Now, Chandigarh to offer free education till 18 for children with special needs
The policy, framed in line with the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (RPwD) Act, 2016, includes several key provisions such as free education till the age of 18, 3% reservation under EWS/disadvantaged group category in admissions and availability of textbooks in accessible formats.
Children with benchmark disabilities, as defined under the RPwD Act, 2016, are considered children with special needs.
Unveiling the policy at Punjab Raj Bhavan, Punjab governor and UT administrator Gulab Chand Kataria said, 'This policy is not just limited to opening the doors of schools, it also aims to bring out the inherent talent and potential of these children. Chandigarh is proud to be strengthening the spirit of equal opportunity and inclusion in the field of education.'
The policy will directly benefit 3,175 children with special needs, currently studying in government schools across Chandigarh, and is likely to set standards for private schools as well.
At present, the education department has 16 special educators at the JBT level, 20 at the TGT level and 21 resource teachers under the Samagra Shiksha Scheme.
Policy a result of HC directions
The policy comes in line with directions issued by the Punjab and Haryana high court in two cases in 2017 and 2019.
Under the new policy, free and compulsory education will now be extended to children with disabilities in government and aided schools till the age of 18, up from the earlier age limit of 14.
Children who are unable to attend school due to their disability will be provided home-based education. This will be supported through transport allowances and other support services.
The policy also gives CWSN the right to admission in all-inclusive neighbourhood schools, and mandates a 3% reservation for them within the 25% quota reserved under the EWS/disadvantaged category under the Right to Education Act.
Private recognised schools will also be required to admit children with special needs and provide them with appropriate educational support in line with this policy.
To ensure the inclusive classrooms are run effectively, the policy mandates the presence of trained special educators, adapted curriculum, Braille and large print books, sign language resources and a special evaluation system.
For children with more severe disabilities, links with special schools and integrated education centres will be strengthened.
Vocational and skill training will also be provided from Class 9 onwards to help students with special needs become self-reliant. Additionally, state-level sports competitions for CWSN will be held in collaboration with the department of sports.
The number of government schools with Special Resource Centres, which offer therapy, counselling for parents, assessments and functional academics, has been increased from five to 20 under this policy.
To ensure smooth and effective implementation, every school will have a grievance redress committee. A state-level monitoring committee has also been set up.
Also present at the policy launch were UT chief secretary Rajiv Verma, principal secretary to governor Vivek Pratap Singh, education secretary Prerna Puri and director of school education Harsuhinder Pal Singh Brar.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
24 minutes ago
- Economic Times
CCI closes startup body's complaint against Google, refrains from probe
The Competition Commission of India (CCI) has decided against launching a probe into the Alliance of Digital India Foundation's (ADIF's) complaint against tech giant Google's alleged anti-competitive practices in the practices in online advertising, and closed the startup body had essentially challenged Google's alleged dominant position and "purportedly abusive behaviour" in the online search advertisement and online display advertisement markets. In an order dated August 1, reviewed by ET, the antitrust regulator, however, said, 'ADIF hasn't pointed out any specific part of any policy or conduct of Google in support of its claim that the allegations made in the present matter also extend to Google's Online Display Advertising services'. 'Therefore, in light of there being no supporting evidence to such claim, the Commission does not deem fit to take cognizance of such claim of ADIF,' it for some other allegations by the ADIF, the regulator said it had addressed similar issues in certain earlier cases and 'no purpose would be served by inquiring into the same issue yet again without there being any material change in circumstances being pointed out'.The regulator added that re-investigating the same issue again 'would simply lead to a wastage of time and resources of the public exchequer'. The Commission has stressed that it has 'examined in detail the averments made by ADIF and the submissions thereto made by Google, on all the issues related to alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies' before reaching its conclusion. It also said that all the four instances of alleged unfair and discriminatory conditions imposed by Google upon advertisers as part of its Google Ads Policies as raised by ADIF in the present matter, 'have already been examined in substance and set to rest by the Commission in its previous decisions in Matrimony case (supra) and/ or Vishal Gupta case (supra)'. 'The Commission is not convinced with the reasons stated by ADIF for distinguishing its allegations from the issues examined in previous orders passed by the Commission. As per the clear language of Section 26(2A) of the Competition Act, the issues examined in the previous order may be 'the same' or 'substantially the same',' it said in the order. 'Therefore, the present matter is directed to be closed forthwith in terms of the provisions of Section 26(2A) of the Act,' it added.
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Explosive in house or on bike? Malegaon blast judgement flags gap in probe; raises torture concerns
NEW DELHI: A special NIA court's damning acquittal order in the 2008 Malegaon blast case has exposed major contradictions between the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad (ATS) and the National Investigation Agency (NIA), raising serious concerns over coercion, flawed evidence, and the legality of the investigation. As per PTI, in the 1,036-page verdict, Special Judge AK Lahoti acquitted all seven accused, including BJP MP Pragya Singh Thakur and Lt Col Prasad Purohit, citing a lack of reliable and conclusive evidence. Contradictory charges: House vs bike The court flagged glaring inconsistencies between ATS and NIA versions of how and where the bomb was assembled. According to the ATS, the RDX device was put together in a house in Pune and then handed to a now-absconding accused. The NIA, however, stated it was fixed onto a motorcycle in Indore and transported via the Sendhawa bus stand. "Thus, there is a material variance in their charge sheets and both the investigation agencies are not consistent with each other on the material aspects like fitting, transporting and involvement of accused," the judge observed, as reported by PTI. The court said the prosecution could not prove the ownership of the explosive-laden motorbike, nor conclusively establish that the blast was caused by the said vehicle. 'The prosecution proved that a blast occurred in Malegaon but failed to prove that bomb was placed in that motorcycle,' the judge said. Torture, coercion, and fabrication of evidence According to PTI, the judgement raised serious concerns over allegations of torture, coercion, and illegal detention of both accused and witnesses by ATS officers. Multiple witnesses testified that their statements were taken under duress and that they were physically assaulted. While prosecution argued that no formal complaints were filed, the court countered that absence of complaints does not invalidate the claims. 'This raises serious concern over the credibility of the evidence collected by the ATS,' it said, noting that similar allegations were not made against NIA officers. The court directed its judgement be sent to the Directors General of both ATS and NIA for appropriate action. Court slams use of UAPA, highlights gaps The court noted that charges under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) were filed without proper application of mind. The right-wing group 'Abhinav Bharat', allegedly linked to the accused, has never been banned or classified as a terror organisation. The court found no evidence that Purohit had stored or transported RDX from Kashmir, where he was posted, or that he assembled the bomb. It added that though money from Abhinav Bharat may have been used to fund construction of Purohit's home, it did not prove intent to commit terrorism. The acquittal comes 17 years after the September 29, 2008 blast, which killed six and injured over 100 people near a mosque in Malegaon, a communally sensitive town in Maharashtra. The Maharashtra government has been ordered to compensate victims' families with Rs 2 lakh each and injured persons with Rs 50,000.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Elon Musk's X Accuses UK Of ‘Censorship' Over Online Safety Laws: 'Free Speech Will Suffer'
Elon Musk's social media platform X criticized the UK's new online safety rules, warning they suppress free expression. Social media platform X (formerly Twitter) criticised UK's new online safety regulations, warning that the laws risk suppressing free expression and amount to state-sponsored censorship. The Elon Musk-owned company said, 'Free speech will suffer. The Act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer." The criticism comes days after new provisions under the UK's Online Safety Act came into force. Among them is a requirement for websites- including adult and social media platforms- to verify users' ages to prevent children from accessing explicit or violent material. X said it had worked to comply with the new rules, including introducing age verification mechanisms but warned that the threat of significant financial penalties could lead platforms to over-censor. The company said, 'Many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression." The UK government has defended the legislation as per which companies that fail to comply could face fines of up to £18 million or 10% of global turnover- a figure that could amount to £200 million in X's case. Earlier this week, the UK's media regulator Ofcom said it had begun investigations into dozens of websites that had not introduced required safeguards. It confirmed it had written to US-based firms to remind them of their obligations. X also criticised measures that would enable police to monitor social media for content deemed anti-immigrant, arguing this 'oversteps the intended mission" of child protection. X's criticism echoes comments made by Elon Musk in which he described the Online Safety Act as a 'suppression of the people." He also endorsed a public petition calling for the law's repeal, which has gathered over 450,000 signatures. However, Ofcom insisted the rules do not require platforms to restrict legal content for adults as a spokesperson said, 'They must carefully consider how they protect users' rights to freedom of expression while keeping people safe." Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from geopolitics to diplomacy and global trends. Stay informed with the latest world news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! view comments First Published: Disclaimer: Comments reflect users' views, not News18's. Please keep discussions respectful and constructive. Abusive, defamatory, or illegal comments will be removed. News18 may disable any comment at its discretion. By posting, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.
