Essex lorry deaths ringleader gets longer sentence
The Vietnamese migrants died after suffocating inside an airtight container, found in Grays in Essex, in 23 October 2019.
Haulage manager Ronan Hughes, 45, was ordered to pay their families £182,078.90 by a judge in January, as part of a compensation package.
Folkstone Magistrates' Court heard he still owed £123,698 and a judge sentenced him to an additional year and four months in prison, according to the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS).
Eleven people were convicted in the UK in connection with the case, in which it was revealed the victims had paid significant sums of money for a "VIP" route into Europe.
Hughes was jailed for a total of 20 years at the Old Bailey in February 2021, after pleading guilty to his part in the 39 deaths.
He was initially ordered to pay the families compensation of more than £180,000 in 2023.
At a hearing in November, Hughes had argued that a property he had built on land belonging to his parents in Ireland was not an available asset for confiscation proceedings.
In January, a judge at the Old Bailey in London decided it was and made the confiscation order of £182,078.90, to be paid in compensation.
The CPS said Hughes had paid £58,380 so far.
Heather Chalk, specialist prosecutor for the CPS, said: "Ronan Hughes led an unscrupulous network of organised criminals that sought to profit from smuggling desperate people.
"It is devastating that 39 vulnerable people lost their lives because of their greed and recklessness."
The Vietnamese men, women and children paid fees rising to £13,000 for what they believed to be a safe passage to the UK.
Their bodies were discovered after the container they were in was transported by ferry from Belgium to Purfleet on the Thames Estuary in Essex.
On the day of the discovery, Hughes left Thurrock and boarded a plane back to Ireland, police said.
On 20 April 2020, after a European Arrest Warrant was granted, Hughes was extradited to Essex.
Follow Essex news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Lorry death families to share seized £280k assets
'Time stood still': remembering Grays lorry deaths
Lorry migrant deaths ringleader made £90k - court
Related internet links
Crown Prosecution Service
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
Lucas Paqueta's two years in limbo: Missed Man City move, West Ham backing and a pastor's prayers
Lucas Paqueta did not wait to let his feelings be known after an independent commission found four alleged breaches of the English Football Association's betting rules could not be proven. 'The enemy will come against us one way, but they will flee seven ways,' read the first line of Paqueta's statement on Instagram, quoting a biblical passage from Deuteronomy 28:7. Advertisement Paqueta, who is in the United States on West Ham United's pre-season tour, was called by his legal team and informed of the verdict on July 25, so he has had plenty of time to prepare his response. You do not need to be a theologian to work out who he believes is the enemy. For Paqueta, 27, yesterday's news represented vindication. When news of the FA's investigation into Paqueta's alleged breaches broke in August 2023, West Ham's squad held a team meeting without then-manager David Moyes and his backroom staff. According to those with knowledge of the meeting, Paqueta was tearful and told his team-mates he was innocent and felt the FA was picking on him. Edson Alvarez was especially vocal, saying he would protect the Brazil international on the pitch if anyone tried to target him. Seven months later, in West Ham's 5-0 victory against Freiburg in the second leg of their round-of-16 Europa League tie, Paqueta ran to Alvarez to hug him after opening the scoring to show his appreciation. His close friend, Emerson Palmieri, an Italy international who was born in Brazil, was keen to arrange a night out to boost morale. In the event, it didn't happen — Paqueta was said to not want the attention — but it was indicative of the faith in their team-mate. An anxious two-year wait, which consisted of a hearing that lasted around 20 days, has led to the charges against Paqueta not being proven. He has, however, been charged with two counts of failing to comply with the FA's investigation. He was facing a lifetime ban if he had been found guilty of the most serious allegations but Paqueta can now continue his career unimpeded. Once the written reasons for the verdict are published in the coming weeks, the FA will have 14 days to lodge an appeal. Paqueta can also appeal the non-cooperation finding. Advertisement In a club statement released on Thursday, Karren Brady, West Ham's vice-chair, noted how the club had 'resolutely stood by him and supported him throughout the process'. 'Despite the incredible pressure on him, Lucas has performed week in and week out for the club, always giving everything', Brady added. In constructing this article, The Athletic has spoken to sources with knowledge of the last two years who were granted anonymity to protect relationships. This is the story of the case and Paqueta's difficult two years in limbo. In the summer of 2023, Paqueta was a footballer with the world at his feet. He was fresh from helping West Ham claim their first silverware in over four decades, having assisted Jarrod Bowen's winner in the Europa Conference League victory over Fiorentina. He was the team's creative hub, looking every inch the club record €60million (£52m; $69m) signing he had promised to be when he arrived from Lyon in August 2022. His future looked bright. An £85m ($107m) release clause was set to become active that June, with Manchester City favourites to secure his signature. West Ham rejected their opening offer of £70m, but the club's executives were anticipating a second bid. It never came. 'One day in August 2023, he's on the verge of a move to the reigning Premier League champions, who looked invincible. Then, the next day, he's being told he might never play football again,' Alastair Campbell, a partner at Level — the legal firm that represented Paqueta — and a member of his representation, told The Athletic. On August 16, the FA emailed West Ham to inform them it had opened an investigation into suspicious betting patterns surrounding bookings Paqueta received in three Premier League games in 2023, against Bournemouth (August 12), Leeds United (May 21) and Aston Villa (March 12), and one in 2022 against Leicester City (November 12). Advertisement It was the fixture at Bournemouth, when Paqueta committed four fouls, that accelerated the FA's investigation. The following day, the FA was informed of an anti-corruption alert by integrity officials. Betway, West Ham's shirt sponsor, a company that is not widely used in Brazil, first flagged the suspicious activity as the bets were made on its platform, but it was only when other betting firms, including several local Brazilian operators, started reporting similar concerns that the International Betting Integrity Association (IBIA) stepped in. The IBIA then notified FIFA, football's world governing body, and the FA. On May 23, 2024, the FA charged Paqueta with four separate counts of spot-fixing. Around 60 people placed bets on Paqueta to receive a yellow card in one or all of the aforementioned matches, with the stakes ranging from £7 to £400. The investigation into Paqueta's yellow cards centred on bets traced to accounts registered on Paqueta, an island off Rio de Janeiro where the midfielder — whose real name is Lucas Tolentino Coelho de Lima — grew up. Many of the bets under investigation are believed to have been made from new accounts. 'I am extremely surprised and upset that the FA has decided to charge me,' said Paqueta in response to the charge in May. 'For nine months, I have cooperated with every step of their investigation and provided all the information I can. I deny the charges in their entirety and will fight with every breath to clear my name.' Paqueta was interviewed in September 2023 and provided the FA with access to his phone the following month. Despite being charged, Paqueta was not provisionally suspended from playing for his club or country. He was recalled to the national team by then-head coach Dorival Junior in March 2024, having not played for Brazil since June 2023, and was also cleared to play in last summer's Copa America after the Brazil Football Confederation (CBF) sought clarity from the FA on his eligibility. West Ham had shielded Paqueta from external media interviews, but before his appearance in Brazil's game with England at Wembley in March 2024, he expressed his appreciation to Moyes in a pre-match press conference interview. 'My relationship with David Moyes is very good,' Paqueta said. 'We talked about this. He wanted me on the team because of what I did last season. The support he gave me to leave all this behind was essential. He was special for me and his support was important.' Given their bond, Moyes agreed to act as a witness in Paqueta's tribunal hearing. It was one of several instances of figures within football sticking with him: another was Newcastle United midfielder Bruno Guimaraes, who joined Paqueta on a family trip to America last summer, visiting Disneyland and Universal Studios. Paqueta and Moyes' close relationship was on show again on Thursday, with the pair embracing before West Ham's pre-season win against Everton at Soldier Field in Chicago. The Brazilian scored the first of his side's two goals that night. David Moyes and Lucas Paquetá shared an embrace before kick-off – with the former West Ham manager having testified for him during his hearing. 💙 That's loyalty. ⚒️ — Hammers Hub (@HammersHubWHUFC) July 30, 2025 Tim Steidten, who left his role as West Ham's technical director in February, also went out of his way to help the player. He visited him in Brazil before the Copa America to reassure him of his importance to West Ham amid interest from boyhood club Flamengo. 'I visited Lucas in Brazil because what he is going through does a lot to a player,' Steidten told The Athletic. 'Especially when you hear the kind of punishments he could face. This is his livelihood, his future. Lucas is Brazilian and, from my experience, they are very emotional people who need their family, their homeland, important things to take their mind off things. When I look at his performances, compared to before (the betting charges), it says it all. Although there was uncertainty surrounding Paqueta's future, West Ham were reluctant to engage in talks with Flamengo, who tried to sign him last summer. He finished the 2023-24 season with eight goals and seven assists across 43 appearances and was still regarded as an important player. According to a senior West Ham source, the Brazilian club attempted to test West Ham's resolve but made an offer they regarded as 'laughable'. Flamengo also explored signing the midfielder on loan, but that approach rebuffed too. It has been a challenging time for Paqueta and his family. Throughout it, his West Ham team-mates and close friends have kept a close eye on his mood. 'We've tried to help him as best as we can,' ex-West Ham goalkeeper Lukasz Fabianski told The Athletic after the 3-1 win against Ipswich Town in May. 'We don't know the full details of the case, but as you can imagine, he's going through a very difficult period. During this whole time, we've always been there for him. On and off the pitch, at the training ground, we've tried our best to keep him smiling and happy.' Hours after West Ham United's 3-1 loss against Manchester City in May 2024, a result that confirmed City's Premier League title win, Paqueta, his wife Duda Fournier, and two sons, Benicio and Filippo, flew to Brazil. When they had arrived, Paqueta contacted pastor Andre Fernandes to pray for him and his family. Senior West Ham sources say he continued to receive support from staff behind the scenes, but grew frustrated with the reports concerning his case. In October 2024, he released a statement calling for the FA to launch a 'thorough investigation' into the disclosure of what he claimed to be 'false' information regarding his case in the media. Paqueta's form dipped before improving slightly after Graham Potter replaced Julen Lopetegui as manager in January. He scored and produced a man-of-the-match performance in Potter's first match in charge against Aston Villa, a 2-1 defeat in the FA Cup, and was serenaded by West Ham supporters as he came off the field. 'He's a tough guy and an unbelievable player,' West Ham midfielder Tomas Soucek told The Athletic post-match. 'If he continues to show this mentality, determination and character, he'll be considered one of the best players in the world. He's a good guy and very funny. He's always dancing — your typical Brazilian. He just needs to be more on it. I try to teach him discipline.' Paqueta scored his last league goal of the season in the following match, a 3-2 win against Fulham, after which he fell to the turf in exhaustion. He had benefited from a one-on-one conversation with Potter and looked eager to prove he had bought into the new manager's methods. When asked before the Nottingham Forest game in May, Potter was reluctant to reveal what he discussed with Paqueta, but it appeared to have the desired effect. His swashbuckling performance in the narrow 2-1 loss against Liverpool in April was a reminder of what West Ham stood to miss if the verdict went against him. 'Ability-wise, Lucas Paqueta, Mohammed Kudus (now at Tottenham Hotspur) and Jarrod Bowen were the three top players at West Ham,' former West Ham defender Thilo Kehrer, now at Monaco, told The Athletic. 'Paqueta made us laugh a lot in training. He would do crazy things that would make you think, 'How are you even human?'. Insanely gifted.' An investigation that had already lasted almost 18 months was beginning to take its toll. Paqueta was informed that his hearing, which started in March and was previously expected to finish in April, was being put on hold and would not conclude until June. The strain was evident during West Ham's home draw against Tottenham in May, when referee Michael Oliver gave him a yellow card for fouling Mikey Moore. It was the eighth time he had been booked in the 2024-25 Premier League season. Paqueta was seen wiping away tears as Bowen consoled him. 'I don't know fully what was making him emotional, but the main thing for me at that time was putting my arm around him,' Bowen told The Athletic after the 1-1 home draw. 'I didn't want him getting sent off or doing anything silly. I wanted to look after him, and I saw him again in the dressing room, and I gave him another hug. 'When we're on the pitch, sometimes our emotions get the better of us. You want to win and leave everything out there. He was on top form (in the dressing room). Things can happen in football and sometimes our emotions run high in games but Lucas is fine, which is the main thing.' After the game, Duda could not hide her frustration. 'I have never said anything on here, and maybe I shouldn't,' she wrote on Instagram. 'My husband has an attitude and a strength that I admire and am impressed by. We've been living through this nightmare for two years, and he is always strong. He always had it in his head that he would only defend himself at the right moment. 'There is nothing against him. Have you never realised that? Anyway, God knows all, and only he knows why we are going through this. It's down to him alone that we are well and living in happiness as a family. I just want people to respect (us). People are cruel and unjust without knowing anything.' West Ham granted Paqueta a few days off following the Spurs game. With the club's Premier League status already secured, Potter did not deem it necessary to start the Brazilian in their remaining fixtures against Manchester United, Forest and Ipswich. 'It has taken its toll on him,' said Potter before the 2-1 defeat to Forest, when Paqueta came on as a substitute for the final 30 minutes. 'The week he had was particularly tough for him. He was feeling under the weather on the day before the game and the day of the game, so I didn't want to risk him and make it worse. Sometimes stress, pressure, can manifest itself differently.' Paqueta and his family flew to Brazil after the season ended. He spent time with childhood friends during the downtime, bonding over a game of cards and reminiscing about old times. He brought his sons to Flamengo's 1-0 victory against Deportivo Tachira, which was their first time watching the Brazilian club. Faith and the outpouring of love from his family have helped Paqueta. He was baptised in June, with friend and Flamengo forward Pedro Guilherme also in attendance. Campbell described Paqueta as 'extremely emotional and extremely grateful' when he was informed that he had been cleared on July 25. While saying that he could not offer details about what their legal argument had been, Campbell mentioned that their case 'was based on circumstantial evidence and a number of strands of circumstantial evidence. We take each of those strands and examine it and question it and present our side of the story on each of those strands.' His form has fluctuated in the last two years, but West Ham sources note how Paqueta has not missed a single day's training without permission. For a player who was seemingly on his way to Manchester City, it is fair to speculate whether such a move may materialise again or if that opportunity has now passed. The Brazilian has not given much thought to transfers. Paqueta's focus for the last two years has been to clear his name. The future can wait as he adjusts to the threat of a potential lifetime ban being lifted from his shoulders.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
MMA fighter Conor McGregor loses appeal in civil rape case
Conor McGregor has lost his civil jury appeal against a finding that he sexually assaulted a woman. In November, McGregor was ordered to pay £206,000 in damages plus costs to Nikita Hand, who accused him of raping her in a hotel in Dublin in 2018. McGregor appealed on the grounds that his lawyers believed his answers to police during interviews should not have been put before the jury. His barrister also argued that a question on the "issue paper" given to the jury to help them decide their verdict should have been worded differently. Three senior judges at the Court of Appeal in Dublin dismissed the appeal on all grounds. Conor McGregor was not in court for the ruling. Nikita Hand attended the hearing with several supporters. In relation to the police interviews, the court found McGregor's lawyers had not proved there was "a real risk of unfair trial". During the original case, the jury heard that McGregor said "no comment" around 100 times when he was interviewed by police. The issue paper asked the jurors if Conor McGregor had assaulted Ms Hand. McGregor's lawyers argued it should have specified "sexual assault" rather than "assault". But the appeal judges said that it was "simply unreal" to suggest that any member of the jury could have become confused about meaning of the question. They gave a unanimous ruling that McGregor's appeal should be dismissed "in its entirety". McGregor's friend, James Lawrence, also lost his appeal against the decision that he should pay costs, even though the jury found he did not assault Nikita Hand. Ms Hand had claimed in her action that Conor McGregor and James Lawrence both raped her. The men said they both had consensual sex with her. 'Retraumatised me over and over' Speaking outside court, Ms Hand said she was grateful for the support she has received throughout the civil action. "This appeal has retraumatised me over and over again, being forced to relive it, what happened has had a huge impact on me," she said. Ms Hand added: "To every survivor out there, I know how hard it is, but please, don't be silenced. "You deserve to be heard, you also deserve justice. Today, I can finally move on and try to heal." What was the basis for McGregor's appeal? The appeal was based around several issues arising from the civil trial at Dublin's High Court last year. They included reference to the question "did Conor McGregor assault Nikita Hand?" being asked of the jury on the issue paper. Conor McGregor's legal team said it should have specified sexual assault. However, a barrister for Ms Hand said "assault" covers a wide variety of assaults adding "what we were dealing with was assault by rape". He added the question put to the jury "was agreed and the jury could not have been confused by it". McGregor was also appealing an issue around the handling of his answers in interviews with gardaí (Irish police officers). His legal team explained that the jury heard McGregor gave about 100 "no comment" answers to gardaí. His barrister said he had a right to silence in police interviews and it was "left hanging", allowing the jury to draw an adverse inference. Ms Hand's legal team countered this argument by saying that if this was such a serious issue for McGregor at the time "surely an application to discharge the jury would have been made". Her barrister said such an application was not made. McGregor's legal appeal was also raising an issue about the judge's charge to the jury during the civil trial. Withdrawal of evidence At the beginning of the process, Ireland's Court of Appeal was told that McGregor had withdrawn an application to have new evidence entered at the appeal. The proposed evidence was from a couple, Samantha O'Reilly and Steven Cummins, who are former neighbours of Nikita Hand. A previous preliminary hearing was told that they claimed to have witnessed a row between Ms Hand and her former partner Stephen Redmond in December 2018. The court heard McGregor believed the new evidence suggested that bruising on Nikita Hand's body could have been caused by her former partner. In an affidavit, Ms Hand had described the allegations as untrue and lies. The senior judges said it was "somewhat mysterious" that what they described as an "important and contentious" part of the appeal had been "cast aside". They awarded Ms Hand costs in relation to this aspect of the case. Conor McGregor ordered to pay Nikita Hand's legal costs 'People want nothing to do with him': How Ireland turned away from Conor McGregor Conor McGregor appeal evidence withdrawal to be referred to prosecutors Woman wins civil rape case against Conor McGregor
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Sweden jihadist jailed for life over Jordan pilot burned alive
A Stockholm court on Thursday handed down a life term to Swedish jihadist Osama Krayem over the 2015 murder of a Jordanian pilot burned alive by the Islamic State group in Syria. The Swedish court was the first to try a person over the killing that sparked outrage around the world. Judge Anna Liljenberg Gullesjo said "the investigation has shown that the defendant was at the execution site, uniformed and armed, and allowed himself to be filmed." Although video evidence showed that another man lit the fire, the judge said the "defendant's actions contributed so significantly to the death of the victim that he should be considered a perpetrator". Krayem, who is serving long prison sentences for his role in the Paris and Brussels attacks in 2015 and 2016, was given a life sentence for "serious war crimes and terrorist crimes" On December 24, 2014, an aircraft belonging to the Royal Jordanian Air Force crashed in Syria. The pilot, Maaz al-Kassasbeh, was captured the same day by IS fighters near the central city of Raqqa and was burned alive in a cage sometime before February 3, 2015, when a slickly-produced video of the gruesome killing was published, according to the prosecution. Gullesjo said Krayem's actions consisted of "guarding the victim both before and during the execution and taking him to the cage where he was set alight while still alive". The court also awarded compensation to the parents and siblings of the Jordanian pilot, amounting to 80,000 Swedish kronor ($8,200) each. - 'Comfort' for family - Prosecutors have been unable to determine the exact date of the murder, but the investigation has identified the location. The 32-year-old jihadist remained silent throughout the hearings, which lasted between June 4 and June 26, though segments from interrogations with Krayem conducted during the investigation were read out and played during the trial. The fact that the defendent did not speak did not "significantly impact the ruling, as the prosecution presented solid evidence, and the investigation was thorough," Gullesjo told AFP. According to his lawyer, Krayem insisted he had spent only 15 to 20 minutes on-site, unaware of what was going to happen until he saw the cameras. "This verdict somewhat comforts the family," the pilot's brother Jawdat al-Kassasbeh, who was a civil party to the case, told AFP. "We thank Sweden and the impartial Swedish judiciary for their efforts in pursuing this case," the brother added. He travelled from Jordan for the trial to testify to the pain, still raw, that he shares with his loved ones. - No remorse - The family's lawyer lamented in court that Krayem showed no empathy or remorse for his actions. "Most people who witnessed what Maaz went through would undoubtedly need lifelong, or at least long-term, treatment to overcome the trauma that this causes in a normal individual," Mikael Westerlund told the court. "Krayem, on the other hand, does not seem to have been traumatised, but inspired. Inspired to continue his terrorist activities, which led him to participate in and then be convicted of terrorist acts in Europe," Westerlund added. Krayem, who is from Malmo in southern Sweden, was sentenced to 30 years in prison in France for helping plan the November 2015 Paris attacks and to life imprisonment in Belgium for the 2016 attacks at Brussels' main airport and metro station. On March 12, France agreed to hand him over to Sweden for nine months, the time needed for the investigation and trial. He must be returned to France by December 27 at the latest, the Stockholm court said Thursday. "Jordanians will always remember this horrible crime," Jordanian government spokesman Mohammed Momani told AFP. "This decision is a significant step towards achieving justice." bur-nzg/rlp/tc
