Red state moves to defund county after leader vows to ‘interfere and interrupt' ICE deportations
This comes amid the Trump administration's concerted whole-of-government approach to cracking down on illegal immigration and migrant crime in the United States.
Bird, a Republican, argues that the sheriff's self-proclaimed "longtime" stance of interrupting immigration enforcement operations based on detainers "impeded and discouraged cooperation with federal immigration authorities in violation of Iowa law."
A detainer is a formal request by ICE to other law enforcement authorities to hold an individual the agency has good reason to believe is an illegal alien who poses a threat to the well-being and safety of the community.
ICE officials have said that by refusing to honor detainers, law enforcement agencies put their communities at risk by allowing potentially dangerous illegals back onto the streets.
Despite this, Winneshiek County Sheriff Dan Marx pledged not to cooperate with ICE detainers in a Feb. 4 Facebook post in which he asserted that a detainer is "simply an unconstitutional *request* from ICE."
In the now-deleted post, Marx encouraged people to contact his office if they encounter "any federal agents" and said he and his staff are "always willing to assist with verifying credentials and the legitimacy of any paperwork federal agents should have to make certain your rights are not being abused."
"If the fed's actions and paperwork are within constitutional parameters (such as proper and valid judicial warrants/court orders) we will assist if needed or requested to ensure their actions are carried out professionally and in the least intrusive fashion possible," he said.
"If their actions or paperwork are not within constitutional parameters," he went on, "then we will make every effort to block, interfere and interrupt their actions from moving forward."
Actions the sheriff claimed are not within constitutional parameters include what he called "non-judicially vetted 'detainers,'" which he claimed "are simply an unconstitutional *request* from ICE or other three letter federal agency to arrest or hold someone."
Marx claimed that "the only reason detainers are issued is because the federal agency does not have enough information or has not taken the time to obtain a valid judicial warrant."
"Simply put, they are not sure they are detaining the right person and need more time to figure it out," he claimed, adding, "these detainers are violations of our 4th Amendment protection against warrantless search, seizure and arrest, and our 6th Amendment right to due process."
Marx concluded the long post by saying his "long-time stance on not recognizing detainers" and involvement with immigration enforcement will be based on "constitutional standards … not opinions, politics or emotions."
In response, Iowa Gov. Kim Reynolds, a Republican, filed an official complaint with the attorney general about the sheriff violating a state law mandating law enforcement cooperate with federal immigration authorities. This prompted an investigation in which Bird found that, despite his defiant rhetoric, Marx's office had complied with "every single ICE detainer request" since 2018.
The attorney general gave Marx a deadline last week to amend his statements to comply with state law. When he refused to issue a correction, Bird launched a lawsuit to pull all state funding to Winneshiek County until the sheriff agrees to comply with state law regarding cooperating with federal immigration authorities.
Bird argues that Marx's post, which she said was "rife with legal and factual errors that discouraged enforcing immigration laws," violated chapter 27A of the Iowa state legal code.
The lawsuit, which was filed in the Polk County District Court, cites section 27A.4 of the Iowa legal code, which states that a county "shall be ineligible to receive any state funds if the local entity intentionally violates this chapter."
Commenting on her suit, Bird said that "sanctuary counties are illegal under Iowa law."
"Sheriff Marx was given the chance to retract his statement, follow the law, and honor ICE detainers, but he refused—even at a cost to his home county," she said. "He left us with no choice but to take the case to court to enforce our laws and ensure cooperation with federal immigration authorities."
A representative for the Winneshiek County Sheriff's Office declined Fox News Digital's request for comment, saying the sheriff and office "are unable to provide any comments at this time due to the pending litigation."
The Winnishiek County Auditor, Benjamin D. Steines would not disclose how much money the county stands to lose, citing the same litigation.
"Iowa is not a sanctuary for illegal immigration. Anyone who threatens to 'block, interfere and interrupt' with immigration enforcement, as this sheriff did, will be held accountable," Bird told Fox News Digital.
She noted that her office "gave the Sheriff an opportunity to fix his state-law violation and cooperate with immigration enforcement, but he refused—knowing that it would cost his home community. All he has to do to end this is fix the problem and follow the law."
"Years of a Biden-Harris border invasion takes a serious toll—even on Iowa, and we're a long way away from the border," she went on. "Thankfully, President Trump hit the ground running to secure the border, crack down on drug trafficking, and reduce crime. And as Iowa's Attorney General, I will keep fighting to ensure our state cooperates with federal immigration authorities to keep our communities safe."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
USA Today
an hour ago
- USA Today
Over 300 protests held Saturday against Trump redistricting push
Pro-democracy activists and labor groups held hundreds of rallies and other events across the United States on Saturday, Aug. 16, protesting the Trump administration's push for Texas to redraw its congressional map in favor of Republicans. Former Congressman Beto O'Rourke was among those who spoke on Saturday in Texas, from which dozens of Democratic state lawmakers fled to deny Republicans the quorum needed to vote on a redistricting plan that President Donald Trump had demanded. "They do this because they are afraid," O'Rourke told an audience on Saturday, speaking of those attempting redistricting. "They fear this power they see here today." More: Obama calls Texas GOP redistricting an 'assault' on democracy Drucilla Tigner, executive director of pro-democracy coalition Texas For All, told Reuters pro-democracy and labor groups held over 300 events attended by tens of thousands of people in 44 states and Washington, D.C. Many of the more than 50 Texas Democrats who fled the state have been staying in Illinois, also the site of protests on Saturday. The Texas lawmakers in Illinois are out of reach of civil arrest warrants that could be acted on within Texas. The Texas Democrats kept the map from coming to a vote during a special session Texas Gov. Greg Abbott called that ended Friday. Abbott immediately called a second special session. Abbott said that redistricting plans, legislation to increase flash flood safety in the wake of deadly July flooding, and other legislative work remain undone because Democrats are absent. California's Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom on Thursday, Aug. 14 unveiled a redistricting plan in his state that he says would give Democrats there five more Congressional seats, possibly offsetting any Republican gains in Texas. The Texas House Democrats said in a written statement on Thursday that they will only return to Texas if their state's special legislation is ended and once California's redistricting maps are introduced.
an hour ago
In Trump's redistricting push, Democrats find an aggressive identity
ATLANTA -- Fight! Fight! Fight! It's not just Donald Trump's mantra anymore. As the Republican president pushes states to redraw their congressional districts to the GOP's advantage, Democrats have shown they are willing to go beyond words of outrage and use whatever power they do have to win. Democrats in the Texas Legislature started it off by delaying, for now, Republican efforts to expand the GOP majority in the state's delegation and help preserve party control of the U.S. House through new districts in time for the 2026 midterm elections. Then multiple Democratic governors promised new districts in their own states to neutralize potential Republican gains in Washington. Their counter has been buoyed by national fundraising, media blitzes and public demonstrations, including rallies Saturday around the country. 'For everyone that's been asking, 'Where are the Democrats?' -- well, here they are," said U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Texas, one of several Democrats who could be ousted under her state's new maps. "For everyone who's been asking, 'Where is the fight?' – well, here it is.' There is no guarantee Democrats can prevent the Republican-powered redistricting, just as Democrats on Capitol Hill have not been able to stop Trump's moves. But it's a notable turn for a party that, by its own leaders' admissions, has honored conventional rules and bypassed bare-knuckled tactics. So far, progressive and establishment Democrats are aligned, uniting what has often been a fragmented opposition since Republicans led by Trump took control of the federal government with their election sweep in November. Leaders on the left say the approach gives them a more effective way to confront him. They can challenge his redistricting ploy with tangible moves as they also push back against the Republicans' tax and spending law and press the case that he is shredding American democracy. 'We've been imploring Democrats where they have power on the state and local level to flex that power,' said Maurice Mitchell, who leads the Working Families Party at the left flank of mainstream U.S. politics. 'There's been this overwrought talk about fighters and largely performative actions to suggest that they're in the fight.' This time, he said, Democrats are 'taking real risks in protecting all of our rights' against 'an authoritarian president who only understands the fight.' Texas made sense for Republicans as the place to start a redistricting scuffle. They dominate the Statehouse, and Gov. Greg Abbott is a Trump loyalist. But when the president's allies announced a new political map intended to send five more Republicans to the U.S. House, state Democratic representatives fled Texas, denying the GOP the numbers to conduct business in the Legislature and approve the reworked districts. Those legislators surfaced in Illinois, New York, California and elsewhere, joined by governors, senators, state party chairs, other states' legislators and activists. All promised action. The response was Trumpian. Govs. Gavin Newsom of California, JB Pritzker of Illinois and Kathy Hochul of New York welcomed Texas Democrats and pledged retaliatory redistricting. Pritzker mocked Abbott as a lackey who says 'yes, sir' to Trump orders. Hochul dismissed Texas Republicans as 'lawbreaking cowboys.' Newsom's press office directed all-caps social media posts at Trump, mimicking his signature sign off: 'THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER.' U.S. Rep. Al Green, another Texas Democrat who could lose his seat, called Trump 'egomaniacal.' Yet many Democrats also claimed moral high ground, comparing their cause to the Civil Rights Movement. State Rep. Ramon Romero Jr., invoked another Texas Democrat, President Lyndon Johnson, who was 'willing to stand up and fight' for civil rights laws in the 1960s. Then, with Texas bravado, Romero reached further into history: 'We're asking for help, maybe just as they did back in the days of the Alamo.' A recent Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll found that about 15% of Democrats' own voters described the party using words like 'weak' or 'apathetic.' An additional 10% called it 'ineffective' or 'disorganized.' Beto O'Rourke, a former Texas congressman who is raising money to support Texas Democrats, has encouraged Democratic-run statehouses to redraw districts now rather than wait for GOP states to act. On Friday, California Democrats released a plan that would give the party an additional five U.S. House seats. It would require voter approval in a November election. 'Maximize Democratic Party advantage,' O'Rourke said at a recent rally. 'You may say to yourself, 'Well, those aren't the rules.' There are no refs in this game. F--- the rules. ... Whatever it takes.' Democratic National Committee Chairman Ken Martin acknowledged the shift. 'This is not the Democratic Party of your grandfather, which would bring a pencil to a knife fight,' he said. Andrew O'Neill, an executive at the progressive group Indivisible, contrasted that response with the record-long speeches by U.S. Sen. Cory Booker, D-N.J. and the Democratic leader of the U.S. House, New York Rep. Hakeem Jeffries, in eviscerating Trump and his package of tax breaks and spending cuts. The left 'had its hair on fire' cheering those moments, O'Neill recalled, but were 'left even more frustrated in the aftermath.' Trump still secured tax cuts for the wealthy, accelerated deportations and cut safety net programs, just as some of his controversial nominees were confirmed over vocal Democratic opposition. 'Now,' O'Neill said, 'there is some marriage of the rhetoric we've been seeing since Trump's inauguration with some actual action.' O'Neill looked back wistfully to the decision by Senate Democrats not to eliminate the filibuster 'when our side had the trifecta,' so a simple majority could pass major legislation. Democratic President Joe Biden's attorney general, Merrick Garland, he said, was too timid in prosecuting Trump and top associates over the Capitol riot. In 2016, Democratic President Barack Obama opted against hardball as the Senate's Republican leader, Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, refused to consider Obama's nomination of Garland to the Supreme Court. 'These unspoken rules of propriety, especially on the Democratic side, have created the conditions' that enabled Trump, Mitchell said. Even on redistricting, Democrats would have to ignore their previous good-government efforts and bypass independent commissions that draw boundaries in several states, including California. Party leaders and activists rationalize that the broader fights tie together piecemeal skirmishes that may not, by themselves, sway voters. Arguing that Trump diminishes democracy stirs people who already support Democrats, O'Neill said. By contrast, he said, the GOP 'power grab,' can be connected to unpopular policies that affect voters' lives. Green noted that Trump's big package bill cleared the Senate 'by one vote' and the House by a few, demonstrating why redistricting matters. U.S. Rep. Greg Casar of Texas said Democrats must make unseemly, short-term power plays so they can later pass legislation that 'bans gerrymandering nationwide ... bans super PACs (political action committees) and gets rid of that kind of big money and special interest that helped get us to this place.' U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett, D-Texas, added that a Democratic majority would wield subpoena power over Trump's administration. In the meantime, said U.S. Rep. Julie Johnson, D-Texas, voters are grasping a stark reality. 'They say, 'Well, I don't know. Politics doesn't affect me,'' she said of constituents she meets. 'I say, 'Honey, it does' If you don't do politics, politics will do you.''
San Francisco Chronicle
3 hours ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Oakland protestors cheer California's efforts to counter GOP-led redistricting
Nearly 2,000 miles from the epicenter of a Republican-led movement to redraw congressional maps, hundreds of people gathered Saturday morning at Oakland's Lake Merritt Amphitheater holding signs with such messages as 'HANDS OFF DEMOCRACY' and 'CALIFORNIA BITES BACK.' For about 90 minutes, that standing-room-only crowd listened to a series of speakers that included Alameda County Supervisor Nikki Fortunato Bas, Rep. Lateefah Simon and Oakland Mayor Barbara Lee. Though they each took different approaches, their speeches all focused on the same basic credo: 'Stop President Donald Trump's takeover.' More than 200 events spanning 34 states echoed that theme Saturday. In Texas, Trump is pushing a new congressional map that could net Republicans five additional seats in the 2026 midterm elections. And, experts believe, he doesn't plan to stop there. As part of his bid to maintain Republicans' slim U.S. House majority in the next elections, Trump is reportedly eyeing new maps in such states as Missouri, Florida and Ohio. Few metro areas protested those efforts in larger numbers Saturday than the Bay Area, where a broad coalition of Democratic organizations organized at least 25 such gatherings everywhere from parks to government buildings to freeway overpasses. A rally even sprouted up in a Tesla showroom at Palo Alto's Stanford Shopping Center. 'It's a real small world, and the repercussions are real and imminent,' said Rick Levine, a retired doctor who lives in Oakland and attended Saturday's rally. 'Texas is not that far away. We can't let what's happening there get any closer.' Perhaps none of the other Bay Area protests could match Oakland's star power, which might have been fitting. Just five days earlier, during a rambling press conference about crime, Trump mentioned this East Bay city of roughly 440,000 residents among the places he might deploy National Guard troops. While listing major urban centers that he accused of having egregious crime problems, he said, 'And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore there.' The off-hand remark gave Lee, who served in Congress during Trump's first administration and was on the House floor during the Jan. 6 attacks, timely material for Saturday's final address. But instead of dwelling on what she called the latest time 'Trump trashed us,' Lee reminded the crowd — much of which was composed of people over 60 — that she's from Texas. Minority Democrats left that state to stall the Legislature from passing Trump's redistricting plan there. Once a minimum number of legislators are present, Texas' new-look districts could still pass. 'As someone who was born in a border town, in the immigrant community of El Paso, Texas, I remember the days when Black and brown people had no political representation,' Lee said. 'But because of the sacrifices and the demands of the people, El Paso has had Latino mayors and now its first Black mayor. … Donald Trump and his MAGA extremist Republicans know what's going on there, and they're trying to stop it.' 'I know Texas well,' she added. 'This is a coordinated, dangerous effort to take power from the people.' Boos emanated from the crowd, which started at several hundred people and grew to around 1,000. The large turnout reinforced why California recently became the first Democratic-led state to insert itself into the redistricting issue. On Thursday, Gov. Gavin Newsom announced that California will hold a Nov. 4 special election to temporarily let lawmakers — not California's independent redistricting commission — draw new congressional boundaries, which could give Democrats five more House seats. Dozens of signs at Saturday's Oakland rally referenced that strategic counter. In front of protesters, a podium with a microphone sat on the back of the type of farming truck known to carry egg crates. Next to the vehicle, a huge inflatable chicken stood, with hair like Trump's and a red wattle reminiscent of his signature red tie. To keep with the poultry theme, three words were emblazoned across the adjacent sign: 'Stop Being Fowl.' At one point midway through the rally, volunteers from a local nonprofit stood on the truck holding large cardboard eggs, which a community organizer called 'hatchlings of authoritarianism.' Over the next 10 minutes, pictures of four Republicans — Sen. Ted Cruz, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott, Chief Justice John Roberts and Office of Management and Budget Director Russell Vought, a key architect of Project 2025 — 'hatched' from the eggs. Along the way, the organizer detailed how each of them was instrumental in Trump's redistricting efforts Those moments of levity soon gave way to an emotional address from Simon, who discussed seeing National Guard troops in the streets of Washington, D.C., this week and implored Democrats not to succumb to Trump's tactics. 'Republicans aren't playing by the rules,' she said. 'When they go low, we go hella high.' During Simon's speech, Oakland resident Jim Williams stood toward the back of the crowd in a navy blue hat with 'DEMOCRACY' emblazoned across the front. As he watched her raise her voice, hyping up some protesters to the point where they were jumping up and down, Williams suddenly felt optimistic. 'I just love her raw power and energy,' said Williams, 71, who tries to attend every anti-Trump rally in Oakland. 'People like Lateefah, who are kind of in that middle generation, can carry that torch for the party when people like Barbara Lee retire.'
