Trump backer Elon Musk says he will spend ‘a lot less' on political campaigns
Elon Musk, the richest person in the world and a key financial supporter of US President Donald Trump, said Tuesday that he'll be spending 'a lot less' on political campaigns, a reversal that could be a setback for Republicans ahead of next year's midterm elections.
Advertisement
Musk disclosed his decision via videoconference during a Bloomberg forum in Doha, Qatar. It speaks to his possible disenchantment with politics after his tumultuous tenure as Trump's pick to lead the newly created Department of Government Efficiency, which has fallen far short of its goals for reducing federal spending.
Musk has scaled back his government role to spend more time at his businesses, including Tesla, which have seen intense blowback.
'In terms of political spending I'm going to do a lot less in the future,' Musk said. Asked why, he responded that 'I think I've done enough'.
Musk's statement marks a reversal of the course he had set during the 2024 campaign – when he was among the very top political spenders – and immediately after.
Advertisement
Musk spent at least US$250 million supporting Trump in the presidential campaign, as the main contributor to America PAC, a super PAC that was active in advertising and funding door-to-door canvassing groups across the seven most-competitive states in the November presidential election.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
South China Morning Post
an hour ago
- South China Morning Post
US Supreme Court sides with woman who says she was demoted because she is straight
The US Supreme Court made it easier on Thursday for people from majority backgrounds such as white or straight individuals to pursue claims alleging workplace 'reverse' discrimination, reviving an Ohio woman's lawsuit claiming she was illegally denied a promotion and demoted because she is heterosexual. Advertisement The justices, in a 9-0 ruling written by liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, threw out a lower court's decision rejecting a civil rights lawsuit by the plaintiff, Marlean Ames, against her employer, Ohio's Department of Youth Services. Ames said she had a gay supervisor when she was passed over for a promotion in favour of a gay woman and demoted, with a pay cut, in favour of a gay man. The dispute centred on how plaintiffs like Ames must try to prove a violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits discrimination based on race, religion, national origin and sex – including sexual orientation. Ames challenged a requirement used by some US courts that plaintiffs from majority groups must provide more evidence than minority plaintiffs to make an initial – or 'prima facie' – claim of discrimination under a 1973 Supreme Court ruling that governs the multi-step process employed to resolve such cases. Advertisement These courts include the Cincinnati-based 6th US Circuit Court of Appeals, which ruled against Ames. They require majority-group plaintiffs to show 'background circumstances' indicating that a defendant accused of workplace bias is 'that unusual employer who discriminates against the majority'.
HKFP
3 hours ago
- HKFP
China vows to ‘resolutely safeguard' its students' rights after Trump ramps up attack on Harvard, Columbia
President Donald Trump ramped up his campaign against top US universities Wednesday, banning visas for all foreign students coming to attend Harvard and threatening to strip Columbia of its academic accreditation. Trump is seeking to bring the universities to heel with claims their international students pose a national security threat, and that they ignored anti-Semitism on campus and perpetuate liberal bias. A proclamation issued by the White House late Wednesday declared that the entrance of international students to begin a course at Harvard would be 'suspended and limited' for six months and that existing overseas enrollees could have their visas terminated. 'Harvard's conduct has rendered it an unsuitable destination for foreign students and researchers,' the order said. Karl Molden, a Harvard government and classics student from Austria, said: 'I'm trembling. This is outrageous.' 'He is abusing his executive power to harm Harvard as much as he can,' Molden told AFP. 'My god!' said another international student at Harvard, who declined to be identified for fear of retribution. 'This is such a disgrace.' China's foreign ministry vowed on Thursday to 'resolutely safeguard the legitimate rights and interests of its overseas students.' 'China has always opposed the politicization of educational cooperation,' ministry spokesman Lin Jian said, adding that the measure would 'harm America's image and international credibility.' US Secretary of State Marco Rubio promised last week to 'aggressively revoke visas' for Chinese students, a move condemned by Beijing. 'Retaliatory' Wednesday's announcement followed the Trump administration's earlier efforts to terminate Harvard's right to enroll and host foreign students were stalled by a judge. The government already cut around $3.2 billion of federal grants and contracts benefiting Harvard and pledged to exclude the Cambridge, Massachusetts, institution from any future federal funding. Harvard has been at the forefront of Trump's campaign against top universities after it defied his calls to submit to oversight of its curriculum, staffing, student recruitment and 'viewpoint diversity.' Trump has also singled out international students at Harvard, who accounted for 27 percent of total enrollment in the 2024-2025 academic year and are a major source of income. 'This is yet another illegal retaliatory step taken by the Administration in violation of Harvard's First Amendment rights,' a university spokesman said. 'Harvard will continue to protect its international students.' Trump's education secretary had also threatened on Wednesday to strip Columbia University of its accreditation. The Republican has targeted the New York Ivy League institution for allegedly ignoring harassment of Jewish students, throwing all of its federal funding into doubt. Unlike Harvard, several top institutions — including Columbia — have already bowed to far-reaching demands from the Trump administration, which claims that the educational elite is too left-wing. 'Combating anti-Semitism' Wednesday's official action suggested it was not enough for Trump. 'Columbia University looked the other way as Jewish students faced harassment,' US Education Secretary Linda McMahon said on social media platform X. She accused the school of breaking rules prohibiting recipients of federal funding from discriminating on the basis of race, color, or national origin. 'After Hamas' October 7, 2023, terror attack on Israel, Columbia University's leadership acted with deliberate indifference towards the harassment of Jewish students on its campus,' McMahon said in a statement. 'This is not only immoral, but also unlawful.' The US Education Department said in the statement its civil rights office had contacted Columbia's accreditation body about the alleged violation. Withdrawing Columbia's accreditation would see it lose access to all federal funding, a very significant proportion of the university's income. Students would also not be able to receive federal grants and tuition loans. Critics accuse the Trump administration of using allegations of anti-Semitism to target educational elites and bring universities to their knees. The administration has already put $400 million of Columbia's funding under review, prompting the university to announce in March a package of concessions to the government around defining anti-Semitism, policing protests and conducting oversight for specific academic departments. A Columbia spokesperson said after Wednesday's announcement the university was 'aware of the concerns' raised by the government. 'We take this issue seriously and are continuing to work with the federal government to address it,' the spokesperson said.
South China Morning Post
3 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US reveals pick for Nato's next supreme allied commander
President Donald Trump 's administration announced on Thursday its nomination for the next top US general in Europe and said the US military officer would also assume the traditional role of Supreme Allied Commander Europe (Saceur). Trump's decision to nominate US Air Force Lieutenant General Alexus Grynkewich to both roles, which was first reported by Reuters, will relieve European Nato allies and even some of Trump's fellow Republicans amid concerns about a retrenchment in American military leadership of Nato Grynkewich must be confirmed by the US Senate. The position of Saceur, which oversees all Nato operations in Europe, has been filled by a US general since its creation after World War II. US Army General Dwight D. Eisenhower became the alliance's first Saceur in 1951. Still, since taking office in January, Trump's administration has pressured Nato allies to ramp up their defence spending, saying Europe should be primarily responsible for defence on the European continent. Speaking at Nato headquarters earlier on Thursday, US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth said he was confident that members of the Nato alliance would agree to a major boost in defence spending. Photo: AP Trump has also said he wants Nato allies to boost investment in defence to 5 per cent of gross domestic product, up from the current target of 2 per cent.
