logo
Bukit Panjang LRT outage: Fault linked to newly installed power system, says SMRT, Singapore News

Bukit Panjang LRT outage: Fault linked to newly installed power system, says SMRT, Singapore News

AsiaOne21-07-2025
The power fault which crippled services across the Bukit Panjang LRT line twice in July have been linked to a newly installed power distribution system, said rail operator SMRT.
The first incident on July 3 saw no service at all stations on the LRT line for about three hours. In the second incident on Saturday (July 19), the disruption lasted for about two hours.
SMRT said in a statement on Facebook that on-site investigations conducted on Saturday evening, after services were restored, indicated that the latest power fault was similar to the July 3 incident.
On Saturday afternoon, a fault in the power distribution system halted train services across the line.
Both incidents are linked to the newly installed Power SCADA system, which remotely monitors and controls power distribution across the Bukit Panjang LRT network.
The system is part of the ongoing Power Renewal Project by the Land Transport Authority (LTA), and is currently still under the warranty period for any defects, said SMRT.
The public transport operator added that LTA is conducting a thorough investigation, including a full design review by the original equipment manufacturer contractor Schneider Electric, to strengthen network stability and prevent further recurrence.
"A key focus is ensuring that the traction power supply remains stable, especially while the system is still being commissioned," it elaborated.
The Bukit Panjang LRT Power Renewal Project is targeted to be completed by end-2026.
"We thank all affected commuters for their patience and understanding during the disruption. SMRT remains fully committed to keeping BPLRT services running safely while renewal works continue," it said.
[[nid:720223]]
lim.kewei@asiaone.com
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Modest sum' of $4,500 confiscated from foreigner over undeclared cash brought into Singapore
‘Modest sum' of $4,500 confiscated from foreigner over undeclared cash brought into Singapore

Straits Times

timea day ago

  • Straits Times

‘Modest sum' of $4,500 confiscated from foreigner over undeclared cash brought into Singapore

Find out what's new on ST website and app. Under Singapore's anti-money laundering laws, travellers must declare if they are carrying more than $20,000 when entering or leaving the country. SINGAPORE – A 47-year-old foreigner who brought more than $49,000 into Singapore without declaring the cash has had $4,500 confiscated by the state, in addition to being fined $3,000 for the offence. The money in various currencies was found in the sling bag and luggage of Ding Rongwei, a St Kitts and Nevis national, in Changi Airport after he arrived in Singapore from Cambodia in July 2024. Under Singapore's anti-money laundering laws, travellers must declare if they are carrying more than $20,000 when entering or leaving the country. In the current case, while there was insufficient evidence to prove that the cash was illegally obtained, a district judge concluded that it was 'just and appropriate' to forfeit part of the seized money as an additional deterrent and punishment. In a written judgment published on July 26, District Judge Vince Gui said a 'modest sum' of $4,500 would be commensurate with the culpability and harm arising from this offence. The confiscated sum represented about 15 per cent of $29,486.29 – the amount exceeding $20,000 – that was liable to be confiscated. The judge said: 'The accused failed to satisfactorily disclose the source and intended purpose of the undeclared cash, thereby undermining the authorities' efforts to investigate their legitimacy. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Asia Thailand, Cambodia agree to 'immediate and unconditional ceasefire' to de-escalate border row Singapore Tanjong Katong sinkhole backfilled; road to be repaved after LTA tests Singapore Ong Beng Seng set to plead guilty on Aug 4 in case linked to ex-transport minister Iswaran Asia Gunman kills 5 security guards near Bangkok's Chatuchak market before taking own life Singapore COE quota up 2.6% to 18,701 for August to October Business Resilient economy versus uncertain outlook splits views on Singapore's monetary policy Singapore HPB looking for vaping, smoking counselling services for up to 175 secondary school students Singapore Jail for former pre-school teacher who tripped toddler repeatedly, causing child to bleed from nose 'The sums moved were not extraordinary but also not insignificant.' The remaining cash will be returned to Ding. He was stopped at Changi Airport on July 21, 2024, by an officer from the Immigration and Checkpoint Authority. After Ding said he had nothing to declare, the officer checked his bag and discovered an assortment of currencies. Ding initially denied that he was carrying more cash, but eventually admitted that there was money in his luggage. The money was in nine different currencies, including US dollars, Hong Kong dollars, Singapore dollars, Philippine pesos and Chinese yuan. During investigations, he claimed that he did not know he was required to report movement of sums above $20,000 into and out of Singapore. He admitted to moving money into and out of Singapore on two previous occasions. On June 3, 2024, he moved $32,360.35 into Singapore, and on July 4, 2024, he moved $49,645 out of Singapore. Ding pleaded guilty to a charge of failing to report the movement of cash. The maximum sentence is a fine of up to $50,000 and a jail term of up to three years. Two similar charges over each of the previous occasions were taken into consideration during sentencing. According to Ding, he travelled frequently as a car salesman with a Singapore company, helping high-net-worth Chinese nationals purchase vehicles from his company. He said the cash he was carrying came from his family-run provision shop business in the Philippines, supplemented with $15,000 he had borrowed from his employer for his travels. Deputy Public Prosecutor Louis Ngia sought a fine of $3,000, and also asked the court to confiscate a sum of $4,500. He argued that disclosure helps law enforcement agencies detect and combat money laundering, and it was therefore not only cases where there is 'actual money laundering' that are of concern. The prosecutor said it was unbelievable that Ding, a frequent traveller, did not know of the reporting requirement. He also pointed out Ding's shifting claims as to the source of the cash in US dollars and Hong Kong dollars. Ding first said these were profits from the previous year, but subsequently claimed that they were a loan to be deducted from the next year's profit. Ding's lawyer, Mr Ravindran Ramasamy, asked for a fine of $2,500. He objected to a confiscation order, arguing that the monies were not linked to criminal conduct. The lawyer said Ding did not have a credit card and habitually carried large amounts of cash. He warned against the risk of injustice in imposing confiscation orders not based on proven wrongdoing but on a perceived likelihood. In his judgment, Judge Gui said it was open to the court to make a confiscation order even when the prosecution had not proven that the cash is linked to criminal conduct. In the current case, he agreed that a fine was appropriate as the prosecution did not have sufficient evidence to prove that the undeclared cash was 'tainted' by illegality. But the judge also noted that the prosecution did not concede that the funds came from legitimate sources. He noted that the difficulty in establishing the legitimacy of the funds stemmed primarily from Ding's failure to provide credible explanations regarding the source and purpose of the undeclared cash. The judge said Ding failed to give further information about the supposed family business in the Philippines, and noted that the sum in Philippine pesos was just a fraction of the cash seized. Ding also did not give the name of the supposed employer who allegedly lent him $15,000. 'His explanations raised more questions than provided answers,' said the judge.

COE quota up 3% to 18,701 for August to October
COE quota up 3% to 18,701 for August to October

Business Times

timea day ago

  • Business Times

COE quota up 3% to 18,701 for August to October

[SINGAPORE] There will be 18,701 certificates of entitlement (COEs) available for tender from August to October 2025. This is up 3 per cent or 469 COEs from the May to July period, where 18,232 COEs were up for bidding, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) said on Monday (Jul 28). The quota for Category A COEs, used to register mainstream passenger cars, will increase by 1 per cent or 75 to 7,586. Category B COEs, for larger and more powerful cars, will also be up 1 per cent or 48 to 4,737. Category C, for goods vehicles and buses, is up 1 per cent or 17 to 1,642 as well. The quota Category D, used for motorcycles, is unchanged at 3,198. Meanwhile, the Category E COE supply, which can be used to register any vehicle type except motorcycles, is up 27.2 per cent to 1,538. The rise in quota was due to vehicle deregistrations from July 2024 to June 2025, and provisions for 0.25 per cent yearly growth in commercial vehicle (Category C) COEs based on the category's vehicle population as at Dec 31, 2024. It also accounts for changes in the taxi population, expired COEs, Early Turnover Scheme for commercial vehicles, redistribution from guaranteed deregistrations for Category A, Category B and Category D and injection of additional COEs.

COE quota to increase by 2.6% for August to October
COE quota to increase by 2.6% for August to October

CNA

timea day ago

  • CNA

COE quota to increase by 2.6% for August to October

SINGAPORE: The overall supply of Certificates of Entitlement (COE) for the August to October period will go up by nearly 2.6 per cent compared with the previous quarter, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) said on Monday (Jul 28). The total number of COEs will rise to 18,701, up from 18,232 during the period from May to July, which had seen a 6 per cent increase. Compared with the same period last year - Aug 2024 to Oct 2024 - there is an increase of more than 22 per cent in the quota. The quota for Categories A, B and C will inch up by about 1 per cent, while that of Category E will rise by about 27 per cent. The quota for Category D will remain unchanged. Bidding under the new quota will start on Aug 4. The COE quota for the bidding period of November 2025 to January 2026 will be announced in October, said LTA. The COE quota consists of the following components: 25 per cent of the replacement COEs from vehicles deregistered in the 12-month period from July 2024 to June 2025 Provision for 0.25 per cent per annum growth for Category C based on the Category C vehicle population as at Dec 31, 2024. Adjustments for changes in the taxi population, expired Temporary COEs, Early Turnover Scheme for commercial vehicles, redistribution from guaranteed deregistrations for Category A, Category B and Category D and injection of additional COEs. LTA announced in October last year that up to 20,000 additional COEs will be progressively injected across all vehicle categories from February over 'the next few years'. The move was made in view of the implementation of ERP 2.0.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store