logo
Govt invokes nationalisation order

Govt invokes nationalisation order

Express Tribune25-02-2025

NIT, in which the government has only 8.9% shares, had offloaded its 23% shareholding in PECO, which the government termed illegal. photo: FILE
Listen to article
The bureaucracy is trying to take over management of a publicly listed company by invoking the "notorious" 53-year-old Nationalisation and Economic Reforms Order of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto that torpedoed the economy, revealed proceedings of a parliamentary committee meeting.
In order to stop further destruction of Pakistan Engineering Company (PECO), the existing shareholders complained to Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Special Investment Facilitation Council (SIFC) National Coordinator Lt General Sarfraz Ahmad, Arif Habib, one of the key shareholders, told the National Assembly Standing Committee on Privatisation on Tuesday.
The State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) Act empowers boards to appoint managing directors of government-owned companies but the government wants to exercise this right in case of a public listed company by invoking the Nationalisation and Economic Reforms Order of 1972, revealed Arif Habib, who owns a 25% stake in PECO.
PECO affairs have to be managed under the Companies Act 2017. Then president Zulfikar Ali Bhutto had promulgated the Nationalisation and Economic Reforms Order in 1972 to nationalise industries. This is considered a key reason behind the destruction of Pakistan's private sector and it took 20 years before former prime minister Nawaz Sharif liberalised the economy.
"I explicitly conveyed to the board of directors that the company's affairs have to be governed by Economic Reforms Order 1972," said a letter written by a joint secretary of the federal government.
Pakistan had enacted the SOEs Act in 2023 as part of its commitments to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund to free public sector companies from the clutches of bureaucracy and politicians.
Habib said that he had taken up the matter with the prime minister and SIFC's Lt General Sarfraz Ahmad. On Tuesday, he also met Minister for Economic Affairs Ahad Cheema on the instructions of the PM.
The hurdles created by the bureaucracy in smooth functioning of the economy and businesses were one of the reasons for setting up the SIFC – a hybrid civil-military body.
Privatisation Commission Secretary Usman Bajwa said that the cabinet had decided in August last year to place Peco on privatisation list.
PECO has been part of the privatisation programme since the 1990s and yet the small company could not be privatised, said Arif Habib.
Bajwa said that until the issue of selling 23% shares by National Investment Trust (NIT) in the stock market back in 2003 remained unresolved, the entity could not be privatised. He added that in July 2023, the Cabinet Committee on Privatisation had set up a three-member secretaries committee to resolve the share sale issue but its report had not yet been finalised.
The mentioning of just two examples – the 2003 alleged illegal share sale and the 2023 secretaries committee underscores the bureaucracy's attempts to maintain the status quo.
The SIFC last month removed a federal secretary, who did not move a summary seeking permission of the Economic Coordination Committee (ECC) for export.
NIT, in which the government has only 8.9% shares, had offloaded its 23% shareholding in PECO, which the government termed illegal. In 2004 – a year after the sale, Arif Habib bought those shares and he currently holds 25% shareholding.
Usman Bajwa said that the Ministry of Industries had not provided clarity on the sale of 23% shares and "terms it an illegal transaction". "We are not proceeding with PECO privatisation until this 23% sale issue is resolved," he stressed.
"People say Pakistan is not progressing. Can it progress when small issues like the sale of shares remain unresolved for decades," questioned Arif Habib.
He mentioned that the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) conducted two separate inquiries on the sale of shares and gave the clean chit.
"The government does not feel and raise the real issues the company is facing, which are either privatisation or its revival," said Arif Habib.
There used to be a time when the company had 25,000 employees and the Chinese PM visited it in 1964, but now it has been restricted to two plots, he said.
Habib pointed out that the government "appoints managing directors, who do not know the basics of PECO business". One MD did not even know the price of electric towers and sold them below production cost, he added.
The financial crisis follows years of catastrophic mismanagement under former MD Mairaj Anis Ariff, a nominee of the Ministry of Industries whose tenure saw the company incur losses exceeding Rs1.2 billion, according to the board.
Standing Committee Chairman MNA Farooq Sattar said that PECO could not be left in the current state of affairs and the Ministry of Industries should have proved its case before NAB. He told the Privatisation Commission to resolve all outstanding issues in the next 40 days.
Sattar said that the government should find a solution to the payments owed by PECO. Arif Habib proposed that the government could recover its loans by selling one property located in Lahore.
The government should also make a decision whether it wants to privatise PECO or revive it. Arif Habib called for setting up a garments city on the piece of land in Lahore. The company has a monopoly over manufacturing high-voltage transformers, provided it is revamped.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pharmaceutical sector: CCP grants six exemptions to undertakings for FY2024–25
Pharmaceutical sector: CCP grants six exemptions to undertakings for FY2024–25

Business Recorder

timea day ago

  • Business Recorder

Pharmaceutical sector: CCP grants six exemptions to undertakings for FY2024–25

ISLAMABAD: In line with its mandate to promote fair competition and protect consumer welfare, the Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has granted six exemptions to undertakings in the pharmaceutical sector for the fiscal year 2024–25, under Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2010. These exemptions relate to specific restrictive clauses in commercial agreements — such as territorial exclusivity and non-compete provisions that would ordinarily be considered anti-competitive under Section 4 (Prohibited Agreements) of the Act. However, after conducting rigorous due diligence, including a detailed assessment of market structures, sector-specific regulations, and the commercial terms of the agreements, CCP determined that the arrangements in question contribute to production efficiency, technological advancement, and enhanced consumer access to critical pharmaceutical products. The Commission noted that these exemptions are expected to improve service delivery, increase the availability of medicines in underserved regions, and lead to better public health outcomes. Consumers stand to benefit from access to advanced pharmaceutical technologies, more reliable product information, and higher standards of service. Each exemption was granted for a specific duration and is subject to conditions that ensure the pro-competitive benefits clearly outweigh any potential adverse effects on competition. Importantly, the undertakings are required to avoid any form of price-fixing or collusive conduct, and pricing arrangements remain outside the scope of these exemptions. The pharmaceutical sector remains a priority area for CCP's exemption regime, with the Commission maintaining close coordination with relevant health regulators to ensure that such decisions serve the broader public interest. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

CCP grants six exemptions to pharma sector
CCP grants six exemptions to pharma sector

Business Recorder

timea day ago

  • Business Recorder

CCP grants six exemptions to pharma sector

The Competition Commission of Pakistan (CCP) has granted six exemptions to undertakings in the pharmaceutical sector for the fiscal year 2024–25, under Section 5 of the Competition Act, 2010, read a press statement on Thursday. These exemptions relate to specific restrictive clauses in commercial agreements—such as territorial exclusivity and non-compete provisions—that would ordinarily be considered anti-competitive under Section 4 (Prohibited Agreements) of the Act, CCP said. However, after conducting rigorous due diligence, including a detailed assessment of market structures, sector-specific regulations, and the commercial terms of the agreements, CCP determined that the arrangements in question contribute to production efficiency, technological advancement, and enhanced consumer access to critical pharmaceutical products. The commission noted that these exemptions are expected to improve service delivery, increase the availability of medicines in underserved regions, and lead to better public health outcomes. 'Consumers stand to benefit from access to advanced pharmaceutical technologies, more reliable product information, and higher standards of service,' it said. The commission informed that each exemption was granted for a specific duration and is subject to conditions that ensure the pro-competitive benefits clearly outweigh any potential adverse effects on competition. 'Importantly, the undertakings are required to avoid any form of price-fixing or collusive conduct, and pricing arrangements remain outside the scope of these exemptions,' the commission stated. On Wednesday, the federal government, in an effort to boost pharmaceutical exports, announced the establishment of an empowered Pharma Export Promotion Council, PharmEx Pakistan, under the Trade Development Authority of Pakistan.

PECA Act: Respondents asked to submit comments
PECA Act: Respondents asked to submit comments

Business Recorder

time2 days ago

  • Business Recorder

PECA Act: Respondents asked to submit comments

ISLAMABAD: The Islamabad High Court (IHC) gave a deadline to the respondents to submit comments in the petitions challenging amendments in the PECA Act. A single bench of Justice Inaam Ameen Minhas on Wednesday heard the petitions of Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ), anchors association and Islamabad High Court Journalists Association (IHCJA). In the petition, counsel of the journalist body adopted the stance that the PECA (Amendment) Act is unconstitutional and illegal; hence, the court should conduct judicial review on it. The petition said the PECA (Amendment) 2025 increased the government control and restrictions on freedom of speech. It said the PECA law violated Article 19 and 19(A) of the Constitution as well. Therefore, it pleaded, the law should be suspended. PECA amendments challenged in SC During the hearing, Advocate Imran Shafiq and other lawyers appeared in the court on behalf of the petitioners. Advocate Shafiq said the federal government has filed its reply only through the Ministry of Interior and the Ministry of Information while the Ministry of Law and Justice, Parliamentary Affairs and the PTA have not submitted any response yet. He informed the bench that the federal government has raised a question on the jurisdiction of this court. He added that the federation has stated that after the 26th Constitutional Amendment, only the Constitutional Bench of the High Court can hear this case. The lawyer said the second objection was raised while giving a reference of a Quranic verse that before spreading the words, do research. The lawyer said the FIRs are being registered against people and the court should hear this case soon. The IHC bench asked whether there is no news going on? Is someone preventing news from being given or published? Riasat Ali Azad advocate prayed the court to issue a stay order that there will be no FIR or arrest against the journalist for reporting the news. He said that the parties are not submitting a response and are taking time from the court. Journalist Mazhar Abbas said that an atmosphere of harassment has been created in the media industry and the journalists are being summoned and harassed by the FIA. The petitioner's lawyer said the parties should be directed to file their replies and provide a copy of the replies to the petitioners in advance before the next hearing. Justice Inaam remarked that even if the response is not filed, the hearing will still be continued. He said that this case would take a long time and therefore, it will be scheduled after Eid. Later, the court deferred hearing of the case till the second week of July. The PFUJ said in the petition that the law infringed international human rights as well as digital rights in Pakistan. The petition read: '…a writ may be issued declaring that the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025 is unconstitutional, being violative of the fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, due process, fair trial, and the concept of regulatory independence, as well as the doctrines of fairness, proportionality, reasonableness, and constitutional limitations or restrictions, hence void, and liable to be struck down.' Therefore, the PFUJ prayed that the respondents may be restrained and prevented from employing the coercive powers under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025, in general, and against the journalist community, in particular till final disposal of the instant petition. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store