
NIH won't renew ‘cruel' drug experiments on beagle puppies — some as young as 8 months old
WASHINGTON — China-led drug tests on hundreds of beagle puppies won't be conducted anymore on the US taxpayers' dime, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) confirmed to The Post on Thursday — but the Defense Department still hasn't copped to partially funding the research deemed 'cruel' by lawmakers and a watchdog group.
A $124,200 contract between the NIH and the Beijing-based biotech firm Pharmaron to test pharmaceuticals on the pooches from Sept. 1, 2023, to May 31, 2025, is not being renewed, according to a spokesperson with the public health agency's Office of Extramural Research.
The taxpayer watchdog White Coat Waste Project unearthed the contract via a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request, with documents showing up to 300 beagles — as well as rats and mice — were being tested per week to help understand and treat neurological disorders.
Advertisement
3 A $124,200 contract between the NIH and the Chinese biotech firm Pharmaron to test pharmaceuticals on beagles is not being renewed, a rep for the agency's Office of Extramural Research said.
via White Coat Waste Project
The experiments abided by the Animal Welfare Act and the Public Health Service Policy on Laboratory — but White Coat Waste pointed to the contract discussing how the pups, some as young as eight months, were 'reused' and then 'euthanized' if they suffered organ dysfunction, were infected or became weak.
A Defense Department spokesperson previously claimed there was no 'evidence' of the Pentagon contributing taxpayer dollars to the research.
Advertisement
'There is no evidence we can find that indicates the Department of Defense funds any related animal research,' a spokesperson said of the experiments in January 2025.
3 The contract stated the NIH's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences 'received a DoD award to specifically fund animal studies delineated in this award.'
Obtained via FOIA by White Coat Waste Project (WCW)
But the contract stated the NIH's National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences 'received a DoD award to specifically fund animal studies delineated in this award.'
Reps for the Defense Department did not respond to requests for comment.
Advertisement
White Coat Waste uncovered the contract as part of an investigation into more than two dozen Chinese labs that had received $2 million-plus in taxpayer funding for animal testing and other experiments.
3 The White Coat Waste Project probed more than two dozen Chinese labs that received $2 million-plus in taxpayer funding for animal testing and other experiments.
Grandbrothers – stock.adobe.com
'We're thrilled that less than 48 hours after the US Navy banned all dog and cat tests following a White Coat Waste campaign, Trump's NIH is now cutting wasteful dog experiments we unearthed in a taxpayer-funded Chinese lab,' said White Coat Waste senior vice president Justin Goodman.
'We're proud of our hard-fought campaign that notched this victory and applaud NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, and President Trump for kicking taxpayer-funded canine cruelty in China to the doghouse of history.'
Advertisement
Staten Island GOP Rep. Nicole Malliotakis and Sen. Joni Ernst (R-Iowa) have been among the lawmakers opposing taxpayer-funded animal testing and other potentially risky research in countries of concern, such as China.
Pharmaron is one of several 'companies of concern' that had been blacklisted due to their Chinese Communist Party ties from doing official business with US firms, per legislation that passed the House last Congress but was never taken up in the Senate.
The Department of Defense's Office of Inspector General audited the Pentagon's funding for overseas gain-of-function research last year and uncovered collaborations with the companies: Pharmaron, WuXi AppTec and Genscript Inc.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Axios
3 hours ago
- Axios
Exclusive: HHS watchdog finds more than $16B in health savings
The Department of Health and Human Services' watchdog identified more than $16 billion in overpayments, fraudulent billings and possible cost savings in health programs over a half year spanning the Biden and Trump administrations, including more than $3.5 billion to be returned to the government. Why it matters: The semiannual summary, first shared publicly to Axios, comes as the Trump administration says it's prioritizing government efficiency and rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. It reflects growing concern over federal payments to Medicare Advantage plans, along with enforcement actions like McKinsey agreeing to pay $650 million to settle charges that its advice caused Purdue Pharma to submit fraudulent claims stemming from the opioid crisis. The report was sent to Congress late Friday. By the numbers: The HHS Office of Inspector General identified $16.6 billion in real and potential savings from October 2024 through March of this year. The office's investigations identified $3.5 billion in funds due back to the federal government, and its audits found another $451 million that the government will recoup. More than $12 billion in potential cost savings were identified if HHS makes recommended policy changes. The office issued 165 recommendations over the six months. In one example, OIG found that Medicare could have saved $7.7 billion if it lowered payments for swing beds at critical access hospitals so that they match skilled nursing facilities. The change would require action from Congress, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said it didn't agree with the recommendation. Nearly 400 civil actions, including settlements, resulted from OIG's work during the period. OIG says its work returned $11 to the federal government for each $1 invested in its office. "Whether it's us, whether it's [the Government Accountability Office], whether it's DOGE, whether it's state auditors, there's always a need for program integrity and oversight," said John Hagg, assistant inspector general in the IG's office of audit services. Zoom in: OIG over the six months covered in the report continued its investigations that raise concerns over improper payments in Medicare Advantage. OIG found that many patient diagnoses reported by privately run Medicare plans were supported only through health risk assessments. That allowed plans to be paid more to care for sicker, more expensive patients without enough supporting documentation, raising questions about their validity, per OIG. OIG recommended that Medicare further restrict plans' abilities to get higher payments based on diagnoses reported only on in-home health risk assessments in order to save an estimated $4.2 billion for Medicare. The office plans to do more work on Medicare Advantage in the near future, Melicia Seay, assistant inspector general in the office of evaluation and inspection, told Axios. "There's a lot of areas in terms of Medicare Advantage that we're exploring, whether it is the payment policy related to the program, the service delivery, quality of care," she said. Catch up quick: President Trump in January abruptly fired several agency inspectors general, including longtime HHS watchdog Christi Grimm. He claimed that"some were not doing their job."


Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
China's Coal Industry Has a Big, Dirty Secret
Exactly a century ago, two German chemists patented a process to transform coal into liquid fuels. Following its discovery in 1925, the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis eventually became infamous: The Nazis used it to fuel their war machine, and apartheid South Africa turned to it to offset the impact of an oil embargo in the 1980s. Its last — and huge — user is China. Largely unnoticed, the size of this obscure corner of the Chinese coal industry has reached gargantuan proportions: It consumes about 380 million metric tons of coal as a feedstock for chemical and liquid fuel production, according to the International Energy Agency. To understand its size better, it helps to think about the segment as if it were a country. As such, it would rank as the world's third-largest consumer, only behind the rest of the Chinese coal sector and India, but ahead of the US, Japan and other top coal-consuming nations like Indonesia and Turkey. It's not a little dirty secret — it's a big one, with significant implications for global climate and energy policy. The longer China remains addicted to coal, the more difficult it will be to decrease carbon dioxide emissions. Despite its huge progress in green energy, from electric cars to solar panels, the Asian giant consumes more coal than every other country on the planet combined. Crucially, the Chinese coal-conversion industry is set to expand even further, potentially offsetting declines elsewhere in the country, including a reduction in coal demand to produce cement and steel. 'We expect a growth between 5% and 10% in the coming years,' Carlos Fernandez Alvarez, head of coal at the IEA, tells me. Unfortunately, the sector is a black hole, as China publishes scant statistical information about it. For decades, China has converted some of its coal into chemical products and liquid fuels in what scholars call the 'traditional' coal chemical industry. The starting point was almost always metallurgical coal, converted into coke, and further transformed into ammonia-based fertilizers and acetylene-based chemicals. Yet over the last two decades, China has built a second layer, typically referred to as the 'modern' coal chemical industry, based on new variations of the old Fischer-Tropsch process plus sophisticated new methods, including methanol synthesis to produce petrochemical goods, such as olefins, used in turn to make plastics. The modern part of that processing was largely experimental in the early 2000s. Commercial-scale projects mushroomed in the 2010s, and, after a brief hiatus, more have emerged in recent years, particularly in the Chinese heartland, where the bulk of the country's coal fields are located far from coastal cities. By now, its scale — which dwarfs all other countries' coal-to-chemicals production — and growth is surprising even veteran industry observers. Look at some modernized plants and coal is nowhere to be seen: It's mined underground almost directly beneath the chemical facilities, carried by conveyor into the furnaces where it's gasified and transformed. From there, it goes into your plastic water bottle or synthetic fabric clothes. 1
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
NY Times columnist compares Elon Musk to history's worst murderers over USAID cuts
New York Times columnist David Brooks suggested Elon Musk belongs on a list of history's greatest mass murderers, including Pol Pot, Mao and Stalin due to DOGE'S cuts to USAID. "So far, 55,000 adults have died of AIDS in the four months since Trump was elected; 6,000 children are dead because of what Doge did. That's just PEPFAR, the HIV. You add them all up, that's 300,000 dead, and we're four months in. You add that all up and accumulate that over four years the number of dead grows very high," Brooks said on PBS News Hour Saturday. "There are mass murderers in the world, Pol Pot, Mao Tse Tung, Stalin. We don't have anybody on the list from America," Brooks added. Trump 'Agreed' On Shutting Down Usaid, Elon Musk Says The New York Times columnist conceded the so-called deaths that he claims Musk is responsible for are not "the same kind of genocide" perpetrated by the despots he cited, but maintained that Musk's closure of USAID made him partially responsible for mass deaths. The casualty counts Brooks cited were provided by a Boston University digital tracker that monitors deaths that it claims occur from changes in U.S. foreign aid created by Global Health Professor Brooke Nichols. When filtered for USAID cuts, the tracker states that 99,528 adults and 207,680 children have died this year from "funding discontinuation." Read On The Fox News App The communist regime Khmer Rouge killed between 1.5-3 million people between 1975 and 1979 in the Cambodian Genocide when the group plunged the country into mass violence targeting intellectuals and religious minorities following their overthrow of the Cambodian Monarchy and installation of Pol Pot as dictator in 1975. Thirty-eight million people died of starvation during Mao's Great Leap Forward and the ensuing famine it produced. Mao biographers Jung Chang and Jon Halliday estimate that Mao was responsible for over 70 million peacetime deaths. Stalin killed over six million of his own citizens in the gulags, the Great Terror and other actions. Click Here For More Coverage Of Media And Culture Brooks is purpotedly one of the few conservative voices at the New York Times. However, the columnist has espoused liberal views on a host of topics and has praised Biden's presidency. He has also positioned himself as a fierce critic of President Donald Trump. "Trumpism can be seen as a giant attempt to amputate the highest aspirations of the human spirit and to reduce us to our most primitive, atavistic tendencies," Brooks wrote in a recent column. USAID was set up in the early 1960s to act on behalf of the U.S. to deliver aid across the globe, particularly in impoverished and underdeveloped regions. The agency now operates in 60 nations and employs some 10,000 people, two-thirds of whom work overseas — though most of the on-the-ground work is contracted out to third-party organizations funded by USAID, according to a BBC report. The Trump administration, however, has argued that USAID is a corrupt organization that is mishandling U.S. taxpayer dollars. DOGE froze USAID funds and sent much of its staff home shortly after Trump took office. Musk, who was spearheading the DOGE effort to root out "waste, fraud and abuse" in government, has said the agency is beyond repair. The Trump administration announced that it would be cutting 90% of all USAID contracts in April. U2 frontman Bono recently made a similar claim as Brooks on Joe Rogan's podcast, saying 300,000 people have died due to USAID cuts. Musk swiftly shot back on social media, calling the Irish rocker a "liar/idiot" and claiming that there have not been any deaths from USAID cuts. "He's such a liar/idiot Zero people have died!" The Tesla CEO posted. Musk and Brooks did not respond to Fox News Digital's request to comment. Michael Dorgan contributed to this report. Original article source: NY Times columnist compares Elon Musk to history's worst murderers over USAID cuts