Department of Social Protection fined €550k for unlawful database of millions of Irish people's faces
The Data Protection Commission (DPC) inquiry, launched in July 2021, examined the DSP's 'SAFE 2′ registration process, which requires applicants to submit biometric facial data used for facial matching as part of their card application.
The Public Services Card is needed for accessing many welfare and public services, including applications for Child Benefit, Jobseeker's Benefit and driving licences.
A sample Public Services Card.
Department of Social Protection
Department of Social Protection
'SAFE 2′ registration has led to the Department of Social Protection holding biometric facial templates for about 70% of Ireland's population, making it one of the largest biometric data collections in the country.
The DPC inquiry found that the Department did not have a valid legal reason to collect or keep this sensitive facial data.
According to the DPC, the Department also failed to clearly inform people about how their data would be used, and the Department's privacy risk assessment was 'incomplete'.
As well as the €550,000 fine, the data watchdog ordered the department to cease processing biometric data for 'SAFE 2′ registration by March next year, unless a lawful basis is identified.
Deputy Commissioner Graham Doyle said that the DPC decision 'does not challenge the principle of SAFE 2 registration itself'.
'The technical and security measures in place for handling biometric data are sound,' Doyle said in a statement.
Advertisement
'Our concerns relate to whether the legal framework and the way the Department of Social Protection operates the system meet the requirements of data protection law. We found clear gaps in that regard.'
The DPC emphasised the need for a clear and precise legal basis when processing such sensitive data, as required by European privacy laws (GDPR), to protect individuals from arbitrary interference with their privacy rights.
The DPC's decision was made by Data Protection Commissioner Dale Sunderland, and was notified to the Department of Social Protection this week.
The Department of Social Protection has yet to comment on the ruling.
'More than a decade late'
The Irish Council for Civil Liberties (ICCL), which has campaigned against the use of facial recognition in the Public Services Card for more than 15 years, welcomed the decision but described it as 'more than a decade late and inadequate.'
Joe O'Brien, ICCL's Executive Director, said the ruling 'vindicates the actions taken by ICCL and Digital Rights Ireland against the Department of Employment and Social Protection'.
He said the ruling also confirmed what they had long argued – that the Department unlawfully collected facial records from millions without proper legal grounds or clear explanation.
'The Public Services Card, which was estimated to have cost the State €100 million, trespassed upon human rights and infringed EU and Irish law,' O'Brien said.
'The Department effectively created a de facto national biometric ID system by stealth over 15-plus years without a proper legal foundation. This illegal database of millions of Irish people's biometric data must be deleted.'
Olga Cronin, Senior Policy Officer at ICCL, criticised the mandatory nature of the facial recognition process.
'The Department unlawfully forced vulnerable people to give it their biometric data before it would help them,' Cronin said.
'It demanded data from people who needed its help to put food on the table. We should not have to trade our biometric data to access essential services to which we are already legally entitled.'
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
4 hours ago
- Irish Times
US Justice Dept loses bid to unseal Epstein partner Ghislaine Maxwell's grand jury records
A US judge ruled on Monday that grand jury records from the sex trafficking case of Ghislaine Maxwell - partner of late financier Jeffrey Epstein - will remain sealed, writing that their release would not answer lingering questions about the case despite the Justice Department's portrayal of them as matters of significant public interest. President Donald Trump , trying to quell discontent from his conservative base of supporters over his administration's handling of the case, last month instructed attorney general Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's and Maxwell's cases. In his decision denying the Justice Department's request as to Maxwell's case, Manhattan-based US district judge Paul Engelmayer wrote that the government's assertion that the materials would reveal meaningful new information was 'demonstrably false'. 'A member of the public, appreciating that the Maxwell grand jury materials do not contribute anything to public knowledge, might conclude that the Government's motion for their unsealing was aimed not at 'transparency' but at diversion - aimed not at full disclosure but at the illusion of such,' the judge wrote. READ MORE Another federal judge in Manhattan, Richard Berman, is weighing the Justice Department's bid to unseal the grand jury records from Epstein's case. Judge Berman has not yet ruled. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after her 2021 conviction on sex-trafficking charges. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. Neither the Justice Department, the White House, nor a lawyer for Maxwell immediately responded to requests for comment. Epstein socialised with the wealthy and powerful. His death in jail sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. The New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging. Mr Trump had promised to make public Epstein-related files if re-elected and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. [ Bill Clinton and ex-federal officials subpoenaed by Republicans over Epstein sex-trafficking operation Opens in new window ] The Justice Department's request to unseal the grand jury records came as the Trump administration sought to contain the political fallout. In a court filing on July 18th, the Justice Department wrote that 'transparency to the American public is of the utmost importance to this Administration'. In his decision, Mr Engelmayer wrote that the Maxwell grand jury proceedings, which consisted of testimony from two law enforcement agents, did not contain noteworthy information that had not previously been made public at Maxwell's month-long trial four years ago. 'The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor. They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's,' wrote the judge, who was appointed by Democratic president Barack Obama. 'They do not reveal new sources of their wealth. They do not explore the circumstances of Epstein's death.' [ Epstein confidante Ghislaine Maxwell transferred to lower-security prison in Texas Opens in new window ] Mr Engelmayer wrote that even though much of the grand jury material was subsequently made public at Maxwell's trial, there was still a 'systemic interest' in maintaining grand jury secrecy. Grand juries operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations and to protect the reputations of uncharged individuals. Last month, a Florida judge rejected the administration's request to unseal grand jury records from federal investigations there into Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Epstein served a 13-month sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a state-level prostitution charge as part of a deal now widely regarded as too lenient. – Reuters
Irish Times
9 hours ago
- Irish Times
Enterprise Ireland sought approval for €300,000 pay package for new chief executive
State agency Enterprise Ireland wanted to raise the salary for their chief executive position by over €70,000 but were warned there was little chance of it being approved. The agency told the Department of Enterprise late last year it was looking to recruit a new boss with a pay package worth €300,000 per year. In a sanction request last December, it said it was looking to 'attract the highest possible calibre of candidates' including CEOs from the private sector. It said the €300,000 package was not at private sector standards but 'would send a strong signal to the candidate market for this role'. READ MORE The Department of Enterprise responded to say that a robust business case would be needed for raising the salary up from the agreed level of around €230,000 per year. [ Enterprise Ireland names Jenny Melia as new CEO Opens in new window ] Two weeks later, Enterprise Ireland submitted a revised document, this time saying they were looking for a salary of €270,000. The sanction request said: 'The CEO role is critical to the growth of the Irish economy while ensuring the effective leadership, direction, governance, client service delivery and internal transformation of the agency.' The Department of Enterprise cautioned, however, there was almost no chance of getting an enhanced pay package approved by the Department of Public Expenditure. A senior official said it was a 'substantial increase in pay' that would mean the CEO was paid more than a department secretary general or the boss of the IDA. An email in January said: 'We envision [the Department of Public Expenditure] will have significant concerns with the proposed salary, particularly, as it could have wider public sector pay implications whereby other non-commercial semi state agencies could cite Enterprise Ireland when making future business cases. 'While the rationale outlined in the business case is well founded and has merit, [we think the department] will be reluctant to sanction the post given the high base salary requested.' Officials also said Enterprise Ireland plans for filling the post quickly seemed 'incredibly ambitious' given how long the Department of Public Expenditure would need to assess the business case. They also asked for a copy of any analysis the enterprise agency had conducted, which underpinned the case for a higher salary. Later that month, Enterprise Ireland dropped the enhanced request entirely and asked to proceed with the appointment at the original rate of €229,949-per year. A copy of the conditions of service said: 'Candidates should note that entry will be at the minimum of the scale and will not be subject to negotiation.' In early February, the Department of Public Expenditure gave the go-ahead for the job to be advertised at the old salary level. It was subsequently filled with the appointment in May of Jenny Melia, a long-serving senior executive at Enterprise Ireland. By the time the announcement was made, the pay level for the post had risen to around €235,000 as part of pay restoration for the public sector. Asked about the discussions, a Department of Enterprise spokesperson said the salary for the Enterprise Ireland CEO was on a single point pay scale. 'At the time of the first draft business case this was set at €229,949. However, due to a pay adjustment in March 2025 the set remuneration was increased to €234,548,' the department said, adding that it was government policy that all appointments from open competitions were at the minimum point of the relevant scale. The spokesperson said any derogations would only be considered in 'exceptional circumstances' and would require approval of the Department of Public Expenditure.
The Irish Sun
10 hours ago
- The Irish Sun
€285 Child Benefit, no tax cuts for Irish workers & €244 welfare freeze in Budget 2026 latest as €2.2bn package axed
FINANCE Minister Paschal Donohoe will not "rewrite" his €9.4 billion Budget 2026 plan in order to tackle Donald Trump's tariffs. The Fine Gael TD said no changes are being made to next year's spending plans - despite the US President slapping 15 per cent tariffs on Ireland and threatening to hit our pharmaceutical sector harder. Advertisement 3 Finance Minister Paschal Donohoe Minister for Public Expenditure Jack Chambers pictured after Budget 2025 last October Credit: Brian Lawless/PA Wire 3 Tanaiste Simon Harris has claimed that people on the dole should not get the same budget pay bounce as pensioners while Ireland is at full employment Credit: Cillian Sherlock/PA Wire It comes as the Coalition faces calls to splash the cash on supports for families in October's Budget despite already ruling out a repeat of last year's €2.2 billion cost of living package. Ireland has run a €4billion surplus so far this year with the Coalition coming under pressure to spend these resources to help hard-pressed families. But Donohoe has ruled out a cost of living package and played down spending, claiming this year's budget will be "more normal" than 2025's bonanza package, which was the largest in the State's history. He said the €2.2billion spent on this package last year may be needed to protect public services and keep public finances safe. Advertisement Donohoe said: "Packages of that scale were in place when we had inflation of five, 10, 15 percent. And we should not and I believe will not repeat that again." Taoiseach Micheal Martin said the coalition would do what it could to alleviate the cost of living but ruled out a specific cost-of-living package. It is understood that boosts worth up to €1,000 per worker will be slashed from the budget. We have outlined everything you need to know about Budget 2026 so far - and why workers may not benefit from any tax cuts despite a cost-of-living package being axed from October's plans. Advertisement ONE-OFF PAYMENTS RULED OUT Government leaders have agreed on the complete elimination of one-off payments such as energy credits, double welfare and Child Benefit double boosts. The one-off cash boosts benefited the average worker by about €1,000 each. Last year, 1.4 million people benefited from double social welfare payments at Halloween and Christmas. It included €400 for those on the Disability Support Grant or Working Family Payment, and a €300 lump sum payment for Fuel Allowance-eligible households. Advertisement There was also €280 for those eligible for Child Benefit. Public Expenditure Minister Jack Chambers previously told the Irish Sun: "We have said we're going to move away from one-off temporary measures. "I think when we're making decisions we have to consider them in the context of the overall fiscal parameters that we've set out." Minister Donohoe warned that the record Social Protection package including 10 lump sum payments won't be repeated in Budget 2026. Advertisement He said: "Yes, the cost of living is still high. I know it's a huge challenge for so many, but we don't have the inflation levels - the five per cent and 10 per cent - that we had for so many years that necessitated spending billions of euro to help offset prices going up. "And it is correct, therefore, to say at this point in time that we can't repeat those kind of measures again and we will need to make sure that we have the enhanced strength in our economy and in our public finances to deal with the kind of risks that we're outlining." SOCIAL WELFARE FREEZE An independent think-tank has called for ALL weekly social welfare rates to increase by €25 and be benchmarked to average earnings in October's budget. This would bring core payments to €269 a week in 2026. Advertisement But Tanaiste Simon Harris recently claimed that people on the dole should not get the same budget pay bounce as pensioners while Ireland is at full employment. He indicated that the Government may freeze the jobseekers allowance at its current level instead of including it in any social welfare increases in the upcoming budget. The payment currently has a maximum rate of €244 each week for those who meet certain eligibility conditions. WHAT WAS BUDGET 2025'S COST OF 'LIVING PACKAGE'? THE last budget, which was announced in October, saw thousands of families across the country benefit from cost-of-living measures. The package, which was worth €2.6 billion in total, was the largest social welfare package in the history of the State. It was made up of a mixture of increased payments and once-off lump sums for social welfare recipients. Other measures in Budget 2025 included an expenditure of €6.9billion and €1.4billion in tax changes. Energy credits were also agreed as part of a €2.2 billion cost-of-living package included in Budget 2025 to help people through the winter. Asked if the Government will separate the jobseekers allowance from other welfare hikes in the budget, the Tanaiste told the Irish Sun: 'I do always think there is merit in not looking at social welfare payments with uniformity across the board. Advertisement 'We've been talking a lot about college fees the last couple of days unexpectedly perhaps but roughly speaking the equivalent of €1.20 or €1.25 on every social welfare payment is roughly the equivalent of reducing the college fees by €1,000. 'I'm not convinced that you need to see as significant a rise in the dole as you do in the pension for example at a time when our country is in full employment and there's lots of supports out there for people getting into work and there is other supports out there for people who can't work for very many good reasons." 'TARGETED' CHILD BENEFIT Social Justice Ireland has called for the increase of supports for families, urging the government to increase Child Benefit by €50 and increase Child Support Payments by €6 and €15. But Minister for Social Protection Dara Calleary has ruled out upping the Child Benefit payment for everyone. Advertisement Instead, the Fianna Fail man confirmed his department is "working on" a targeted new Child Benefit payment as part of "key" efforts to tackle child poverty in Ireland. A "second tier" boost worth an average €285 each month would allow lower-income families to top up the existing €140-a-month benefit currently paid out to around 650,000 Irish families. The €140 flat payment would still be paid to everyone, regardless of income. WORKERS MISS OUT ON TAX CUTS The Government is allowing scope for €1.5 billion of tax cuts in Budget 2026, according to the Summer Economic Statement. Advertisement However, Irish workers are set to lose out in the budget if a planned lower rate of VAT for hospitality goes ahead. The cost of reducing VAT for restaurants, bars and cafes will take up approximately €1 billion of the €1.5 billion available for tax cuts in the outline of Budget 2026. Last month, Tanaiste Simon Harris told the National Economic Dialogue event that the Government had made a 'solemn commitment' to slash the VAT rate for the hospitality sector. But the plan has sparked concerns that there will be little to no income tax cuts for hard-pressed workers. Advertisement Minister Donohoe warned that tough decisions will have to be made in the budget as he will not be going above the €1.5billion tax package. He said: 'It would not be right to grow the scale of our tax package with everything that we are confronting at the moment.' BACK TO SCHOOL COSTS There are currently no plans to increase or extend the Back to School Clothing and Footwear allowance grant for Irish parents. But the Labour party has called for "urgent Government action" on spiralling back-to-school costs that are setting parents back an eye-watering €1,450 or €1,560 per child. Advertisement Shock data from the Irish League of Credit Unions revealed that parents are now spending over €1,450 per primary pupil and €1,560 for those in secondary school. Labour has called on the Government to make the Back to School Clothing and Footwear Allowance universal and restore the full €100 increase. The means tested payment, received by over 236k families so far this year, is currently €160 for children aged 4-11 years and €285 for kids between 12-22 years. Labour has also called on the Government to "permanently abolish" exam fees and "make school transport free for all" with a €27m investment. Advertisement The party has also demanded a ban on voluntary contributions and called for a 20 per cent increase of capitation grants. Labour TD's have also requested that Home Economics students get the same ingredient support that exists for the Woodwork and Metalwork subjects. Minister for Social Protection Dara Calleary last year confirmed that the BSCFA will not cover extra costs parents face ahead of the school year. When asked by Sinn Fein TD Louise O'Reilly if he is aware that many parents rely on back to school payments for help to pay for iPads or other devices used in the classroom, he confirmed the allowance only covers clothing and footwear. Advertisement
