
Healthcare provider's collapse prompts reform demands
The viability of private healthcare is under the microscope following the collapse of a major hospital operator, with one union casting doubt on private equity management in the sector.
Healthscope, which operates 37 hospitals across every state and territory, has vowed it will be business as usual for patients and staff after entering receivership.
Unions called on governments to reassess the sustainability of the health system, including how public healthcare is funded and delivered within the private sector.
"We don't want to see a sector governed by private equity firms like we have seen with Brookfields coming in and essentially leaving Healthscope in shatters," Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation's Victoria branch acting secretary Maddy Harradence told AAP.
"We know the private sector plays a really important piece in the broader healthcare system but we need them to be functioning, regulated and we need them to ensure a fair share of profits go back into the private hospital sector."
The provider, owned by North American private equity firm Brookfield, said while the parent entity had entered receivership, the operational business - which runs the hospitals - had not.
Anthony Scott, a professor of health economics at Monash University, says it is difficult to remain profitable in the private health sector due to workforce shortages, the cost of living and rising supply costs.
"It's one of those things where it's been very hard to maintain its profits over time," he told AAP.
Prof Scott said it would be important to assess how private hospitals are funded moving forward, along with managing contracts with private health insurers.
The federal government confirmed on Monday that taxpayers would not be footing the bill for the healthcare provider.
Health Minister Mark Butler said the provider would be a "very different beast going forward in terms of the ownership".
Victorian Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas said the state needed a strong private health system to complement the public system.
"I am confident that we will be able to meet the needs of all Victorians and that there is simply, at this point, no need to be concerned," she told reporters at state parliament on Tuesday.
In 2022 the Victorian government took over two Healthscope facilities, Frankston Private and Bellbird Private Hospital, to assist with the increased pandemic demand for healthcare and elective surgery services.
Ms Thomas said the state government had been watching the ailing company for some time.
Healthscope operates the Northern Beaches Hospital in Sydney, Hobart Private Hospital, Darwin Private Hospital and Knox Private Hospital in Melbourne.
The viability of private healthcare is under the microscope following the collapse of a major hospital operator, with one union casting doubt on private equity management in the sector.
Healthscope, which operates 37 hospitals across every state and territory, has vowed it will be business as usual for patients and staff after entering receivership.
Unions called on governments to reassess the sustainability of the health system, including how public healthcare is funded and delivered within the private sector.
"We don't want to see a sector governed by private equity firms like we have seen with Brookfields coming in and essentially leaving Healthscope in shatters," Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation's Victoria branch acting secretary Maddy Harradence told AAP.
"We know the private sector plays a really important piece in the broader healthcare system but we need them to be functioning, regulated and we need them to ensure a fair share of profits go back into the private hospital sector."
The provider, owned by North American private equity firm Brookfield, said while the parent entity had entered receivership, the operational business - which runs the hospitals - had not.
Anthony Scott, a professor of health economics at Monash University, says it is difficult to remain profitable in the private health sector due to workforce shortages, the cost of living and rising supply costs.
"It's one of those things where it's been very hard to maintain its profits over time," he told AAP.
Prof Scott said it would be important to assess how private hospitals are funded moving forward, along with managing contracts with private health insurers.
The federal government confirmed on Monday that taxpayers would not be footing the bill for the healthcare provider.
Health Minister Mark Butler said the provider would be a "very different beast going forward in terms of the ownership".
Victorian Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas said the state needed a strong private health system to complement the public system.
"I am confident that we will be able to meet the needs of all Victorians and that there is simply, at this point, no need to be concerned," she told reporters at state parliament on Tuesday.
In 2022 the Victorian government took over two Healthscope facilities, Frankston Private and Bellbird Private Hospital, to assist with the increased pandemic demand for healthcare and elective surgery services.
Ms Thomas said the state government had been watching the ailing company for some time.
Healthscope operates the Northern Beaches Hospital in Sydney, Hobart Private Hospital, Darwin Private Hospital and Knox Private Hospital in Melbourne.
The viability of private healthcare is under the microscope following the collapse of a major hospital operator, with one union casting doubt on private equity management in the sector.
Healthscope, which operates 37 hospitals across every state and territory, has vowed it will be business as usual for patients and staff after entering receivership.
Unions called on governments to reassess the sustainability of the health system, including how public healthcare is funded and delivered within the private sector.
"We don't want to see a sector governed by private equity firms like we have seen with Brookfields coming in and essentially leaving Healthscope in shatters," Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation's Victoria branch acting secretary Maddy Harradence told AAP.
"We know the private sector plays a really important piece in the broader healthcare system but we need them to be functioning, regulated and we need them to ensure a fair share of profits go back into the private hospital sector."
The provider, owned by North American private equity firm Brookfield, said while the parent entity had entered receivership, the operational business - which runs the hospitals - had not.
Anthony Scott, a professor of health economics at Monash University, says it is difficult to remain profitable in the private health sector due to workforce shortages, the cost of living and rising supply costs.
"It's one of those things where it's been very hard to maintain its profits over time," he told AAP.
Prof Scott said it would be important to assess how private hospitals are funded moving forward, along with managing contracts with private health insurers.
The federal government confirmed on Monday that taxpayers would not be footing the bill for the healthcare provider.
Health Minister Mark Butler said the provider would be a "very different beast going forward in terms of the ownership".
Victorian Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas said the state needed a strong private health system to complement the public system.
"I am confident that we will be able to meet the needs of all Victorians and that there is simply, at this point, no need to be concerned," she told reporters at state parliament on Tuesday.
In 2022 the Victorian government took over two Healthscope facilities, Frankston Private and Bellbird Private Hospital, to assist with the increased pandemic demand for healthcare and elective surgery services.
Ms Thomas said the state government had been watching the ailing company for some time.
Healthscope operates the Northern Beaches Hospital in Sydney, Hobart Private Hospital, Darwin Private Hospital and Knox Private Hospital in Melbourne.
The viability of private healthcare is under the microscope following the collapse of a major hospital operator, with one union casting doubt on private equity management in the sector.
Healthscope, which operates 37 hospitals across every state and territory, has vowed it will be business as usual for patients and staff after entering receivership.
Unions called on governments to reassess the sustainability of the health system, including how public healthcare is funded and delivered within the private sector.
"We don't want to see a sector governed by private equity firms like we have seen with Brookfields coming in and essentially leaving Healthscope in shatters," Australian Nursing and Midwifery Federation's Victoria branch acting secretary Maddy Harradence told AAP.
"We know the private sector plays a really important piece in the broader healthcare system but we need them to be functioning, regulated and we need them to ensure a fair share of profits go back into the private hospital sector."
The provider, owned by North American private equity firm Brookfield, said while the parent entity had entered receivership, the operational business - which runs the hospitals - had not.
Anthony Scott, a professor of health economics at Monash University, says it is difficult to remain profitable in the private health sector due to workforce shortages, the cost of living and rising supply costs.
"It's one of those things where it's been very hard to maintain its profits over time," he told AAP.
Prof Scott said it would be important to assess how private hospitals are funded moving forward, along with managing contracts with private health insurers.
The federal government confirmed on Monday that taxpayers would not be footing the bill for the healthcare provider.
Health Minister Mark Butler said the provider would be a "very different beast going forward in terms of the ownership".
Victorian Health Minister Mary-Anne Thomas said the state needed a strong private health system to complement the public system.
"I am confident that we will be able to meet the needs of all Victorians and that there is simply, at this point, no need to be concerned," she told reporters at state parliament on Tuesday.
In 2022 the Victorian government took over two Healthscope facilities, Frankston Private and Bellbird Private Hospital, to assist with the increased pandemic demand for healthcare and elective surgery services.
Ms Thomas said the state government had been watching the ailing company for some time.
Healthscope operates the Northern Beaches Hospital in Sydney, Hobart Private Hospital, Darwin Private Hospital and Knox Private Hospital in Melbourne.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Advertiser
18 hours ago
- The Advertiser
Parents spending thousands to choose baby's sex
Stacey Hughes always knew she wanted to have a little girl, but her pathway to getting there was a little different. Already a mum to three boys, in 2019 she travelled with her family to undergo IVF in the United States, where the team implanted a female embryo. Ms Hughes is one of hundreds of Australian parents who choose to travel overseas for sex selection, a practice that is not permitted in Australia other than for medical reasons. "I didn't want a fourth child, I wanted a girl," Ms Hughes told AAP. "My mum passed away in 2009 so I didn't have that mother-daughter relationship anymore and I just also wanted to have a girl in our family." Experts say Ms Hughes is not alone, with parents wanting to select a boy or a girl for family balancing reasons. Australia previously allowed sex selection for non-medical reasons, however in the early 2000s the guidelines changed, Connect IVF scientific director Lauren Hiser said. As a result, people are choosing to travel to nations that allow it, including parts of Southeast Asia, Europe and the US. "The concern in allowing Australians to go offshore is that we can't control the quality of service they are going to get overseas," Ms Hiser said. "The Australian IVF industry is highly regulated and allowing sex selection would make it safer for people to access." Ms Hiser stressed the process was not akin to "playing God" as the embryos were made during a regular IVF process and tested for a range of genetic abnormalities which also determined their sex. The number of people wanting to select a particular sex was in the hundreds, so allowing it in Australia would not expand boy or girl ratios in a particular direction, she added. "The reality is that sex selection is happening in Australia already, just not in the IVF industry," she said. "Then there's the risk of people going through a termination of pregnancy with all the physical and emotional impacts that come with that." Gender Selection Australia (GSA) is a service that helps families navigate overseas IVF processes. The sex selection process often came with a lot of misinformation, GSA general manager Nikki Mason said. "The majority of people want to balance out their family, it's not about preferring one sex over another," she said. "Sex selection is not manufacturing a result, it's just revealing what (embryos) families have after a normal IVF process and then they can choose which to implant." The IVF process is already stressful and the additional overseas travel costs make it unattainable for many. It cost Ms Hughes and her family about $30,000, including medications, accommodation, flights and medical appointments. While family and friends supported her decision, she faced trolling online after she previously spoke to the media about her experience. "I don't understand (the trolling) because it doesn't really affect anyone that I've had a baby girl," she said. "I think there's a lack of understanding of the process and people thinking that you are intervening." Stacey Hughes always knew she wanted to have a little girl, but her pathway to getting there was a little different. Already a mum to three boys, in 2019 she travelled with her family to undergo IVF in the United States, where the team implanted a female embryo. Ms Hughes is one of hundreds of Australian parents who choose to travel overseas for sex selection, a practice that is not permitted in Australia other than for medical reasons. "I didn't want a fourth child, I wanted a girl," Ms Hughes told AAP. "My mum passed away in 2009 so I didn't have that mother-daughter relationship anymore and I just also wanted to have a girl in our family." Experts say Ms Hughes is not alone, with parents wanting to select a boy or a girl for family balancing reasons. Australia previously allowed sex selection for non-medical reasons, however in the early 2000s the guidelines changed, Connect IVF scientific director Lauren Hiser said. As a result, people are choosing to travel to nations that allow it, including parts of Southeast Asia, Europe and the US. "The concern in allowing Australians to go offshore is that we can't control the quality of service they are going to get overseas," Ms Hiser said. "The Australian IVF industry is highly regulated and allowing sex selection would make it safer for people to access." Ms Hiser stressed the process was not akin to "playing God" as the embryos were made during a regular IVF process and tested for a range of genetic abnormalities which also determined their sex. The number of people wanting to select a particular sex was in the hundreds, so allowing it in Australia would not expand boy or girl ratios in a particular direction, she added. "The reality is that sex selection is happening in Australia already, just not in the IVF industry," she said. "Then there's the risk of people going through a termination of pregnancy with all the physical and emotional impacts that come with that." Gender Selection Australia (GSA) is a service that helps families navigate overseas IVF processes. The sex selection process often came with a lot of misinformation, GSA general manager Nikki Mason said. "The majority of people want to balance out their family, it's not about preferring one sex over another," she said. "Sex selection is not manufacturing a result, it's just revealing what (embryos) families have after a normal IVF process and then they can choose which to implant." The IVF process is already stressful and the additional overseas travel costs make it unattainable for many. It cost Ms Hughes and her family about $30,000, including medications, accommodation, flights and medical appointments. While family and friends supported her decision, she faced trolling online after she previously spoke to the media about her experience. "I don't understand (the trolling) because it doesn't really affect anyone that I've had a baby girl," she said. "I think there's a lack of understanding of the process and people thinking that you are intervening." Stacey Hughes always knew she wanted to have a little girl, but her pathway to getting there was a little different. Already a mum to three boys, in 2019 she travelled with her family to undergo IVF in the United States, where the team implanted a female embryo. Ms Hughes is one of hundreds of Australian parents who choose to travel overseas for sex selection, a practice that is not permitted in Australia other than for medical reasons. "I didn't want a fourth child, I wanted a girl," Ms Hughes told AAP. "My mum passed away in 2009 so I didn't have that mother-daughter relationship anymore and I just also wanted to have a girl in our family." Experts say Ms Hughes is not alone, with parents wanting to select a boy or a girl for family balancing reasons. Australia previously allowed sex selection for non-medical reasons, however in the early 2000s the guidelines changed, Connect IVF scientific director Lauren Hiser said. As a result, people are choosing to travel to nations that allow it, including parts of Southeast Asia, Europe and the US. "The concern in allowing Australians to go offshore is that we can't control the quality of service they are going to get overseas," Ms Hiser said. "The Australian IVF industry is highly regulated and allowing sex selection would make it safer for people to access." Ms Hiser stressed the process was not akin to "playing God" as the embryos were made during a regular IVF process and tested for a range of genetic abnormalities which also determined their sex. The number of people wanting to select a particular sex was in the hundreds, so allowing it in Australia would not expand boy or girl ratios in a particular direction, she added. "The reality is that sex selection is happening in Australia already, just not in the IVF industry," she said. "Then there's the risk of people going through a termination of pregnancy with all the physical and emotional impacts that come with that." Gender Selection Australia (GSA) is a service that helps families navigate overseas IVF processes. The sex selection process often came with a lot of misinformation, GSA general manager Nikki Mason said. "The majority of people want to balance out their family, it's not about preferring one sex over another," she said. "Sex selection is not manufacturing a result, it's just revealing what (embryos) families have after a normal IVF process and then they can choose which to implant." The IVF process is already stressful and the additional overseas travel costs make it unattainable for many. It cost Ms Hughes and her family about $30,000, including medications, accommodation, flights and medical appointments. While family and friends supported her decision, she faced trolling online after she previously spoke to the media about her experience. "I don't understand (the trolling) because it doesn't really affect anyone that I've had a baby girl," she said. "I think there's a lack of understanding of the process and people thinking that you are intervening." Stacey Hughes always knew she wanted to have a little girl, but her pathway to getting there was a little different. Already a mum to three boys, in 2019 she travelled with her family to undergo IVF in the United States, where the team implanted a female embryo. Ms Hughes is one of hundreds of Australian parents who choose to travel overseas for sex selection, a practice that is not permitted in Australia other than for medical reasons. "I didn't want a fourth child, I wanted a girl," Ms Hughes told AAP. "My mum passed away in 2009 so I didn't have that mother-daughter relationship anymore and I just also wanted to have a girl in our family." Experts say Ms Hughes is not alone, with parents wanting to select a boy or a girl for family balancing reasons. Australia previously allowed sex selection for non-medical reasons, however in the early 2000s the guidelines changed, Connect IVF scientific director Lauren Hiser said. As a result, people are choosing to travel to nations that allow it, including parts of Southeast Asia, Europe and the US. "The concern in allowing Australians to go offshore is that we can't control the quality of service they are going to get overseas," Ms Hiser said. "The Australian IVF industry is highly regulated and allowing sex selection would make it safer for people to access." Ms Hiser stressed the process was not akin to "playing God" as the embryos were made during a regular IVF process and tested for a range of genetic abnormalities which also determined their sex. The number of people wanting to select a particular sex was in the hundreds, so allowing it in Australia would not expand boy or girl ratios in a particular direction, she added. "The reality is that sex selection is happening in Australia already, just not in the IVF industry," she said. "Then there's the risk of people going through a termination of pregnancy with all the physical and emotional impacts that come with that." Gender Selection Australia (GSA) is a service that helps families navigate overseas IVF processes. The sex selection process often came with a lot of misinformation, GSA general manager Nikki Mason said. "The majority of people want to balance out their family, it's not about preferring one sex over another," she said. "Sex selection is not manufacturing a result, it's just revealing what (embryos) families have after a normal IVF process and then they can choose which to implant." The IVF process is already stressful and the additional overseas travel costs make it unattainable for many. It cost Ms Hughes and her family about $30,000, including medications, accommodation, flights and medical appointments. While family and friends supported her decision, she faced trolling online after she previously spoke to the media about her experience. "I don't understand (the trolling) because it doesn't really affect anyone that I've had a baby girl," she said. "I think there's a lack of understanding of the process and people thinking that you are intervening."


Perth Now
21 hours ago
- Perth Now
Parents spending thousands to choose baby's sex
Stacey Hughes always knew she wanted to have a little girl, but her pathway to getting there was a little different. Already a mum to three boys, in 2019 she travelled with her family to undergo IVF in the United States, where the team implanted a female embryo. Ms Hughes is one of hundreds of Australian parents who choose to travel overseas for sex selection, a practice that is not permitted in Australia other than for medical reasons. "I didn't want a fourth child, I wanted a girl," Ms Hughes told AAP. "My mum passed away in 2009 so I didn't have that mother-daughter relationship anymore and I just also wanted to have a girl in our family." Experts say Ms Hughes is not alone, with parents wanting to select a boy or a girl for family balancing reasons. Australia previously allowed sex selection for non-medical reasons, however in the early 2000s the guidelines changed, Connect IVF scientific director Lauren Hiser said. As a result, people are choosing to travel to nations that allow it, including parts of Southeast Asia, Europe and the US. "The concern in allowing Australians to go offshore is that we can't control the quality of service they are going to get overseas," Ms Hiser said. "The Australian IVF industry is highly regulated and allowing sex selection would make it safer for people to access." Ms Hiser stressed the process was not akin to "playing God" as the embryos were made during a regular IVF process and tested for a range of genetic abnormalities which also determined their sex. The number of people wanting to select a particular sex was in the hundreds, so allowing it in Australia would not expand boy or girl ratios in a particular direction, she added. "The reality is that sex selection is happening in Australia already, just not in the IVF industry," she said. "We have non-invasive pre-natal testing at around 10 weeks, so some people are getting pregnant, determining the sex and then choosing to continue with that pregnancy or not. "Then there's the risk of people going through a termination of pregnancy with all the physical and emotional impacts that come with that." Gender Selection Australia (GSA) is a service that helps families navigate overseas IVF processes. The sex selection process often came with a lot of misinformation, GSA general manager Nikki Mason said. "The majority of people want to balance out their family, it's not about preferring one sex over another," she said. "Sex selection is not manufacturing a result, it's just revealing what (embryos) families have after a normal IVF process and then they can choose which to implant." The IVF process is already stressful and the additional overseas travel costs make it unattainable for many. It cost Ms Hughes and her family about $30,000, including medications, accommodation, flights and medical appointments. While family and friends supported her decision, she faced trolling online after she previously spoke to the media about her experience. "I don't understand (the trolling) because it doesn't really affect anyone that I've had a baby girl," she said. "I think there's a lack of understanding of the process and people thinking that you are intervening."


West Australian
21 hours ago
- West Australian
Parents spending thousands to choose baby's sex
Stacey Hughes always knew she wanted to have a little girl, but her pathway to getting there was a little different. Already a mum to three boys, in 2019 she travelled with her family to undergo IVF in the United States, where the team implanted a female embryo. Ms Hughes is one of hundreds of Australian parents who choose to travel overseas for sex selection, a practice that is not permitted in Australia other than for medical reasons. "I didn't want a fourth child, I wanted a girl," Ms Hughes told AAP. "My mum passed away in 2009 so I didn't have that mother-daughter relationship anymore and I just also wanted to have a girl in our family." Experts say Ms Hughes is not alone, with parents wanting to select a boy or a girl for family balancing reasons. Australia previously allowed sex selection for non-medical reasons, however in the early 2000s the guidelines changed, Connect IVF scientific director Lauren Hiser said. As a result, people are choosing to travel to nations that allow it, including parts of Southeast Asia, Europe and the US. "The concern in allowing Australians to go offshore is that we can't control the quality of service they are going to get overseas," Ms Hiser said. "The Australian IVF industry is highly regulated and allowing sex selection would make it safer for people to access." Ms Hiser stressed the process was not akin to "playing God" as the embryos were made during a regular IVF process and tested for a range of genetic abnormalities which also determined their sex. The number of people wanting to select a particular sex was in the hundreds, so allowing it in Australia would not expand boy or girl ratios in a particular direction, she added. "The reality is that sex selection is happening in Australia already, just not in the IVF industry," she said. "We have non-invasive pre-natal testing at around 10 weeks, so some people are getting pregnant, determining the sex and then choosing to continue with that pregnancy or not. "Then there's the risk of people going through a termination of pregnancy with all the physical and emotional impacts that come with that." Gender Selection Australia (GSA) is a service that helps families navigate overseas IVF processes. The sex selection process often came with a lot of misinformation, GSA general manager Nikki Mason said. "The majority of people want to balance out their family, it's not about preferring one sex over another," she said. "Sex selection is not manufacturing a result, it's just revealing what (embryos) families have after a normal IVF process and then they can choose which to implant." The IVF process is already stressful and the additional overseas travel costs make it unattainable for many. It cost Ms Hughes and her family about $30,000, including medications, accommodation, flights and medical appointments. While family and friends supported her decision, she faced trolling online after she previously spoke to the media about her experience. "I don't understand (the trolling) because it doesn't really affect anyone that I've had a baby girl," she said. "I think there's a lack of understanding of the process and people thinking that you are intervening."