logo
School zone camera bills: One to ban them, one to reform. But both overturn the system

School zone camera bills: One to ban them, one to reform. But both overturn the system

Yahoo06-03-2025

The Brief
The Georgia House of Representatives approved two measures for reeling in automated school zone speed cameras, sending both over to the state Senate.
House Bill 225 bans the cameras completely. House Bill 651 sets strict guidelines for operating them.
The latter bill also strikes language in current law allowing cities and counties to send unpaid tickets to the state Department of Revenue – which then blocks auto tag renewals until the fines are paid.
The bill's sponsor, Rep. Alan Powell, R-Hartwell, acknowledged to the FOX 5 I-Team, that would effectively eliminate the incentive to pay the tickets, which are civil citations. "Who's to push anybody to pay?" he said.
Meanwhile, the I-Team found more than $700,000 in political donations over the past four years from three major camera companies.
ATLANTA - In the debate over what to do with school zone speed cameras popping up all over Georgia, the state House of Representatives has approved two solutions to the same problem.
On Tuesday, lawmakers approved one bill that outlaws the cameras – overturning the 2018 law that allowed automated ticketing systems near schools. The other bill would let them stay, but with a list of restrictions on when they can operate, how to warn oncoming traffic and what can be done with the proceeds.
But the FOX 5 I-Team has learned that even the reform bill would effectively overturn the system. Under its current language, there would be no penalty if a ticketed driver decided to toss his citation in the trash.
SEE ALSO: 2 school zone speed camera bills pass House, move to Georgia State Senate
The backstory
In 2018, then-Speaker of the House David Ralston worked with his Senate counterparts, during the final minutes of that year's session, to pass a bill that allowed school zone speed cameras. One of the lobbyists pushing the bill was Ralston's son, Matt.
The stated purpose was to slow traffic near schools, protecting students, parents, and school personnel. But critics claim the real motive has been easy revenue for local governments and private, out-of-state speed camera companies.
"We can safely say that fines have been issued at a level in excess of $200 million," state Rep. Dale Washburn, R-Macon, told his House colleagues Tuesday. "The school zone cameras are taking a percentage of that. Using a conservative estimate, they've probably taken $50 million out of Georgia."
Over the past seven years, complaints have poured in to lawmakers about the automated tickets. Drivers have claimed they were ticketed outside of school hours or on weekends, that cameras are set up on busy four-lanes where children don't walk, and that signage is too confusing.
The FOX 5 I-Team identified cameras in three cities where timing disconnects between cameras and flashing school zone lights misled drivers into speeding, or caused them to be cited them for speeding when they weren't. The I-Team's stories led to more than a half a million dollars in refunds for drivers.
"When people are being entrapped and issued tickets, with deceit and trickery, it is wrong," Washburn said in a House Motor Vehicles committee meeting last month. "And it's something we need to do something about."
Washburn introduced House Bill 225, which overturns the 2018 law. It would require police departments statewide to shut down the cameras entirely.
State Rep. Alan Powell, R-Hartwell, with the support of current Speaker of the House Jon Burns, introduced House Bill 651, which salvages the camera systems, but with strict guidelines.
By the numbers
The votes Tuesday showed more appetite for the reform bill than the total ban.
Washburn's bill passed by a vote of 129 to 37.
Powell's passed 164 to 8.
Both bills now move to the state Senate, which can grapple with the issue and make adjustments, additions and subtractions of its own.
Washburn said he does not think senators will be swayed by which bill got the most votes Tuesday.
Tickets from school zone cameras are civil citations, not criminal. They don't put points against drivers' licenses and they can't lead to jail time.
"I'm not sure that they'll pay that much attention to that," he said. "My goal is to get over to the Senate now, and begin to talk to some individual senators, and to talk to their leadership, and try to convince them that banning these school zone cameras is a good thing."
What the reform bill does
Powell called his bill "a second choice."
House Bill 651 would limit ticketing to two-hour periods on mornings and afternoons, when school starts and lets out.
"A lot of the jurisdictions were running these around the clock, through the day, sporting events," Powell told the I-Team. "It just became suspect. It became a 'gotcha.'"
His bill also requires feedback signs, informing oncoming drivers of their speeds before they pass a camera.
It requires half of a jurisdiction's speed camera ticket proceeds to go to local schools, to be used for school safety. It applies "speed trap" rules on cities and counties, setting limits on how much a government can collect from citations, in relation to their police budget – no more than 35 percent.
The bill eliminates $25 administrative fees that inflate citation amounts. So tickets can cost no more than $75 for a first violation and $125 for a second.
Under the bill, when the tickets arrive in the mail, the envelope has to be clearly marked, so as not to be confused with junk mail.
"The bill I passed was pretty radical about putting guardrails around this," Powell said.
But actually, he acknowledged to the I-Team, ticketed drivers could treat the citations like junk mail.
House Bill 651 eliminates the section of current law that allows cities and counties to send unpaid school zone tickets to the state Department of Revenue, which then blocks car tag renewals until the tickets are paid.
Tickets from school zone cameras are civil citations, not criminal. They don't put points against drivers' licenses, and they can't lead to jail time.
"If it doesn't go through the Revenue Department, who's to push anybody to pay," Powell said. "Either bill, we're getting to the same conclusion."
The other side
Bob Dallas, a former Governor's Office of Highway Safety director who's now a lobbyist for camera company Blue Line Solutions, said the company opposes many of the points in Powell's bill. (And it opposes Washburn's bill entirely.)
Dallas said, to keeps school zones safe, ticketing should be allowed throughout the school day. Children and parents come and go from a school building all day, he said.
He said Blue Line supports the warning devices, would agree to pay for them, and would also agree to requiring flashing school zone lights wherever automated cameras are placed.
The company opposes the 35-percent rule on revenues, which Dallas said would negatively impact smaller jurisdictions.
And Blue Line wants to keep the system of sending unpaid tickets to the Department of Revenue.
Washburn's ban bill received pushback on the House floor Tuesday. A lawmaker who represents South Fulton brought up the death of an 11-year-old outside Sandtown Middle School in 2018. A speeding car struck the car the girl was riding in.
"Is it not true that I shared with you that I was on the scene the day that a young middle school student was killed by a speeding driver ...?" State Rep. Robert Dawson, D-Atlanta, asked Washburn.
"It is a terrible tragedy whenever a child is killed," Washburn responded. "But I must say that there is little evidence that the cameras would have prevented that tragedy."
Dig deeper
Still to be determined as the Senate considers the bills: How much will some very large political donations factor into the outcome? That includes some sizable donations made to the head of the Senate, Lt. Gov. Burt Jones.
For years, private camera companies have poured hundreds of thousands of dollars into campaign coffers and political committees.
"They have given a lot of money here," Washburn said. "It's obviously very important to them, because they're making a lot of money. And so they are spending a lot of money.
"But the money they're spending is a very small percentage of the money they're taking out of Georgia."
The I-Team examined the past four years of donations from three major companies – RedSpeed, Blue Line Solutions and American Traffic Solutions, or Verra Mobility.
The total: $728,250.
More than half of that – $400,200 – poured in since February 2024, when now-retired state Rep. Clay Pirkle first floated a bill to ban the cameras entirely.
Since 2021, there's been $215,000 donated to the Georgia House Republican Trust, with a lion's share ($150,000) given by RedSpeed. Another $110,000 went to the Georgia Republican Senatorial Committee.
Lt. Gov. Jones's leadership committee received $171,000, also mostly from RedSpeed, and his campaign received another $38,500.
Jones's office didn't respond to a request for comment on the donations, but he said in a written statement to the I-Team, "I believe that school safety is a critical issue we must address through a variety of initiatives."
The I-Team also found $16,500 in camera company donations to Rep. Powell.
"I think if you looked at the outcome (Tuesday), political donations don't carry any weight about doing the right thing," Powell told the I-Team. "You saw two bills passed that's going to probably put these folks out of business in Georgia."
Dallas, the lobbyist, described the donations as camera companies' way of reaching out to policymakers to educate them on the issue. "What's happening – an industry representing it's desire to make school zones safe," he said.
READ MORE:
School zone speed cameras clash: Georgia lawmakers to debate on ban vs. reform
Fight to ban school zone speed cameras begins in Georgia House
Ga. lawmaker aims to shut down school zone speed cameras
I-Team: Thousands ticketed by school zone cameras set up further from the school than law allows
After I-Team investigations, ATL and Riverdale to automatically refund drivers wrongly ticketed by speed cams
The Source
The FOX 5 I-Team has been reporting on problems with school zone speed cameras for more than a year, discovering thousands of erroneous tickets issued in Atlanta, Jonesboro and Riverdale. I-Team reporter Johnny Edwards has been tracking bills dealing with the cameras at the state Legislature. He was at the Capitol for Tuesday's vote on two bills and interviewed the sponsors of both.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Elon Musk issues grovelling apology to Trump saying that his posts ‘went too far'
Elon Musk issues grovelling apology to Trump saying that his posts ‘went too far'

Yahoo

time36 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Elon Musk issues grovelling apology to Trump saying that his posts ‘went too far'

Elon Musk has taken to X to express regret over his war of words with President Donald Trump, backing down after less than a week and conceding that 'some' of his posts attacking the commander-in-chief 'went too far.' 'I regret some of my posts about President Donald Trump last week. They went too far,' the world's richest man wrote on the social media platform he owns in the early hours of Wednesday morning. The apology comes six days after Trump said he was 'very disappointed' in his former special adviser and campaign donor for criticizing the 'Big, Beautiful Bill' he is attempting to push through the Senate, prompting Musk to lash out with a series of highly personal attacks against the president, who responded in kind on his own platform Truth Social. Musk's 130-day tenure leading the cost-cutting Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) as a government employee came to an end on May 30, but just days later the billionare began trashing Trump's signature tax and spending package, warning it would greatly increase the national debt and calling it a 'disgusting abomination.' 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore. This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination,' he wrote on X. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' Musk followed that up a day later with a fresh appeal to 'KILL the BILL', imploring his millions of followers to contact their representatives and senators to remind them that 'bankrupting America is NOT ok!' The president was reportedly quickly 'losing patience' with Musk's intervention behind the scenes and was 'confused' by his animosity, eventually saying as much while hosting German Chancellor Friedrich Merz at the White House on Thursday. In addition to expressing his disappointment in the Tesla and SpaceX boss, Trump also claimed that he could have won the crucial battleground state of Pennsylvania in last year's presidential election without Musk's help. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election, Dems would control the House and the Republicans would be 51-49 in the Senate,' Musk shot back on X. 'Such ingratitude,' he added in a separate post. From there, a vicious exchange of barbs commenced on the billionaires' competing social media platforms, with Trump saying Musk's company had been 'wearing thin' and accusing him of going 'CRAZY' on Truth Social, also threatening to take away his lucrative government contracts. The latter responded on X by threatening to decommission SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft, which is used to ferry astronauts to-and-from the International Space Station and, most shockingly, alleging that Trump was mentioned in top secret files held by the government on the late pedophile Jeffrey Epstein, which, he said, was the true reason for their being withheld from the public. Musk also posted a picture of Trump and Epstein together and a video of the two New Yorkers chatting at a house party from 1992. The following day, West Wing aides indicated that the two men were planning a phone call to clear the air, only for Trump to tell reporters that he had no interest in speaking to the man who had donated at least $288m to his election campaign just months earlier, leaving their once-close relationship in limbo. The fallout from the spat saw former Trump aide Steve Bannon call for Musk to be deported and investigated over his alleged drug use, the late-night satirists have a field day and the internet explode with speculation and opinion. But the situation has since been eclipsed by the eruption of protests in Los Angeles against the president's illegal immigration crackdown, which has seen activists clash with Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers and the president controversially send in the National Guard to aid local law police officers in maintaining order.

Is Windsor-Essex ready for a guaranteed basic income? This senator says it's time
Is Windsor-Essex ready for a guaranteed basic income? This senator says it's time

Yahoo

time40 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Windsor-Essex ready for a guaranteed basic income? This senator says it's time

Windsor had the dubious distinction of having the second highest unemployment in the country last month — and that's among the reasons our community would benefit from a universal basic income, according to a Canadian senator. In late May, Sen. Kim Pate introduced Bill S-206, which calls upon the federal government to develop a financial framework for a Guaranteed Livable Basic Income. "How can we actually weave a safety net that leaves no one behind?" Pate said. "This bill is one strand in a social and economic fabric that would help us rebuild." Statistics Canada says Windsor's unemployment rate in May was 10.8 per cent. Only Peterborough had it harder with an unemployment rate of 11.7 per cent. And the situation could worsen in the near future: Pate says the growing reality of job losses due to the trade war and artificial intelligence technology means talking about a guaranteed income in Canada is more relevant than ever. "At a time like now, when we're facing the threat from the United States, when we're facing the threat of A.I., when we're facing challenges to industry — it strikes me that it's a perfect time for us to develop a plan that actually leaves nobody behind," Pate said. Lorraine Goddard, CEO of United Way/Centraide Windsor-Essex County, also believes the community would benefit from a guaranteed livable basic income — because she feels the current system isn't providing people with the support they need to improve their situations. "Social assistance programs keep people in poverty. They don't give people enough to live," Goddard said. "You're just living moment to moment in deprivation mode." "I see so many families and children really struggling... If you could help a family get that basic income, get them stabilized, let them help their children get through school successfully — then you could see, in 10 years, a transformation in this community." It's not the first time Pate has advocated for a guaranteed basic income. In 2021, she introduced a similar bill — S-233. But progress on that bill ended with the prorogation of Parliament in January 2025. "It died on the order paper," Pate admitted. Bill S-206 is entering its second reading in the Senate. It will need to survive multiple readings in the House of Commons to become law. It's still too early for Pate's idea to involve actual numbers and policy. But in 2017, the Province of Ontario experimented with a pilot project that provided a basic income to around 4,000 low-income people in Hamilton, Thunder Bay, and Lindsay. That project offered approximately $17,000 a year to single individuals, and $24,000 to couples. The amount was reduced by 50 cents for every dollar earned through work. Pate said a federal program could have a similar system — adjusted for the current economy. "Let's streamline this process," she said. "Make it universally accessible to people once they drop below a set income. Let's provide the resources the people need to rebound out (of poverty). Not just stay stuck in it." Critics like Franco Terrazzano, director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation, believe that such a program is something the country simply can't afford. "You've got to remember: The federal government is broke. It's more than a trillion dollars in debt," Terrazzano said. A universal basic income in Canada would be "massively expensive," Terrazzano said. "Even in the best case scenario, this would cost Canadian taxpayers billions of dollars every single year... This would be big time tax increases for Canadians who are already struggling." Indeed, in the Parliamentary Budget Officer's study of Bill S-206, the gross cost of implementation is estimated at $107 billion. But Pate pointed out that the PBO's estimate is for the gross cost: The net cost could be as low as $3 billion, taking into account potential long-term savings in existing social assistance, health care, and the legal system. As an example, Pate cited the work of Canadian economist Evelyn Forget, who found that low-income people in a Manitoba community were inducing massive costs at their local emergency room — because they didn't have preventative health care and proper nutrition. "If we looked at what we actually spend now on those initiatives, the administration alone would cover a lot of costs," Pate suggested. "[The PBO] has very much said we would likely see many cost savings, particularly in health care and the criminal legal system." According to Terrazzano, the reality is that "if you pay people not to work, fewer people will end up working." Meanwhile, Pate believes the main obstacle to adopting a guaranteed livable basic income isn't finding the funding or the political will — it's adjusting attitudes. "The biggest barrier to implementing this kind of approach is the view that poor people somehow will waste the money or defraud the system," Pate said. "It's the stigma that attaches to poor people, the presumption that it's their own fault... a presumption that there are some people who deserve to be supported — and some who don't." Patrick Clark is a Windsor civil lawyer who earned his master's degree in political science from the University of Windsor with a 2021 paper titled The Answer to Poverty: A Universal Basic Income in Canada. Four years later, Clark says his views on the issue haven't changed: "That's the big key, moving forward: To put in place a system that essentially helps those who no longer can help themselves. "Right now, we have a situation where there are a lot of people who are unable to cover their basic needs — while we see the corporations at the top continue to increase prices. You'll find people falling further and further behind."

Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members

timean hour ago

Judge tosses lawsuit over Trump's firing of US African Development Foundation board members

A federal judge has tossed out a lawsuit over President Donald Trump's dismantling of a U.S. federal agency that invests in African small businesses. U.S. District Judge Richard Leon in Washington, D.C., dismissed the case on Tuesday, finding that Trump was acting within his legal authority when he fired the U.S. African Development Foundation's board members in February. In March, the same judge ruled that the administration's removal of most grant money and staff from the congressionally created agency was also legal, as long as the agency was maintained at the minimum level required by law. USADF was created as an independent agency in 1980, and its board members must be confirmed by the U.S. Senate. In 2023, Congress allocated $46 million to the agency to invest in small agricultural and energy infrastructure projects and other economic development initiatives in 22 African countries. On Feb. 19, Trump issued an executive order that said USADF, the U.S. Institute of Peace, the Inter-American Foundation and the Presidio Trust should be scaled back to the minimum presence required by law. At the time, USADF had five of its seven board seats filled. A few days later, an administration official told Ward Brehm that he was fired, and emails were sent to the other board members notifying them that they had also been terminated. Those emails were never received, however, because they were sent to the wrong email addresses. The four board members, believing they still held their posts because they had not been given notice, met in March and passed a resolution appointing Brehm as the president of the board. But Trump had already appointed Pete Marocco as the new chairman of what the administration believed to now be a board of one. Since then, both men have claimed to be the president of the agency, and Brehm filed the lawsuit March 6. Leon said that even though they didn't receive the emails, the four board members were effectively terminated in February, and so they didn't have the authority to appoint Brehm to lead the board. Brehm's attorney, Bradley Girard with Democracy Forward, expressed disappointment with the judge's decision. 'But in our parallel case, Rural Development Innovations v. Marocco, a grantee and two USADF employees have also challenged Marocco's unlawful appointment," Girard wrote in an email. "We are hopeful that the Court will reject the defendants' attempt to ignore the constitutional and statutory requirements for appointing board members to federal agencies.' That lawsuit is still pending before the same judge. In that case, two USADF staffers and a consulting firm based in Zambia that works closely with USADF contend that the Trump administration's efforts to deeply scale back the agency wrongly usurps Congress' powers. They also say Marocco was unlawfully appointed to the board, in part because he was never confirmed by the Senate as required.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store