Water industry may be added to list of sensitive business sectors, says minister
Communications, energy and data infrastructure are among the 17 sectors that must notify the investment security unit of certain business deals since the list was created in 2021.
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden has asked for businesses' views on extending this requirement to the water sector.
It is not expected to affect large numbers of deals but reflects 'increasing risks to the sector's resilience in a growing threat landscape', the Cabinet Office said.
'Data shows our investment security powers are working well, but there's more we can do to ensure our tool kit keeps pace with the modern economy,' Mr McFadden said.
'We're taking action to hone the type of transactions facing the greatest scrutiny, as well as consulting on updates to the sectors of the economy specified in the legislation.'
Thames Water is battling to secure funding to shore up its creaking finances and stave off temporary nationalisation by the Government.
Southern Water asked its owner, Australian investment firm Macquarie, for an extra £2.1 billion earlier this month to help boost its struggling finances.
Making semiconductors and critical minerals into their own standalone categories and moving computing hardware to fall under semiconductors is also being proposed.
Mr McFadden also said he planned to remove some requirements that are 'very unlikely to present risk'.
Businesses will no longer need to notify the unit of certain internal reorganisations or when appointing liquidators, special administrators and official receivers.
Secondary legislation would be brought to Parliament to put these changes in place.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
5 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Spotify CEO bankrolls AI military warfare while musicians walk away
Spotify, despite its ubiquity, has never been looked upon kindly by artists. The music streaming giant has spent years paying musicians by the fraction of a penny, covertly adding AI-generated and in-house commissioned songs to its playlists, and writing the rules as it sees fit on how its royalty system pays out. But now, CEO Daniel Ek has given the music world yet another reason to ditch the platform – this time, by pouring millions into playing business with high-tech war. Last week, Australian psych-rockers King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard yanked their entire catalog off Spotify, posting a blunt message on Instagram: 'We can't support a platform that profits from destruction'. They're not alone. A growing number of artists are cutting ties with Spotify after learning that Ek's investment firm, Prima Materia, is bankrolling Helsing, a German tech startup building AI systems for military drones and warfare. Read more: This extreme metal album blew up over a weekend – now it's accused of being AI Ek's investment firm first started their bankroll of Helsing in 2021, and recent reports from the Financial Times reveal they've just pumped in another €600 million. The musicians scraping by, and seeing paltry returns from their popularity on Spotify, are probably wondering what it's all for, other than fuelling the terrifying next generation of warfare. Truthfully, it will take a Taylor Swift or a Drake pulling out of the platform to cause any movement. Swift had previously taken her music off Spotify between 2014 to 2017, enraged by the bum deal offered to her through its royalty system. But in those years, Spotify was not quite the omnipresent juggernaut it is now – its huge gain in popularity in those years highlighted where music consumption was heading, but the total enmeshment between the major digital streaming services and the music industry was not quite yet complete. The idea of Swift removing her music from the platform would be much more radical now, but also much less likely. Many artists and projects removing themselves from Spotify are independent musicians, with sizeable enough audiences, but independent all the same. King Gizzard & the Lizard Wizard are the biggest, averaging 1.5 million listeners a month on the platform, but the vast structure of such a space means their exclusion is negligible in the long run. Same could be said for the other artists leading the charge against Spotify. Acclaimed indie acts like Xiu Xiu and Deerhoof have joined the boycott, but their influence on the trajectory the platform takes shakes out to even less. Read more: The internet was my favourite thing in the world – now it just fills me with dread Still, musicians are boycotting Spotify, knowing all the risks to their own careers that it brings. The risk is simply worth it for them when trying to sleep soundly at night. Deerhoof made a scathing statement, equating their streaming revenue profits directly to the death toll of war. ''Daniel Ek uses $700 million of his Spotify fortune to become chairman of AI battle tech company' was not a headline we enjoyed reading this week,' read their statement. 'We don't want our music killing people. We don't want our success being tied to AI battle tech.' These artists know their boycotts won't touch Spotify financially, but the moral grace of taking a stand outweighs any financial loss. If musicians are squeezing for pennies in the streaming economy, then at least they might as well not be blood pennies. Spotify came onto the scene touting itself as a champion of artists, that the ease and use of streaming would inevitably democratise the process of music distribution. It once positioned its public image on this basis. But that has never been the case. Its business model has always prioritised growth and returns over dealing with anything close to fair artistic compensation. And with its CEO diverting hundreds of millions into advanced military AI technology, the disconnect between its image and its financial incentives has become too hard to ignore, too much of an ethical red line for any silence. Read more: Can we pass a law banning the sale of Highland cow AI art? For now, the boycott remains symbolic. Without major label artists with industry clout joining in, Spotify's bottom line will remain steady. But the growing discontent highlights the deeper issue of the music industry's reliance on these platforms, how they are now the only game in town worth playing, and how artists can be held at mercy over any basic ethical concerns they might have. For those musicians staying, the dilemma remains. Can they justify supporting a platform that funnels money into military AI, even if leaving means opting out of the biggest platform for their music? Either way, the conversation has begun, and it's a snowballing that the music industry will eventually not be able to ignore.
Scottish Sun
7 hours ago
- Scottish Sun
Major fast food chain ‘better than Taco Bell' set to open first ever Scottish restaurant
The chain has gained popularity for its customisable burritos and bowls GRUBS UP Major fast food chain 'better than Taco Bell' set to open first ever Scottish restaurant Click to share on X/Twitter (Opens in new window) Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window) A MAJOR fast-food chain is set to open its first-ever Scottish restaurant as part of huge expansion plans. Zambrero is a popular Australian franchise famous for its customisable burritos and bowls, and many fans have hailed it as being "better than Taco Bell". Sign up for Scottish Sun newsletter Sign up 3 Zambrero has announced huge expansion plans across the UK Credit: Sportsfile 3 And it includes opening up its first-ever Scottish restaurant Credit: HANDOUT The Mexican-inspired chain now has 13 restaurants across the country after entering the UK market back in 2021. Bosses launched at their first branch in London, and the other 12 quickly followed. However, Zambrero has over 300 restaurants spanning across Australia, New Zealand, the US, Ireland and England. And the firm is now planning to open 100 more restaurants across Britain by 2030. This would create around 1,500 jobs in the process. But even sooner than that, an undisclosed number of other sites are planned to open across the UK over the next year. We've had a lot of interest in the brand during the last couple of years. And now is the right time for us to expand Emily Teh This includes plans for Zambrero to open its first-ever Scottish location. Although it is currently unclear where exactly in Scotland the new restaurant will be based. Emily Teh, CEO of Zambrero UK, told The Caterer: 'We've had a lot of interest in the brand during the last couple of years. "And now is the right time for us to expand through our franchise partners and work towards opening 100 restaurants by 2030." McDonald's Spices Up Breakfast: Spicy McMuffin, New Sweets & Summer Meal Deals She added that the business is on the lookout for more area developers and franchise partners to support its expansion goals. Aussie philanthropist Dr Sam Prince founded Zambrero 25 years ago when he was a 21-year-old medical student. At the time, he had less than £12,000 in savings, according to the chain's website. And while it has taken longer to make its mark in the UK, it is already the largest Mexican restaurant franchise in Ireland. The fast food chain also has a "Plate 4 Plate" initiative, whereby a meal is donated to someone in need for every burrito or bowl bought. So far, Zambrero has donated over 93 million meals - a sum expected to reach 100 million later this year. It comes as the business secured a £141m investment from Metric Capital Partners in February 2023. In recent years, people on social media have lined up to taste-test Zambrero against Taco Bell and Wahaca.
North Wales Live
10 hours ago
- North Wales Live
DWP pension changes that could mean people retire later
Sweeping changes to both state and private pensions, overseen by the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP), have been announced. The modifications form part of extensive reforms to the pensions sector by the Labour government. Among the most significant alterations is the prospect of a substantial rise in the state pension age, which could force people to postpone their retirement. Last week, the government revealed a wide-ranging review of the UK pensions system. An independent commission has been formed to examine a series of controversial matters and put forward recommendations for reform. The Government plans to increase the State Pension age from 66 to 67 between 2026 and 2028, affecting those born on or after 6 April 1960. For money-saving tips, sign up to our Money newsletter here. There are proposals for a further rise, lifting the State Pension age from 67 to 68 between 2044 and 2046, though this timeline could be brought forward, reports Birmingham Live. "A faster increase is definitely on the cards," says Rachel Vahey, the head of public policy at investment platform AJ Bell. Sign up for the North Wales Live newsletter sent twice daily to your inbox The Institute for Fiscal Studies thinktank caused a stir when it suggested that the State Pension Age may need to climb to 69 by 2049 and 74 by 2069 if the triple lock safeguarding its value remains in place. Australian employers are presently obliged to pay 11.5% of workers' salaries into their pensions, with this figure set to rise to 12% in 2025. In comparison, whilst the overall minimum contribution in the UK sits at 8%, employers need only provide 3%. Pension firms and sector specialists have repeatedly lobbied for this amount to be raised to 12%. Nigel Peaple, director of policy and advocacy at the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association, has continually maintained the minimum pension contribution should rise from the current 8% of earnings to 12%. He said: "To minimise the impact on savers and employers, the increases should happen gradually, as they did in Australia, with employers paying more so that, by about 10 years from now, both employers and employees would pay the same. "This approach of a 50/50 split between employers and employees would strike a fair balance; it would involve higher contributions for employers compared to the current UK rules but much lower ones than traditional UK pensions in which the employer usually paid around two thirds of the cost." One concept attracting attention is the "sidecar savings" method. There are different ways to structure a "sidecar account". Two proposed models are the dual account and integrated plan frameworks. Within the dual account structure, the worker keeps a workplace pension whilst simultaneously joining a separate savings account via a savings provider. The saver sets a savings ceiling for the sidecar account, and the savings provider directs the employer to contribute to this sidecar until the limit is reached. Once the threshold is achieved, any extra funds are channelled into the pension alongside the standard pension contributions. Should funds be withdrawn from the sidecar, the individual recommences saving into it until the cap is attained once more. In the in-plan model, employees opt to save via their employer. Employers then remit the total sum contributed by an employee to both a workplace pension and an emergency savings account to a pension provider. The pension provider allocates the contribution between the pension pot and the emergency savings account. Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the UK's Financial Conduct Authority, remarked: "Australia, New Zealand, the US, Singapore and South Africa all permit citizens to leverage their pension savings to buy a first home. "Some have suggested we consider, carefully, similar approaches in some circumstances here in the UK." This week, the government announced its dedication to "committed to both monitoring and narrowing" the gender pensions gap. Recent Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) figures have revealed that the gender pension gap has escalated to a "stark" 48%. The figures, unveiled as the government declared a 'revival' of the Pensions Commission amid concerns about undersaving, showed that in 2020 to 2022, women aged 55 to 59 had a median wealth of £81,000 compared to £156,000 for men. Approximately 20% of self-employed individuals are contributing to a private pension, with many pointing to the Lifetime ISA as a potential solution. There's talk that ministers may tweak the rules to let over-40s open a Lifetime ISA and boost its appeal by cutting the 25% withdrawal charge. Helen Morrissey, head of retirement analysis at Hargreaves Lansdown, commented: "The 25% government bonus acts in the same way as basic-rate tax relief, and any income can be taken tax-free." She added, "There is also the ability to access money early if needed, subject to a 25% exit charge."
