Shelter beds at risk in R.I. if state doesn't fill housing budget gap, advocates warn
Luis Negron stood in the State House rotunda Tuesday afternoon among a crowd of 250 with his 2-year-old daughter Mia atop his shoulders holding a sign that said 'shelter was my lifeline.'
Negron said that two years ago he, his partner, and then 3-month old daughter were evicted from their apartment and had to sleep in their car.
'We didn't know what to do,' he said in an interview inside the State House. They eventually connected with the Providence-based social service organization Amos House which got them into a shelter. Now his family lives in permanent supportive housing.
Advocates fear Rhode Island's unhoused community could lose such critical lifelines if lawmakers fail to address a $17.8 million budget shortfall for homelessness services as they finalize the fiscal 2026 budget. Which is why Negron and his family were at the State House Tuesday afternoon, joining others in urging state leaders to fill that gap.
'Unfortunately, there's not enough money for everything that has to happen in our state,' Eileen Hayes, CEO of the Providence social service organization Amos House, told the crowd. 'But people whose lives are at risk should not be the ones that have to forfeit their needs.'
Federal pandemic money has allowed Rhode Island to more than double its number of shelter beds since 2020, but with that funding now gone, advocates fear as many as 926 beds could be lost statewide.
'We need shelter beds to stay open while we build affordable housing for all,' Hayes said.
According to the state, advocates' projections rely on outdated numbers. Rhode Island Department of Housing spokesperson Emily Marshall pointed to a request for proposals for homeless service providers issued by the state on May 7 which 'anticipates provider savings' which would reduce the number of beds that may have to come offline should the state not plug the department's budget.
Marshall did not immediately provide an estimate on how many shelter beds the state would have to reduce.
'We remain committed to maintaining emergency shelter access within available funding while strategically investing in long-term solutions like affordable and permanent supportive housing,' Marshall said in an email Tuesday.
The state's shelter dashboard notes a total of 1,514 beds available across the entire state, with 181 unused as of May 23.
Advocates are urging state lawmakers to consider new taxes to help cover provider costs, including a tax on second homes, a higher real estate conveyance tax on property sales over $800,000, and increased income contributions from the state's highest earners.
They are also calling on the General Assembly to approve Gov. Dan McKee's budget proposal to fund shelter beds by extending the state's 5% hotel tax to include short-term rental homes.
McKee's recommended fiscal year 2026 budget calls on the state to eliminate the exemption whole-home short-term rentals have from the state's 5% hotel tax starting Jan. 1, 2026. The governor projects an annual revenue of roughly $5 million.
Advocates supported a similar proposal McKee introduced as a budget amendment in 2024, but the General Assembly ultimately replaced it with its own $46 million plan which relied on remaining pandemic relief aid. The governor's plan also faced competition from municipalities that have historically received a quarter of the revenue from the state's hotel tax.
Municipal interests are again vying for that expanded share of the fiscal pie.
Legislation introduced by Sen. Matthew LaMountain, a Warwick Democrat, would maintain that existing split to towns, if McKee's proposal is approved.
Rep. Lauren Carson, a Newport Democrat who chairs a legislative panel studying short-term rentals, has again proposed returning all of the revenue generated by a hotel tax on short-term rental houses exclusively for municipal infrastructure.
'If we don't have infrastructure and the stormwater not running and toilets not working, then the tourists ain't coming,' she said in an interview.
And the potential tax revenue could always go toward funding homeless services, Carson said, it would just be up to the municipalities rather than the state.
'Newport is perfectly qualified to make decisions on homeless shelters and how to assist homeless people,' she said.
Keeping housing decisions local is a preference of the Rhode Island League of Cities and Towns, whose executive director said a cookie-cutter approach will not work with each municipality.
'Not one of my 39 communities are all the same, they're all unique,' Randy Rossi, executive director of the league, said in an interview. 'What Burrillville might need, Westerly may need something completely different.'
Kimberly Simmons, executive director for the Rhode Island Coalition to End Homelessness, said she would prefer any potential revenue from the tax expansion end up in state coffers.
'The state has the ability to get it out evenly,' Simmons said in an interview.
Carson's bill was heard before the House Committee on Finance on May 13 where it was held for further study, as is standard procedure for an initial vetting by a legislative panel. Companion legislation sponsored by Sen. Victoria Gu, a Westerly Democrat, was held by the Senate Committee on Finance on March 4.
House Speaker K. Joseph Sheakrchi has not taken any official stance, but said he will continue to prioritize addressing homelessness in the final budget.
'In recent years, the General Assembly has gone above and beyond the Governor's budget requests for homeless assistance,' he said in a statement. 'Despite an extremely challenging budget year, homelessness will remain a priority of the legislature.'
At least 2,442 unhoused people across Rhode Island were counted when volunteers conducted an annual survey in late January 2024 — up 35% from the 2023 count. The coalition conducted the annual Point-In-Time count for the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development this year on Jan. 28, but results aren't expected to be released until some time in the summer.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Trump on what it will take to bring Israeli hostages home: Hamas must be 'confronted and destroyed'
President Donald Trump said Monday that the remaining Israeli hostages will only be returned once Hamas is "confronted and destroyed," as the Gaza-based terrorist group cited alleged progress in ongoing ceasefire talks. The U.S. and Israel pulled their negotiators from Qatar last month, with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff saying at the time that Hamas demonstrated a "lack of desire to reach a ceasefire in Gaza" and were likely not negotiating in good faith. "We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!!" Trump wrote on TRUTH Social on Monday morning. "The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be," Trump wrote. "Remember, I was the one who negotiated and got hundreds of hostages freed and released into Israel (and America!). I was the one who ended 6 wars, in just 6 months. I was the one who OBLITERATED Iran's Nuclear facilities. Play to WIN, or don't play at all! Thank you for your attention to this matter!" The message came ahead of Trump's meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and European leaders at the White House on Monday as they try to iron out a separate peace deal with Russia. Meanwhile, in the Middle East, the Iran-backed Hamas said Monday it has accepted a new proposal from Arab mediators for a ceasefire in the Gaza Strip that would still need Israel's approval. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in response that Hamas is under "enormous pressure" after Israel announced plans to reoccupy Gaza City and other heavily populated areas after ceasefire negotiations again stalled in Qatar last month. "I hear the media reports – and from them, you can draw one conclusion: Hamas is under enormous pressure," Netanyahu said in a Hebrew video statement translated by Fox News. Netanyahu also said on Monday he visited the Gaza Division, where he met with the senior Israeli Defense Forces command staff, and expressed "tremendous appreciation for the great achievements of the IDF in the War of Rebirth – the war on seven fronts." The prime minister said he was "deeply impressed by the fighting spirit and determination to complete the defeat of Hamas and to bring about the release of all our hostages." He said he also spoke to the defense minister and chief of staff "about our plans regarding Gaza City and the completion of our missions." A diplomat briefed on the negotiations with Hamas told Fox News that "through pressure on Hamas to accept, Qatari and Egyptian mediators secured a breakthrough that preserves 98% of the Witkoff proposal, which the Israeli side had previously agreed to." "The mediators were able to secure this outcome despite recent events and developments moving toward further escalation," the diplomat said. "This step marks the beginning of the road to a comprehensive solution." Egyptian Foreign Minister Badr Abdelatty said mediators are "exerting extensive efforts" to revive a U.S. proposal for a 60-day ceasefire, during which some hostages would be released and the sides would negotiate a lasting ceasefire and the return of the rest. He spoke during a visit to Egypt's Rafah crossing with Gaza, which has not functioned since Israel seized the Palestinian side in May 2024. He was accompanied by Mohammad Mustafa, the prime minister of the Palestinian Authority. Abdelatty said Qatari Prime Minister Sheikh Mohammed bin Abdulrahman Al Thani had joined the talks, which include senior Hamas leader Khalil al-Hayya, who arrived in Cairo last week. He said they are open to other ideas, including a comprehensive deal that would release all the hostages at once. Bassem Naim, a senior Hamas official, later told the Associated Press that the terrorist group had accepted the proposal introduced by the mediators, without elaborating. An Egyptian official, speaking to the AP on condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive talks, said the proposal includes changes to Israel's pullback of its forces and guarantees for negotiations on a lasting ceasefire during the initial truce. The official said it is almost identical to an earlier proposal accepted by Israel, which has not yet joined the latest talks. Netanyahu has vowed to continue the war until all the hostages are returned and Hamas has been disarmed, and to maintain lasting security control over Gaza. Hamas has said it will only release the remaining hostages in exchange for a lasting ceasefire and an Israeli withdrawal.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Texas bills increasing youth camp safety face long odds, even after Hill Country floods
Although not specifically named in Gov. Greg Abbott's list of directives for the current special legislative session, state lawmakers have filed several bills to shore up the safety of youth camps in the wake of the devastating Hill Country floods. So far, nine bills have been proposed that would address everything from emergency plans and camper disaster drills, to better communication systems and life jackets inside every cabin. They are all in response to the July 4 floods that killed 137 people, including 27 campers and counselors at storied Camp Mystic. The camp's longtime owner Dick Eastland was also among the victims. 'My hope is that these common sense reforms would help prevent confusion during floods and ensure every camper has the tools and information needed to act quickly when every second matters,' said state Sen. Judith Zaffirini, D-Laredo, who has filed three of eight camp safety bills. Realistically, it's tough to see how any camp safety proposal will pass by Aug. 19, when the special session ends, when so much is vying for the Texas Legislature's attention. Many flood-related proposals that will likely take priority over camps are aimed at fast-tracking disaster funding to businesses and improving emergency disaster response. And there's no guarantee that all camps will be on board with the proposed safety regulations. While some camp industry representatives have told The Texas Tribune they welcome regulation as they grieve alongside their impacted peers, these businesses, particularly more profitable camps, have influenced legislation or circumvented certain mandates in the past. Two weeks after the flooding, the Associated Press reported that Camp Mystic had in recent years successfully appealed to FEMA to have several of its buildings removed from federal flood zone maps, which could have lowered Mystic's insurance cost and made expansion of the camp easier to do. 'The youth camps don't like regulation,' state Rep. Vikki Goodwin told The Texas Tribune when asked about concessions she had to make to certain camps on a 2023 safety bill. Whether the camp safety bills make it, are re-filed in another special session or resurface in the 2027 regular legislative session, one thing is certain: The small but politically astute camp industry is expected to face a lot more questions from lawmakers and specifically, Texas parents, about how it keeps campers safe, particularly the large contingent of sleepaway camps along the state's lakes and rivers. 'Whatever is coming out, especially from the Legislature or state law, we're going to gladly take it and run with it,' said Dan Neal, the chair of the state's camp advisory committee and whose family owns Georgetown-based Camp Doublecreek. 'And the camps that I know that I work closely with are going to be happy to take what that is, and really, I would say, make it even better than what is just gonna be probably the base regulation.' Camp safety bills The Hill Country flooding largely exposed the lack of preparation by youth camps when confronted with disastrous weather events. Although they may not have mitigated the devastation that caught residents and community leaders off guard in the early hours of July 4, recently filed legislation aim to prevent another catastrophic death toll at children's camps. Among them include: Senate Bill 35 and House Bill 223 requiring camps along a river to have flood safety equipment in each cabin, including life jackets and a cabin-to-cabin communication system. SB 49 requiring safety drills for campers. HB 124 requiring the state to establish better rules about building a camp within a floodplain. HB 211 and HB 239 requiring all camp emergency management plans to be filed with the Texas Division of Emergency Management. The last bill addresses the call from some parents to have camp's emergency plans more available for public scrutiny. Currently, camps are governed under the state's health and safety code which contains very general rules about how camps will be inspected by the Texas Department of State Health Services. For example, camps must have an emergency plan, including ways to evacuate in case of a disaster, but those plans are merely verified — not evaluated — by state licensing workers and copies of them are not maintained by the state. During a joint legislative hearing Thursday on the disaster, Kerr County Emergency Management Director William 'Dub' Thomas revealed the county had never had a county-wide evacuation drill and wasn't able to access six of the 19 youth camps in the area. One Houston mom who traveled to Kerrville to attend the hearing pleaded with lawmakers to make youth camps post their emergency plans on their websites. 'After hearing about the camp emergency plans or lack thereof, please address that,' said Keli Rabon, whose sons Braeden and Brock survived their flooded cabins at La Junta camp on July 4. 'That should be mandatory and published on every camp website for the public to view, not in an office somewhere.' To be licensed by the state health agency, all youth camp emergency plans are required to be posted in every occupied camp building. But the state does not require them to be posted on a youth camp's website or on the agency's website. Parents can ask a camp to see their emergency plans. HB 211 is more prescriptive than current law on what must be included in emergency plans. It would require TDEM to obtain the plans, which would presumably allow the public to request them. The state's disaster response agency would also be required to set emergency procedures for camps and provide feedback to camps about their plans. 'We remain committed to working with lawmakers and the state to ensure any legislation is approached thoughtfully, with room for collaboration and reflection following the tragic July 4th floods,' said Tommy Ferguson, a retired camp director and spokesperson for Camp Association for Mutual Progress, the trade association for the state's major overnight camps, including Camp Mystic. 'Camper safety is always C.A.M.P's top priority.' The camp industry's influence The youth camp industry is hardly different from other industries in Texas, a pro-business state famously allergic to strict regulation. Youth camps, like most private enterprises and even counties and cities, hire lobbyists to protect their interests via a trade association during legislative sessions. The top request of that organization, C.A.M.P., is to end the ever-changing start of Texas public schools, which forces camps to readjust their summer schedule and impacts their bottom line. While the state has not sided with it on that issue, C.A.M.P. can and has pushed back successfully behind the scenes on blanket regulations. Camps also have a little-known state committee that advises DSHS, the very same state agency that licenses them, on requirements and policies. The Youth Camp Advisory Committee and similar advisory groups point to their necessity in a state without a full-time Legislature. Instead of waiting on state lawmakers to meet as scheduled every two years to pass laws, youth camps, which make up six of the nine members on the advisory group, meet semiannually to request rule changes to the state agency and the Legislature when it convenes. 'I mean, it is purely advisory,' said Neal, who chairs the committee. 'We have really no say in creating a rule. In other words, we're not legislators.' But they can influence how much a rule impacts them. The youth camp committee's March meeting provides a glimpse into the give-and-take nature of its operation. For example, while the state rejected the advisory group's request to exclude staff from wearing protective helmets during horseback riding, the state sided with camps on tweaking a rule to allow them to have a physician assistant or nurse practitioner on call instead of a doctor, which are harder to come by in rural areas. The camp advisory group also tries to protect camps from blanket regulations. 'I'm all about improving camps but sometimes I'm a little hesitant to make another requirement on a camp that is maybe not needed,' said Camp Mystic Cypress Lake director Britt Eastland during the March meeting as members discussed training policies on handling camper behavior. Neal says one of the primary concerns of both C.A.M.P. and the state committee is to protect families from unregulated camps. 'We also want to not have people out there that use the name camp and are not committed to the same regulations as we are,' Neal told The Texas Tribune this week. 'Safety has always been at the forefront of every single [camp] director and owner and you know, it's something that keeps us up at night.' While the state and the committee have beefed up background checks and staff training to screen out sex offenders, a check of the committee's meeting minutes posted online since 2007 reveal that there's been no discussion of disaster planning, camp emergency evacuation or procedures in case of any natural disaster or threat. Neal, who has served on the committee for three years, said camps know their emergency preparation will be highly scrutinized by the state and by the public moving forward. 'Whatever is in the past is in the past,' he said about the committee's history with disaster planning. 'We're ready to get down to work, whatever that looks like, to make sure we can keep this a top priority, camper safety.' One grieving family's legislative experience Seven years ago, Jonestown resident Kori DelaPeña dropped off her daughter Cati to the High Hopes Summer Camp with strict instructions to staff that the 6-year-old could not swim and if she were taken near water, she must wear a life jacket. DelaPeña even spelled out the instructions in writing to the day camp's staff who assured her that precautions would be taken. Cati drowned in a local pool during the camp's second day. The little girl was found without a life jacket. An investigation would later reveal that life jackets were available and the number of campers exceeded the pool's own capacity rules. The DelaPeñas contacted their state Rep. Vikki Goodwin to discuss creating a law that would force all Texas' youth camps to comply with stricter water safety rules. Until then, Goodwin recalls, she had no idea that there were different rules for different youth camps. 'I didn't understand that there's different regulations for the camps like Camp Mystic versus just a day camp, child care center type of thing,' Goodwin said. Goodwin's bill ended up exempting the 375 camps licensed by DSHS to avoid pushback from C.A.M.P. Texas private schools, some of which have water features like ponds or pools and operate camps on their campuses, had concerns about the overly broad language in the original bill text. Language was tweaked but private schools as well as public schools are required to adhere to the new law. Tommy Ferguson, a retired camp director, speaking for C.A.M.P. said that exemption of DSHS-licensed youth camps had nothing to do with undue influence. He said their inclusion wasn't necessary because existing state law requires camps to test campers' swimming ability and to keep children 'confined to the limits of swimming skills for which they have been classified.' 'Youth camps … already had state-mandated waterfront safety standards,' he said in a statement. Initially, DelaPeña was disappointed. 'My job will always be [about] what we lived, these other families don't live it,' she said. But she came to understand that 'in legislation, you have to pick your battles." Today, the DelaPeñas are satisfied with the resulting law they campaigned so hard for. Day camps operated by child care centers and other organizations using pools for water activities must now get a parent's signature on a form attesting to their child's swimming ability if that child is younger than 12. If that child cannot swim, they must wear a U.S. Coast Guard-approved life jacket before entering a pool. Additionally, the couple's non-profit, Live Like Cati, offers water safety training and raises money to provide life jackets to organizations. The DelaPeñas understand better than anyone else the grief, the demands for accountability and the questions that will go unanswered that face the families who lost children during the July 4 disaster. They encourage them to stay strong and for decisionmakers to enact changes for summer camps, particularly those near open water. 'Be persistent, don't give up,' DelaPeña said. 'Try and do not let your anger or grief take over your mission. Do it for the love of your child and God will guide you and open the doors you need to walk through.' The lineup for The Texas Tribune Festival continues to grow! Be there when all-star leaders, innovators and newsmakers take the stage in downtown Austin, Nov. 13–15. The newest additions include comedian, actor and writer John Mulaney; Dallas mayor Eric Johnson; U.S. Sen. Amy Klobuchar, D-Minnesota; New York Media Editor-at-Large Kara Swisher; and U.S. Rep. Veronica Escobar, D-El Paso. Get your tickets today! TribFest 2025 is presented by JPMorganChase. : The story has been updated to say that to be licensed by the Texas Department of State Health Services, camps must post their emergency plans on occupied buildings, but they are not required to post them online. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Trump will ignore crime reduction data for the political value of a show of force
'They fought back against law enforcement last night, and they're not going to be fighting back long,' Donald Trump said of young people on a 'rampage through city streets' at his press conference this morning. 'See, they fight back until you knock the hell out of them, because it's the only language they understand.' Lay this comment against a series of executive orders about law enforcement and civil rights that the president has issued over the last seven months, and one consequence of the federalization of police in Washington DC becomes evident: Trump will ignore measured effectiveness in reducing crime for the political value of a show of force. 'There is no public safety emergency warranting the deployment of the national guard on DC streets or the federalization of the city's police force,' said Ryan Downer, legal director of the Washington Lawyers Committee for Civil Rights and Urban Affairs, a Washington DC-based civil rights group that has litigated police brutality cases. Noting a sharp decrease in violent crime – reaching a 30-year low this year – Downer said that federalizing control of the district 'is an invitation for abuse. When you try to solve a problem of criminal behavior with overpolicing and harsher penalties … you see increases in police violence and police harassment. It's a call at the highest levels for police lawlessness.' Related: Trump spreads false narratives about DC crime – just as he did with LA Downer said his group would be vigilantly looking for stories to share about police abuses over the term of federal control of the district's police. But accountability under these conditions is complicated. Police officers almost anywhere else in the US are constrained both by state and federal law. If a local cop in New York or Los Angeles brutalizes someone in the course of an arrest, they can be arrested by either state or local police, and accountable to a state court and a prosecutor elected by local voters. Uniquely in the US, a serious felony in Washington DC is prosecuted not by the elected attorney general for the district, but by a federal prosecutor appointed by the president – Jeanne Pirro, TV judge turned US attorney for the District of Columbia. And a crime prosecuted in that federal court can be pardoned by the president, as we saw with the convictions of rioters from the January 6 insurrection. 'This is ultimately a problem of DC not having statehood,' said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the ACLU of Washington DC. The city council passes laws covering the district and the mayor controls the police force, but the president can declare an emergency that gives him control for 30 days, she said. 'He is acting under a pretextual emergency and extending the sort of blatant abuse of power over DC in a way that he could not do in any other jurisdiction as of right now.' Local organizations said they view Trump's declaration as yet another reason to call for statehood. 'Statehood is the only path to real accountability and local control. Without it, the current administration will continue to treat us as powerless and deploy power over us,' said Clinique Chapman, CEO of the DC Justice Lab. 'This latest overreach mirrors nationwide efforts to disempower Black-led cities, elected officials and prosecutors, while leaving federal agencies, unaccountable to our residents, in control of our justice system.' Violent crime is higher in Washington DC than the national average. But it is not among the most violent large cities in the United States today, and the number of incidents have been falling in Washington DC for about two years. Trump cited figures during the press conference from 2023, while ignoring precipitous drops in most categories of violent crime since. Violent crime overall was at a 30-year low on the day Trump took office this January. Decrying local leaders who 'demonize' and 'handcuff' aggressive police, Trump issued an executive order in April, Strengthening And Unleashing America's Law Enforcement To Pursue Criminals And Protect Innocent Citizens, calling for the federal government to withdraw its support for consent decrees and other federal oversight on civil rights and police brutality and for city to 'unleash high-impact local police forces'. Then he went on to test out the experiment in California. Over the objections of California governor Gavin Newsom, Trump called in nearly 5,000 national guard troops and to guard federal property in Los Angeles, a move facing a three-day hearing today for Newsom's federal court challenge. But Trump has also called in the national guard in Washington DC in the past. Troops were present during protests against police brutality in the summer of 2020. US park police dispersed hundreds of demonstrators in Lafayette Park in front of the White House during the protests using chemical irritants, rubber bullets, smoke bombs, flash grenades and a baton charge. Related: 'Red meat to throw to his base': DC residents on Trump's police takeover The federal government settled an ACLU lawsuit over the dispersal of peaceful protesters at Lafayette Park in 2022, agreeing to policy changes that restrict park police from arbitrarily withdrawing demonstration permits, allowing protesters to leave safely and to identify themselves clearly, and modifying Secret Service policy to make clear that uses of force and dispersals are not normally justified by the unlawful conduct of some individuals in a crowd. At the press conference on Monday, Trump seemed to ignore that completely and talked about the conduct of protesters writ large as justification for police violence. 'They're standing and they're screaming at them an inch away from their face, and then they start spitting in their face,' Trump said. 'And I said: 'You tell them you spit and we hit,' and they can hit real hard … People are spitting in their face, and they're not allowed to do anything, but now they are allowed to do whatever the hell they want.' The downward trend in violence in Washington is consistent with what's being reported in other large cities across the country, according to statistical tracking by the Council on Criminal Justice. But that may not matter if the president is ignoring data in favor of ideology and bluster. 'He made some pretty bold statements that I think should concern everyone in the country at that press conference,' Hopkins said. 'DC is being done now, but he is looking at other cities, right? He just can move more swiftly with DC.'
