logo
Gen Z says salary norm should be ‘banned' — but critics say ‘it really is not that difficult'

Gen Z says salary norm should be ‘banned' — but critics say ‘it really is not that difficult'

New York Post08-06-2025
A fired-up Gen Zer has declared being paid fortnightly in Australia should be straight-up 'banned' because she finds it difficult to manage her salary.
Ren Adelina, 21, has amassed over 700,000 views on TikTok by declaring she's unhappy with a fortnightly pay cycle.
'Getting paid fortnightly needs to be genuinely banned,' she said.
'One week I am so rich, I am so rich! The next week … I am living off genuine scraps.'
According to the Australian Bureau of Statistics, fortnightly is the most common pay cycle for Aussie workers, followed by weekly and then monthly.
Speaking to news.com.au, Adelina reiterated her position and said she'd much prefer to be paid more frequently.
A fired-up Gen Zer has declared being paid fortnightly in Australia should be straight-up 'banned' because she finds it difficult to manage her salary.
TikTok.com/@renadelinaa
'I think it should be banned because for us Gen Zers we were never taught how to manage money properly,' she said.
'Getting a huge influx of money at once, of course, we are going to get excited and are going to blow it all on food, shopping, outings, etc.'
Adelina said the problem with that is that once it is gone, it is gone, and then she's got to hang out for another grueling seven days.
'Then, after we spend it all, there is none left for the next week. Maybe I just have a shopping addiction,' she said.
The 21-year-old doesn't just want to ban fortnightly pay with no other solution. She's got plans.
'I believe we should get paid weekly instead as it provides more frequent income, making it easier to manage all expenses. I think it also simplifies budgeting,' she said.
Adelina's suggestion of banning fortnightly pay quickly took a turn when people on the internet broke the news to her that some people get paid … monthly.
One warned, 'Wait until you get paid monthly.' The 21-year-old replied, 'Stop, that is so scary!'
Someone else chimed in and said getting paid monthly is 'criminal' and another demanded to know what professions get paid monthly so they can avoid them.
Ren Adelina, 21, has amassed over 700,000 views on TikTok by declaring she's unhappy with a fortnightly pay cycle.
TikTok.com/@renadelinaa
The commentator quickly discovered that monthly pay isn't specific to one industry. Everyone, from childcare workers to trade workers, get paid monthly. It is just up to the employer's discretion.
The comment section quickly became populated by workers getting paid monthly who argued that fortnightly wasn't so bad in comparison.
'Babe, I'm counting my coins on monthly pay,' one said.
'Monthly is horrendous,' another shared.
'I get paid monthly. You got lucky,' someone claimed.
'Every adult I know gets paid monthly. Budgeting is hard,' another worker shared.
'Fortnightly isn't bad. Wait until you see monthly,' one warned.
'I applaud those who can wait a whole month. I can't even do two weeks,' someone else shared.
Quite a few people also suggested to the 21-year-old that it wasn't how frequently she was getting paid but rather how she managed her money.
'Just budget. It really is not that difficult. I love getting paid fortnightly,' one shared.
'Not knowing how to budget should be banned,' another joked.
'I get paid fortnightly, and when you get paid, literally just split it in half and put it aside in another account until the following week,' someone else said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

How to Boost Social Media Followers & Engagement the Right Way
How to Boost Social Media Followers & Engagement the Right Way

Time Business News

time8 hours ago

  • Time Business News

How to Boost Social Media Followers & Engagement the Right Way

Having thousands of followers without real interaction is like talking to an empty room. Many Nigerian creators and businesses focus on numbers, but what truly matters is engagement. When people like, comment, and share your content, it shows your message is connecting and that's what drives growth. The challenge is that boosting both followers and engagement can feel impossible. That's why SnappyPay introduced Social Boost Pro, a tool designed to help you boost social media followers & engagement in an authentic way. Grow your audience with real followers across platforms like Instagram and TikTok Improve engagement through genuine interactions on your content Build credibility so your brand looks trustworthy and active Attract new opportunities from brands, customers, and collaborators If you've been wondering how to boost TikTok followers or searching for the best way on how to get followers on TikTok, Social Boost Pro makes the process easier by connecting you with real users who actually engage with your posts. That way, you grow both your numbers and your influence at the same time. Unlike fake growth services, Social Boost Pro prioritizes quality over empty numbers. It ensures your social media not only looks good but also performs well. Powered by SnappyPay, a trusted name in digital services, Social Boost Pro is safe, affordable, and effective for Nigerians who want results without the risk of scams. If your goal is to stand out online, now is the time to invest in real growth. With Social Boost Pro, you don't just gain followers, you build lasting engagement that turns your social media into a true community. TIME BUSINESS NEWS

There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.
There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.

Indianapolis Star

time9 hours ago

  • Indianapolis Star

There's just a month until TikTok could be banned – again. Here's where things stand.

President Donald Trump has one month to finalize the sale of TikTok or the short-form video platform risks going dark in the U.S. – again. For months, Trump has said negotiations for the sale of TikTok have been ongoing with China, as the platform is owned by Beijing-based ByteDance. Since the platform went dark for less than 24 hours in January, Trump has extended the deadline on a ban of TikTok in the U.S. three times. And he may just conduct a fourth. In late July, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a CNBC interview that if China did not approve a U.S.-drafted deal to sell the platform's American assets, the app would go dark again, once the next ban extension expires on Sept. 17. "If that deal gets approved by the Chinese, then that deal will happen. If they don't approve it, then TikTok is going to go dark," Lutnick previously said. "And those decisions are coming very soon, so let's see what the Chinese do. They've got to approve it. The deal is over to them right now." The White House did not immediately respond for comment when contacted by USA TODAY on Aug. 15. The next deadline for TikTok to be sold by ByteDance is Sept. 17. Some government officials are concerned that TikTok poses a national security threat, believing that ByteDance, which is based in Beijing, is sharing U.S. user data with China. TikTok has repeatedly denied these claims. In January, the platform went dark for less than 24 hours under federal legislation signed into law by former President Joe Biden in 2024. Trump has signed executive orders three times now that push back the deadline for when TikTok must be sold, promising that deals with China are on the horizon. The latest was in early July, when Trump told reporters aboard Air Force One that he was hopeful Chinese President Xi would agree to a deal to see the platform to the U.S.

Aussies erupt over new $363 per year tax hit
Aussies erupt over new $363 per year tax hit

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Aussies erupt over new $363 per year tax hit

There are fears that electric vehicle (EV) sales could be affected if a road-user charge (RUC) is introduced to level the playing field with other cars. At the moment, EVs don't attract a tax for using Aussie roads like those in internal combustion engines (ICE). But ahead of the government's economic roundtable, there have been calls for EV drivers to pay their fair share with a brand new levy designed just for them. Electric Vehicle Council's (EVC) head of legal, policy and advocacy, Aman Gaur, told Yahoo Finance it doesn't make any sense to him why Australia would go down this path. "The simple principle around taxes is that you tax the things you don't want to see, like smoking or alcohol," he said. "Why are we taxing something that is actually trying to make Australia and the country safer from climate change? It just seems very counterintuitive." RELATED Major EV warning as true battery range for big brands like Tesla and BYD exposed ATO $2,548 tax refund cash boost for 2.6 million Aussies Hidden $3,000 per year cost of cashless revolt as record number of banknotes hoarded Why is a road-user charge being considered for EVs? Those in ICE vehicles have to pay an excise on fuel at the moment, which goes to the federal government as general revenue and can be used to fund transport infrastructure. It raises around $17 billion a year, but that revenue stream could start to go on a downward trend if more people buy EVs and don't pay a RUC. According to the Australian Automobile Association, one in 10 cars sold in the June quarter in Australia was an EV, which is a new record. The EVC said a RUC for electric cars shouldn't be introduced until that statistic hits at least three in 10 vehicles sold. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese acknowledged there needed to be a shakeup in the system to account for the rise of battery-powered vehicles. 'We need money to ensure that roads are adequate, and that is a long-held belief,' he said this week. 'What we need to do is to work those issues through and to come up with a realistic plan that can be implemented. And we'll await those discussions.'How would a road-user charge work? That hasn't been hashed out yet, and will form part of the discussions at next week's productivity and economic roundtable. 'We haven't settled on a model or on timing when it comes to that change, but clearly a government of either political persuasion will need to make changes there because the excise take on petrol will come down as petrol vehicles exit the fleet," Treasurer Jim Chalmers said this week. He added "people shouldn't anticipate that there will be a change very soon". Instead of EVs having their own type of RUC, Gaur told Yahoo Finance there should be a universal road tax applied to every vehicle. This was supported by EV motoring expert Toby Hagon, who said electric car drivers needed to start paying their way, but not with their own unique levy. "I'm not sure why we would treat EVs any differently to any other car on the road; we should be taxing them all equally," he told Yahoo Finance. "Don't just single out EVs or hybrids or plug-in hybrids. Apply a road user charge across the board and get rid of fuel excess. It seems like a logical way to do it." Hagon suggested a possible RUC scenario of 3 cents per kilometre driven. The latest data found the average Aussie drives around 12,100 kilometres per year, meaning EV motorists could be paying around $363 each year under Hagon's prediction. Comparatively, the fuel excise is currently 51.6 cents per litre of petrol or diesel, and, according to Compare the Market data from last year, a typical household pays around $3,200 a year in petrol or diesel. Would people stop buying EVs if they had to pay an RUC? A poll of more than 2,500 Yahoo Finance readers found 64 per cent would avoid buying an EV if they had to pay for a road tax. But Hagon said an RUC should not influence a person's decision-making if they're looking for a new car. "The running cost of an EV is so much lower than $363 a year, so it's not going to be the determining factor of whether someone buys an EV or not," he said. When you compare that $3,200 per year cost for ICE car drivers, an EV owner is typically only paying around $701 per year for charging. Gaur said there is a much bigger potential cost than a possible $363 yearly charge to contemplate. "To the person who's thinking about their next car, think about your children, think about your own lifestyle, and what is the best way to keep Australia safe from the effects of climate change," he said. Scott Maynard, the Australian boss of Swedish EV maker Polestar, said Australia needs to make sure that whatever direction it goes in with an RUC that it makes sense for everyone. 'Driving is an essential activity, so it's important the government has a clear understanding of what it would be seeking to achieve with a road user charge," he said. "Only when we understand that question can a framework be developed, and commentary applied. 'I don't think any driver, electric or otherwise, will have an issue with a road user charge system to replace fuel excise as long as it is fair and equitable."Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store