Local farms taking a hit after USDA cuts programs
FALLS, WYOMING COUNTY (WBRE/WYOU)— More federal budget cuts are on the way, this time, impacting the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA).
These cuts will do away with two pandemic-era programs which provided a billion dollars worth of funding to schools and food banks to purchase their food from local farms.
28/22 News Reporter Avery Nape met with a local farmer to find out how these cuts will be affecting business going forward.
Bedbugs discovered at Carbondale Area High School
The IU.S. Department of Agriculture recently announced it would do away with two programs which granted funding to schools and food banks.
One is the Local Food Purchase Assistance Cooperative Agreement- or LFPA. $420 million in funding was given to food banks to provide locally sourced food to people in need.
'We supply them with a full line of home-grown produce. Various kinds of peppers, tomatoes, cherry tomatoes, grape tomatoes, sweet corn, squash, cucumbers, pickles, beans,' said Bill Hopkins, managing partner of Hopkins Farm.
Bill Hopkins, managing partner of Hopkins Farm in Falls, has been involved in the program since its inception in 2022. He delivered truck loads of produce to Weinberg Food Bank throughout their summer harvest.
He says the food bank purchases food from the farm at costs below market value. Much of that produce, would otherwise go to waste, making it a win-win for both parties.
'I have a good idea of what they need every week. And then if I have extras of other stuff and they have a use for it, they get that too,' stated Hopkins.
The decision comes as the Trump administration slashes federal spending to reduce waste. The program was created under the Biden administration, using funding from the department's commodity credit corporation, a depression-era fund to purchase goods directly from farmers.
A USDA spokesperson said in an email to 28/22 News, in-part:
'As pandemic-era programs, the local food purchase assistance cooperative agreement program (LFPA) and the Local Food for Schools Cooperative Agreement Program (LFS) will now be sunsetted at the end of the performance period, marking a return to long-term, fiscally responsible initiatives.'
They say this isn't an abrupt shift, and that the remainder of the programs' funding was released earlier this month to fulfill their existing commitments.
Hopkins says while the decision does not put his business in jeopardy, they'll still be taking a hit.
'I'm concerned it is going to impact our business, but I don't believe it'll be detrimental,' added Hopkins.
Hopkins tells us that regardless of the cuts, he will continue supplying the Weinberg Food Bank with whatever leftover produce they have on-hand.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
44 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Complimentary Webinar: Regulatory Shifts Ahead: What You Need To Know Now for Food Safety & Product Development
Complimentary Webinar Regulatory Shifts Ahead: What You Need to Know Now for Food Safety & Product Development June 17, 2025 | 12:00 PM ET / 9:00 AM PT REGISTER Join SCS Global Services for a mid-year Regulatory review update, as the shifting priorities and focus by both the FDA and USDA is having a significant impact on how we develop and manufacture products. This webinar will provide you with an update on the key changes and give you the tools to navigate current requirements and compliance with the timelines. We will also explore how it starts with product development and considerations for food safety, quality and regulatory compliance from allergens, ready-to-eat status, to considering upcoming banned ingredients and reformulations. Lastly, you will take away a stronger understanding of actions your company should take now and those that can help to improve your current programs to achieve regulatory compliance and meeting customer expectations. REGISTER HERE FOR THE WEBINAR By registering, you will get access to the webinar recording. For inquiries, contact: Shyama Devarajan Senior Marketing Analyst, SCS Global Services [email protected] Visit 3BL Media to see more multimedia and stories from SCS Global Services
Yahoo
14 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers
It should be clear by now that, despite the assurances from President Donald Trump and his allies in government, the One Big Beautiful Bill Act—which passed the U.S. House of Representatives last month—not only won't reduce the federal budget deficit but will in fact increase the nation's debt load by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Given that Trump came into office promising to cut federal spending, it's worth looking at how Trump's bill does the opposite of what he and other Republicans say it does. And one of the more egregious things it does is boost corporate welfare for wealthy farmers. "The government provides agricultural subsidies—monetary payments and other types of support—to farmers or agribusinesses," says the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). "While some subsidies are given to promote specific farming practices, others focus on research and development, conservation practices, disaster aid, marketing, nutrition assistance, risk mitigation, and more." "In reality, this support is highly skewed toward the five major 'program' commodities of corn, soybeans, wheat, cotton, and rice," according to the Environmental Working Group (EWG), an environmental advocacy organization. "Despite the rhetoric of 'preserving the family farm,' the vast majority of farmers do not benefit from federal farm subsidy programs and most of the subsidies go to the largest and most financially secure farm operations." The new bill will only make the problem worse: According to an analysis by the American Farm Bureau Federation, the bill "would increase agriculture-facing programs spending by $56.6 billion over the next decade," of which "$52.3 billion is tied to enhancements in the farm safety net." That "farm safety net" comprises most agricultural subsidy spending in any given year. It includes price and revenue guarantees for certain crops, ensuring farmers earn a set minimum on staples like corn and soybeans, as well as crop insurance assistance, covering up to 60 percent of farmers' insurance premiums in the event of price declines or poor harvests. The programs are a bad deal for taxpayers—indeed, for anybody but the very wealthiest agribusinesses. "Just in the last 10 years, crop insurance agents and the 14 companies the USDA allows to sell and service crop insurance policies…received almost $33.3 billion from the federal Crop Insurance Program," EWG Midwest director Anne Schechinger wrote in 2023. "In some years, up to one-third of crop insurance payments are made to companies and agents, not farmers." The new bill would make the program even more generous, tying payouts to inflation and putting taxpayers on the hook for even more insurance company operating costs. The bill would also increase the price minimums for many staple crops, though the increases for those grown in southern U.S. states go up exponentially: While corn would go up by 18 percent, and wheat and soybeans by more than 70 percent each, minimum prices for seed cotton, peanuts, and rice—grown primarily in the southern states—would each more than double, with the minimum price of rice going up 185 percent. Price minimums inherently distort the market, causing farmers to prioritize favored crops even if others would be better suited to the growing conditions—after all, if you're guaranteed a minimum price for what you sell, and you're covered for what doesn't grow, what do you have to lose? At the same time, "subsidies increase land prices, which benefits wealthy landowners at the expense of the many farmers who rent," writes Nan Swift of the R Street Institute. "Young farmers can't afford to rent or buy land at inflated prices. Likewise, young farmers often have smaller farms that don't benefit from the primary federal subsidy programs." Not only does the "Big Beautiful Bill" keep these programs intact, it expands them; it even introduces an "insurance pilot program" for "poultry growers." "The farm subsidy increases in the reconciliation bill are brazen. The GOP lavished the biggest subsidy increases on GOP parts of the country," writes Chris Edwards of the Cato Institute. "More importantly, in a supposed spending reform bill, the GOP doesn't just spare millionaire farmers from cuts, they aggressively expand inefficient farm giveaways by $57 billion." The post Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' Would Boost Subsidies for Rich Farmers appeared first on
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Are egg prices falling in Texas? Here's how much a dozen costs in June 2025
Your wallet might get a little break at the grocery store. According to the average price of a dozen eggs is $4.26. The average has been the lowest it has been since its March peak of $6.23, according to a report published on June 3 by the U.S. Department of Agriculture's Economic Research Service. According to the USDA, retail prices tend to follow wholesale prices with a delay due to several factors. 'Retail egg prices are influenced by wholesale egg prices, but additional factors such as pricing strategies and contracts can mute the impact of short-term fluctuations,' the USDA report said. 'As a result, retail price movements tend to lag directional changes made by wholesale prices. When wholesale prices spike, retailers occasionally and temporarily have sold eggs at a loss. As wholesale prices retreat, retail prices are slower to decline and often remain elevated for a longer period." Here's what to know about egg prices in Texas. Last time we reported on egg prices in Texas, the average price for a dozen was $5.43. Today, those prices remain largely unchanged, according to the World Population Review. The decline in national egg prices comes as the USDA reported fewer cases of bird flu last month. Bird flu cases declined significantly to 2.1 million cases in March, according to the USDA, compared to 12.64 million in February and 23.19 million in January. Yes, bird flu is still spreading, particularly the H5N1 strain. While the risk to the general public remains low, experts emphasize the need for continued surveillance and precautions. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, there are 70 total national cases. However, in Texas, no reports have been made of poultry farms or other animals being affected. -USA Today Network reporter Betty Lin-Fisher contributed to this report. This article originally appeared on Austin American-Statesman: Egg prices are down in the US. How much does a dozen cost in Texas?
