court on Thursday declined to temporarily block a Mississippi law that requires age verification and parental consent for minors to use social media platforms. The law, aimed at protecting young people from potential online harm, will remain in effect while legal challenges continue. It is one of several measures passed by US states to curb the influence of social media on children. NetChoice – a group representing companies including Facebook, Instagram , Reddit, X and YouTube had asked the Supreme Court to halt the law after the New Orleans-based 5th US Circuit Court of Appeals allowed its enforcement. A lower court had earlier blocked the law, ruling it likely violated the First Amendment. US District Judge Sul Ozerden said the measure was overly broad and that parents already have other ways to monitor their children's online activity. The Supreme Court did not explain its decision. However, Justice Brett Kavanaugh noted that while the law may be unconstitutional, NetChoice had not proven that enforcing it during the court battle would cause enough harm to justify halting it. NetChoice attorney Paul Taske called the ruling a 'procedural delay' and expressed confidence the group would ultimately prevail in protecting free speech rights. 'Although we're disappointed with the Court's decision, Justice Kavanaugh's concurrence makes clear that NetChoice will ultimately succeed in defending the First Amendment − not just in this case but across all NetChoice's ID-for-Speech lawsuits," Taske said in a statement. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Is it better to shower in the morning or at night? Here's what a microbiologist says CNA Read More Undo Mississippi officials defended the law, saying it targets platforms that allow predators to contact minors. They cited a case in which a 16-year-old boy took his own life after he met someone on Instagram who threatened to expose their sexual encounter unless he paid $1,000. The state also argued that blocking the law conflicted with the Supreme Court's earlier decision to uphold a Texas law requiring age verification for pornographic websites. NetChoice maintains the law infringes on free speech by forcing all user, including adults to provide personal information to access online platforms. "Social media is the modern printing press − it allows all Americans to share their thoughts and perspectives,' Taske said. 'Just as the government can't force you to provide identification to read a newspaper, the same holds true when that news is available online.'