logo
NIRF to award mild penalty to institutions for retractions this year, harsh penalty next year

NIRF to award mild penalty to institutions for retractions this year, harsh penalty next year

The Hindu19-07-2025
In a first, starting this year, the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) will award negative scores to higher educational institutions for papers that have been retracted from journals in the last three calendar years and their corresponding citations.
'This year, we will award some negative weightage for retracted papers and their citations. Next year, the penalty will be harsher,' says Anil Sahashrabudhe, Chairperson of the National Board of Accreditation (NBA), the agency managing the NIRF. This is the first time the NIRF will be awarding negative weightage while calculating the ranking.
'Both the number of retractions as well as citations from these retracted papers will be taken into account,' Dr. Sahashrabudhe says. 'We are also learning and will fine-tune the negative scoring system as we go.'
'By awarding a negative score for retractions, we want to send out a strong message that research should be conducted ethically,' he says. Explaining the reason why the NIRF is awarding a negative score for retractions, he says: 'The number of retractions was small a few years ago but the numbers have increased in the couple of years. So we are taking this seriously.'
While most of the retractions are due to unethical research practices such as data fabrication, manipulation of images, using the same image in multiple papers dealing with completely different materials, using large language models (LLMs) without proper disclosure etc., some are due to genuine mistakes. It is for this reason that journals do not wish to give the impression that retractions are necessarily bad. Will it be correct to penalise institutions for retractions that have been due to genuine mistakes and not due to unethical practices? 'Retractions due to genuine mistakes are far less, and that had been happening some years ago. But most of the retractions now are due to unethical practices,' he asserts.
That the number of retracted papers from China and the U.S. is far higher than India cannot be cited as a reason, he says. 'India should not be in the race with China and the U.S. for negative things.'
He does not rule out harsher penalties to institutions that continue to have a large number of retractions in the years to come. To begin with, the penalty will be mild this year, which will become harsh next year and harsher in the future if institutions continue to have a large number of retractions every year, he says. 'Maybe we may even blacklist institutions for a few years if the retractions stay high,' Dr. Sahashrabudhe says.
Dismissing any objections that institutions should not be penalised for wrongdoings of individual researchers, he retorts: 'If institutions can take the credit for the number of papers published by their researchers, they should also take the discredit [penalty] for the retracted papers. They should take measures to ensure that the number of papers retracted reduces.' He then asks: 'What are the authorities doing? Where is the governance? Institutions already have internal quality teams. What are they doing?'
It is time that institutions take research ethics seriously and encourage their faculty to engage in ethical research practices, he says. 'The focus should shift from mere quantity to quality of research and research ethics,' Dr. Sahashrabudhe says.
'Research and Professional Practices' is one of the important parameters used by the NIRF for ranking institutions. Under this head, scores are awarded for parameters such as the weighted number of publications in a given year, quality of publications which are measured based on the total citation counts over previous three years and the number of citations in the top 25 percentile averaged over the previous three years.
According to him, international bodies involved in ranking institutions have started to take into account the retracted papers. This, he says, is a reflection of the increasing number of retractions in recent years. Unlike a few years ago, journals have now become more responsive to red flags raised by independent research integrity researchers who point out serious flaws in published papers. The time taken to retract papers has also reduced considerably. Also, journals on their own have begun investigations into papers produced using LLMs without correct disclosures, authors added or changed during the reviewing process without adequate explanations, and manuscripts produced by paper mills — fraudulent organisations that make money by writing fake manuscripts and offering authorship slots for sale to academic customers.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Who's opting for DU's fourth year? More takers from Humanities, not Science or Commerce
Who's opting for DU's fourth year? More takers from Humanities, not Science or Commerce

Indian Express

time3 days ago

  • Indian Express

Who's opting for DU's fourth year? More takers from Humanities, not Science or Commerce

Shalin Dan had always dreamed of studying at St Stephen's College. When he was admitted to its BSc Mathematics (Honours) programme three years ago, it felt like a goal fulfilled. But now, with Delhi University (DU) transitioning into a four-year undergraduate format in line with the National Education Policy, 2020, Dan has chosen not to continue. 'The first batch is always a trial batch,' said the 22-year-old, who now works as a merchandiser at a private firm. 'Seminars were held in our college, but even faculty members couldn't answer many of our questions. Especially in Mathematics, it didn't make sense to go in blindly without a clear research path.' Dan is part of a cohort of science students across DU choosing to exit their undergraduate courses at the end of the third year, despite the opportunity to pursue a research-intensive fourth year and graduate with an 'Honours with Research' degree. According to DU records, the fourth year — at least in this initial rollout — is being embraced more readily by students of Humanities and Languages programmes than those in Sciences and Commerce. As of last week, 9,674 students across DU have opted to exit early, according to data accessed by The Indian Express. The last date to make the choice is July 31. Tripti Mittal, (20), a BSc Mathematics (Hons) student at St Stephen's College, has chosen to stay on. 'I want to pursue a PhD in Mathematics. With the fourth year, I can bypass a full Master's programme… In seminars, we were told we could choose any topic in our subject of research,' she said. At Miranda House — consistently ranked among DU's top five colleges by the National Institutional Ranking Framework — between 40% to 60% students of Science students have chosen to exit the undergraduate programme after three years. In Humanities, the figure is notably lower, with only 25%-35% of students of Political Science and History choosing to leave. In the Commerce stream, too, not many are opting for the fourth year. At Shri Ram College of Commerce, the most-preferred DU college, only 170 of 900 BCom (Honours) and 74 of 210 Economics (Honours) students are opting for the fourth year. At Hindu College, another top-ranking DU college, Principal Anju Srivastava said that interest varies with the subject. 'In Sciences, around 30-35% students have expressed interest in the fourth year. History and Political Science may see more than 30% staying on, but Sociology and Philosophy may not see many takers. While English and Economics have more than 35% of the students opting to continue, Commerce may see less interest,' she added. At Kirori Mal College, the split is nearly even. As of Wednesday, 472 students had opted to exit while 455 have chosen to stay on. The highest number of students exiting the college is 66 in BCom and 60 in BCom (Hons) out of the 472. In the Sciences, specific departments are witnessing a sharper decline. In Physics, 40 students have exited, followed by Chemistry (38) and Mathematics (6). By comparison, in the BSc Programme Physical Sciences (with Chemistry), 38 students have chosen to leave. The contrast is sharper when Languages are considered. While Hindi and Sanskrit have seen two students each opting out, four students have decided not to pursue Urdu, suggesting a stronger interest in research among students. Kirori Mal College Principal Dinesh Khattar said the mixed response was understandable. 'It is quite natural for students to have a little insecurity. This is the first batch. They are bound to have doubts,' he said. 'So far, it looks like a 50-50 split across courses, but these numbers might change in the coming week.' At Ramjas College, Principal Ajay Arora said, 'About 45-50% students would like to continue with the fourth year. This percentage is almost consistent across every course, including Humanities, Sciences, and Languages.' He added that more than 50% of Chemistry students are staying on. The principal from a prominent North Campus college admitted that students of the Sciences are harder to retain in the fourth year. 'Many of them are either taking up jobs or opting for MA programmes elsewhere… Interestingly, students of Languages are showing more interest in research.'

LU joins Agenda 2030 with new cell for SDGs
LU joins Agenda 2030 with new cell for SDGs

Time of India

time3 days ago

  • Time of India

LU joins Agenda 2030 with new cell for SDGs

Lucknow: Lucknow University has established a Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) cell which will be a dedicated unit focused on integrating the principles of the United Nations' SDGs into various aspects of university life. It will act as a central hub to promote awareness, research, and action related to sustainability in university-wide activities. "There is growing global expectation from institutions of higher learning to act as pivotal contributors in achieving the 17 SDGs outlined by the United Nations' 2030 Agenda," said dean academics Prof Geetanjali Mishra while adding, "The inclusion of sustainability in national (NIRF) and international rankings makes it imperative that we develop institutional mechanisms to align our academic, research, and outreach activities with these goals. "

PAU ranked among world's top 100 agricultural schools
PAU ranked among world's top 100 agricultural schools

Time of India

time4 days ago

  • Time of India

PAU ranked among world's top 100 agricultural schools

Ludhiana: Punjab Agricultural University has earned a global distinction by securing the 93rd rank in agricultural sciences in the latest EduRank 2025 list of the world's top 100 agricultural institutions. Among 4,407 institutions worldwide assessed in this category, PAU is the only state agricultural university from India to feature on the list, underscoring its growing international stature. EduRank, an independent global ranking platform, evaluates more than 14,000 institutions based on measurable indicators such as research output, citation impact and academic influence. PAU's entry into the top 100 is a powerful indicator of its rising prominence in global agricultural research and education. Only 22 institutions from Asia made it to the global top 100 in agricultural sciences. Thirteen of these are from China, followed by Japan (2), and one each from Israel, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan and India. India is represented by just two agricultural institutions in this category: Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, at 47th position, and PAU at 93rd. While IARI is a national institute under the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), PAU is the sole full-fledged state agricultural university to receive this global recognition. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Indonesia: New Container Houses (Prices May Surprise You) Container House | Search Ads Search Now Undo PAU ranks 20th in Asia with China Agricultural University being on the top, ranking 6th in the world. This achievement follows a series of national accolades for PAU. The university was ranked no. 1 among all state agricultural universities in India by the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) of the ministry of education for two consecutive years, 2023 and 2024. In addition, the Indian Institutional Ranking Framework (IIRF) 2025, a prominent private-sector agency, also named PAU the top state agricultural university in the country. The vice-chancellor of PAU, Satbir Singh Gosal, said this international ranking reflects the commitment, scientific strength and tireless work ethic of the PAU fraternity. He noted that such global recognition is not only a milestone for the university but also a moment of national pride. He said these rankings will help PAU expand its international visibility and foster new collaborations with research institutions and industry leaders around the world. He said the rankings might also aid international and national funding for further research in the university. For Rishi Pal Singh, the registrar, the global ranking is a validation of the university's academic leadership and research-driven ecosystem. He said PAU's consistent national and international recognition reflects its forward-looking vision, commitment to excellence, and the collective efforts of faculty, scientists, students and staff in advancing agricultural innovation and education. Founded in 1962, PAU has been at the forefront of India's agricultural transformation. As the cradle of the Green Revolution, it has shaped the country's food security landscape. Today, it continues to lead with innovations in climate-resilient farming, sustainable agriculture, and capacity building for the agri-food sector, the VC stated. BOX WHO SCORES WHAT Only 22 institutions from Asia made it to the global top 100 in agricultural sciences Thirteen of these are from China, followed by Japan (2), and one each from Israel, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan and India India is represented by just two agricultural institutions in this category: Indian Agricultural Research Institute (IARI), New Delhi, at 47th position, and PAU at 93rd While IARI is a national institute under the Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), PAU is the sole full-fledged state agricultural university to receive this global recognition. PAU ranks 20th in Asia with China Agricultural University being on the top, ranking 6th in the world WHO RANKED AGRI INSTITUTIONS EduRank, an independent global ranking platform, evaluates more than 14,000 institutions based on measurable indicators such as research output, citation impact and academic influence. PAU's entry into the top 100 is a powerful indicator of its rising prominence in global agricultural research and education PAU's PAST LAURELS The university was ranked no. 1 among all state agricultural universities in India by the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) of the ministry of education for two consecutive years, 2023 and 2024 In addition, the Indian Institutional Ranking Framework (IIRF) 2025, a prominent private-sector agency, also named PAU the top state agricultural university in the country VC SPEAK The international ranking reflects the commitment, scientific strength and tireless work ethic of the PAU fraternity. Such global recognition is not only a milestone for the university, but also a moment of national pride. These rankings will help PAU expand its international visibility and foster new collaborations with research institutions and industry leaders around the world Satbir Singh Gosal, VC, Punjab Agricultural University

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store