
'Appalled' at condition of Grade II listed Civic Centre as hotel plan fails to materialise
The formerly grand building itself was sold in late 2022 to Llandudno hotelier Ian Robbins of Parc Eirias Hotel Ltd, who said he would invest £2-3m into the iconic building to create a four star hotel.
Planning permission was secured but the redevelopment never started. Conwy County Council took enforcement action, due to the state of the building.
It has now been revealed Ian Robbins sold the property to local businessman Robin Brookes around a month ago, claiming post-Covid building costs made the renovation into a four-star hotel 'unfeasible'. The council said it was "now communicating with the new owners".
Several councillors have complained about the state of the building, saying it has fallen into 'rack and ruin' with smashed glass, boarded-up doors and windows, and rubbish piled high around the land, which is overgrown and strewn with weeds. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox.
Cllr Cheryl Carlisle of Colwyn ward said: "I am absolutely appalled that this historic and much-loved Old Colwyn landmark building has been allowed to fall into rack and ruin like this.
'The residents of Old Colwyn and the surrounding area have been most concerned about the rapid decline and lack of even basic maintenance afforded to this listed building. We hope it will have a brighter future ahead as part of our local history.'
Glyn ward councillor Abdul Khan was also concerned. 'We've had complaints from residents,' he said.
'It is a Grade II listed building as well. It does need a lot of work needing doing to it.'
Colwyn Bay town councillor Phil Ashe added: 'The state of the building just shows a complete lack of management by Conwy and foresight. They spend all this money on consultants.
'But from my point of view, why is the council selling a building they knew would need a lot of money spent on it without doing their due diligence to make sure the work would be done so the building wouldn't go to rack and ruin to the point it is now that it might have to get knocked down for health and safety reasons?'
Aberconwy MS Janet Finch-Saunders said the building 'brought down the character of the other properties nearby'.
But the Civic Centre's former owner Mr Robbins said the building was still in good condition.
'We sold it just over a month ago. It took about 14 months to go through because the council was being difficult,' said Mr Robbins.
'We've got water, gas, and electric going to the building over the service road, and they wanted us to put an easement on it so they could dig holes for gas and electric.
'Robin Brookes bought it off us. We sold the building for the same price as we bought it. His intention was (for a hotel) when we sold it, but people change their minds.
'It won't get knocked down because it is a listed building. It's not that bad inside. The paintwork is cracked, and that is about it. It is very good. The only reason the outside looks as bad is because thieves took the lead. On the side of the building, there are dormer windows, and they were leaded on the top, and the lead got stolen. That is why it looks as bad as it does, but it won't take much to rectify."
He added: 'The reason we sold it was pre-pandemic we had a quotation of £2.2m to renovate, and it went up to about £3.8m, and it wasn't feasible for us to do. If we'd had some help from the grants that were around at the time, we'd have done it, but there was no help from local government. We would have created nearly 50 jobs.'
The Local Democracy Reporting Service attempted to contact the new owner through his legal representatives.
A Conwy spokesperson said: "A Section 215 notice was served on the previous owners. The property has since been sold, and we are now communicating with the new owners."
Public notices in your area
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
US could force tourists to pay up to £11k to visit country in new visa rules
The United States could demand a bond payment of up to $15,000, around £11,300, to enter the country as Donald Trump steps up his aggressive approach to immigration The US State Department is proposing a costly new requirement for business and tourist visa applicants if they want to enter America. The United States could potentially demand a bond of up to $15,000, around £11,300, to gain entry. A State Department notice, published in the Federal Register on Tuesday, outlined the year-long pilot scheme as President Donald Trump continues his aggressive approach to immigration. Under the potential programme, individuals from nations identified as having high visa overstay rates or deficient internal document security controls may be forced to pay thousands when applying. It comes after a lip reader revealed exactly what Donald Trump and Keir Starmer said to each other on the golf course. It has been reported that most of the 42 countries enrolled in the program are in Europe. Others included are in Asia and the Middle East. The bond, which could be waived depending on the individual circumstances of the applicant, would enable travel for for up to 90 days. The notice specifies: "Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure and who are nationals of countries identified by the department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering citizenship by investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot program." The pilot program is set to commence within 15 days following its official publication, according to the announcement. It is not the first time such a proposal has been put forward, with a similar isa bond pilot scheme poised to launch in 2020, before the COVID pandemic put paid to the plan. Currently, UK holidaymakers wanting to visit the US for tourism need to apply for the Electronic System for Travel Authorization (ESTA), under the Visa Waiver Program. According to the UK Foreign Office: "All Visa Waiver Program (VWP) travellers intending to enter the US by land, sea and air will be required to obtain an approved ESTA prior to application for admission at land border ports of entry." To enter the US, your passport must be valid for the length of your planned stay. The ESTA application costs $21 and is generally valid for two years from the date of authorisation, or until your passport expires, whichever comes first. However, the US Congress has approved new legislation which includes a price hike for the ESTA from $21 to $40. As a result, the travel experts at Journeyscape have issued a warning for travellers, urging them to apply for the ESTA now if they have US travel plans. They explained: "While many travellers report receiving approval within minutes, ESTA applications can sometimes take up to 72 hours for approval." Common mistakes that could see your application rejected include incorrect passport information, failing to disclose previous travel plans, or applying too close to travel dates, as if there's an issue you may not get the document in time, and therefore you'll be unable to travel. They also issued advice for Brits around third party services that could leave you paying even more, explaining: "Only use the official ESTA website to avoid additional fees from third-party services. The current application fee is $21, but it was recently announced that it's set to rise to $40, nearly double the current cost. Many third-party sites charge even more, often without offering any added value." Kerry Manley, Head of Marketing at North America travel specialist Journeyscape added: "Navigating the ESTA process can indeed be smooth and hassle-free if you take a proactive approach. The key is to apply early, ideally at least a week before your departure, to account for any unexpected delays. Using the official ESTA website is crucial to avoid unnecessary fees or scams. "Double-checking your details—such as passport information and travel itinerary—can prevent common mistakes that lead to denials. Additionally, staying informed about recent rule changes is essential, especially for travellers who may be affected by the latest restrictions, such as those related to travel history in Cuba. "Even with a valid ESTA, remember that entry to the U.S. is ultimately determined at the border by Customs and Border Protection. Be prepared to answer questions about your travel purpose and itinerary. Following these steps will help ensure a seamless travel experience, minimising stress and maximising your trip's success."


Daily Mirror
4 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Donald Trump wants some holidaymakers to pay $15,000 to enter the US
The US State Department is set to roll out a pilot program that will require some tourist and business visa applicants to pay a bond of up to $15,000 to enter the United States Some tourists will have to fork out $15,000 (£11,500) to enter the US under new plans. The US State Department is gearing up to launch a pilot scheme that will see certain tourists and business visa seekers required to fork out a bond of as much as $15,000 for entry into the United States. This initiative targets individuals from countries with high rates of visa overstays, as revealed in a cable dispatched to State Department personnel on Monday, which Politico managed to get a hold of. For the duration of this year-long trial, applicants for business and tourist visas hailing from specific nations will need to cough up a $10,000 bond per adult and $5,000 for each child. This deposit will be returned at the end of the trip, so long as visa conditions are met. The visa plans have come to light as Trump's interior design choices for the White House have come under scrutiny. Those from countries where screening and vetting data are considered inadequate might also find themselves affected, as detailed in a notice published on the Federal Register's website on Monday. "Aliens applying for visas as temporary visitors for business or pleasure and who are nationals of countries identified by the department as having high visa overstay rates, where screening and vetting information is deemed deficient, or offering citizenship by investment, if the alien obtained citizenship with no residency requirement, may be subject to the pilot program," the notice outlined. The specific countries whose citizens will be subject to the bond will be announced when the program is implemented, although it won't affect those from nations participating in the Visa Waiver Program. The UK is one of those Visa Waiver countries. According to the announcement, the pilot program is set to commence within 15 days following its official publication. A similar six-month visa bond pilot scheme was poised to launch in 2020, but the onset of the COVID pandemic and subsequent decline in international travel meant it never got off the ground, the announcement revealed. "The Department did not implement the pilot and consequently it did not provide any data on the feasibility for full implementation," the statement read. Historically, the Department's advice has been against visa bonds, citing that the "mechanics of posting, processing and discharging a bond are cumbersome" and warning of the "possible misperception of a bond requirement by the public." However, the department has now indicated that this stance is "not supported by any recent examples or evidence, as visa bonds have not generally been required in any recent period."


Scotsman
10 hours ago
- Scotsman
Workers behind Edinburgh Festival deserve better
Scottish Green Party co-leader Lorna Slater Every August Edinburgh is trans-formed. The streets hum with energy, performers from every corner of the globe fill our stages and the Capital becomes a vibrant, chaotic celebration of art, expression and culture. Sign up to our daily newsletter Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to Edinburgh News, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... But behind the curtain of colour and creativity is another story, one that rarely makes the headlines but which defines the experience of thousands of people who live and work in our city. I'm talking about the workers who keep Edinburgh's festival economy running: the cleaners and bar staff, the delivery drivers and kitchen porters, the tech crews and front-of-house teams who make the magic happen. While the city celebrates, many of them are working long hours in insecure jobs for low pay, often without basic protections or rest. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad During August, the demand on hospitality and service staff is enormous. Shifts stretch late into the night, tips become unpredictable and some are forced to put up with unsafe working conditions because they fear losing their jobs. Many are on zero-hour contracts, with little notice and no job security. These are the workers that keep our city ticking during its busiest season, yet they're often treated as disposable. This isn't just a festival problem, it's a symptom of a wider economic model that treats workers as an afterthought. We hear about the record-breaking ticket sales, the star-studded shows, the millions brought into the economy. But what about the workers at the heart of it all? What about fairness, dignity and decent pay? Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad We should be asking more from employers and from those who profit most from this month-long surge in revenue. That means fair work conditions, safe staffing levels, real breaks and the right to union representation. It means supporting campaigns like Unite Hospitality's call for a £12 minimum wage plus tips, no unpaid trial shifts and fair rotas. It also means local authorities and government making funding and licensing conditional on fair work commitments. In a post-Brexit world where hospitality workers are harder to come by, their value should be protected. As a Scottish Green MSP, I believe we need to build an economy that puts people and planet before profit. That includes festivals and tourism. Culture can be a force for justice, not just spectacle. If Edinburgh is to truly be a world-class festival city, it must also be a fair work city. Let's ensure that those making our summer sparkle are respected, protected and paid what they deserve. Because a festival without fairness isn't something to celebrate.