The US has toppled an Iranian government before. Here's what happened
Since Israel began its concerted attack on Iran, calls for regime change have grown louder, with US President Donald Trump and Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu raising the possibility of targeting Tehran's all-powerful leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei.
Many Iranians have firsthand experience with the United States enforcing a regime change in their country.
Oil fields: In 1953, the US helped stage a coup to overthrow Iran's democratically elected prime minister Mohammad Mossadegh.
He had pledged to nationalize the country's oil fields – a move the US and Great Britain saw as a serious blow, given their dependence on oil from the Middle East.
Height of the Cold War: The move to nationalize was seen as popular in Iran and a victory for the then-USSR.
Strengthen Shah rule: The coup's goal was to support Iran's monarch, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, to rule as Shah of Iran, and appoint a new prime minister, Gen. Fazlollah Zahedi.
The coup: Before the coup, the CIA, along with the British Secret Intelligence Service (SIS), helped foment anti-Mossadegh fervor using propaganda. In 1953, the CIA and SIS helped pull pro-Shah forces together and organized large protests against Mossadegh, which were soon joined by the army.
US cash: To provide Zahedi, the country's new prime minister, with some stability, the CIA covertly made $5,000,000 available within two days of him taking power, documents showed.
US acknowledgement: In 2013, declassified CIA documents were released, confirming the agency's involvement for the first time. But the US role was known: Former President Barack Obama acknowledged involvement in the coup in 2009.
It backfired: After toppling Mossadegh, the US strengthened its support for Pahlavi to rule as Shah. Iranians resented the foreign interference, fueling anti-American sentiment in the country for decades.
Islamic Revolution: The Shah became a close ally of the US. But in the late 1970s, millions of Iranians took to the streets against his regime, which they viewed as corrupt and illegitimate. Secular protesters opposed his authoritarianism, while Islamist protesters opposed his modernization agenda.
The Shah was toppled in the 1979 Islamic revolution, which ended the country's Western-backed monarchy and ushered in the start of the Islamic Republic and clerical rule.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
8 minutes ago
- CNN
Texas Instruments to invest more than $60 billion to make semiconductors in the US
Texas Instruments will invest more than $60 billion to expand semiconductor manufacturing in the United States, the company announced on Wednesday, as President Donald Trump continues to pressure tech giants like Apple and Samsung to build their products in America. The investment will go towards seven semiconductor fabrication plants across Texas and Utah, resulting in more than 60,000 jobs, the company said in a press release. TI says it's working with the Trump administration to help produce the critical chips that power everything from smartphones to data centers and cars domestically. It's part of the White House's push to keep the United States ahead of China in the technology industry while promoting American manufacturing. TI, which partners with tech and auto giants like Apple, Nvidia and Ford, claims this is the 'largest investment in foundational semiconductor manufacturing in US history.' 'President Trump has made it a priority to increase semiconductor manufacturing in America – including these foundational semiconductors that go into the electronics that people use every day,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a press release. 'Our partnership with TI will support US chip manufacturing for decades to come.' The announcement marks the latest major planned investment in the United States by an American company as Trump pushes industries like tech to onshore more production. Earlier this month, General Motors said it would invest $4 billion to increase US production. Apple said in February that it would invest $500 billion to expand its US facilities. Oracle, OpenAI and SoftBank announced in January that they would team up to create a new company called Stargate to grow artificial intelligence infrastructure in America. However, some of these tech giants – including Apple and TSMC – were expanding in the United States long before Trump's second administration. Reviving US manufacturing has been a tentpole goal of Trump's presidency. For the first three months of his second term, he went on a tariff blitz, promising to impose levies on nearly every product made abroad. He claimed these efforts would boost jobs in the US and rebalance what he saw as unfair practices by America's trading partners. Trump Mobile, a new venture from the Trump Organization, plans to launch a new smartphone in September that it claims will be 'proudly designed and built' in the United States. But experts have said manufacturing products like iPhones domestically would be a daunting challenge even if the United States had the necessary fabrication plants. That's primarily because America lacks the labor skills and components to produce them. Staying ahead of China in the tech race has been another priority of Trump's presidency, especially after Chinese startup DeepSeek shook Wall Street and Silicon Valley with its high-performing yet supposedly cheap AI model. 'The United States of America is the leader in AI,' Vice President JD Vance said at the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris in February. 'And our administration plans to keep it that way.'
CNN
9 minutes ago
- CNN
Texas Instruments to invest more than $60 billion to make semiconductors in the US
Texas Instruments will invest more than $60 billion to expand semiconductor manufacturing in the United States, the company announced on Wednesday, as President Donald Trump continues to pressure tech giants like Apple and Samsung to build their products in America. The investment will go towards seven semiconductor fabrication plants across Texas and Utah, resulting in more than 60,000 jobs, the company said in a press release. TI says it's working with the Trump administration to help produce the critical chips that power everything from smartphones to data centers and cars domestically. It's part of the White House's push to keep the United States ahead of China in the technology industry while promoting American manufacturing. TI, which partners with tech and auto giants like Apple, Nvidia and Ford, claims this is the 'largest investment in foundational semiconductor manufacturing in US history.' 'President Trump has made it a priority to increase semiconductor manufacturing in America – including these foundational semiconductors that go into the electronics that people use every day,' US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said in a press release. 'Our partnership with TI will support US chip manufacturing for decades to come.' The announcement marks the latest major planned investment in the United States by an American company as Trump pushes industries like tech to onshore more production. Earlier this month, General Motors said it would invest $4 billion to increase US production. Apple said in February that it would invest $500 billion to expand its US facilities. Oracle, OpenAI and SoftBank announced in January that they would team up to create a new company called Stargate to grow artificial intelligence infrastructure in America. However, some of these tech giants – including Apple and TSMC – were expanding in the United States long before Trump's second administration. Reviving US manufacturing has been a tentpole goal of Trump's presidency. For the first three months of his second term, he went on a tariff blitz, promising to impose levies on nearly every product made abroad. He claimed these efforts would boost jobs in the US and rebalance what he saw as unfair practices by America's trading partners. Trump Mobile, a new venture from the Trump Organization, plans to launch a new smartphone in September that it claims will be 'proudly designed and built' in the United States. But experts have said manufacturing products like iPhones domestically would be a daunting challenge even if the United States had the necessary fabrication plants. That's primarily because America lacks the labor skills and components to produce them. Staying ahead of China in the tech race has been another priority of Trump's presidency, especially after Chinese startup DeepSeek shook Wall Street and Silicon Valley with its high-performing yet supposedly cheap AI model. 'The United States of America is the leader in AI,' Vice President JD Vance said at the Artificial Intelligence Action Summit in Paris in February. 'And our administration plans to keep it that way.'
Associated Press
18 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Supreme Court work goes on with 16 cases to decide, including birthright citizenship
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court is in the homestretch of a term that has lately been dominated by the Trump administration's emergency appeals of lower court orders seeking to slow President Donald Trump's efforts to remake the federal government. But the justices also have 16 cases to resolve that were argued between December and mid-May. One of the argued cases was an emergency appeal, the administration's bid to be allowed to enforce Trump's executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally. The court typically aims to finish its work by the end of June. On Wednesday it decided one of its most closely watched cases, handing down an opinion that upheld a Tennessee ban on some healthcare for transgender minors. Here are some of the biggest remaining cases: Trump's birthright citizenship order has been blocked by lower courts The court rarely hears arguments over emergency appeals, but it took up the administration's plea to narrow orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the U.S. The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years. These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies. At arguments last month, the court seemed intent on keeping a block on the citizenship restrictions while still looking for a way to scale back nationwide court orders. It was not clear what such a decision might look like, but a majority of the court expressed concerns about what would happen if the administration were allowed, even temporarily, to deny citizenship to children born to parents who are in the country illegally. Democratic-led states, immigrants and rights groups who sued over Trump's executive order argued that it would upset the settled understanding of birthright citizenship that has existed for more than 125 years. The court seems likely to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity. The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools. The school district introduced the storybooks in 2022, with such titles as 'Prince and Knight' and 'Uncle Bobby's Wedding.' The case is one of several religious rights cases at the court this term. The justices have repeatedly endorsed claims of religious discrimination in recent years. The decision also comes amid increases in recent years in books being banned from public school and public libraries. A three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana is making its second trip to the Supreme Court Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are weighing whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time. The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life. At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act. Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024. A three-judge court found that the state relied too heavily on race in drawing the district, rejecting Louisiana's arguments that politics predominated, specifically the preservation of the seats of influential members of Congress, including Speaker Mike Johnson. The Supreme Court ordered the challenged map to be used last year while the case went on. Lawmakers only drew that map after civil rights advocates won a court ruling that a map with one Black majority district likely violated the landmark voting rights law. The justices are weighing a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous. The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking. The justices appeared open to upholding the law, though they also could return it to a lower court for additional work. Some justices worried the lower court hadn't applied a strict enough legal standard in determining whether the Texas law and others like that could run afoul of the First Amendment.
