logo
Irish officials step up backroom plans for influential deal-making role for EU presidency

Irish officials step up backroom plans for influential deal-making role for EU presidency

Irish Times17-05-2025

It was a balmy day in May when the then
French
president
Jacques Chirac
,
UK
prime minister
Tony Blair
and Italian premier
Silvio Berlusconi
were ushered on to a coach in Phoenix Park in
Dublin
.
The year was 2004 and they were making the short trip between Farmleigh House and Áras an Uachtaráin, for a flag-raising ceremony with other leaders, to mark the entry of 10 new (mostly central and eastern) states to the
European Union
.
The event was the highlight of the Republic's six-month stint holding the presidency of the
Council of the European Union
.
A crucial cog in the labyrinthian EU policymaking machine, the council presidency rotates between member states and involves brokering compromises, to get the 27 national governments on the same page.
READ MORE
The State is due to take over the role again in the second half of next year. Officials in Dublin and Brussels have been laying the groundwork for what will be a major diplomatic and political undertaking.
Running a successful presidency can boost a member sate's standing and influence inside the EU. A poor one can leave a black mark that takes years to erase.
Irish ministers will chair EU meetings on foreign affairs, finance, justice, agriculture and other policy areas, where they and their counterparts from the other 26 member states will trash out decisions.
You have to be an 'honest broker' between the other capitals, one EU source said. The country running the presidency often acts as the 'engine', keeping legislation moving through the system and unjamming blockages, they added.
The last time the Republic took on the EU council presidency was in 2013. The State was about to come out from the shadow of the bailout, which staved off financial ruin but brought years of painful austerity.
The presidency offered an opportunity for Enda Kenny's government to restore its reputation on the European stage.
'We were trying to turn a tanker around, to say 'we are still a player at the table',' one source involved behind the scenes back then said.
There was a huge focus on avoiding excessive spending. Tap water rather than bottled water was served at meetings. Cars ferrying visiting politicians around Dublin were kept to a minimum.
Running an effective presidency 'will be essential for Ireland's future position and influence in the EU', an internal December 2024 briefing stated. The briefing, drawn up by Department of Foreign Affairs officials, stated that 'significant preparatory' was needed to make sure the Republic did a decent job.
More than 230 meetings will be held in the State over the six months, including up to 20 gatherings of EU ministers and a large number of lower-level working groups involving officials and diplomats.
The State will also host a summit of the EU's 27 national leaders and a meeting of the European Political Community (EPC), a wider forum of leaders set up after Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
[
Republic eyes chance to host grand summit on future of Europe
Opens in new window
]
Some 47 European heads of state and government will potentially attend the EPC, making it the biggest international meeting hosted in the history of the State.
Discussions are ongoing about where to stage the event. Holding it in Dublin is one option, in which case the Convention Centre could be in the frame, several sources said. That would necessitate shutting down large parts of the city centre for security reasons, causing major disruption.
The alternative would be to hold the summit on the site of a stately-home style hotel outside of the capital, with temporary infrastructure built for the 5,000 travelling diplomats, officials and journalists. That option poses difficulties getting people to the venue and accommodating them nearby, one Irish official involved in the planning said.
The Government has dodged questions about how much it expects holding the EU council presidency will cost.
'The actual costs arise next year and they will be significant,' said Minister of State for European affairs Thomas Byrne.
Documents seen by The Irish Times show officials estimate the costs will be in the region of €120 million to €170 million.
A Department of Foreign Affairs briefing released in response to a Freedom of Information Act request stated that hosting the EPC would be an 'unprecedented' undertaking that threw up 'significant logistical and security implications'.
One department source said they expected the Irish presidency would cost between €150 million and €180 million all in.
The bailout presidency of 2013 cost €42 million mainly because most meetings were held in Brussels. Those that took place in Ireland were limited to Dublin Castle. A temporary media centre constructed for journalists covering a meeting of EU finance ministers at Dublin Castle went through more than 1,000 litres of tea and coffee.
The 2004 presidency cost €110 million and had the feel of a travelling road show, sources said.
'It was certainly plentiful; it was the Celtic Tiger, all was good,' one said.
Meetings were held across the State, on more than one occasion in or very near the constituency of the relevant Irish minister chairing them.
The Office of Public Works were like 'roadies' building and taking down infrastructure for events. 'They could have done Taylor Swift's world tour after the six months,' a source who worked on the 2004 presidency said.
Department officials initially seemed to envisage that the Republic's 2026 turn in the EU hot seat would mainly be run in Dublin. Now the plan is for a greater regional mix, though Dublin Castle will still feature. The deal underpinning the Fianna Fáil-Fine Gael Coalition contains a commitment that some of the high-level EU meetings would be brought 'to cities and counties across Ireland'.
Big EU policy debates that the Government will be expected to steer include a drive to increase defence spending and improve the bloc's economic competitiveness.
Discussions about once more enlarging the 27-state club will feature. Ukraine, Montenegro and Albania are hopeful of being in a position to join the EU by the end of this decade.
Irish ministers and diplomats will spend a lot of time in the weeds of negotiations on the size and scope of the EU's next budget, to replace the existing €1.2 trillion one that runs out in 2027. The budget is always the result of an intense arm wrestle between national capitals and the European Commission, the EU's executive body that proposes laws.
Taoiseach Micheál Martin has privately told Cabinet members to start making more of an effort to travel to EU meetings that cross their brief, to get to know their counterparts in other governments.
'You will see a stepping-up of that this year,' one Minister said.
Mr Martin is planning to arrange individual sit downs with many other EU leaders over the next year as well.
Some ministers – finance, foreign affairs and agriculture – are already travelling to Brussels several times a year, as the EU has more decision-making power in those areas. Others are less frequent visitors.
Much of the legwork will be done by the State's corps of diplomats and officials based in Brussels, who make up its permanent representation to the EU.
The size of the State's 'perm rep', as it is known in EU-speak, will more than double, up from the 100 officials who usually working there.
The department has rented a second office down the road from the commission's Berlaymont headquarters to accommodate the increase on a three-year lease at a cost of €2.3 million.
What makes a good council presidency?
The Republic's presidency will be watched closely for how the Government approaches debates on defence and security given how its policy of military neutrality puts it out of step with most other member states.
One rough yardstick for success is the number of compromises agreed. However, for all the careful plotting Irish diplomats are doing to gauge what EU legislation might come to the boil later next year, some unforeseen political crisis could grip Europe and dominate the agenda.
Catherine Day, a former secretary general of the commission, said a successful presidency was one that 'helps the system work towards consensus'.
Catherine Day, former secretary general of the European Commission. Photograph: Nick Bradshaw
The time in the chair was not an opportunity to 'call the shots', but about listening to what was being said around the table and proposing a way forward, she said.
'The big countries will listen if Ireland has done its homework and brings forward a well-crafted compromise,' the commission's former top civil servant said.
The average person on the street may only take notice when delegations of European leaders start touching down on the tarmac.
For Irish officials and diplomats in Brussels, and many in Dublin, the EU council presidency will have taken over their day-to-day working life long before that.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Drivers put a brake on Tesla sales,
Drivers put a brake on Tesla sales,

Irish Times

time32 minutes ago

  • Irish Times

Drivers put a brake on Tesla sales,

Irish drivers have put a brake on buying Tesla electric cars, says The Sunday Times. The company run by billionaire Elon Musk, whose split with US president, Donald Trump, dominated headlines this week, has suffered a 13 per cent drop in Irish sales so far this year. Chinese rival BYD has overtaken Tesla, increasing its sales by 48 per cent, the newspaper reports. 'In Ireland Tesla's year got off to a good start with sale of his cars doubling year on year in early 2025, driven by the arrival of the cheaper Tesla Model 3,' it says. 'But sales plunged by 62 per cent last month.' READ MORE Housing policy chasing developers away Government policy is driving investment in housing to other countries, according to the Sunday Independent. Developers including Claire Solon, managing director of the Irish arm of international player, Greystar, tells the newspaper that the Government needs to tackle 'planning, infrastructure, rent caps and viability'. The company warns that 'problematic policy changes' are pushing housing investment to other countries. Michael O'Flynn, chief executive of O'Flynn Group, says additional taxes on the building industry in the middle of a housing crisis are 'actually holding back the delivery of new homes'. He maintains that the residential zoned land tax has become a development tax. Hotelier's Heathrow runway pitch Billionaire hotelier, Surinder Arora is joining forces with US engineering giant Bechtel, to pitch an alternative third runway plan for London's Heathrow airport , reports The Sunday Telegraph. Mike Kane, Britain's aviation minister, says the country's government is open to alternative bids for the hub's third runway. Mr Arora told the newspaper that his bid could no doubt 'build it cheaper than Heathrow airport Ltd'. The hotels mogul previously led an alternative bid in 2018, saying he could do it one third cheaper than the airport company. Renewables' biogas call Renewables developer Bia Energy says data centres and large energy users should be obliged to use biogas to aid kick-starting the industry here, the Business Post writes. The firm, backed by businessman Eamon Waters, who sold Panda Recycling to Macquarie Infrastructure Fund for €1.2 billion, warns that the Government will not meet its climate plan biogas targets. Bia Energy is calling for a 'renewable heat obligation policy' which legally binds large energy users, such as data centres and pharmaceutical manufacturers, to buy renewable energy. The Republic faces penalties of up to €28 billion by 2030 if it fails to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 51 per cent.

Russia says it's pushing offensive into Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region
Russia says it's pushing offensive into Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region

RTÉ News​

time2 hours ago

  • RTÉ News​

Russia says it's pushing offensive into Ukraine's Dnipropetrovsk region

Russia said it was pushing into Ukraine's eastern industrial Dnipropetrovsk region for the first time in its three-year offensive - a significant territorial escalation amid stalled peace talks. Moscow, which has the initiative on the battlefield, has repeatedly refused calls by Ukraine, Europe and US President Donald Trump for a full and unconditional ceasefire. At talks in Istanbul last week it demanded Kyiv pull troops back from the frontline, agree to end all Western arms support and give up on its ambitions to join the NATO military alliance. Dnipropetrovsk is not among the five Ukrainian regions over which Russia has asserted a formal territorial claim. It is an important mining and industrial hub for Ukraine and deeper Russian advances into the region could have a serious knock-on effect for Kyiv's struggling military and economy. Dnipropetrovosk was estimated to have a population of around three million people before Russia launched its offensive. Around one million people lived in the regional capital, Dnipro. Russia's defence ministry said forces from a tank unit had "reached the western border of the Donetsk People's Republic and are continuing to develop an offensive in the Dnipropetrovsk region". The advance of Russian forces into yet another region of Ukraine is both a symbolic and strategic blow to Kyiv's forces after months of setbacks on the battlefield. There was no immediate response from Ukraine to Russia's statement. Moscow in 2022 said it was annexing the frontline Donetsk, Kherson, Lugansk and Zaporizhzhia regions, which it did not have full control over. In 2014, it seized the Crimean peninsula following a pro-EU revolution in Kyiv. In a set of peace demands issued to Ukraine at the latest talks, it demanded formal recognition that these regions were part of Russia - something Kyiv has repeatedly ruled out. Tens of thousands have been killed in Russia's three-year offensive, millions forced to flee their homes and cities and villages across eastern Ukraine devastated by relentless air attacks and ground combat. In more than a decade of conflict with Kremlin-backed separatists and the Russian army, Ukraine has never had to fight on the territory of the Dnipropetrovsk region until now. Ukrainian military personnel previously said that Russia could advance relatively quickly in the largely flat region, given there are fewer natural obstacles or villages that could be used as defensive positions by Kyiv's forces. The region - and in particular the city of Dnipro - have been under persistent Russian strikes for the last three years. Russia used Dnipro as a testing ground for its "experimental" Oreshnik missile in late 2024, claiming to have struck an aeronautics production facility. Earlier today, local Ukrainian officials said one person was killed in the region in an attack on a village close to the frontline.

Why is it costing me more to use green fuel in my car than fossil fuels?
Why is it costing me more to use green fuel in my car than fossil fuels?

Irish Times

time3 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Why is it costing me more to use green fuel in my car than fossil fuels?

May I draw attention to an item that seems to escape scrutiny and that is the higher per litre pump price of HVO (hydrogenated vegetable oil). I switched my 1.5-litre diesel car to HVO in early 2024, when it was cheaper but the supplier has increased it since, stating the original price was an introductory promotion. The fuel is currently costing two to three cent more per litre than the prevailing diesel price. The Department of Transport has not responded to two queries re the taxation element, which ought to reflect the lower emissions factor. This seems to indicate that Revenue considerations supersede environmental objectives, and this deserves examination. Mr W.K. READ MORE As our carbon emissions continue to rise despite everything we are being told about the perils of climate change, it is good to see some people making the necessary personal choices to reduce emissions. But I can fully understand your chagrin at having made the switch only to see you are actually paying more for your biofuel than you would be if you had stuck with diesel, a fossil fuel. The Sustainable Energy Authority of Ireland said hydrogenated vegetable oil (HVO) is a renewable form of biofuel derived from vegetable oil, which is processed with hydrogen, to create a diesel substitute product. It says HVO can have a carbon footprint that is at least 65 per cent lower than conventional fossil fuel, such as diesel. For its part, Revenue tells me that HVO, like all liquid fuels, is subject to mineral oil tax. However, the tax applied to biofuels produced by biomass, including HVO, relieved of the carbon component of the tax. What does that mean? Well, the diesel you used to use has an motor oil tax charge of €595.68 per thousand litres, or just shy of 0.6 cent per litre. HVO has a motor oil tax charge of €425.72 per thousand litres as it is excused the €169.96 carbon element of the diesel tax rate. That comes to just over 0.4 cent per litre. So, all other things being equal, your HVO should cost 0.17 cent less per litre. For other people reading this, it is worth bearing in mind that the figures will vary slightly if your biofuel is replacing petrol or if you are using it for heating. It will be different again for those using blended fuels where the dispensation applies only to the portion that is biofuel. You can find all the details here . Revenue also notes that the relief from the carbon component of motor oil tax is granted to the supplier at the top of the chain. This means the price paid by wholesalers and retailers already allows for that ...which is why you should expect to benefit from the relief. Moving on from motor oil tax, fuels are also liable in Ireland to value added tax (VAT). Irish VAT rates are obliged to work within EU rules although there is some wriggle room in places. In this case, motor fuels are subject to the standard rate of VAT – currently 23 per cent. Ireland does use the discretion available to it to tax HVO at a lower rate of VAT – 13.5 per cent – but only when it is used as a heating oil, not in cars. So where does that leave us? Well, you're paying fractionally less tax on your HVO and you have the comfort of knowing that it sharply reduces the emissions from your car. However, that does not mean it is cheaper. There are two factors here. First, HVO is more expensive to produce than diesel. The industry says this is due to higher production costs and the challenge of sourcing raw material in industrial quantities. In fact, if one UK supplier is to be believed, you should be expecting to pay 10-15 per cent more for HVO than diesel but I understand the UK gives HVO no relief such as is available in Ireland under motor oil tax. The other factor is that it is not as efficient as diesel for your car. That means you will need to purchase around 7.3 per cent more HVO to cover the same mileage as you would with diesel. This is why most HVO in Ireland is, I understand, used by commercial fleets rather than by individual motorists. For companies, the offsetting by the green credentials may make it more attractive despite the added costs. But it is also why consumers need to ensure they are fully informed of the longer-term budgetary impact before making a decision to switch to such fuels. You note you switched at a time when the supplier was offering HVO at a price lower than diesel. I would have hoped the supplier made it clear this was an introductory offer but it appears from your letter that they didn't. That's not a great way for a long-term supplier of fuel to build a relationship of trust. From what I can gather, it will cost you more to run your car with HVO than with diesel. And that is even with the preferential tax rate. You suggest Revenue considerations appear to supersede environmental objections. On the basis of the motor oil tax relief, that's not entirely fair, although it is true to say the incentive to go green is modest – perhaps too modest given the additional base costs outlined above. The Government faces a choice. Either it increases the incentives available to accelerate take-up among the public, or it relies on people caring more for the environmental (and likely financial) benefits for future generations than their own pocket. On a related note, if Government departments are simply ignoring queries that come into them, it is dispiriting. The Department of Transport is among the department supposedly leading the Government's charge to hit what now appear to be unattainable climate change targets by the end of the decade. You would think they should be encouraging moves in that direction and pointing people in the direction of the information that helps them make informed choices. Ignoring people inevitably irritates people and makes them less receptive to messages the Government tells us it considers important. The information you sought was readily available from Government departments – Revenue was able to provide me with the details and point me to references within 24 hours – so it really was not beyond the department to direct your query appropriately and provide you with the basic information sought. Please send your queries to Dominic Coyle, Q&A, The Irish Times, 24-28 Tara Street Dublin 2, or by email to with a contact phone number. This column is a reader service and is not intended to replace professional advice

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store