NIRF to award mild penalty to institutions for retractions this year, harsh penalty next year
'This year, we will award some negative weightage for retracted papers and their citations. Next year, the penalty will be harsher,' says Anil Sahashrabudhe, Chairperson of the National Board of Accreditation (NBA), the agency managing the NIRF. This is the first time the NIRF will be awarding negative weightage while calculating the ranking.
'Both the number of retractions as well as citations from these retracted papers will be taken into account,' Dr. Sahashrabudhe says. 'We are also learning and will fine-tune the negative scoring system as we go.'
'By awarding a negative score for retractions, we want to send out a strong message that research should be conducted ethically,' he says. Explaining the reason why the NIRF is awarding a negative score for retractions, he says: 'The number of retractions was small a few years ago but the numbers have increased in the couple of years. So we are taking this seriously.'
While most of the retractions are due to unethical research practices such as data fabrication, manipulation of images, using the same image in multiple papers dealing with completely different materials, using large language models (LLMs) without proper disclosure etc., some are due to genuine mistakes. It is for this reason that journals do not wish to give the impression that retractions are necessarily bad. Will it be correct to penalise institutions for retractions that have been due to genuine mistakes and not due to unethical practices? 'Retractions due to genuine mistakes are far less, and that had been happening some years ago. But most of the retractions now are due to unethical practices,' he asserts.
That the number of retracted papers from China and the U.S. is far higher than India cannot be cited as a reason, he says. 'India should not be in the race with China and the U.S. for negative things.'
He does not rule out harsher penalties to institutions that continue to have a large number of retractions in the years to come. To begin with, the penalty will be mild this year, which will become harsh next year and harsher in the future if institutions continue to have a large number of retractions every year, he says. 'Maybe we may even blacklist institutions for a few years if the retractions stay high,' Dr. Sahashrabudhe says.
Dismissing any objections that institutions should not be penalised for wrongdoings of individual researchers, he retorts: 'If institutions can take the credit for the number of papers published by their researchers, they should also take the discredit [penalty] for the retracted papers. They should take measures to ensure that the number of papers retracted reduces.' He then asks: 'What are the authorities doing? Where is the governance? Institutions already have internal quality teams. What are they doing?'
It is time that institutions take research ethics seriously and encourage their faculty to engage in ethical research practices, he says. 'The focus should shift from mere quantity to quality of research and research ethics,' Dr. Sahashrabudhe says.
'Research and Professional Practices' is one of the important parameters used by the NIRF for ranking institutions. Under this head, scores are awarded for parameters such as the weighted number of publications in a given year, quality of publications which are measured based on the total citation counts over previous three years and the number of citations in the top 25 percentile averaged over the previous three years.
According to him, international bodies involved in ranking institutions have started to take into account the retracted papers. This, he says, is a reflection of the increasing number of retractions in recent years. Unlike a few years ago, journals have now become more responsive to red flags raised by independent research integrity researchers who point out serious flaws in published papers. The time taken to retract papers has also reduced considerably. Also, journals on their own have begun investigations into papers produced using LLMs without correct disclosures, authors added or changed during the reviewing process without adequate explanations, and manuscripts produced by paper mills — fraudulent organisations that make money by writing fake manuscripts and offering authorship slots for sale to academic customers.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
3 days ago
- Time of India
Will aliens contact humans in 2025? Baba Vanga & Living Nostradamus predictions explained
Baba Vanga & Living Nostradamus predictions: Are humans about to meet aliens in 2025? According to two famous visionaries, Baba Vanga and the Living Nostradamus, the answer might be yes. Both of these renowned figures have made shocking predictions about the future – and their latest claims suggest that extraterrestrial life could soon come face-to-face with humankind, reported in NBT. Who Are Baba Vanga and the Living Nostradamus? Baba Vanga, often referred to as the "Balkan Nostradamus", was a blind mystic from Bulgaria who became famous for her chillingly accurate predictions. She foresaw major global events such as the 9/11 attacks, the death of Princess Diana, and even natural disasters. On the other hand, Athos Salomé, popularly known as the Living Nostradamus, is a modern-day prophet whose predictions include the COVID-19 pandemic and the passing of Queen Elizabeth II. His insights into the future have left many people astonished, as some of his prophecies have come true with alarming accuracy. Both Predict Contact with Aliens in 2025 What happens when two of the world's most famous clairvoyants predict the same event? It certainly grabs attention. And that's exactly what's happened now. Baba Vanga and the Living Nostradamus both predict that humans will make contact with aliens in 2025. According to their predictions, this major event could occur during a large-scale sporting tournament, though they haven't specified which one. With many major events like Wimbledon, the Super Bowl, and the NBA playoffs already behind us, all eyes are now on the upcoming global competitions later in 2025. Why Do They Think Aliens Will Contact Humans? Athos Salomé, the Living Nostradamus, believes that advanced space exploration and powerful technology could be the key to unlocking the truth about extraterrestrial life. He specifically mentioned the James Webb Space Telescope, suggesting that it could be instrumental in proving that aliens do exist. He stated: 'Thanks to the James Webb Telescope, humanity might finally get the answer to the existence of alien life, while governments like the US may declassify UFO files.' This implies that, alongside technological breakthroughs, secret information held by governments could be made public, confirming long-held suspicions of UFOs and aliens. What Could Happen If Humans and Aliens Meet? If aliens make contact with humans, there are a few possibilities — and not all of them are frightening. Some experts believe that it could lead to: A peaceful exchange of knowledge and technology Cultural interactions that help both species understand one another More concerning possibilities like biological warfare or an invasion However, at this stage, these are purely speculations. Nothing is confirmed, but these predictions have sparked widespread curiosity. Past Predictions That Came True Both Baba Vanga and the Living Nostradamus have made headlines in the past for predictions that turned out to be shockingly accurate. Baba Vanga predicted the 9/11 attacks, the Chernobyl disaster, and the death of Princess Diana. Athos Salomé foresaw the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic and the death of Queen Elizabeth II. These successful prophecies make their latest claims about aliens making contact with humans even more intriguing. Should We Believe These Predictions? While many people dismiss such forecasts as nonsense, others believe there's some truth hidden in them. With space agencies around the world increasing their search for alien life, and UFO sightings making global headlines, the idea of humans meeting aliens no longer feels like pure science fiction. Whether this prediction comes true remains to be seen. As 2025 unfolds, the world will be watching and waiting to see if this is the year that humans and aliens finally meet. To stay updated on the stories that are going viral, follow Indiatimes Trending.
Indian Express
4 days ago
- Indian Express
IIT Hyderabad 14th Convocation: 1273 degrees awarded; Rahul Ramachandran from CSE receives Prez gold medal
The Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IITH) on Saturday celebrated its 14th Convocation with 1273 students graduating across various programmes, including BTech, MTech, MSc, MDes and PhD. Ashwini Vaishnaw, Union Minister of Railways, Information & Broadcasting, and Electronics & Information Technology, was the Chief Guest of the Convocation, who delivered the address and presented the four gold medals and 44 silver medals. Rahul Ramachandran from the Department of Computer Science and Engineering received the President of India Gold Medal. He scored 9.89 CGPA. Heads of Departments, Deans, Registrar, Director, Chairman and Chief Guest participated in the Convocation procession. The chief guest also toured campus facilities, including the Technology Innovation Hub on Autonomous Navigation (TiHAN). Among the undergraduate programs, 460 students graduated with a BTech degree, while 20 students completed their BDes. The postgraduate cohort included 11 MA graduates in Development Studies and Health, Gender & Society, 98 MSc graduates, and 33 MDes graduates, including 10 who completed MDes by Practice. The MTech programme saw the largest postgraduate turnout with 511 degrees awarded, encompassing traditional MTech, MTech by BTech conversion (1 student), Direct BTech to PhD (4 students), MTech through PhD conversion (6 students), Executive MTech (12 students), and Online MTech (40 students), claimed the press release. Additionally, 1 MPhil, 4 MS by Coursework, and 1 MS by Research degrees were awarded. The institute also celebrated the achievements of 134 PhD scholars. This convocation also marked the graduation of the first batch from launched interdisciplinary programmes, including BTech in Biotechnology & Bioinformatics, Computational Engineering, and Industrial Chemistry; MTech in Quantum & Solid-State Devices and Sustainable Engineering; MSc in Medical Physics; and the first PhD in Artificial Intelligence. Meanwhile, the Institute has been officially recognised as an Institute of National Eminence by the Income Tax Department, Ministry of Finance, on March 27, 2025. This designation grants 100 per cent tax exemption under Section 80G of the Income-tax Act, 1961, on donations made to the institute. In the 2024 National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) rankings, the Indian Institute of Technology Hyderabad (IITH) was ranked 8th in the engineering category and 12th in the overall category.
The Hindu
4 days ago
- The Hindu
NIRF to award mild penalty to institutions for retractions this year, harsh penalty next year
In a first, starting this year, the National Institutional Ranking Framework (NIRF) will award negative scores to higher educational institutions for papers that have been retracted from journals in the last three calendar years and their corresponding citations. 'This year, we will award some negative weightage for retracted papers and their citations. Next year, the penalty will be harsher,' says Anil Sahashrabudhe, Chairperson of the National Board of Accreditation (NBA), the agency managing the NIRF. This is the first time the NIRF will be awarding negative weightage while calculating the ranking. 'Both the number of retractions as well as citations from these retracted papers will be taken into account,' Dr. Sahashrabudhe says. 'We are also learning and will fine-tune the negative scoring system as we go.' 'By awarding a negative score for retractions, we want to send out a strong message that research should be conducted ethically,' he says. Explaining the reason why the NIRF is awarding a negative score for retractions, he says: 'The number of retractions was small a few years ago but the numbers have increased in the couple of years. So we are taking this seriously.' While most of the retractions are due to unethical research practices such as data fabrication, manipulation of images, using the same image in multiple papers dealing with completely different materials, using large language models (LLMs) without proper disclosure etc., some are due to genuine mistakes. It is for this reason that journals do not wish to give the impression that retractions are necessarily bad. Will it be correct to penalise institutions for retractions that have been due to genuine mistakes and not due to unethical practices? 'Retractions due to genuine mistakes are far less, and that had been happening some years ago. But most of the retractions now are due to unethical practices,' he asserts. That the number of retracted papers from China and the U.S. is far higher than India cannot be cited as a reason, he says. 'India should not be in the race with China and the U.S. for negative things.' He does not rule out harsher penalties to institutions that continue to have a large number of retractions in the years to come. To begin with, the penalty will be mild this year, which will become harsh next year and harsher in the future if institutions continue to have a large number of retractions every year, he says. 'Maybe we may even blacklist institutions for a few years if the retractions stay high,' Dr. Sahashrabudhe says. Dismissing any objections that institutions should not be penalised for wrongdoings of individual researchers, he retorts: 'If institutions can take the credit for the number of papers published by their researchers, they should also take the discredit [penalty] for the retracted papers. They should take measures to ensure that the number of papers retracted reduces.' He then asks: 'What are the authorities doing? Where is the governance? Institutions already have internal quality teams. What are they doing?' It is time that institutions take research ethics seriously and encourage their faculty to engage in ethical research practices, he says. 'The focus should shift from mere quantity to quality of research and research ethics,' Dr. Sahashrabudhe says. 'Research and Professional Practices' is one of the important parameters used by the NIRF for ranking institutions. Under this head, scores are awarded for parameters such as the weighted number of publications in a given year, quality of publications which are measured based on the total citation counts over previous three years and the number of citations in the top 25 percentile averaged over the previous three years. According to him, international bodies involved in ranking institutions have started to take into account the retracted papers. This, he says, is a reflection of the increasing number of retractions in recent years. Unlike a few years ago, journals have now become more responsive to red flags raised by independent research integrity researchers who point out serious flaws in published papers. The time taken to retract papers has also reduced considerably. Also, journals on their own have begun investigations into papers produced using LLMs without correct disclosures, authors added or changed during the reviewing process without adequate explanations, and manuscripts produced by paper mills — fraudulent organisations that make money by writing fake manuscripts and offering authorship slots for sale to academic customers.
