American scientists say their work is under attack and ask Canadians for help
Also: Yukon craftsman makes beautiful furniture from trees killed by wildfires
Image | What on Earth logo slimmer
(Sködt McNalty/CBC)
Open Image in New Tab
Sign up here to get this newsletter in your inbox every Thursday.
This week:
American scientists say their work is under attack and ask Canadians for help
Image | Gretchen Goldman
Caption: Gretchen Goldman, president of the Union of Concerned Scientists, hopes the courts will protect U.S. scientific institutions and research. (Jaela Bernstien/CBC)
While fielding questions at the front of a packed conference room in Boston, Gretchen Goldman checks her phone.
She's waiting to find out if her husband will be fired in the latest round of layoffs of federal scientists under U.S. President Donald Trump.
A month ago, Goldman voluntarily left her own government job in D.C. as climate change research and technology director at the Department of Transportation.
She saw the writing on the wall.
Goldman is now the president of an advocacy group, the Union of Concerned Scientists, and can speak out while many of her former colleagues cannot over fear of losing their jobs.
"Science is under attack in the United States," she said in an interview after the panel. "I think we're seeing a lot of fear and people not feeling they can speak up."
American and international scientists from various fields across government, academic, industry and research institutions gathered in Boston for the three-day annual conference hosted by the American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Some of the scientists were guarded around media, afraid to say too much.
Others were still processing the breakneck speed of widespread layoffs, slashing of research-funding, data purges and new restrictions imposed on U.S. scientific institutions like the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH).
AAAS program organizers had to scramble for last-minute substitutions to replace federal scientists who dropped out because they'd suddenly been banned from travelling.
Many who attended said they expected changes after the election, but not so dramatic or sudden.
"We're kind of still, I think, in a bit of a state of shock. Now we have to recover from that and go into action mode," said Rémi Quirion, president of the International Network for Governmental Scientific Advice.
What form that action should take depends on who you ask.
Quirion, who also advises the Quebec provincial government, said Canada can help by recruiting — encouraging scientists who left for jobs and resources in the U.S. to return home.
Within the U.S., there's momentum building to advocate and lobby congress.
AAAS CEO Sudip Parikh told a crowd gathered for the Boston conference's opening ceremony that there will be action — both quiet and loud — in the coming weeks.
He avoided specifics, but said the AAAS would be working hard because "500 years of enlightenment is something you don't throw away."
"We're gathered in a moment of turmoil. And I don't want to sugarcoat that," Parikh said.
"Science and engineering and medicine are sources for truth and facts and objectivity. We live in a time when that seems under threat. And we have to be able to say that."
Matte Heide, director of communication strategy for the Union of Concerned Scientists, also called on the international scientific community to speak out.
"If some people stand up, those who are able and willing to … it builds courage," he said.
Heide is especially worried about the preservation of public access to weather and climate information.
That concern is shared by Doug Wallace, the associate scientific director of the Marine Environmental Observation, Prediction and Response Network (MEOPAR).
He said it would be "extremely disruptive" for Americans and Canadians if NOAA data goes offline or disappears.
Wallace, based at Dalhousie University in Halifax, said he's already reached out to American counterparts at NOAA to offer help saving vulnerable datasets.
At the end of the conference, CBC News asked Gretchen Goldman if she'd heard back from her husband.
She told me he still has his job, for now.
Goldman also said she refuses to give up hope.
"A lot of it is just rhetoric at this stage. It's playing out in the courts, we're going to see what actually holds."
— Jaela Bernstien
Check out our podcast and radio show. In our newest episode: Sociologist Dana Fisher says disasters like the Los Angeles wildfires and Hurricane Helene can spur community action in the face of the climate crisis. The author of Saving Ourselves: From Climate Shock to Climate Action says individuals coming up with solutions for resilient communities are what give her "apocalyptic optimism." She shares how we can use the idea in our own personal fight against the climate crisis.
Media Audio | What On Earth : How to become an 'apocalyptic optimist' during scary times
Open Full Embed in New Tab Loading external pages may require significantly more data usage.
What On Earth drops new podcast episodes every Wednesday and Saturday. You can find them on your favourite podcast app or on demand at CBC Listen. The radio show airs Sundays at 11 a.m., 11:30 a.m. in Newfoundland and Labrador.
Reader feedback
Rebecca Lamb wrote: "Hi, I am from Southern Saskatchewan near the SaskPower coal plant…. I was wondering why the heat and steam generated from the plant is not piped
underground to local communities, homes and businesses. This free energy
would create a secondary income for SaskPower and cleaner energy."
Feeding"waste heat" into networks for heating buildings is a climate-friendly idea that's getting more and more interest these days and being used in many parts of Canada..
In fact, SaskPower says it already does this. "A great example of this would be our Shand Greenhouse, which is directly next to Shand Power Station. Waste heat from Shand is used to heat the greenhouse year-round. At our Cory Cogeneration Station, waste heat is used by Nutrien at the Cory Potash Mine for their process."
But what about Rebecca's suggestion of using heat from the coal plant (or other thermal power plants)? "There are a few reasons why it wouldn't be feasible," SaskPower said in an email. "The major issue is the distance the heat would need to travel and still remain hot enough to be useful. In addition, most power stations are at the edge of or well outside the closest community, so significant new infrastructure would need to be constructed and maintained by both the company and the buildings receiving this heat."
Write us at whatonearth@cbc.ca. (And feel free to send photos, too!)
The Big Picture: Haunting owl in a haunting habitat
Image | The Edge of Night
Caption: (Jess Findlay/Wildlife Photographer of the Year)
Open Image in New Tab
After spotting this dilapidated barn on a blueberry farm outside Vancouver in 2019, photographer Jess Findlay knocked on the door of a nearby home. The man who answered gave Findlay permission to explore, but warned him about the "really crazy noises coming from back there." Findlay had a good feeling about what he would find. A few nights later, the dramatic sight of a male barn owl soaring through the dark window of the barn "left a real mark on me," he recalled. He spent 10 nights trying to capture what he had seen with his camera, a flash and a sensor to time everything just right.
The result is a reminder that "every little bit of habitat" for wildlife – even manmade structures such as old barns – "makes a huge difference," he said. However, even these kinds of habitats are in danger. The next time Findlay drove by a couple of years later, the barn was gone.
Findlay's photo, Edge of Night, was one of , in the People's Choice Award category of the Wildlife Photographer of the Year competition, announced by competition organizer, the Natural History Museum in London, earlier this month.
– Emily Chung
Yukoner makes chairs from trees killed by wildfires
Image | Yukon woodworker Ulrich Trachsel
Caption: Ulrich Trachsel sits beside a chair he made of local aspen. The owner of Ibex Valley Wood Products says he sources deadwood from burn areas to make furniture. (Julien Greene/CBC)
Open Image in New Tab
From Ulrich Trachsel's driveway, just west of Whitehorse, you can see the deep orange slash of the Takhini burn — a visible scar from a past wildfire.
Stands of trees that even from a distance look like toothpicks fringe the spine of a hill. Trachsel uses trees like these to make furniture.
"I just see all this wood around and I want to use it," he said. "I just started to really appreciate dead standing wood and how convenient it is — and also how pretty it is."
Most lumber sold in the Yukon is trucked up from places like Alberta and British Columbia. Trachsel, the owner of Ibex Valley Wood Products, said that doesn't work for him — the costs to the environment and climate are too great.
Trachsel cuts deals with local harvesters targeting dead trees mostly destined for someone's woodstove. Right now, the majority of wood commercially harvested in the Yukon is sold as firewood.
By doing this, Trachsel spares live forests and avoids greenhouse gas emissions linked to transportation.
The wood harvested from Yukon burn sites is also perfect for his purposes.
"It is already mostly dry," he said.
Peter Wright, executive director of the Yukon Wood Products Association, said he wants to see more local timber used not just as a heat source. Trees like white spruce are valuable in other ways, he said, and that could bolster local economies.
"Every time that a truck brings something in, whether it's a chair, whether it's a table, whether it's a 2x4 that could have been made here, when that truck hits the road south, all of the revenue, all of the profits, all of the employment leaves with it," Wright said.
There are longstanding problems, though, he said. Timber harvesting projects are getting mired in delays during the Yukon Environmental and Socio-economic Assessment Board process.
Wright wants to see more trees in burn areas felled and the environmental assessment process move far more quickly. That's something the Yukon Wood Products Association is negotiating over with the Yukon government this year.
Wright said unlike places in the South, the Yukon doesn't have an industrial-sized kiln capable of quickly drying wood. That makes harvesting trees that are already dead an obvious priority.
"We're not taking green trees that are still growing," he said. "We are salvaging areas. And every month that stands more of it is falling down naturally on its own. We're battling time."
Hilary Cooke, a co-director with the Wildlife Conservation Society, said both dead and living trees play crucial roles in the territory's boreal forests.
"There's life in these burns," Cooke said. "There's one species of black-backed woodpecker… that's where they're going to nest…. As they [forests] regenerate, it becomes habitat for moose, and a whole community of bird species that like that regenerating willow, aspen."
Cooke said the ecological importance of burns is understudied in the Yukon, and she'd like to see the territory take a more measured approach when eyeing these areas for timber harvesting.
"The best thing we can do, and what we have an opportunity to do, is to think in advance about what values we want on the landscape," she said. "That's a process of regional land use planning and regional forest management planning.
"It's where everyone comes together."
Trachsel's business is small and just getting off the ground.
He's confident there's a market for what he's making, like the set of chairs he was recently crafting out of aspen — the same type of tree that surrounds his home.
To Trachsel, it's pretty simple.
"What we can buy in this town is not good quality," he said. "It's usually from far away, and it's cheap because it's mass-produced.
"I want everyone to enjoy locally-made, locally-grown wood products."
— Julien Greene
Thanks for reading. If you have questions, criticisms or story tips, please send them to whatonearth@cbc.ca.
What on Earth? comes straight to your inbox every Thursday.
Editors: Emily Chung and Hannah Hoag | Logo design: Sködt McNalty
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Toronto Star
2 hours ago
- Toronto Star
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo
NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.'


Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
It's Trump's economy now. The latest financial numbers offer some warning signs
WASHINGTON (AP) — For all of President Donald Trump's promises of an economic 'golden age,' a spate of weak indicators this week told a potentially worrisome story as the impacts of his policies are coming into focus. Job gains are dwindling. Inflation is ticking upward. Growth has slowed compared to last year. More than six months into his term, Trump's blitz of tariff hikes and his new tax and spending bill have remodeled America's trading, manufacturing, energy and tax systems to his own liking. He's eager to take credit for any wins that might occur and is hunting for someone else to blame if the financial situation starts to totter. But as of now, this is not the boom the Republican president promised, and his ability to blame his Democratic predecessor, Joe Biden, for any economic challenges has faded as the world economy hangs on his every word and social media post. When Friday's jobs report turned out to be decidedly bleak, Trump ignored the warnings in the data and fired the head of the agency that produces the monthly jobs figures. 'Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes,' Trump said on Truth Social, without offering evidence for his claim. 'The Economy is BOOMING.' It's possible that the disappointing numbers are growing pains from the rapid transformation caused by Trump and that stronger growth will return — or they may be a preview of even more disruption to come. Trump's economic plans are a political gamble Trump's aggressive use of tariffs, executive actions, spending cuts and tax code changes carries significant political risk if he is unable to deliver middle-class prosperity. The effects of his new tariffs are still several months away from rippling through the economy, right as many Trump allies in Congress will be campaigning in the midterm elections. 'Considering how early we are in his term, Trump's had an unusually big impact on the economy already,' said Alex Conant, a Republican strategist at Firehouse Strategies. 'The full inflationary impact of the tariffs won't be felt until 2026. Unfortunately for Republicans, that's also an election year.' The White House portrayed the blitz of trade frameworks leading up to Thursday's tariff announcement as proof of his negotiating prowess. The European Union, Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Indonesia and other nations that the White House declined to name agreed that the U.S. could increase its tariffs on their goods without doing the same to American products. Trump simply set rates on other countries that lacked settlements. The costs of those tariffs — taxes paid on imports to the U.S. — will be most felt by many Americans in the form of higher prices, but to what extent remains uncertain. 'For the White House and their allies, a key part of managing the expectations and politics of the Trump economy is maintaining vigilance when it comes to public perceptions,' said Kevin Madden, a Republican strategist. Just 38% of adults approve of Trump's handling of the economy, according to a July poll by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs. That's down from the end of Trump's first term when half of adults approved of his economic leadership. The White House paints a rosier image, seeing the economy emerging from a period of uncertainty after Trump's restructuring and repeating the economic gains seen in his first term before the pandemic struck. 'President Trump is implementing the very same policy mix of deregulation, fairer trade, and pro-growth tax cuts at an even bigger scale – as these policies take effect, the best is yet to come,' White House spokesman Kush Desai said. Recent economic reports suggest trouble ahead The economic numbers over the past week show the difficulties that Trump might face if the numbers continue on their current path: — Friday's jobs report showed that U.S. employers have shed 37,000 manufacturing jobs since Trump's tariff launch in April, undermining prior White House claims of a factory revival. — Net hiring has plummeted over the past three months with job gains of just 73,000 in July, 14,000 in June and 19,000 in May — a combined 258,000 jobs lower than previously indicated. On average last year, the economy added 168,000 jobs a month. — A Thursday inflation report showed that prices have risen 2.6% over the year that ended in June, an increase in the personal consumption expenditures price index from 2.2% in April. Prices of heavily imported items, such as appliances, furniture, and toys and games, jumped from May to June. — On Wednesday, a report on gross domestic product — the broadest measure of the U.S. economy — showed that it grew at an annual rate of less than 1.3% during the first half of the year, down sharply from 2.8% growth last year. 'The economy's just kind of slogging forward,' said Guy Berger, senior fellow at the Burning Glass Institute, which studies employment trends. 'Yes, the unemployment rate's not going up, but we're adding very few jobs. The economy's been growing very slowly. It just looks like a 'meh' economy is continuing.' Trump's Fed attacks could unleash more inflation Trump has sought to pin the blame for any economic troubles on Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell, saying the Fed should cut its benchmark interest rates even though doing so could generate more inflation. Trump has publicly backed two Fed governors, Christoper Waller and Michelle Bowman, for voting for rate cuts at Wednesday's meeting. But their logic is not what the president wants to hear: They were worried, in part, about a slowing job market. But this is a major economic gamble being undertaken by Trump and those pushing for lower rates under the belief that mortgages will also become more affordable as a result and boost homebuying activity. Monday Mornings The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week. His tariff policy has changed repeatedly over the last six months, with the latest import tax numbers serving as a substitute for what the president announced in April, which provoked a stock market sell-off. It might not be a simple one-time adjustment as some Fed board members and Trump administration officials argue. Trump didn't listen to the warnings on 'universal' tariffs Of course, Trump can't say no one warned him about the possible consequences of his economic policies. Biden, then the outgoing president, did just that in a speech last December at the Brookings Institution, saying the cost of the tariffs would eventually hit American workers and businesses. 'He seems determined to impose steep, universal tariffs on all imported goods brought into this country on the mistaken belief that foreign countries will bear the cost of those tariffs rather than the American consumer,' Biden said. 'I believe this approach is a major mistake.'


Winnipeg Free Press
2 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
After a reference to Trump's impeachments is removed from a history museum, complex questions echo
NEW YORK (AP) — It would seem the most straightforward of notions: A thing takes place, and it goes into the history books or is added to museum exhibits. But whether something even gets remembered and how — particularly when it comes to the history of a country and its leader — is often the furthest thing from simple. The latest example of that came Friday, when the Smithsonian Institution said it had removed a reference to the 2019 and 2021 impeachments of President Donald Trump from a panel in an exhibition about the American presidency. Trump has pressed institutions and agencies under federal oversight, often through the pressure of funding, to focus on the country's achievements and progress and away from things he terms 'divisive.' A Smithsonian spokesperson said the removal of the reference, which had been installed as part of a temporary addition in 2021, came after a review of 'legacy content recently' and the exhibit eventually 'will include all impeachments.' There was no time frame given for when; exhibition renovations can be time- and money-consuming endeavors. In a statement that did not directly address the impeachment references, White House spokesperson Davis Ingle said: 'We are fully supportive of updating displays to highlight American greatness.' But is history intended to highlight or to document — to report what happened, or to serve a desired narrative? The answer, as with most things about the past, can be intensely complex. It's part of a larger effort around American stories The Smithsonian's move comes in the wake of Trump administration actions like removing the name of a gay rights activist from a Navy ship, pushing for Republican supporters in Congress to defund the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and getting rid of the leadership at the Kennedy Center. 'Based on what we have been seeing, this is part of a broader effort by the president to influence and shape how history is depicted at museums, national parks, and schools,' said Julian E. Zelizer, a professor of history and public affairs at Princeton University. 'Not only is he pushing a specific narrative of the United States but, in this case, trying to influence how Americans learn about his own role in history.' It's not a new struggle, in the world generally and the political world particularly. There is power in being able to shape how things are remembered, if they are remembered at all — who was there, who took part, who was responsible, what happened to lead up to that point in history. And the human beings who run things have often extended their authority to the stories told about them. In China, for example, references to the June 1989 crackdown on pro-democracy demonstrators in Beijing's Tiananmen Square are forbidden and meticulously regulated by the ruling Communist Party government. In Soviet-era Russia, officials who ran afoul of leaders like Josef Stalin disappeared not only from the government itself but from photographs and history books where they once appeared. Jason Stanley, an expert on authoritarianism, said controlling what and how people learn of their past has long been used as a vital tool to maintain power. Stanley has made his views about the Trump administration clear; he recently left Yale University to join the University of Toronto, citing concerns over the U.S. political situation. 'If they don't control the historical narrative,' he said, 'then they can't create the kind of fake history that props up their politics.' It shows how the presentation of history matters In the United States, presidents and their families have always used their power to shape history and calibrate their own images. Jackie Kennedy insisted on cuts in William Manchester's book on her husband's 1963 assassination, 'The Death of a President.' Ronald Reagan and his wife got a cable TV channel to release a carefully calibrated documentary about him. Those around Franklin D. Roosevelt, including journalists of the era, took pains to mask the impact that paralysis had on his body and his mobility. Trump, though, has taken it to a more intense level — a sitting president encouraging an atmosphere where institutions can feel compelled to choose between him and the truth — whether he calls for it directly or not. Wednesdays What's next in arts, life and pop culture. 'We are constantly trying to position ourselves in history as citizens, as citizens of the country, citizens of the world,' said Robin Wagner-Pacifici, professor emerita of sociology at the New School for Social Research. 'So part of these exhibits and monuments are also about situating us in time. And without it, it's very hard for us to situate ourselves in history because it seems like we just kind of burst forth from the Earth.' Timothy Naftali, director of the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library and Museum from 2007 to 2011, presided over its overhaul to offer a more objective presentation of Watergate — one not beholden to the president's loyalists. In an interview Friday, he said he was 'concerned and disappointed' about the Smithsonian decision. Naftali, now a senior researcher at Columbia University, said museum directors 'should have red lines' and that he considered removing the Trump panel to be one of them. While it might seem inconsequential for someone in power to care about a museum's offerings, Wagner-Pacifici says Trump's outlook on history and his role in it — earlier this year, he said the Smithsonian had 'come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology' — shows how important those matters are to people in authority. 'You might say about that person, whoever that person is, their power is so immense and their legitimacy is so stable and so sort of monumental that why would they bother with things like this … why would they bother to waste their energy and effort on that?' Wagner-Pacifici said. Her conclusion: 'The legitimacy of those in power has to be reconstituted constantly. They can never rest on their laurels.' ___