US appeals court keeps block on Trump administration's federal workforce cuts
A US federal appeals court on Friday declined to freeze a lower court ruling that has temporarily halted the Trump administration's attempt to shrink the federal workforce. The decision ensures that the order issued by US District Judge Susan Illston remains in effect, pausing the cuts for now.
President Donald Trump's administration had asked the court for an emergency stay of Judge Illston's injunction, which was issued in a lawsuit filed by labor unions and cities including San Francisco and Chicago. The case challenges the administration's move to significantly reduce federal staffing levels.
The downsizing effort stems from an executive order signed by President Trump in February, followed by a directive from the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and the Office of Personnel Management (OPM).
The judge's order blocks federal agencies from implementing those directives.
In her ruling, Judge Illston — appointed by former President Bill Clinton — made clear that while presidents have authority to direct agency reforms, major structural changes require legislative involvement and the cooperation of Congress.
Government lawyers argued that the executive order and DOGE memo were meant to offer general guidance, not binding rules. But the court noted that these directives had already resulted in significant staff reductions and disruptions.
Though the administration has not provided an exact figure, at least 75,000 federal employees have reportedly opted for deferred resignation under the new plan. Thousands more—particularly those in probationary roles—have already been terminated or placed on administrative leave.
Trump's deferred resignation program: The administration offered federal employees in January, a buyout equal to eight months' salary to voluntarily resign by early February. It aimed to reduce the federal workforce and save up to $100 billion. Certain critical groups, including postal workers and military personnel, were excluded.
Mass resignations from Elon Musk's Efficiency Department: Over 20 civil servants quit in mass from Musk's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), protesting the use of their skills to dismantle public services and criticising the political agenda behind the downsizing.
DOGE, led by billionaire Elon Musk, was established by Trump to carry out what he has described as a voter-backed mandate to remake the federal government. Trump has repeatedly defended the initiative, saying it reflects the will of the American people. He appointed Musk earlier this year to lead DOGE, citing his reputation for streamlining operations and reducing inefficiencies.
(With inputs from AP)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
27 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Karine Jean-Pierre no longer a Democrat? Ex-WH press secy writes tell-all book on ‘broken' Biden administration
Former White House press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre has run her race in the Democratic Party after serving former Presidents Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The 50-year-old shared the news in a statement released Wednesday, revealing that she is writing a tell-all book on the 'broken' administration she served. Titled Independent: A Look Inside a Broken White House, Outside the Party Lines, the memoir is set to hit the bookshelves on October 21, per Associated Press. The upcoming memoir promises a closer look at Biden's decision to exit the 2024 presidential race against Donald Trump and Jean Pierre's decision to become an Independent. 'Jean-Pierre didn't come to her decision to be an Independent lightly,' Hachette Book Group says in a promotional release. 'She has served two American presidents, Obama and Biden… She takes us through the three weeks that led to Biden's abandoning his bid for a second term and the betrayal by the Democratic Party that led to his decision.' Meanwhile, Jean-Pierre said in a statement, 'Until January 20, I was responsible for speaking on behalf of the President of the United States.' 'At noon on that day, I became a private citizen who, like all Americans and many of our allies around the world, had to contend with what was to come next for our country. I determined that the danger we face as a country requires freeing ourselves of boxes. We need to be willing to exercise the ability to think creatively and plan strategically.' The 50-year-old succeeded Jen Psaki as press secretary in 2022. She previously served as deputy press secretary and a senior advisor to Biden's 2020 campaign. Before that, she was a regional political director during Obama's first term. Throughout the November race, Jean-Pierre faced criticism, especially for being evasive about the former president's health. Legacy Lit's announcement on Wednesday further states that Jean-Pierre 'presents clear arguments and provocative evidence as an insider about the importance of dismantling the torrent of disinformation and misinformation that has been rampant in recent elections and provides passionate insight for moving forward,' per the outlet.
Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
Why Elon Musk turned against Donald Trump and his ‘One Big Beautiful Bill' - Here are the 5 reasons
Once close allies, now at odds: Elon Musk's once-robust relationship with Donald Trump appears to be crumbling amid growing policy clashes, public criticism, and mounting fallout for Musk's companies. The turning point seems to be Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' a sweeping Republican legislative package that Musk claims undermines innovation and economic discipline. Here's a breakdown of the key reasons behind the falling out: Elon Musk's sharp break from Donald Trump finds its most immediate pain point in Tesla's bottom line: the proposed elimination of federal electric vehicle (EV) tax credits. Under current policy, buyers of new EVs are eligible for up to $7,500 in federal tax credits, with an additional $4,000 available for used EVs. These credits, part of the Biden-era Inflation Reduction Act, have been a critical incentive driving EV adoption—and by extension, Tesla's sales. But Trump's so-called 'Big Beautiful Bill,' backed by GOP lawmakers, aims to gut those incentives entirely for manufacturers that have already sold over 200,000 qualifying vehicles between 2009 and 2025. Tesla, by far the EV market leader, is directly in the firing line: the company sold over 336,000 vehicles in just Q1 of 2025 alone. According to JPMorgan analyst Ryan Brinkman, the removal of these credits could represent a $1.2 billion headwind for Tesla—a significant blow as the company battles slumping demand, falling profits, and political backlash from Musk's government role. So, Musk became increasingly vocal in criticising Trump's massive federal spending bill—nicknamed the 'Big Beautiful Bill.' Musk called the bill 'a disgusting abomination' and accused GOP lawmakers of abandoning fiscal responsibility. 'I was disappointed to see the massive spending bill, frankly… which increases the budget deficit… I don't know if a bill can be big and beautiful,' Musk told CBS previously. Musk's discontent escalated after Trump abruptly withdrew the nomination of private astronuat and his ally Jared Isaacman—as NASA Administrator. Trump cited 'prior associations' in his decision, which Musk might have seen as a betrayal. Isaacman had broad support in the space community and was seen as Musk's pick to align NASA policy with SpaceX's interests. His removal coincided with Musk's own exit as a 'special government employee' running the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE). 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk said in support of Isaacman, signaling the depth of his frustration. Elon Musk's foray into federal governance as a 'special government employee' under the Trump administration has left a lasting dent in his personal and public image. What began as a high-profile effort to 'streamline government efficiency' quickly turned into a political and reputational minefield for the billionaire CEO. As head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), Musk was tasked with cutting what the Trump administration called 'wasteful spending.' But the resulting actions—including mass layoffs in federal departments, rumored threats to Social Security and Medicare programs, and abrupt budget slashes—sparked widespread backlash. Despite Musk's repeated clarifications that DOGE had no authority over entitlement programs, public anger snowballed. 'It's a bit unfair because DOGE became the whipping boy for everything,' Musk told CBS. 'I've had people think DOGE is going to stop them from getting their Social Security check, which is completely untrue.' The political blowback triggered a sharp decline in Musk's public approval. Protests, online campaigns, and lawsuits followed, along with a string of death threats and acts of violence targeting both Musk and Tesla facilities. As public anger grew, Tesla became a target: Showrooms were vandalised Tesla vehicle sales plummeted Shares fell 50% from record highs Net worth dropped by $100 billion Musk lamented being made the scapegoat: 'DOGE became the whipping boy for everything... People thought it would stop their Social Security checks.' His candid remarks reflect a man caught between two identities—visionary entrepreneur and political appointee. 'I don't want to speak up against the administration,' he said, 'but I also don't want to take responsibility for everything this administration is doing.' Musk recently escalated pressure on the FAA to drop Verizon's $2.4 billion contract for air traffic control upgrades, claiming the system is failing. He offered Starlink as an emergency solution, suggesting the FAA should shift the contract to SpaceX. But critics flagged this as a possible conflict of interest—especially since Musk had been advising on federal spending.
Economic Times
42 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Chinese 'kill switches' found in equipment at US solar firms trigger national security fears. What are they?
Engineers have discovered 'kill switches' embedded in Chinese-manufactured parts on American solar farms, raising fears Beijing could manipulate supplies or 'physically destroy' grids across the US, UK and Europe. Rogue communication devices found in Chinese solar inverters have triggered fears of national security concerns. But what exactly are kill switches? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What are kill switches? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Chinese "kill switches" that could allow Beijing to cripple power grids and trigger blackouts across the West were found in equipment at US solar farms earlier this month, raising fears that China could manipulate supplies or 'physically destroy' grids across the US, UK and Europe. US energy officials re-assessed the risk posed by small communication devices in power inverters - an integral component of renewable energy systems that connects them to the power to Times, the rogue devices, including cellular radios, were discovered in Chinese-made power inverters that are used to connect solar panels and wind turbines to electricity grids across the world, including the UK. The hidden communications equipment could be deployed remotely to switch off inverters with potentially catastrophic US experts found rogue communication devices in some solar power inverters not listed in product documents, Reuters reported citing these devices to skirt firewalls and switch off inverters remotely, or change their settings, could destabilise power grids, damage energy infrastructure and trigger widespread blackouts. The discovery has sparked concerns that Beijing could potentially disrupt power grids in Western nations, given the heavy reliance of renewable energy systems on Chinese-manufactured solar panels incorporate parts from various countries, including China. However, it remains unclear whether any power converters installed at UK wind or solar farms contain the suspected Chinese "killswitches." kill switch is a mechanism used to shut down or disable a device or program, according to Tech Target. A kill switch is typically used to prevent the theft of equipment or data, or to shut down machinery in emergency situations. The extent to which it restricts, modifies, or halts an action or process depends on the specific system, operation, or software it is designed to switch is a broad term when it comes to the types of technology, software and tools used to create and facilitate it. In manufacturing, for example, a factory might use a kill switch -- also called a big red button -- to shut down machinery if a worker is in danger. Kill switch software, on the other hand, can sometimes include software-encoded kill switches such as anti-piracy radios, acting as kill switches, were discovered embedded in power inverters produced by Chinese manufacturers and supplied to US power inclusion of these remotely controllable devices introduces potential cybersecurity vulnerabilities within the nation's power infrastructure. Power inverters are essential components in solar and wind farms, converting renewable energy into a form compatible with the national grid. This makes them a critical point of vulnerability. If compromised, these devices could be manipulated—potentially by China—to cause widespread blackouts across the West or even disrupt the entire power grid."We know that China believes there is value in placing at least some elements of our core infrastructure at risk of destruction or disruption," said Mike Rogers, a former director of the US National Security Agency."I think that the Chinese are, in part, hoping that the widespread use of inverters limits the options that the West has to deal with the security issue."Over the last nine months, US experts discovered suspicious devices hidden inside inverters and batteries from several Chinese manufacturers. These specialists carefully dismantle the equipment to identify potential security threats before the products are integrated into power typically have remote access capabilities through cellular networks, and utility companies usually install firewalls to block unauthorized access and prevent communication with China. However, these unauthorized components were not disclosed in the product documentation when the equipment was shipped to the United States.(With inputs from Reuters)
