Unison members accept two-year council pay deal
Unison Scotland's local government committee chairwoman Suzanne Gens said: 'This pay deal is a crucial step in turning round cuts to council staff pay.
'It gives local government workers some financial security now they know their pay will be higher than inflation over the next couple of years.
'This has only been achieved because of the determination of council workers to demand better.'
The union's co-lead for local government David O'Connor said there was 'no room for complacency', despite the offer being accepted.
'Local government has suffered over a decade of cuts,' he added.
'This pay deal shows what can be done when people stand together. Our campaign to protect council services continues.'
Scottish Finance Secretary Shona Robison welcomed the news, urging other unions to also accept the offer.
'I am delighted that Unison members have voted to accept this improved pay offer, which will see valued local government workers receive pay increases of 4% in 2025-26 and 3.5% in 2026-27,' she said.
'Although the Scottish Government has no formal role in local government pay negotiations, we recognise the importance of an agreement being reached by Cosla – as the employer – and trade unions.
'I would urge members of Unite and GMB to join Unison members in recognising the clear benefit of this offer so that all workers can get the pay they deserve without delay.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
21 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
'We are not alone in our disappointment' for Glasgow
Here is a practical example of both national governments supporting a local partnership of business, academia and city council to encourage regional economic growth. It would have been even more cheering if we had arrived home to find that Glasgow and its city region were benefitting from a similar approach in the comprehensive spending review. All it would have taken was a single sentence saying that the UK and Scottish governments would be working together to establish long-term flexible funding deals for Scottish cities to match those already sorted out for Greater Manchester and the West Midlands. No such sentence appeared. Read more: Instead, I found myself reading Chief Secretary of the Treasury, Darren Jones, arguing that in Scotland the decision to "empower the city regions rests firmly with the Scottish Government". If he really believes that, we are at risk of stepping back a decade in time. Eleven years ago, it was the UK and Scottish governments that together announced the £1.3 billion Glasgow City Region Deal. That deal was the first of many in Scotland, each designed in collaboration with local stakeholders to demonstrate how joint working between both governments can initiate real empowerment on the ground. The chamber, senior business leaders and leading academics have all invested time and energy to help create the structures and capabilities of the Glasgow City Region. We did so in the belief that there was good faith in their value being demonstrated by both the UK and Scottish governments. We were encouraged by decisions made by the last UK Government to allocate over £300 million in additional resources to help the city region grow. Read more: The most recent was the announcement of £160m for a 10-year investment zone supporting the growth of advanced manufacturing. The chamber was involved in the process for project selection and there were so many more exciting projects - and in many other industry sectors - that could have been funded had the money been available. We can see the region's growth potential and how it can be unlocked. Over time, we have become a vigorous advocate for regional devolution deals. We believe that many of the projects our members want to see - particularly in skills, infrastructure, and innovation - are best delivered at the regional level. Projects like the Clyde Metro transport system, our three university-led innovation districts for emerging industries, our city centre renewal plan and investment help to grow our airport and our conference centre, all demonstrate the kind of ambition that regional empowerment can unlock. We shouldn't really need to argue the importance of regional devolution deals with the UK Government. It sets out all the reasons in several papers, including its English Devolution White Paper: the UK's low productivity trap, the stagnation of living standards and the unusual economic underperformance of all the UK major cities outside London. The chamber had therefore asked for a devolution deal with long-term funding and greater flexibility, but there is no such deal being proposed for Glasgow – or for any other region in Scotland. Read more: Instead, Glasgow is offered confirmation of the investment zone announced by the previous government, a share in a new UK-wide local growth fund, and support from the National Wealth Fund. These are all welcome but the investment zone had already been announced and the local growth fund looks set to be small once funds have been allocated across the country. It is also unclear if those funds are expected to deliver on old commitments such as that for Greenock town centre. The National Wealth Fund's commitment to a strategic partnership with Glasgow City Region could be more promising, but it is unclear whether there will be any new funds under the control of the regional partnership. If it helps the region attract private finance for projects, it could still prove valuable. However, it appears from the outside to be more like working with a body such as the Scottish National Investment Bank than a genuine devolution deal. Read more: We are not alone in our disappointment. The London-based thinktank the Centre for Cities issued its own report describing Glasgow as the "missing piece in the big cities' jigsaw". Especially worrying is their assessment that the lack of a devolution deal "places Glasgow at risk of falling behind its comparators south of the border". And yes, of course the Scottish Government has a poor track record on regional devolution. So much of the momentum building behind Glasgow City Region has come from UK Government funding programmes. One notable exception was the Clyde Mission - a Scottish Government initiative that promised much but ultimately fizzled out and ended up being passed to the city region with approaching £30m in funding. Otherwise the Scottish Government has undoubtedly been slow to devolve. As one example, the announcement in the programme for government of £2m towards a Glasgow City Region response to maritime industry skills shortages was welcome, but there is a much bigger prize. Passing apprenticeship funding from Skills Development Scotland direct to the regions instead of to the Scottish Funding Council would be much a better long-term aim. Regional devolution has not been the Scottish Government's natural default, so all eyes have tended to fall on the UK Government. If Darren Jones is signalling that momentum on regional devolution is to be stalled until the Scottish Parliamentary elections next May, then sadly, so too the growth potential of Scotland's largest city region may be stalled as well. Stuart Patrick is chief executive of Glasgow Chamber of Commerce.
Daily Record
25 minutes ago
- Daily Record
New contract at Ferguson is shot in the arm for Scots ship building industry
Shipbuilding remains Glasgow's single biggest manufacturing industry. Thousands of men and women are hard at work every day at the two shipyards at Govan and Scotstoun, building the next generation of frigates for the Royal Navy. The order book is full until the 2030s and BAE Systems, the defence giant which runs the sites, struggles to fill all of the available apprenticeship schemes. It is a different story down river at the much smaller Ferguson Marine yard, which has historically built ferries, not complex warships. Nationalised by the SNP government in 2019, it was lumbered with a needlessly complex design for two car ferries which it simply could not finish on time. Delay after delay turned an industrial story into a political scandal. But there was good news yesterday when it was announced that Ferguson workers will help fabricate three parts of HMS Birmingham, which is already being assembled at Govan. The naval order is a welcome shot in the arm for the yard and will hopefully tide it over until other orders can be secured. Shipbuilding is an iconic industry in Scotland and particularly on the Clyde. The term Clydebuilt was once a synonym for world class, denoting a quality of workmanship in the magnificent vessels that were built along the famous old river. Increased investment, followed by new contracts, should be welcomed by anyone who cares about Scottish industry of which shipbuilding is an integral part. Save our ailing pubs and bars The news that Scotland's pub culture is under threat is a growing concern. Since 2020, more than 200 pubs and bars have closed with industry experts describing the situation as critical. That's why there are now calls on both the Scottish and UK governments to provide greater rates relief and reduction, if not a reduction of the VAT charges which, at 20 per cent, eat a chunk of profits. Rising costs mean more pubs and bars will go to the wall in the coming year. What we need to remember is that pubs and bars are not drinking dens, as the puritans and temperance movement might have called them. They are a community gathering point, a hub where people can meet, perhaps get a bite and socialise. Demands made by those at the sharp end in the licensed trade should be taken seriously.
South Wales Argus
3 hours ago
- South Wales Argus
Senedd gives green light to Wales' tourism tax plans
Senedd members voted 37-13 for the tourism tax bill , which will see people charged £1.30 each, plus VAT, for stays in hotels, B&Bs and self-catering accommodation. People staying in hostels and campsites would pay 75p per person per night, with under-18s exempt from the lower rate of the tax, which would be introduced in 2027 at the earliest. The tax would raise around £33m a year if implemented across the country, but the 22 councils in Wales will be given powers to decide whether to introduce a levy locally. Only two councils, Cardiff and Anglesey, have so far indicated plans to bring in a levy, but other authorities had yet to make a decision or had 'no plans' to introduce a tax. A register of visitor accommodation providers operating in Wales will also be established by the bill, laying the groundwork for licensing plans set to be brought forward separately. Proponents argue the levy will ensure visitors contribute to the cost of services with revenue reinvested, while detractors warn the tax will put tourists off and damage Wales' economy. Tourism taxes are commonplace on the continent and, closer to home, Scottish councils will gain similar powers next year and Manchester introduced a visitor charge in 2023. Leading a debate before the key vote on July 8, Mark Drakeford told the Senedd: 'By passing this bill, we will give councils the choice to introduce a modest additional charge which would be reinvested to support a thriving, sustainable tourism industry.' The finance secretary said the visitor levy will be the first local tax for more than 500 years to have been designed and made in Wales, marking an important step for devolution. Prof Drakeford said the Welsh Government wants to ensure the pressures and opportunities of tourism are fairly balanced, with visitors contributing to infrastructure and services. The former first minister pointed to evidence 'from Iceland to New Zealand' of the revenue generated contributing significantly to challenges without deterring tourism. He argued the bill would strengthen communities and build democratic accountability, putting tourism in Wales on a new and sustainable footing.
