Fraudster jailed for selling fake 'Scottish-grown tea'
Trading as The Wee Tea Plantation, Robinson claimed his brews had been grown on farmland in Perthshire and Dumfries and Galloway, but really the tea had been bought from a wholesaler in Oxford and resold at hugely-inflated prices.Concerns were raised with the authorities when genuine tea growers caught wind that Robinson had populated the Balmoral Hotel's Palm Court luxury tea menu with Scottish brands.
Richard Ross bought 500 plants from Robinson in 2015 but as the crop failed he followed stories of Robinson in the media."I heard about the Balmoral tea list and decide to go and have a look," Mr Ross said."He'd taken names of genuine plantations but no-one involved in the actual plantations had heard they were selling to The Balmoral and that's because none of them had produced any tea from their plants."In 2017, Perth and Kinross Council started to check if Robinson had a food processing licence. At the same time Food Standards Scotland (FSS) was alerted and Robinson's fraud began to unravel.
Lead investigator Stuart Wilson said: "It didn't take long to establish that the tea he was selling to the hotels was being bought from wholesalers, likely to have originated in Sri Lanka or India."He'd created such a story that people were taken along. Once we started digging into it, it was quite clear that not only could the quantity of tea not be grown but the plants he sold couldn't have been grown either in the quantities claimed."Mr Wilson added: "It was quite clear there were a lot of false claims."He claimed at certain points to be a chemist, a scientist and an agronomist. He claimed to have served in the Army as well as many other things. "Digging in to each aspect, it was quite clear that all of these were falsehoods and he built up his lies upon these falsehoods."
'Sincerest apologies'
The Balmoral said it was "shocked and devastated" when the fraud was discovered and has since tightened its procurement process.General manager Andrew McPherson said: "We work hard to support local Scottish food producers, providing them with a global platform to showcase their products."To have been deceived in such a calculated manner left us all profoundly disappointed and embarrassed."As the hotel general manager, I would like to extend my sincerest apologies to everyone affected by this tea incident, particularly our loyal guests, who trusted in the authenticity and quality of our offerings."Robinson couldn't help but embellish his credentials when trying to defraud. He boasted that tea he had supplied to London's Dorchester Hotel in 2017 was "the Queen's favourite".
The media was also taken in with numerous stories appearing about his tea "success", including on the BBC News website and in a BBC podcast.One magazine feature introduced Robinson as having previously lived "on a canoe in the Amazon, bitten by a deadly snake in Brazil and shot at on the Thailand-Burma border" before he turned to tea.During his trial, it was heard that he created the "CV of a fantasist" - claiming he was a multi-millionaire, a former bomb disposal expert and an inventor.He claimed to have developed a "special biodegradable polymer" that would make the tea plants grow in half the usual time. The court was told it looked just like a black bin liner.
Mr Wilson from the FSS investigation said Robinson was a unique character."Fraudsters will do whatever it take to continue their lies but once caught they tend to diminish away into the background - but Tam O'Brann, or Thomas Robinson, was quite happy to stand up in court and continue his lies."Clearly the jury didn't believe him."
Tea enthusiasts
Along with the hotels, high-end shops were also targeted, raking in £278,000 for Robinson.When a buyer from the prestigious food store Fortnum and Mason's wanted to visit his plantation near Loch Tay, he hurriedly bought in plants from a nursery in Sussex and put them on show.Robinson's scam also hit tea enthusiasts trying to build the industry in Scotland.He defrauded a dozen genuine tea growers in Scotland and one from Jersey by supplying them with 22,000 plants at £12.50 each.Robinson claimed they were "specially engineered" for Scottish conditions but he had actually imported them from a horticulturist in Italy at around £2 per plant.Many of the plants died or failed to thrive while Robinson made almost £275,000 from the sales.
Islay Henderson started growing tea at a plantation in Tighnabruaich, in Argyll and Bute, seven years ago, after hearing a radio interview with Hamilton.She and her husband bought 1,500 plants from him."He told us we were buying tea (plants) that were selectively grown in Scotland for 11 years, so we thought we had Scottish seed that had already been trialled. "When we realised they weren't actually from Scotland, it was quite a worry."We felt really lied to – he was promising so much with these plants and I guess that's when the suspicion became a bit more obvious."Robinson denied the fraud at his trial and claimed paperwork that would have proved his innocence had been destroyed in a flood.He said he was proud of his work and told the jurors: "I wanted to leave something that would stand in the history of tea."
'Honest toil'
Genuine tea grower Mr Ross said the industry in Scotland had been damaged but was now moving on."It's hard enough to convince people that tea growing is a thing in Scotland," he said."It's taken a number of years for us to bolster our credentials. Tea Scotland has now collaboratively produced a tea – a product of honest toil."He added: "Right from the first day when tea was traded in this country there has been nefarious practices around it. "There's been smuggling, contraband tea, counterfeit tea."When there's money to make from a high-value product, there's always somebody who's going to try and take a shortcut and try to make the most of it."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
43 minutes ago
- The Independent
NY attorney general sues Zelle's parent company after Trump administration drops similar case
New York 's attorney general on Wednesday sued the parent company of the Zelle payment platform, months after the federal Consumer Financial Protection Bureau abandoned a similar case as the Trump administration was gutting the agency. Attorney General Letitia James, a Democrat, sued Early Warning Services in New York state court, alleging that the company, which is owned by a group of U.S. banks, had failed to protect users from fraud by not including critical safety features in Zelle's design. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau earlier this year dropped a similar case after President Donald Trump fired the agency's leader and his administration halted nearly all the bureau's work, closed its headquarters and moved to fire many of its workers. In a statement, James' office noted that its suit was filed after the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau abandoned its lawsuit following a 'change in the federal administration.' 'No one should be left to fend for themselves after falling victim to a scam,' James said in a statement. 'I look forward to getting justice for the New Yorkers who suffered because of Zelle's security failures.' James has been a leading antagonist of Trump, a Republican, and has sued him dozens of times. Last week, The Associated Press and other news outlets reported that the Justice Department has subpoenaed James as part of an investigation into whether she violated Trump's civil rights, according to people familiar with the matter. James' case against Early Warning Services alleged that Zelle, which allows users to send and receive near-instant money transfers, failed to include adequate verification processes. Her office said scammers were able to access peoples' accounts or trick users into sending money to bogus accounts that posed as official businesses. In one instance cited by the attorney general's office, a Zelle user got a call from someone posing as an employee of the utility company Con Edison who told the user that his electricity was going to be shut off unless he sent them money through Zelle. The user then transferred about $1,500 to a Zelle account named 'Coned Billing" and then realized he had been scammed but was told by his bank that he could not get his money back, James' office said. In a statement issued through a spokesperson, Zelle called James' lawsuit 'a political stunt to generate press, not progress.' 'The Attorney General should focus on the hard facts, stopping criminal activity and adherence to the law, not overreach and meritless claims,' the statement said.
Daily Mail
44 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Priscilla Presley hits back at lawsuit claiming she 'pulled the plug' on daughter Lisa Marie's life support
Priscilla Presley has hit back at a bombshell $50million lawsuit claiming she 'pulled the plug' on daughter Lisa Marie's life support to regain control of the Presley estate. Elvis Presley's widow, 80, is being sued by former business partners Brigitte Kruse and Kevin Fialko, who allege she 'masterminded' a scheme to defraud them and exploited Lisa Marie's 2023 death - which Presley slammed as 'shameless and salacious' in a statement to the Daily Mail. The bombshell fraud and breach of contract lawsuit claims that 'opportunist' Presley 'clung' to Lisa Marie as the sole heir of Elvis' estate, and ignored her daughter's Advanced Health Care Directive by quickly taking her off life support after her cardiac arrest aged 54 in January 2023. The suit alleges that Presley 'ultimately wanted to control' her daughter's trust and Graceland' and that Lisa Marie had 'no desire to see or otherwise be near' her mother before they attended the 2023 Golden Globes in support of the Elvis biopic, two days before her death. 'Crucially, Priscilla was aware that Lisa was getting ready to remove her as the sole trustee of Lisa's irrevocable life insurance trust, and was otherwise threatening to sue her' the complaint states. Kruse and Fialko 'worked to keep the family together', per the suit, with Presley and Lisa Marie walking the red carpet together. It was claimed that a 'noticeably ill' Lisa Marie had complained to Presley about her health - who allegedly 'ignored the warning signs' and went with her to the Chateau Marmont for drinks. The suit alleges that Presley ignored her daughter's Advance Health Care Directive from 2010 which stated she wanted her life 'to be prolonged as long as possible' in making end-of-life decisions' - and 'pulled the plug within hours of Lisa being admitted.' Presley died from a small bowel obstruction caused by previous weight-loss surgery, 'Priscilla knew that Lisa's death neutralized the threat of Lisa's efforts to have Priscilla removed as the sole trustee of Lisa's irrevocable life insurance trust, and Priscilla ultimately wanted to control the Promenade Trust and Graceland' states the complaint. 'At her house the following week (before Lisa's funeral), Priscilla exclaimed, "I'm the queen. I'm in charge of Graceland", the suit added. Two weeks after Lisa Marie's death, Presley filed a legal challenge to her daughter's will - which gave control of Lisa Marie's wealthy Promenade Trust to her daughter Riley Keough. Presley's petition challenged a 2016 amendment to the Promenade Trust which removed her and former business manager, Barry Siegel, as trustees while appointing Keough and late brother Benjamin as co-trustees. The matter was settled five months later. The bombshell fraud and breach of contract lawsuit claims that 'opportunist' Presley 'clung' to Lisa Marie as the sole heir of Elvis' estate, and ignored her daughter's Advanced Health Care Directive by quickly taking her off life support in January 2023 - pictured 1970 Priscilla Presley's claims against former business partners in full - She alleges that she was pressured into signing over 20 different agreements in a 27 minute session at Kruse's house, which agreements Presley had never even seen before. - Presley contends that Kruse even tried to demand that Presley give up her cell phone and have all communication go through Kruse. - Presley alleges Kruse and her co-conspirators closed all of Presley's bank accounts and opened new ones on which they were signatories - Kruse and her co-conspirators torpedoed a deal that had been negotiated before they came into the picture and 'renegotiated' the deal, giving themselves over two-thirds of the proceeds (almost $300,000) for doing nothing. - Kruse and her co-conspirators took over $120,000 in 'commissions' from a deal that they had absolutely nothing to do with pertaining to the motion picture Priscilla. - Kruse and her co-conspirators duped Presley into shipping valuable personal property and highly confidential financial records to Kruse's home in Florida, promising to store them for free but then charging over $30,000 for moving and storage expenses. - To boost their own public profiles (not unlike what they are trying to accomplish with this latest absurd filing), Kruse and her co-conspirators negotiated to have the right to attend Presley's memorial service in the future. - When Priscilla Presley finally discovered the truth about Kruse's elder abuse and fraud, she closed a number of bank accounts that Kruse and her co-conspirators controlled, which went from having hundreds of thousands of dollars to having less than three thousand dollars. Kruse claims she and Fialko 'worked tirelessly' to negotiate a $2.4million settlement payment for Presley and 'a seven-figure deal for Priscilla's son, Navarone.' They claimed they were terminated days before the settlement was finalized, and never compensated for their work. Presley's attorney Marty Singer told the Daily Mail in a statement: 'This is, without a doubt, one of the most shameful, ridiculous, salacious, and meritless lawsuits I have seen in my practice. 'This is nothing more than a sad and vicious attempt to falsely tarnish the reputation of an eighty year old woman in blatant retaliation for bringing a lawsuit to redress the wrongful conduct of Brigitte Kruse, Kevin Fialko, and their co-conspirators. 'Kruse and her co-conspirators are now on their fourth different set of lawyers in this dispute, and this is a disgusting publicity stunt by new counsel, as evidenced by the fact that the complaint and press release were sent to the press before the complaint was served. 'Accusing a grieving mother of contributing to her daughter's death is not savvy advocacy; it is malicious character assassination, and should be broadly condemned. These fabricated claims have absolutely no validity and we are confident this case will be dismissed. 'Our client, Priscilla Presley filed a complaint over a year ago in which she alleges that she was the victim of a concerted effort by Brigitte Kruse and Kevin Fialko (among others) to isolate her from her trusted advisors and dupe her into signing a series of agreements in which Kruse contends she gave them a majority interest in Presley's own name, image, and likeness, in perpetuity, and that purportedly required Presley to get their permission before even accepting any offer of employment or otherwise. 'In an order on one of a series of motions that Kruse filed (and lost, one after the other) in a desperate effort to avoid facing responsibility for her actions, the Court found that, 'if plaintiff's allegations are true…it is classic elder abuse.' 'After suffering a series of defeats in lawsuits in both California and Florida, Kruse and her co-conspirators are desperately and transparently employing the strategy of 'the best defense is a good offense.' 'It will not work. It is also evident that Kruse, Fialko and her new 4th set of attorneys are not happy with the rulings this past year by the judge handling the existing case against Kruse and Fialko by going forum shopping to try and go before a different judge.' The statement added that Riley Keough 'stands behind her grandmother 100 per cent and is equally disgusted with this latest, vicious attempt by Kruse to attempt to ruin her grandmother's life.' The legal row first erupted in 2023 when Presley was sued for breach of contract by businesswoman Kruse - who said that she managed Presley's business and personal affairs when she was nearly broke and had outstanding tax debts of nearly $700,000. Presley denied these claims and in July 2024 sued for 'financial elder abuse' - claiming Kruse, Fialko, Vahe Sislyan and Lynn Walker Wright 'preyed on her' and stole over $1million from her - which was denied by their lawyers. In the lawsuit Kruse and Fialko filed in Los Angeles Superior Court on Monday, Stan Lee 's ex- business manager Keya Morgan - who was previously acquitted of theft charges against the Marvel icon - was accused of orchestrating Presley's elder abuse claims against Kruse and Fialko. Presley allegedly first approached Kruse and Fialko in 2022 when she was in 'severe financial distress'. They claim they restructured her finances, negotiated settlements and increased her event profits from under $10,000 to as much as $50,000 per show. The plaintiffs claim they formed several companies with Presley to 'exploit her NIL [Name, image, likeness] and invested 'large sums of money in merchandise, events, and marketing tied to Presley's image to enhance her depleted value.' The suit also alleges Presley falsely claimed ownership of her NIL, despite secretly selling the rights to the last name Presley and Graceland in 2005 for $6.5 million. It was alleged she 'never disclosed' this to Kruse and Fialko and later claimed that she 'forgot' about the deal. Morgan is accused of befriending Presley, threatening Kruse, and helping persuade Presley to sever ties with the plaintiffs by making elder abuse claims. It was claimed Morgan contacted Presley after the settlement saying that he could get the rights to her name, image and likeness back from Elvis Presley Enterprises, which manages Elvis Presley's intellectual property. The suit alleges after the settlement in 2023 Presley 'cut ties' with Priscilla Presley Partners, 'undermined their ventures, and began exploiting her NIL on her own, including high-profile appearances on NBC's Christmas at Graceland,, comic conventions, and promotional events) without disclosing or sharing proceeds. Presley is also accused of taking funds from company bank accounts and closing them without authorization and diverting endorsement payments to herself. Jordan Matthews, attorney for Kruse and Fialko, exclusively told the Daily Mail: 'Our lawsuit demonstrates for the first time where Priscilla got the idea to claim elder abuse. 'We have thorough documentation to show that the idea came from Keya Morgan, who is now a co-defendant in this lawsuit, making him a serial comic book villain in what we intend to demonstrate is a real life tale of lives destroyed due to one woman's desperation and greed.' He added: 'As detailed video recordings and communications already confirm, there is absolutely no evidence of undue influence, coercion, or elder abuse involved, only a legitimate, well-documented business partnership. 'The evidence will establish that the real victims here are my clients, who invested millions and years of hard work into revitalizing Priscilla Presley's brand, only to be betrayed and falsely accused once the money was on the table and every personal and business issue had been resolved. 'Our complaint alleges that Priscilla targeted Kruse and Fialko from day one, when she was in dire financial need, faced with mounting IRS debt and multiple lawsuits, even within her own family. 'The complaint alleges that Priscilla's relationship with her daughter was in ruins for decades and long before Kruse and Fialko were involved. Kruse and Fialko invested seven figures into rebuilding Priscilla's brand, stabilizing her finances, settling her lawsuits, cleaning up numerous private family ordeals, and attempting to help Priscilla repair her relationship with her daughter. Priscilla has, in turn, smeared Kruse and Fialko with false lies and malicious campaigns.' The plaintiffs are seeking more than $50 million in damages, including punitive damages, along with injunctive relief to stop Presley from using her name, image or likeness outside of the 'agreed upon corporate structures.' The Daily Mail has contacted representatives for Keya Morgan for comment and has yet to hear back. In court papers, which were filed in September 2023, Kruse said Presley had been 'about 60 days away from financial collapse' when she swooped in and got her affairs in order. Kruse said that she and the actress began a company Priscilla Presley Partners in 2022. Kruse told the court that she spent 'a significant amount of money and time' working on projects for Priscilla to capitalize on from publicity of the Sofia Coppola biopic Priscilla, which was released in October of 2023. Priscilla's lawyer Marty Singer said that the star ceased working with Kruse when she found out 'Kruse and her associate were attempting to misappropriate Ms. Presley's assets and were engaging in other acts of wrongdoing.' In July 2024 Presley accused Kruse, Fialko, Sislyan and Walker Wright of financial elder abuse in a lawsuit, and 'forcing her into a form of indentured servitude' in a 'meticulously planned and abhorrent scheme.' Presley said she met Kruse - in 2021 when Kruse ran a business selling Elvis memorabilia through an auction house. Kruse posed alongside Presley in an August 27, 2021 Instagram post in which she advertised a September 4, 2021 luncheon in Beverly Hills, California. The lawsuit claimed Kruse convinced Presley her former financial advisors were either 'deceitful or incompetent' - before allegedly duping her into signing contracts and forming companies which allowed her and her associates to get 80 per cent of her income - leaving Presley with 'just 20 percent of her own company.' Presley claimed the group left her with minority shares in companies they created which profited off her 'name, image and likeness'. The lawsuit was also against Priscilla Presley Partners, LLC. The lawsuit alleged funds from 2023 biopic Priscilla which starred Jacob Elordi and Cailee Spaeny were also misappropriated and branded Kruse a 'con artist and pathological liar.' Presley also claimed her ex-business associates 'torpedoed' a deal for the star to get an ownership interest in a cosmetics company - but instead settled for a $300,000 upfront payment - which she says they put in their own bank accounts. The lawsuit claimed the associates were 'setting up new accounts at their preferred banks (and poisoning the relationship Presley had for many years with her financial institutions), adding themselves to her bank accounts, transferring funds between accounts (and to their own personal accounts), and entering into sham, insider transactions for their own benefit.' The lawsuit also claimed Kruse and associates took $40,000 out of an account for her son Navarone Garibaldi without authorization, tried to make deals related to the late Lisa Marie's estate and fraudulently charged Presley for moving and storage expenses. Presley sued Kruse for more than $1million in damages and wanted the contracts she signed with Kruse and the other defendants voided. Legal representatives for Kruse and Fialko told the Daily Mail at the time: 'The suit filed is a retaliatory lawsuit due to the one filed by Priscilla's business partners last year. 'We are confident that the facts will speak for themselves and justice will prevail. It saddens all of us who dropped our lives to provide aid to a woman who needed help and she is now attempting to use her celebrity status to ruin the lives of kind, hardworking people.' A description on Kruse's Instagram page, which has more than 356,000 followers, lists Kruse as an Entrepreneur and Director of Operations for the brand Kruse GWS Auctions.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
Man who stepped in front of train with toddler jailed for ten years
A suicidal man who attempted to murder a two-year-old boy by walking in front of a train while carrying the child has been jailed for ten years. Frederick Danquah, 28, stepped in front of a train after being told that his former partner had entered into a new relationship. Both the child, who cannot be named for legal reasons, and Danquah were injured in the incident at Garrowhill railway station in Glasgow's east end in July 2023. Garrowhill railway station, in Glasgow, where the incident took place two years ago Danquah denied attempted murder and another charge of culpable and reckless conduct, regarding another incident on the same date, stating his mental condition as a defence, but he was convicted by a jury at the High Court in Glasgow last month. At the same court on Wednesday, the judge said the 'harm was of the greatest kind' and sentenced Danquah to ten years in prison. He also imposed a non-harassment order until the child is 18. The court heard that earlier that day, Danquah had tried to climb over a footbridge above the M8 in Glasgow with the child on his shoulders, after arguing with his former partner who told him she had 'moved on'. After posting a suicidal message on Facebook, he prepared a 'contingency plan' including a note with contact details, the court heard. Danquah collected the child from relatives and took him into Glasgow city centre and met his sister's partner, before he attempted to climb the bridge over the M8. He was spotted by police but 'reassured them', the court heard, before he travelled to Garrowhill station with the child and made an attempt on their lives. British Transport Police said Danquah sustained a broken jaw and fracture to his neck, while the child suffered cuts and bruises but no serious injuries, and the child was discharged from hospital two days later. Danquah sustained a broken jaw and fracture to his neck but the child escaped serious injury BRITISH TRANSPORT POLICE Sentencing, Judge Tony Kelly said: 'You went to the platform, picked up [the child] and walked into the path of a train. You suffered injuries and [the child] was injured. 'To seek to take the life … over some hours is great criminality. I have no doubt about your intentions. You were intent on taking your own life on July 2, 2023.' He said a train driver 'saw you step in the path of a train' and people involved in the rescue were in 'various stages of upset'. The court heard that Danquah had no previous convictions and was involved in a Ghanaian community group. Danquah made further suicide attempts, including in December 2023, the court heard. Gary Allan, for the defence, said it was a 'horrible miracle' and Danquah was receiving psychiatric help since a 'one-off horror story took place at his own hand'. Allan said Danquah had been 'beaten up by other prisoners', and jail 'will be a living nightmare for him'.
