logo
It's Time to Cut the Chaos and Let Leaders Truly Lead

It's Time to Cut the Chaos and Let Leaders Truly Lead

Forbes4 days ago
Leadership is broken.
The issue isn't with the leaders themselves, but with the expectations we've built around them. We hand them a job description that reads like a superhero origin story, then shackle them with process, politics, and unrealistic expectations. We ask them to lead with courage – but speak with caution. We demand agility – but bury them in red tape. We want decisive action – but require consensus or a committee for every move. We ask that they hit their numbers – but don't push your team too hard. In short: leaders are handcuffed – and it's costing us more than we realize.
I once led a strategy workshop for a group of Fortune 500 manufacturing executives. The goal? To ignite true strategic transformation from the inside out. Their planning process had grown stale – short-sighted, ineffective, and void of bold vision.
As a futurist, my role was to provoke fresh insight and decisive action. I introduced them to my Kill the Company exercise, where leaders are asked to think like their fiercest competitors and brainstorm how they would put their own company out of business. The goal is to expose vulnerabilities and name what's broken – out loud – so we can fix it. It's an exercise designed to stop politics and performance and address real issues head-on.
At first, the group hesitated. Their culture wasn't built for this kind of raw honesty. But once they realized they had permission to speak freely, everything changed. What was scheduled as a two-hour exercise turned into the day's entire agenda.
Why? Because they'd never been invited - let alone encouraged - to be this direct. To name the real problems, unshackled by politics or fear.
As one executive told me afterward, excited by what had been accomplished: 'It's not that we don't know what to do. It's that we're afraid to do it.'
A System on the Brink
Teams are exhausted, but so are leaders. Let's talk about the reality many leaders face:
An LHH survey of over 2,600 global executives found that 56% of leaders experienced burnout in 2024, and 43% of companies lost at least half of their leadership teams within the past year as a result.
In DDI's 2025 Global Leadership Forecast, 40% of stressed leaders say they've considered leaving leadership to preserve their well‑being—underscoring a risk of talent pipeline breakdowns from burnout-led departures.
And it's no wonder. Leaders today are expected to be:
All while navigating:
Who would want that job?
From Change to Chaos
Here's the shift no one wants to say out loud: we're not just navigating change anymore—we're managing chaos.
As McKinsey notes in The State of Organizations 2023, 'volatility is a feature, not a bug, in today's organizations,' with just half of surveyed leaders believing their organization is prepared to respond to future shocks. Instead of driving proactive change, leaders feel stuck in cycles of reaction, burnout, and reactivity. The more complexity we add, the more brittle our organizations become.
The result? Leaders are forced into a whack-a-mole approach to daily work, trying to tamp down issues and mitigate constant surprises. After a recent keynote I gave at a healthcare company on leading through change, a VP of Strategy commented: 'We used to manage change. Now we survive it.'
Employees are looking to leaders for clarity. Yet what they're often met with is scripted corporate-speak that says everything, and means nothing; messages so heavily polished by corporate communications that they're stripped of substance entirely.
Because behind every all-hands address is a mental loop that sounds like this:
Be bold—but not too bold. Be clear—but avoid controversy. Lead change—without leaving anyone behind. Drive innovation—but don't risk mistakes. Be human—but also superhuman.
It's leadership in a straitjacket. And it's killing momentum, trust, and morale.
The Cost of Complexity and Chaos
Complexity and constant change are both expensive and destructive. Consider the impact:
Meanwhile, simple, focused leadership yields extraordinary results. Research from the Simplicity Index by Siegel+Gale shows that since 2009, the brands and organizations that simplify outperform their peers on the major indexes by 1600% in the stock market. Why? Because simplicity and clarity drive speed, trust, and customer loyalty.
And that just makes business sense.
Case in Point: Project Raindrop at AT&T
AT&T launched an internal initiative called Project Raindrop to crowdsource simplification ideas from employees. The results were staggering. Teams cut time-to-completion on key tasks by up to 80%, reduced internal email clutter, and saved nearly 3.6 million work hours annually – equivalent to $230 million in reclaimed value.
What made it work? Leaders listened. They empowered employees to call out unnecessary rules. Simplification and clarity became a leadership act – not an administrative task.
We Need a Better Way to Lead.
Leadership today isn't simply a skill problem. It's a system problem.
This won't be solved by the typical solution: executive coaching. We need a culture shift that gives leaders permission to lead clearly, decisively, and unapologetically – with clarity over complexity, purpose over politics, and action over appearance.
Here's how we begin to fit it. Not with more talk, but with three bold shifts leaders can make right now:
'Clarity is kindness. Ambiguity breeds confusion and chaos.' — Brené Brown
Forget motivational posters. People are tired of word salads that sound good but say nothing. They're exhausted from jargon and unclear direction. The bravest thing a leader can do right now is say what needs to be said – with specificity, honesty, and focus.
That means setting goals that are bold and achievable. It means saying 'no' to distractions. It means being direct about expectations, implications, responsibilities and performance – kindly, but without compromise.
Years ago at Merck Canada, internal communications were flooded with email overload. Their solution? One simple rule: any email that didn't require a reply had to begin with 'NNTR' (No Need to Respond). Within months, internal email traffic dropped, and productivity and satisfaction improved.
Simplification saves money, time, and energy because it lets you operate with clarity. But more than that – it restores sanity. It gives teams room to think, act, and breathe.
We need leaders to continually challenge the status quo and eliminate what's not working to make space for what does. If we want speed, subtraction must be as important as addition. Simplifying lets us not just do less – but do what matters most.
'The essence of strategy is choosing what not to do.' — Michael Porter
Boundaries are not barriers — they are guardrails that free people to focus.
Clear boundaries around meetings, scope, expectations, and communication protect our time, energy, and attention. They empower us to say yes with intention and no with purpose.
While clarity tells people where we're going and why it matters, boundaries define how we get there together—safely, sanely, and with focus. That means establishing limits on time, scope, and energy to enable bold, clear action.
In early 2023, Shopify made headlines by deleting 76,500 hours of meetings from employee calendars. They initiated a 'calendar purge,' canceling all recurring meetings with more than two people—requiring teams to rejustify them from scratch. This was a bold boundary: you can't take people's time without good reason.
It's time to put guardrails back in place. Without boundaries around priorities, decisions, and timelines, we risk operating in chaos and fear instead of clarity and confidence.
The Time Is Now
We're standing at a crossroads. We can either continue to drown in chaos, clinging to outdated ideals of what leadership should be, or we can choose a better path.
Let leaders lead. Give them space to think. Give them tools to simplify. Give them the trust to speak plainly, set clear boundaries, and challenge the clutter.
Let's reclaim leadership now.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How Much Richer Is Warren Buffett Than Donald Trump?
How Much Richer Is Warren Buffett Than Donald Trump?

Yahoo

time27 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

How Much Richer Is Warren Buffett Than Donald Trump?

No matter how you define wealth, there's no doubt that even rich people have vastly different degrees of it. Warren Buffett: Check Out: For example, Donald Trump was rich before he won a second term to the White House, and has grown that wealth even more since taking office. But you could still multiply his wealth by a factor of 28 and it wouldn't be as big of a fortune as that of Warren Buffett. How Much Richer Is Buffett? Buffett, the CEO of Berkshire Hathaway and legendary 'Oracle of Omaha,' has a net worth of $142.8 billion, according to the latest estimates from according to the latest estimated from Forbes. That ranks him as the ninth richest person in the world. The richest, Elon Musk, has a net worth of $413.8 billion. In contrast, Forbes pegs Trump's net worth at $5.7 billion — which places him as the 755th richest person in the world. Trump and Buffett are both rich under just about any definition. To put their net worths in perspective, consider this: Michael Dell ranks as the 11th richest person in the world with a net worth of $128.2 billion. But if Trump could magically add Dell's wealth to his own, it still would fall well short of Buffett. Be Aware: Buffett's Road to Riches One reason Buffett is so much richer than Trump is he has spent decades as one of the world's savviest investors, building Berkshire Hathaway into a financial powerhouse whose biggest holdings include iconic brands such as Apple, Coca Cola, Bank of America and Chevron. The 94-year-old plans to step down as Berkshire CEO at the end of the year, but will remain as chairman. Buffett came from a fairly modest background in Nebraska, and got bitten by the investment bug early, buying his first stock at age 11, Forbes reported. One thing he learned is that stocks can be a sure path to wealth — if you follow the right investment strategy. In Buffett's case, that strategy includes investing for the long term, putting money only into companies and businesses he understands, and focusing on value stocks rather than high flyers. Trump's Road to Riches Trump made most of his money in real estate — a business that he learned from his father, Fred, a millionaire real estate developer in New York City. According to a Forbes analysis of Trump's wealth, he first became a billionaire in 1988. He dropped off Forbes' billionaire list from 1990 to1996, but returned in 1997 and has been on it ever since. Here's a look at Trump's net worth since returning to billionaire status in 1997: 1997: $1.4 billion 2000: $1.7 billion 2005: $2.7 billion 2010: $2.4 billion 2015: $4.5 billion 2020: $2.5 billion 2025 (latest estimate): $5.7 billion As the above chart shows, Trump's net worth has reached its highest point ever since he began his second term in the White House. According to Forbes, he has presided over the 'most lucrative post-presidency in American history, selling his supporters NFTs, coffee-table books and, most importantly, shares of a money-losing social-media venture.' More From GOBankingRates 5 Old Navy Items Retirees Need To Buy Ahead of Fall Mark Cuban Tells Americans To Stock Up on Consumables as Trump's Tariffs Hit -- Here's What To Buy This article originally appeared on How Much Richer Is Warren Buffett Than Donald Trump? Sign in to access your portfolio

Experts sound alarm over reason behind growing productivity gap between US and Europe: 'A serious threat to economic competitiveness'
Experts sound alarm over reason behind growing productivity gap between US and Europe: 'A serious threat to economic competitiveness'

Yahoo

time5 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Experts sound alarm over reason behind growing productivity gap between US and Europe: 'A serious threat to economic competitiveness'

Experts sound alarm over reason behind growing productivity gap between US and Europe: 'A serious threat to economic competitiveness' A climate tech executive writing for Fortune warned of a rising disparity between Europe and the United States, contrasting a putative commuter's experience in the hot and "sticky" former environment with that of an American in "optimized" conditions. "The fundamental difference between these two realities? Air conditioning," author Taco Engelaar said. America's broadly air-conditioned landscape and Europe's relative absence of the technology have been a perpetual topic of debate on social media for years. As temperatures in the U.K. soared and triggered water restrictions, the topic was revived on platforms and in the news. As it relates to an overall warming planet, air conditioning occupies a strange space. On one hand, there are valid concerns about a corresponding increase in emissions for more widespread adoption of air-conditioned environments. However, extreme heat is a form of extreme weather, and as Engelaar noted, Europe is warming faster than any other continent. Heatwaves and record-breaking temperatures cause much of the day-to-day life to grind to a halt amid previously rare high temperatures. "This climate vulnerability isn't just inconvenient, it's a serious threat to economic competitiveness," Engelaar wrote. The issue isn't as simple as fitting homes, workplaces, and public areas with air conditioners, either, he added. Upgrades to the energy grid and broader infrastructure are needed, Engelaar observed, citing recent blackouts during a heatwave in Italy and a frustrating contradiction. "It's a deep irony that the vast quantities of solar power brought about by hotter, drier summers — which could unlock AC capabilities without creating a new carbon burden — can't be properly harnessed due to grid connection delays," he lamented. Comfort and the ability to engage in daily life are frequently the center of discussions about Europe's soaring average temperatures and air conditioning, but extreme heat is incredibly dangerous. Nearly half a million people die worldwide each year due to heat-related illness, causing over 175,000 deaths in Europe annually, underscoring the necessity of understanding climate-related issues. Do you worry about the quality of the air inside your home? Yes — often Yes — but only sometimes Only when it's bad outside No — I never do Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. "In the European region, heat stress is the leading cause of climate-related death in the region," said World Health Organization Regional Director Dr. Hans Kluge. Although it's not an overnight solution, transitioning to renewable energy will go a long way in mitigating concerns about air conditioning and emissions, and increased adoption of solar energy is — as Engelaar pointed out — likely to ease a necessary or even inevitable transition. In April, the World Economic Forum reported that more than 40% of the world's electricity was generated by renewables in 2024. Ultimately, air conditioning is among the "most effective and lifesaving methods of adaptation to a changing climate," Dr. Cory Franklin wrote in a Chicago Tribune editorial advocating for increased adoption of the technology as a life-saving measure. "Human-made efforts to reduce greenhouse gases are essential, but human-made efforts to adapt to weather extremes would have lifesaving consequences more immediately," Franklin concluded. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword

A 23-year-old CEO convinced his parents to open a custodial account in second grade. He fears meme stocks inflate Gen Z's dreams of getting rich quick
A 23-year-old CEO convinced his parents to open a custodial account in second grade. He fears meme stocks inflate Gen Z's dreams of getting rich quick

Yahoo

time13 hours ago

  • Yahoo

A 23-year-old CEO convinced his parents to open a custodial account in second grade. He fears meme stocks inflate Gen Z's dreams of getting rich quick

Steven Wang, the 23-year-old CEO of 'dub,' a copy-trading platform, has been an investor almost all his life. Fueled by get-rich-quick aspirations, Wang told Fortune he's seen how viral moments like rare meme-stock success stories have inflated his peers' investment expectations and diminished their risk considerations. He hopes to change this. When Steven Wang was in second grade, he convinced his parents to open a custodial stock account. Now 23 years old, he's running 'dub,' a copy-trading platform aimed at solving the financial-literacy gap among his peers. A recent Harris Poll survey commissioned by dub highlights the contradiction: while 60% of Gen Z and 66% of millennials are investing in the stock market outside of their 401(k)s, just 17% of Americans feel 'very confident' in their understanding of how markets actually work. Most believe investing, rather than a traditional 9-to-5 career, offers the fastest path to wealth—a dream increasingly shaped by viral TikTok finance videos or meme-stock success stories rather than grounded investment knowledge, Wang told Fortune. Copy trading, the concept underpinning dub, allows everyday investors to automatically replicate the trades of more skilled market participants in real-time. Instead of picking their own stocks, users can select vetted traders, hedge-fund veterans, and other experienced investors to follow. Whenever those investors make a move, the same trade is executed in the user's account, mirroring strategies and outcomes. 'The ultra-wealthy are already betting on smart people to deploy their capital,' Wang told Fortune. 'We're bringing that experience to regular Americans.' Wang grew up 20 minutes outside Detroit, the child of poor Asian immigrants who both worked in the auto industry. He watched the city's decline after the Great Financial Crisis and the auto industry's blows to blue-collar families, an experience that shaped his desire to build a more stable financial future for himself. A self-described 'hustler,' Wang sold Pokémon cards on the playground and flipped Air Jordans in grade school. Growing up, he nerded out on Warren Buffett books and Howard Marks memos, fueled by a self-professed 'childish' vision to get rich through stock-market investments. 'I really learned the hard way,' Wang said. 'I'm competing against hundreds of thousands of people on Wall Street trading for a living… [who] have decades of investing experience over me.' By the pandemic, he was day trading from his Harvard dorm room—watching waves of new investors enter the market and lose big to 'hype, misinformation, and bad timing.' Wang said that's when he decided the tools of professional investors should be accessible to everyone. dub is built to merge the accessibility of social media with the discipline of professional investing, Wang said. Users browse creators' portfolios, analyze performance metrics, and choose investors to copy, with trades executed automatically in their own accounts. Creators are vetted, regulated, and compensated through royalties when others follow their portfolios—aligning incentives toward consistent performance rather than one-off meme stocks. Wang doesn't avoid the paradox of dub—the company leverages the power of influencers, but also tries to build a layer of trust and accountability, he said. 'Every portfolio on dub has a transparent track record,' Wang said. 'You can see exactly how each creator has performed over time. This isn't about hype or going viral, it's about verified results.' Still, the platform operates in a market dominated by what Wang calls 'FinTok'—financial influencers on TikTok and Instagram reels whose bite-size videos have become a primary source of investment advice for 62% of Gen Z, according to the Harris Poll survey. Wang understands the appeal: 'Creators on TikTok can probably communicate better with my generation than any stodgy financial advisor can.' But he warns that social media's lack of accountability can be dangerous. 'If someone's wrong on social media, they just delete the video and move on,' he said. A resurgence in meme stocks—shares pumped by online communities and detached from fundamentals—reflects a generation with both the desire to make money quickly and a reluctance to put in the harder, slower work real investing requires. Wang insists dub is not about replicating that behavior under another name. The difference, he says, is a platform with regulated, vetted professionals, transparent performance data, and trade rationales written directly in the app. Users get more than a button to copy trades—they also see the thinking behind them. 'dub's not a substitute for deeper learning,' Wang admits, but it aims to make the process less intimidating while promoting gradual understanding. Wang took steps to build trust with users from the moment he conceived of the app, and dub spent over two years working with the SEC and FINRA before launch, registering as a broker-dealer and investment adviser, and ensuring accounts come with standard investor protections, he said. Wang believes in the markets as 'the greatest wealth generator in the world,' but wants his generation to approach them with more even caution than he had as a new investor in the past. 'That's the gap dub is trying to close,' Wang said. 'We're here to build trust, not trends.' This story was originally featured on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store